Asteroid vs Earth (TV Movie 2014) Poster

(2014 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Ludicrous storyline leaves for a below mediocre experience...
paul_haakonsen22 June 2014
Given the synopsis of this movie, you know that you are going to be in for a low budget version of disaster movies already done before with bigger budgets and a more impressive cast list.

And the very first thing that pops up on the screen is in itself a warning sign enough to behold, The Asylum. Yep, a movie such as this is, of course, a movie by The Asylum. So why keep watching it? Well, every now and then The Asylum do manage to strike gold and release something that is impressive and surprisingly good. "Asteroid vs. Earth" wasn't one of those moments, however.

A massive asteroid is on a collision course with Earth, and it is up to the American military to save the world, of course. And how do they plan to do this? Well, first of all by attempting to scatter the meteor into fragments by blowing it up with nuclear warheads out in space (yep, that has been seen and done before countless times). And if that plan is to fail, the failsafe plan is to detonate nuclear warheads in a deep oceanic trench to, and I kid you not, move the entire Earth out of the trajectory of the meteor. Move the Earth, are you kidding me? I guess that puts a whole new meaning to the song "I feel the Earth move".

The storyline in "Asteroid vs. Earth" is just so preposterous and out there that it doesn't pass as being believable for even the slightest of moments. And you just sit there throughout the entire movie baffled at the ludicrous imagination going on here.

I sat down to watch this movie simply because of Tia Carrere, and she actually do manage to make the movie watchable. The rest of the movie barely scrapes by as being mildly entertaining at best.

The effects in the movie is nothing to make notice of. It wasn't particularly memorable. But truth be told, I have seen much worse effects and CGI in movies.

If you enjoy disaster movies, there are far better ones available.
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Worse than expected
Tyypo7 July 2014
I watched this anticipating, even looking forward to, a bad movie. Within a few minutes, it sets up the premise as revealed in the title. As such, it starts like any of too many movies with same basic plot, and devolves from there. Incomprehensible, unrelated, unexplainable events follow, and then the movie ends. That is as much as you need to know going into it, and it's more than you will remember one day later. I feel sorry for Tia Carrere for being desperate enough to be in this movie. It is typical fare for Jason Brooks.

It aspires to the level of even a typical Syfy Original movie from Asylum, but fails. It's no Sharknado.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Let's see if we can destroy the planet first
unbrokenmetal18 October 2014
"Asteroid vs. Earth" tells the same old story of an asteroid on collision course with earth - however, the plan to avoid the collision is different from previous movies on the same subject. Instead of blowing up the asteroid, the protagonists want to cause a massive earthquake, 18 (!) on the Richter scale, to push the earth out of the way. Robert Davi plays a 4 star general who is immediately convinced this lunatic plan is great. So let's blow up the earth to save it! Tia Carrere plays a scientist who is more or less abducted to co-operate, otherwise I presume no person with a scientific mind - or any mind for that matter - would take part in this enterprise. If someone seriously attempts to list the goofs in this movie, especially things are technically not possible, he'll be busy for days.

The most enjoyable thing on the Blu-ray disc was the making of, when the stars try desperately to keep a straight face, saying thinks like "I signed for the movie because I thought the script was brilliant". Yes, sure, most likely that's how it happened.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This Looks Like a Job for Superman
wes-connors6 February 2015
An asteroid is discovered to be on a collision course with Earth. This one is 200 miles wide; comparatively, the one thought to have wiped out the dinosaurs was only six miles wide. Ouch. For some nonsensical reasons, it is decided to move Earth out of the way. Earthquakes are set to "blow up the Yap Trench" and save the planet. Taking the planet Earth out of its orbit and rotation would also kill everyone, but nobody seems to care. US military officials abduct undersea deep sea geophysicist Tia Carrere (as Marissa Knox) and nuclear submarine pilot Jason Brooks (as Chase Seward) to assist in moving Earth. They were just about to have sex, but Earth comes first...

Science fiction at its worst. Christopher Douglas Olen Ray unsteadily directs this woefully haphazard disaster movie. The plot makes no scientific sense; grade-school knowledge about Earth and the solar system are, apparently, forgotten by college students. While writer Adam Lipsius scores points with diverse characters, they have little chemistry and no community. Several take the assignment too seriously. This may be why less seasoned performers like Charles Byun (as Evan "Telly" Kitsias) outperform elders like Robert Davi (as Jim Masterson). The most memorable co-stars, Wade F. Wilson and Craig Blair (as Rudy and Terry), never appear on screen together.

** Asteroid vs Earth (4/29/14) Christopher Ray ~ Jason Brooks, Tia Carrere, Robert Davi, Wade F. Wilson
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No Just No
ydoc1617 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Only watched this movie because I saw that Tuvok from Star Trek was in it, and for his role in the movie I guess he did a passable job. The movie however was so terrible...

The plot is completely and utterly garbage, only a person with no schooling of any type would buy the story. It's one of those moments in a movie where they need to get you to go along with what they are saying. There are usually two ways, Science, and magic. Lets face it they would have been better off going the magic route on this one.

Second, Roles of officials, Soldiers, and general professionals. The world leaders acted like badly mannered teenagers, and seemed completely incompetent. The Main scientist was a Child, The person in charge of the nukes on shore had to be the worst over-actor I have seen in ages. He made those crates seem so heavy that Hulk couldn't have lifted them but some how he did after he had himself a cry.

The General in charge of the US affairs doesn't have any scientific advisers or professionals instead he trusts a child for advice.

The Soldiers just pointed guns at everyone. Going to pick up a scientist to help with the plan, Sure lets all point m16's at her and yell loudly. Hey we are going to offload nuclear devices at a naval base and apparently there is no where to store them on base so lets lug em around in SUV's.

The engineers on the ship were incompetent. When told to wrap things up outside the ship and continue working from the inside the Head engineer tells someone inside! the ship to stop work.... The ship itself seems to be held together with duct tape.

Let us delve a little deeper though, no Romance in the film just a really fake gay relationship that was done terribly. The relationship between the XO and the female scientist was Just terrible, they kiss at the end after having had no real romantic moments the entire movie...

Apparently our intern dies from foam ceiling tiles a collapsible pipe and some drywall.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pretty bad but not quite bottom-of-the-barrel for The Asylum
TheLittleSongbird28 June 2014
Anything from The Asylum does make one wary, as does a movie of theirs with a vs. title and a concept as silly as the one in Asteroid vs. Earth. The Asylum have definitely done far worse and there are a couple of redeeming merits. The best thing about Asteroid vs. Earth is Tia Carrere who gives a very charming performance and has a compelling enough screen presence. The scenery is nice too and there are moments of halfway decent photography, the editing also could have been far worse as well. The look of the movie though is far too drab giving it a gloomy and overly-serious visual quality, and while there have been far worse special effects in an Asylum movie they look rushed and awkward as there been inconsistency in how they're proportioned. The music is much too pedestrian and is constantly happening, when the orchestration and sound is so heavy throughout and in a dramatic sense it does get too much really. Apart from Carrere the acting is not much to write home about, Robert Davi spends the whole time looking lost and Paul Russ plays his role far too seriously. There are no characters here to engage with, not in the annoying sense but in that they are very cardboard and underwritten, and the script at best is flimsy with dialogue that is flat and at times gibberish-like and things that are picked up on but rarely explored. The story, the concept of which was silly to begin with, is ludicrously implausible to the point in places of being incoherent, any potential fun is so hampered by stupidity that it's tiring instead and the unconvincing conflicts and predictability makes Asteroid vs. Earth very low on the tension and suspense levels. Overall, there is far worse than Asteroid vs. Earth from The Asylum, but it is still pretty bad with every ingredient for a badly done disaster movie(mostly from The Asylum oddly enough) present here. 3/10 Bethany Cox
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
so bad, it's pretty funny (spoiler) Warning: Spoilers
OK, Asylum is known for pretty bad flicks. Sharknado is one of the better of the lot IMHO. This movie is pretty far fetched, the acting sucks, and a lot of canned footage used. BUT I enjoyed the interior sub footage - we're talking "super low budget"! Ever see PC monitors and 'puters, dryer vent hosing, loose wiring draped down from the ceiling or a teletype machine on a sub? And a gay XO? Give me a break... And blasting the ship in two? What a hoot! Also, I liked the mylar aluminum radiation suit (unzipped!) and the lieutenant telling gunny "I was talking to Terry." Gunny says "we know"... sadly the intern dies, making things dire. Then the Saipan volcano saves the day.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This will rise to the status of Cult Classic!
AZ-Ben8 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Destined to be a cult classic, this movie reminds me of Plan 9 from Outer Space, Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, etc. The plot includes a subtle reference to a former gay shipboard romance, later solidified in the last scenes by the tough crewman acknowledging "we know". The asteroid is too big for deflection, but the earth can shimmy out of the way with a couple of earthquakes that will kill only half the population. This is kept secret from everyone except the evil U.S. military command who runs roughshod over China, Russia/Ukraine, and EU in an early teleconference. The XO is told he will report to the civilian scientist (Tia Carerre) as her "weapons officer". The nuclear powered submarine needs to leave before low tide. The draft is 18 feet. So they DIVE in the harbor to leave. Amazing. The faulty welding floods part of the sub and they lose the nuclear bombs made from parts of the scientist's deep water submarine which somehow float out the top hatch. Yet the people in the flooded compartment are OK. Later the submarine is severed in two by charges placed at 18-inch intervals — while underway at maximum depth — to drop the tail section with nuclear bombs into the Yap Trench. Yet when the front section surfaces it can make way with no tail and no propellers — AND the conning tower is moved from mid-ship to forward. There are so many continuity, logic, and procedural errors that the laughs never stop. This film will stay alive like Rocky Horror Picture Show!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst film I have ever seen!
claudiocarli28 January 2015
Terrible. There are no words to describe the incoherence of this film!

It tries to emulate a big sci-fi masterpiece without minimally succeed in the effort. Ridiculous scenes, inconsistent, inexplicable, too short. Simply horrific!

The plot is so badly done by picking up the nervous while you watch it.

Many many times I was about to turn off but I continued to watch it just to the disbelief of what I was seeing.

I'm really sorry for Tia, who is a good actress and should denounce the authors and the director which compelled her to star in a film like this!
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Crime against humanity
DukeOfMarshall19 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was so bad that everyone involved should be prosecuted and imprisoned for crimes against humanity.

Just kidding, but it really was that bad.

I thought with some big stars like Tim Russ (Tuvok, Star Trek Voyager) and Robert Davai (Kholia, Stargate Atlantis) then it should be at least bearable. Nope. Nothing even close.

Coming from a career in the military, the military characters and dialogue were horrific. Not the worst I've seen but still really bad.

The Asylum "was" progressing slowly but surely towards better movies, but this was a step back. Even for the Asylum.

Save your time, save your money, and just skip this. Trust me, if you watch this you'll wish you had taken my advice.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
just a thought
oatsart5412 June 2014
the movie was not bad but what I do not understand is the earth is about to end and you had to put a gay guy in it.There is a saying, if you want an alcoholic to be accepted as an an alcoholic stop telling people he is an alcoholic.Hollywood insists on exploiting sexual preferences to gain ratings.Enough is enough.The gay and lesbian population are out there and there are quite capable of making themselves heard without Hollywood turning them into a circus for your ratings or profit.Stop already!Anyway the movie it self had some good graphics the story line was up to par and the acting was very good. But however the script was lacking.Too robotic,too predictable.Not sure why but allot of B movies with the proper care can be hits.
19 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Asteroids, submarines and the Mount of Doom
TDeMona29 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I just got through watching this on the telly, since I often try to catch all the Asylum -projects I can out of sheer curiosity.

The plot of this epic revolves around the Deep Impact / Armageddon -style asteroid that is hurling towards us and can't be blown up or thrown out of it's course. The best option they come up with is to bury nuclear weapons to the bottom of the planet and explode whole Earth out of it's course thus easily avoiding the deadly impact.

I'll admit I'm no geologist or scientist of any creed, but even to the complete layman this sounds like a legit plan that can in no way backfire or cause any harm to our entire ecosystem. And the whole thing is orchestrated by a temp in NASA, who happens to be smarter than all the science minds of the nation combined.

Tia Carrere plays a geologist that gets involved with the mission, and Robert Davi is a general of the army.

I have always appreciated Carrere, because even at the height of her popularity, she often appeared in all things cheap and stupid. She is rather okay in this, although not as lovely as Renee O'Connor one could see in the Moby Dick interpretation of the same firm - which is probably shot in the same submarine set as most of this film.

Davi's only point is to look concerned and drink a lot of coffee.

This movie had a lot of good brain fart mentality. The biggest problem with Asylum these days is that their movies have become too coherent and can only be distinguished from the normal Hollywood crap by their cheapness. Asteroid vs Earth was like if Ronald Emmerich had £3 cash and was even more crazy as the reality shows - and that's a good thing.

We had a nice scene, where the sub has a leak at it's backside, so they device an explosion to separate only the front part of the vehicle and continue with just that. Or how about the ending, where we go into The Lord of the Rings -territory, as one soldier has to try and smuggle few nukes up a roaring volcano whilst avoiding enemies surrounding the mountain.

And in the end, world literally jumps from it's orbit in a scene that looks like it has been directly lifted from the intro sequence of 3rd Rock from the Sun. In horrible, horrible CGI, of course - as is everything in this piece.

This gets an okay score in terms of Asylum films from me. I wasn't disappointed, because this time the dumb cheese translated as entertainment, not a boring snooze fest.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A laugh riot
gthompson-6771019 June 2019
This is bad writing, directing, low budget Sci-fi movie making at its worst (or is it best). Some really great laughs though. I may have to watch it again. You need a pencil and paper to take notes to keep up with the plot twists. Props though for the non-traditional tertiary love story.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A must watch movie..
delmonti-2123814 August 2018
If you're a seasoned movie goer but have become tired of the relentless big box office releases then this is the movie for you.

You'll need to nail your feet to the floor and duct tape your eyes open for the full 90 minute duration if you're to reap the benefit offered by this pox riddled flick.

I'm unable to divulge any further details, as if you've not seen this movie then you'll think I made the whole thing up.

On the upside, you'll come out the other side with a new appreciation of those big box office movies.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Atrocious
thales-6304525 March 2020
Oh my god what a load of complete twaddle. Tim (Tuvok) Russ must have been desperate for work. The story, the acting especially from the female lead is so wooden it makes Pinocchio look real when he was still a puppet. The Science isn't just laughable it's straight out a comic book. Please in these days if Civid-19 don't watch this even in lockdown. Go read a book instead.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not bad if you consider the third grade writing mentality behind this.
mark.waltz24 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This starts off really bad with the young Asian scientist (obviously a Red Bull addict having an overdose) spinning around a space computer room, then calling his sister to let her know that there was a meteor headed towards earth. This is a really stupid way to start the film because it shows that the inmates indeed running the "asylum" and it doesn't put much confidence in me to have such people in charge of world matters that could impact our future in this solar system. The sight of him offering advice to military officers is just one opportunity to laugh at this, making you hope that when they caught him away, he'll never be seen on screen again. Unfortunately no such luck as the irritation hasn't even begin to strike.

An encounter between submarine officer Jason Brooks and scientist Tia Carrare (who hired her own brother, the irritating little sugar freak as an intern) leads to more idiocy which creates conflicts between science and the navy, neither of which deserve the audience's support. This is pretentious, takes itself way too seriously yet has a juvenile, impish maturity about it that any intelligent adult will see right through and immediately call out. It comes to the point where I have to paraphrase a line from "Airplane!": "I say let it crash!"
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Who made this junk
ariannel-862-13385526 June 2019
From a floating half submarine with a lawn chair as a control seat to such an exaggerated dialogue, I don't see how this movie even made it to TV... boy was this a sad movie to watch... did it win Golden Raspberry award!! If not it should!!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"You want me to blow up the Yap Trench?"
hwg1957-102-26570414 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
An asteroid is going to hit the earth so to avoid the collision the earth is moved. Put plainly like that it sounds silly and it is. The Asylum provides the usual confusing story, laughable dialogue and no characters you care for. The moment it starts the irritation factor begins to rise and never reduces. Poor Robert Davi. Poor Tia Carrere. Poor Tim Russ. Have pity on them for being in such a sub-standard movie. Hope they were paid well as they couldn't have had any artistic satisfaction from appearing in this dreck.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Where Washed Up Actors Go?
wired_rogue7 June 2016
There's no excuse for bad writing, bad screenplay, bad sets, bad camera work, and bad directing. Nothing was thought out nor there was no insightful preparation to keep things real. The pacing was horrible and there was no military liaison to ensure that the rank structure or feel of a military presence was kept in tune with what to expect in running a ship, more so a submarine. Being a veteran of the U.S. Submarine Force, I gave this film a chance, but using a surface ship to present the inside of a submarine???...they would have had a better set using the inside of a car garage with PVC pipes taped along the walls. Even the uniforms were wrong, no haircuts, wrong use of rankings. The list goes on and on. The angle with the young, hotshot scientist was such a dumb move and there's no real linear threat with the time and distance of the approaching asteroid.

Most of the actors in this film are washed up and probably needed the money, so they must have just been going through the motions to complete the film to receive their paychecks. I expected better from two or three of the actors, hopefully to lead and guide other actors towards a better film. But in the end, the whole thing falls apart in the first 15 minutes of the film. I held back from throwing up watching the rest.

Stick a fork in the director, his career is done.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bad
acerbic-18 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Very bad, but not outright unwatchable.

Contrary to other reviews I found that gay lieutenant to be the ONLY plausible story element.

If you love physics or science in general - do not watch this movie.

Otherwise if you are able to suspend your disbelief so much it floats into outer space at warp speed - you can give it a try.

I enjoyed it *kinda*. It was so bad, it was almost good, but not really. It is definitely above Asylum "average" quality, but I must agree that "it could be worse" is an adequate assessment here, and not a very encouraging one. Maybe it would go better after few beers.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This premise and it still wasn't exciting
Leofwine_draca31 January 2015
The usual Asylum nonsense. As usual, I go into these expecting that they might be, surprise, surprise, good - like AIRPLANE VS VOLCANO, which was entertaining in a thoroughly cheesy way - but usually end up being thoroughly disappointed by a pitiful movie. Unfortunately, ASTEROID VS EARTH is an example of the latter.

The storyline - which is all over the place, by the way - sees astronomers discovering a giant, 200-mile wide asteroid heading straight for Earth. Their solution is novel, to say the least; it involves MOVING the Earth by blowing up some nukes. What follows is a lot of nonsense involving characters globetrotting, some very poor explosive special effects, and exotic locales being razed to the ground.

The cast is headlined by a rapidly ageing Tia Carrere, who looks off somehow; like she's had so much surgery, her face appears to be melting a little. Better is Robert Davi (DIE HARD) who at least appears to be trying, although he's a long way from the huge screen presence he had in the 1980s. STAR TREK: VOYAGER's Tim Russ pops up in a supporting role as a submarine captain. The only part of ASTEROID VS EARTH I really liked (apart from the end credits, obviously) was the international feel of the production, with much of the action centred in south-east Asia; a change from the usual US-centric Asylum flicks.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Tia baby, what are you doing?
swalexan222 July 2014
I am a big fan of Tia Carrera--especially since I met her at ComicCon, she gave me her smile! But what were you doing in this movie? For that matter, what were Tim Russ and Robert Davi doing in this movie? Did they really need the money? Even though the budget allowed them to have some OK special effects and some CGI scenes, the list of problems could go on and on and on. There would be some interesting CGI effect and then they would be in a submarine command center that was obviously just a bunch of computers in a room and the fact that Davi was clearly not in any kind of "command center", Please do not waste your time on this movie unless you want a good laugh.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible acting
maxinerobb28 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Why is this film on our TV. The acting is not at all convincing. Surely the plot film should unfold gradually, it doesn't make any sense to me😐
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's as if every story has been told and they just started super-sizing them, repackaging them, and reselling thinking we wouldn't notice.
tailsofthewind15 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It's a super-duper asteroid headed for Earth.

It is so big that nothing on Earth can alter its path, so the plan is to move Earth out of the way by bombing the bejesus out of it along a fault line.

That takes you to 45 minutes into the movie where I gave up. There was 45 minutes left; if it improved massively after that, then I apologize for the low score.

I have to get on with my life, such as it is with the COVID-19 lockdown, but cleaning the bathroom cupboards is preferable to this.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unbelievable plot
wawildbill-197-98644318 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Asteroid headed for earth, can't destroy or move it so we move the planet. Like you're driving a Suzuki Samurai and come upon a 20 ton boulder and decide it's easier to try and move the boulder, than the vehicle. I like the scenes in the submarine when it gets rocked back and forth in one scene, and in another scene, rolled over after getting hit by a tsunami, how the free standing computer monitors, the crew sitting (unstrapped) in office chairs (that are not bolted down), manage to basically stay in one place.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed