"Law & Order" Inconvenient Truth (TV Episode 2024) Poster

(TV Series)

(2024)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Inconveniently quick ending
safenoe29 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Anyway, this episode from season 23, Inconvenient Truth, started off very well and pretty much until the final commercial break I was kept on the edge of my seat about whodunit. But then the ending (it was the defendant's wife) was quite abrupt. Perhaps this episode should have been a two-parter to allow events to unfold, as this seemed to be quite rushed init.

The Associate Producer is Sara Cimino, but I'm not sure if she's related to Michael "The Deer Hunter" Cimino.

Anyway, Hugh Dancy has stepped up as he now leads the six at the end of the opening credits as they walk to the camera init. Hugh's American accent is amazing in character and it makes you forget he's English.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Inconvenient Truth
bobcobb30121 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This was kind of a dull episode of Law and Order. I like them actually admitting they were wrong and showing how the process of dropping charges actually goes: we don't get that kind of thing very often on this show, despite it happening a lot in real life. But they did not really explain how they found out who really did it, outside of listening to a call. Why did the waiter identify the wrong person? The husband and wife clearly do not look alike at all, so it seemed odd. I imagine the defense attorney would pick that situation apart when this finally did go to trial with the real killer on the seat.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dumbfounded
commonsensical15 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
23 years of watching L&O. I have never written an IMDB review before. I'm shaking my head in disbelief. A pretty good episode that ended so abruptly I had to check to see if this is a 2-parter. Nope. It's almost like the writers had no idea how to end... so they just did! No explanation whatsoever, just closing credits. He didn't do it, the wife did. She didn't come across as a track star, the stoned waiter couldn't catch up and ID her, but he saw the car??? I know I won't sleep tonight trying to make sense of this one. IMDB has informed me I need 46 more characters to meet the minimum limit of.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed