User Reviews

This is an interesting, and entertaining, romp into the world of Ufology but ultimately the 'science' seems to fall apart pretty quickly. A quick Google search can clear up some of the questions about the elements and isotopes being 'rare' and 'created.' For example Zinc 64 is the most abundant isotope of Zinc, yet they claim it couldn't come from Earth. Seems like all the 'scientists' are misleading and looking for proof it came from aliens rather than using a real methodology. Like another reviewer said, probably was a motorcycle chunk or road debris.

He says after the removal of the object that he hopes it is a rock and not from out of this world,because he is Christian and if it is ST it would disprove everything he believes in .Then 3 min later he did there and tells you a story of when he was abducted and he truly believes it so wouldn't that have all ready disproved his believe of his God?? And doesn't he look like a fire fighter or an astronaut?? Lo l first thing i thought. He'll it's probably a piece of fender spit up from his tire of the street while riding his half ass motorcycle.

0 Stars - WOW, and yes I did watch the whole thing. It was what I'd expected, but Ken Ham, (Queensland Institute of Technology (B.AS.) University of Queensland) the guy who built the Ark reproduction has a better scam. (u mm... I meant science)

I DARE you to watch this and tell me I am wrong!

The "Nano-scientist," (just listed as Christoper C. in the credits,) was some guy in a shed, looking up information from a high school level textbook, "Modern Physics" by Hans C Ohanian (1986), and yes I looked it up, but by using Google, along with an old classroom size periodic table. Believe it or NOT!

As far I could tell, there were only to people that had degrees at all in this film, the main character Roger Krevin Leir, graduated with a bachelor's degree in Science from the University of Southern California in 1961, qualifying as a podiatrist three years later. I could not find any advance degree listed, my guess is to "qualify" in 1961 as a podiatrist was not as rigorous, but I'm not sure why one would not flaunt your credentials a bit.

The surgeon who actually performed the operation was only listed as Dr. Matrisciano. Boy, was it hard to find him! Doing an in-depth Google search, it was hard to really link the doctors together, go figure!

In the movie, Dr. Matrisciano explicitly states "just some small foreign object. I just removed it, up to the tests to see what it is" In the one and only Google article I could find to tell me who/if he was a real doctor stated;

""Dr. John D, Matrisciano. "I know nothing about UFOs or implants," Dr. Matrisciano said after the operation, "but I think that's what is needed in this case; to be objective.""

The article also makes it clear this was Matriscianos' first operation done for Leir. Dr. John D, Matrisciano still seems to be working in Thousand Oaks California, and has what someone would expect to find, some link to credentials.

Well there, my guess is I spent more time researching this online than any of the above spent on contemplating how silly they all appear in the film. Or maybe they just wanted a quick buck, and thought anyone that matters would never see the film?

Basically a really really slow documentary discussing a tiny bit of metal in a man's leg which pretty obviously got there when riding his motorbike.

The experts are, well not experts.

Utter nonsense

This movie presents "evidence" that is never documented, makes claims that have no support in science, and the "scientists" who speak in favor of the supposedly alien device do not identify their full names. Nor do they supply the scientific formulae which would show the device has isotopes that do not exist on earth.

The whole thing is wishful thinking disguised as investigative reporting.

The party who will not release the device once extracted is apparently the patient himself, it seems. Yet no reporter asks him, "How come you won't tell us where the device is so we can examine it to see if the claims you and your medical team are making are true?"

This documentary is so poorly executed, feels like a high school project. The so called "SCIENTISTS" were a complete joke, especially the dude that looks like he just woke up in every scene. I have one suggestion for the director, you need to have a comparison to help explain what you're trying to reveal. Start with a few items describing their elements before you start your hypothesis. The science dude was barely audible, hard to understand, and sounded like he needed another hit of whatever he was on. The actual patient did a better job throwing actual questions and realized some improvising was needed to help connect the dots. Why on earth would you spend so much time and then end up getting crap reviews. Uggghhhh, this is just a sham of a documentary!

I was really looking forward to watching this but I was extremely disappointed. The abductee/patient 17 was good and very believable actually and I enjoyed hearing his views/ideas/thoughts. I enjoyed hearing about what he would do to them were he to meet them (again)! However, the other people or experts involved were too 'on the fence' with nothing definitive at the end. Throughout the film, it appeared that something amazing was going to be reported only for the ending to leave the viewer thinking, "Oh, was that it, was that their so-called verdict?". The metallurgy guy was irrelevant if there was not really a "WOW" factor in his analysis. The physicist at the end was good and he seemed to be convinced but his report or views were not followed through further enough. This then led me to think that the documentary seemed to ignore his findings. I think more should have been reported or done with regards to the testing of the implant, much more. Nothing was reported on the whereabouts of the device and patient 17. What happened to them? Oh, and before I forget, the filming was atrocious! Many times, the blurring of an initial scene was off-putting and if it was intentional, for special effects, it was a bad decision. If not, the filming was crap. Wouldn't really recommend this unless there is an extended edition where there is further analysis on the implant to confirm that this is, indeed, a 'smoking-gun' piece of evidence for the UFO world.

In its relentless quest for cheap content to fool its subscribers into thinking they are getting something for their ever-increasing subscription fees, Netflix has come up with this inanity - an amateurish hodge-podge of UFO nonsense about sinister aliens implanting horrific devices (that look like tiny splinters of glass) into the bodies of poor devils who appear more than anything else to need psychiatric care. The usual suspects are all here, with a particularly goofy emphasis on "experts" who include a podiatrist (now dead), and a couple of "scientists" who appear to be conducting experiments in their garages with the kind of oscillators and other apparatus usually seen in low-budget 1950s science fiction flicks. Best of all is the the narrator and "filmmaker," a guy with four names none of which will be repeated by me. He drones on in a high-pitched whine, intoning lunatic bon mots about the importance of his work to humankind, and occasionally throwing in a "Wow!" when one of the scientific "authorities" reveals some thoroughly prosaic factoid about the business at hand. For the record, none of the people involved in this scurrilous enterprise will cooperate with any scientific body that could validate (and much more likely, invalidate) their imaginative conclusions. Sadly, with just a little tweaking, this could have been a truly hysterical mockumentary. The only saving grace I can think of is that this film may inspire some 12-year-old aspiring filmmaker with two dollars and a dream. Because this film proves conclusively that ANYONE with a couple of bucks and in idea, no matter how nonsensical, can produce a documentary and have it broadcast on Netflix. God save us.