"Once Upon a Time" In the Name of the Brother (TV Episode 2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Outsider and In the Name of the Brother
tbmforclasstsar22 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I'm noticing a pattern when it comes to Once Upon a Time; a pretty good episode must immediately be followed by a pretty bad one. Case in point: last week's "The Outsider" and yesterday's "In the Name of the Brother." Whereas the former somehow miraculously spelled some progress for the show in terms of narrative momentum and character development, the latter didn't hesitate to dash it with a story that went off into its own rather meaningless tangent, completely diminishing any positive stability the previous episode may have established. And while at this point I probably shouldn't even be surprised such a pattern exists, I must admit—this whole back and forth thing is becoming increasingly frustrating.

When we last left our fairytale gang in "The Outsider," the show still never strayed too far from a silly line, goofy image, or quickly resolved strand (I'm looking at you, Archie) as it is ought to do, but it also held signs of promise; Mr. Gold had discovered a way of crossing Storybrooke's boundary line with his memory intact, a discovery that allowed him to begin planning a journey to seek Baelfire, Belle, through both the Storybrooke plot and fairytale flashback, provided the story's powerful, albeit too-neat, moral of fighting for what you believe in and finding strength within that belief, and Captain Hook finally managed to enact his revenge on the conniving crocodile he so passionately hunted by shooting his one true love and erasing her memory completely. Also, the episode's introduction of a mysterious stranger (Ethan Embry) teased with the glimmer of a good conflict. What was even more interesting about "The Outsider" was that it managed to establish Belle as real character with honest-to-goodness depth (this show really has done wonders reimagining Disney's classic princesses, I will give it that), and more importantly, it solidified Mr. Gold as one of the characters on this show with the most impressive arc.

And then "In the Name of the Brother" happened. Now, I don't know about the rest of you, but I was in no hurry to return to the world established for us a few months back in "The Doctor," but OUAT's remarkable ability to divert our attentions wins out yet again, and that's precisely where we go. The next hour then is spent on a morally conflicted Dr. Whale who struggles with saving the town's newest stranger (whose cell phone ringtone is the Star Wars theme, I might add; real subtle, Disney) or letting him die, a decision that could mean long-term consequences for Storybrooke. There are other random plots sprinkled throughout such as the horribly acted Dr. Frankenstein-themed flashback, Mr. Gold's realization that Belle's memory won't be returning any time soon (ultimately motivating him to officially leave to seek out his son and allowing him to revert to full-on baddie by the end of the episode), and Regina and Cora's completely disappointing reunion. Competing only with Mr. Gold for the title of this show's most interesting character, Regina's development up to this point in the show seems completely pointless now that she seems so quick to forget all the evil her mother has committed (though I will admit, Regina's reference to "Emma, Henry, and the other two idiots" was a moment of beauty).

To read the rest (IMDb form too short) visit: http://custodianfilmcritic.com/once-upon-a-time-2-11-2-12/
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Season 2's first disappointment
TheLittleSongbird30 January 2018
When 'Once Upon a Time' first started it was highly addictive and made the most of a truly great and creative premise. Really loved the idea of turning familiar fairy tales on their heads and putting own interpretations on them and the show early on clearly had clearly had a ball. Watched it without fail every time it came on and it was often a highlight of the week. Which was why it was sad when it ran out of ideas and lost its magic in the later seasons.

Ok, there was a three-episode dip between "The Doctor" and "Queen of Hearts", with "Tallahassee", "Child of the Moon" and "Into the Deep" (particularly "Tallahassee"), but they still had enough to make them decent episodes in my opinion. Not everybody is going to agree with this. For me though, "In the Name of the Brother", while not a bad episode, was frustrating and the first disappointment of Season 2 which was generally very good to great even with the three-episode dip. Again from personal opinion, "In the Name of the Brother" is the weakest 'Once Upon a Time' episode since Season 1's "Dreamy", will even go as far to say it's the weakest of the show up to this point.

So what makes "In the Name of the Brother" a frustrating episode? The main reason is that 'Once Upon a Time' was making particularly major strides in the right direction with "Queen of Hearts", "The Cricket Game" and "The Outsider", where characters were becoming more complex and interesting, there was a stronger emotional core and things were really moving forward. This episode however felt like the show was taking a few steps backwards.

How? There is very little here that is propelled or moves the story forward, too much of it feels like filler with elements feeling forced in rather than natural. The conflict in the awkwardly tacky, in fit and writing, flashback lacks tension and some of it came over as vague.

Characters that were becoming more complex and conflicted were here one-dimensional and like the writers had forgotten what the previous three episodes did in developing them, Rumplestiltskin in particular. David Anders' material is too weak for him to do much with his character, a problem seeing as he is one of the episode's primary focuses. Too much of the writing felt cheesy, corny and under-explored.

On the other hand, "In the Name of the Brother" is a very handsomely mounted episode visually, the settings and costumes are both colourful and atmospheric, not too dark or garish and never cookie-cutter. It is photographed beautifully too. The effects are not as sloppy here. The music is haunting, ethereal and cleverly used with a memorable main theme.

Some moments of humour, intrigue and charm, the best line belonging to Regina, though mystery and pathos are lacking. The character interaction is generally compelling and most of the acting rises above the lacking material, though too many of the actors don't have much to do. Lana Parrilla, Robert Carlyle, Ginnifer Goodwin and Josh Dallas do their best and succeed.

In conclusion, a disappointment but a long way from terrible. 5/10 Bethany Cox
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed