The Mysterious Cities of Gold (TV Series 2012– ) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Admirable (but not perfect) effort at continuing the legacy
Camel1318 February 2016
The original "The Mysterious Cities Of Gold" was such a core element of my childhood. Well before I'd ever heard the name "Indiana Jones" it was that series alone that sparked my lifelong love affair with both the treasure hunt genre, as well as ancient mythology. With that in mind, I do not take the task of appraising this sequel to that amazing story lightly.

This long-coming sequel series did a great many things right. First and foremost among them was simply getting made. The first time I ever saw this show, as a boy of maybe 5 or 6, I wanted more. Buried deep within me throughout my teenage years and then adulthood was a forgotten yearning for more of that enthralling story. Now that it has finally arrived, the sense of satisfaction is undeniable. Even with all it's flaws and subtle stylistic incongruities that make it feel like it's skewed just a bit from the story I remember, this new chapter was clearly made with the purest of intentions, by people who respect the original stories and wanted to do it, and it's fans, justice. These diligent efforts have certainly paid off and given us a compelling new story.

But, I feel I would not be doing justice if I didn't also note some of it's more distracting flaws.

First of all, the voice acting was, for the most part very good. The 2 main exceptions being Mendoza and Tao. Tao, in particular, now sounds like a whiny Kath Soucie character. In the original, he always sounded the most mature of the children and this was reflected a lot in his character. He'd grown up alone for many years on an island and this self-sufficience hardened him a lot I think and made him a little wiser in the realities of the world then a typical boy his age. In this series he just seems more like a whiny brat and is a little too trusting for me to mentally associate with the mistrustful hermit boy from the original. This new Tao feels like he was played by an adult actress, whereas in the original, I'd guess he was played by a teenage boy. A similar casting choice in this series would've worked much better.

Mendoza, on the other hand… it's not that he was portrayed poorly. It's just that in the original, Mendoza was all man. His voice had hutzpah. He was a strong "don't screw with me"-type leader, the kind of character you'd expect to be played by Brad Pitt or Russel Crowe in a live-action film. This was perfectly encapsulated in the original voice acting. The new voice actor makes a noble attempt, but he's just too… vanilla. I have a sense that his voice may actually be deeper then the original Mendoza, but it lacks the fire that the original did; the sense of command and perhaps also the sense of his remarkably quick intelligence. As the principal adult character in the story, the series really needs a strong Mendoza.

Otherwise, the voice casting was marvelous. I especially thought that the recreations of Sancho and Pedro were marvelously loyal to the original characters. And I love Cocoapettal's new cutesy-poo voice! It mightn't sound very parroty, but it is much better then the old-lady-with-hemorrhoids voice he had in the original series.

Another mis-step with this series was that the sci-fi side was a bit overdone in this series. First of all, the Mu bases now have things like holographic control screens & projectors? That is way beyond what we saw of their technology in the original show! I'm not saying it's implausible that they could've been so advanced, but the technology we see in this series is out of step with what was established in the original series. Worst of all, it feels more like these stylistic choices were made with an agenda to impress modern day kids with technology that is way more advanced then what they are used to, rather then having an organic progression of the story.

Also, the sci-fi aspects of this story were far more grandiose, and came far more quickly and easily then they did in the original. How many comparatively primitive machines the kids encounter on their way to the first city of gold? With rare exceptions like the Solaris and the condor, their highlights of their quest comprised of mostly of stone booby-traps and secret doors. It was about halfway through the series before they encountered the "Jade Mask" booby-trap, which was really just an arrangement of many simple stone piston devices. By contrast, only a few episodes in to this series we encounter a gigantic gold room that spins cyclonically and somehow manages to spell out a message in a manner that defies our modern grasp of science.

It's just too much too soon. This series was overloaded with super sci-fi, whereas the original had a wonderfully suspenseful subtlety to it's sci-fi side. Only once we met the Olmecs did that show really show us the true lengths it was going to take us to. The new series burns that suspense out in just a couple hours.

Finally, the "big twist" (if one could call it that) of this show was ridiculously drawn out. From the beginning I had my suspicions. By about halfway through Peking I was in no further doubt. And the series gives you sooo many glaringly obvious hints that there is absolutely zero shock when it is finally revealed. I cannot believe that their carrying this "mystery" over in to the next series. One can only hope that they don't try to keep up the pretense for more then a couple of episodes. It's an appallingly poor "mystery". Admittedly, though, there's a secondary twist that is quite clever and well-managed.

But once again, I really liked this series and I can't wait until they release series 3!
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
How Not To Do a Sequel to a Classic
THX17019 February 2022
The original Mysterious Cities of Gold is a gem in animation and a beloved part of my childhood. The producers waited 30 years to do a sequel and it does not fully live up to the original. The most heartbreaking thing is the voice casting; they sound horrible. Tao had the husky voice and Esteban had the sweet high-pitched voice. What really grinds my gears is that Disney makes a huge effort in keeping their voice casting consistent with every generation yet this French production does not put in the same effort to maintain consistency.

There are other inconsistencies. Mysteries that had a basis in science and physics have been replaced by magic. The Golden Condor, for example does not operate the same way and the medallions also act differently.

Kokapetl is the most irritating character. Previously he served a useful purpose of warning everyone when danger was near. Here he is a loud squawking screaming chicken always in your face. He also interrupts during the documentaries. To top it off, he has his own short documentary following the educational part where he asks a question from something seen in that episode.

The story overall is not all bad. This could have been a better sequel if not for those dreaded points I mentioned. If you can get past those cringeworthy shortcomings, you will be able to enjoy this. The animation is very glossy aided by modern technology.

This should have been done in 1992 and then we would not have those problems mentioned here. The production would have been more consistent in all of its elements.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nickelodeon to the Rescue
caspian197828 August 2015
Growing up in the 80's, I was witness to the one of the greatest networks for kids of my generation, Nickelodeon. Shows like Double Dare and You Can't Do That on Television owned the attention span of kids in my neighborhood. Among other shows was the Mysterious Cities of Gold. Nothing else like it was on television. It was among some of the best animated series of the 1980's. Now, many many years later, season 2 has arrived, sort of. Premiering in the foreign market in 2012, it finally hit the UK market 2 years later in 2014. Still, as of today, the North American market (US) has very little ways to watch it unless we find a way to view it online. Season 2 picks up where we left off back in the 1980's. With better production value and an interesting story, Season 2 is worth watching. However, without a network like Nickelodeon, the Mysterious Cities of Gold Season 2 has taken more than three years to find an American audience like it had with Season 1. If you are a fan of the original, I recommend you attempt to find it online. It will bring back childhood memories.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Subpar-- as in, don't hold your breath
guoliannasell18 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It's subpar, meaning some good things, some bad. When I watch something, it's with a view to execution of craft. At the end of the day, this revival series can't hold a candle to the original, which was way more well-researched and well-written. The modern dialogue is primitive at the very least. You can see just about everything that's coming without thinking too hard. Lots of cliches. But I will say the animation is shiny and pretty at times. And when the meat of the story is revealed, the series can even be entertaining.

Some slight spoilers ahead.

Drawbacks:

Casting was lazy. The only three voices that are remotely close to the original are Zia, Sancho and Pedro. They're enjoyable to watch. The rest range from wow-that's-way-off to wow-that's-really-annoying. Esteban is played by a grown woman, and it's obvious. Tao is just noisy and brash, and his bird, the adorable fluffy little companion we grew to love, is now oh-my-great-goodness the worst! And he's inserted everywhere for no reason whatsoever.

The characters don't feel 3-dimensional to me anymore. In the original, they had depth, each with their own failings and fears. In the new version, I feel the writers simplified quite a few of them for the sake of easier writing, so now they're just basic versions of what they used to be. Tao and Mendoza suffered the worst in this downgrade, then Zia.

Zia was intelligent and so adorable in the original. Now she's typecast in the typical female role, somehow perpetually getting lost from the group and becoming romantically entangled with new boys in each adventure. Kind of silly. To spice her up they gave her telepathic powers? Really? No. Lazy screenwriting.

Mendoza in the original was a boss kind of guy. Just watching him and hearing him talk you knew he knew what he was talking about and you had confidence in his character, even if you didn't quite trust him until the end. He's now been downgraded to the stereotypical "hot" guy who's just there for decoration basically. He looks tough, but, ironically, he's usually the one getting knocked out or something. And I cannot with the new love interest they gave him. That subplot is just cheesy and cliche. He's a little hard to watch, knowing what he used to be.

Tao, my friends, is the worst failure of this comeback. He lost a lot as a character. I actually liked Tao in the original. He was quiet and independent, distrusting for good reasons. He made you love him. He's now just an annoying, frankly pig-headed and self-centered little child that somehow has backtracked from his having learned to trust Mendoza in the original to now forgetting all of that. (So the ending of the first series doesn't matter to him anymore?) That's just lazy writing, imo. His baseless suspicions lead him to make some pretty stupid (and backstabbing) choices. Besides that, he now is presented as being jealous of the limelight the chosen children have, believing that the Mu people, of which he is a descendant (and this fact he reminds us of constantly), should have picked him. His jealousy is directed mainly towards Esteban, and we find him going so far as to sabotage some of their key adventures because of wishing he was chosen. Side villain much. (Also, weren't his ancestors called the Hiva people in the original? Why the name change? Ok.)

The villains are token villains, unless they're meant to be something more. I'm talking endless, and very annoying, evil laughs. The role these guys play is your generic filler for each episode until the true story finally starts taking off. It's a slow start.

I give it four stars for the ending. All in all this series, while being very, very predictable and a bit of a chore, does get a bit interesting if you stay for the plot twists, surprise endings, etc. For me, though, it's unfortunately a miss mainly, with some bright spots.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible voice casting (english)
billus-8625430 January 2022
Who ever cast the voice actors needs removing from the industry, especially if they watched the original and thought these voices sounded anything alike. Esterban no longer sounds like a boy and Mendoza has lost his fatherly tone. Maybe if I hadn't just finished rewatching the original it might have been barely bearable, but it is unwatchable for me. Hopefully someone will one day sample the voices of the original and overlay it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Horrible
kotomo-0089522 September 2023
All the faults of current French animation : Destruction of the original work for political quotas, Wokism, Misuse of 3D, Horrible graphics, Poor animation, Incoherent script, Inability to make a mature series without Japanese presence, Feminism, No respect for the original material, Infantilization of the audience, Media hype masking incredible artistic poverty, Silliness, The proportions of the characters and the great condor are disproportionate, and the soundtrack is insignificant.

In short, I don't recommend watching this series, and urge people to go back to the magnificent 1982 series. The one by Jean Chalopin, Scott O'Dell and Soji Yoshikawa.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed