Fury of the Demon (2016) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
In Praise of Lost Films
gavin694218 July 2016
Paris, January 2012. The famous film collector Edgar Wallace invites the media to the screening of a film from 1897, long assumed lost and sometimes regarded as an outright myth: "La Rage du Demon". According to some, the film is by Georges Méliès, or perhaps Victor Sicarius, a forgotten friend of the fantasy film pioneer. The screening becomes a nightmare, the audience gripped by a murderous frenzy — as it has every time the film has inexplicably surfaced, once in each century.

This documentary, "La Rage du Demon" (alternately called "Fury of the Demon"), has two layers to it. One is grounded firmly in facts: a biography of Georges Melies, arguably the founder of cinema as we know it. And the other is more spurious: did Melies create a film that is cursed, and has it really caused audiences to go mad?

The first layer is of crucial importance, because it shines a light on lost films, and the early French role in cinema history. With Pauline Melies talking of her grandfather's involvement in magic and Rue Morgue's Dave Alexander commenting on the role of Melies in creating horror pre-German expressionism, we are treated to a re-exploration of Melies and his work. Any casual historian of cinema knows that Melies was vitally important, but how many people have seen much of his output beyond "A Trip to the Moon"? Clips shown here reveal he was much more than that one film.

The topic of spiritualism is also discussed, which is a fascinating part of religious history that few speak about today. Why it died out is not clear, but it plays a dual role in the story of Melies. One, the world of spiritualism often overlapped with the world of magic – no less a figure than Harry Houdini was mesmerized by the movement. But also, the peak of spiritualism and the birth of cinema coincide – even if one did not directly influence the other, they were born of the same world.

The second layer is spell-binding, though it is left to the audience to decide if they believe any of the legend. Following a story that bears more than a passing resemblance to John Carpenter's "Cigarette Burns", we hear that a rare screening of this semi-lost film ("La Rage du Demon") had attendees acting like zombies, and one viewer thinking he suffered a stroke. One person even died of a heart attack and more than ten were wounded. Worse than that, this is the third time such a thing has happened since the film's original November 1897 screening.

Interviewing such a figure as director Alexandre Aja adds to the realism, and for those who find the idea of curses to be silly, the documentary offers an alternate explanation: perhaps the film was inadvertently coated with a hallucinogenic chemical that becomes airborne when it heats up on the projector. A quick Internet search adds more doubt, however, when we find it hard to track down Victor Sicarius (Melies' occult protégé) or the story of actress Juliette Andre and her mutilation murder, which surely would have made history.

Whether the second layer is true or merely a clever ruse concocted by the director is ultimately unimportant, however, because the second layer serves primarily to reinforce the first. If the film inspires viewers to re-evaluate George Melies, read and learn more about his life, watch his films, or gain an appreciation for lost films, this documentary is a resounding success. And I think it does exactly that. Here's hoping that more of Melies' work can be found… not to mention lost movies from Thomas Edison, Karl Freund, F. W. Murnau, and many others.

"La Rage du Demon" premieres July 18 at the Fantasia International Film Festival, and is sure to inspire a new generation of both cinema lovers and cinema creators. At a lean 60 minutes, it is time well-spent.
41 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sadly this is "not" a real (or reel) documentary
RudeArtAndDesign_Com23 August 2020
Yet another 'mock'umentary that, albeit not a bad film, gets your hopes up to explore a mystery that goes no further than say a short Wikipedia search.

I don't want to dissuade anyone out there from viewing this movie and I'm going to make a point here not to give any of the plot away. It really isn't a bad film just turn your brain off for an hour and enjoy!!

Another reviewer said something along the lines of "LA Rage du Demon" really makes you want to see the original. And that was true for me too. "Fury of the Demon" really does get your hopes up to go out and and do your own search for any possible way to see this long lost film despite this little mock'umentary's warning of its dangers...

However sadly no matter how hard you search for the original "La Rage du Demon" you'll never come across your own copy because, it never existed to begin with.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Clever spoof
Go656515 September 2021
A clever idea, well executed. At heart it is a spoof of cultural/historical documentaries, with various talking heads (cinema professionals, critics, and the like) earnestly giving their very best expert analysis of largely fictional events in the history of early cinema. They are, for the most part, playing themselves while following a script. Despite this they mostly come across in a very naturalistic way, even though what they are talking about is not just untrue but rather far-fetched, which leads me to think that the director probably let them improvise their own dialogue from detailed notes. However it was achieved, it works.

The film also contains entirely factual segments about the remarkable career of the pioneer director Georges Meliès, well illustrated with an abundance of material, and which effectively function as a real documentary embedded in the fictional one.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
fooled me!
Nicholas-1321 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Sorry, I guess that title is a spoiler.

It wasn't until I looked at these reviews that I knew this was a mockumentary. When the American journalist spoke, it sounded like he was reading lines, but I thought maybe it was just that he was well prepared. And because I don't speak French, nothing sounded off about the performances of the French cast.

From the perspective of someone who thought this was real, I gave it 6 stars. It was a really interesting topic, albeit a so-so film. There is very little visual content, mostly talking heads. But I was so fascinated that I was still thinking of it today.

When I realized it was fake, I was ready to downgrade my rating. But, they fooled me. And that's worth something, right?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty interesting
eschase2 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
While this "documentary" is very interesting, it's difficult to determine its legitimacy. Having come out in 2016, any search for "The Fury of the Demon" brings you back here. On top of that, the film frequently referenced renowned collector, Edgar Wallace, who the documentary claimed screened the original film in 2012. The only Edgar Wallace I could find evidence of is only known as a writer. A writer who died in 1932...

So this is most likely a mockumentary which is played completely straight. The connections to actual historical figures is impressive, and all of the testimonies are fairly convincing. I'm willing to accept that the missing information is just not readily available on the internet, despite my inclination to believe that the 2012 screening would have been international news.

It's worth checking out if you're into lost cinema. For the most part I was able to suspend disbelief. Plus it's only an hour long, so you won't be wasting much of your time.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Just talking
jfgibson7325 August 2021
I went in knowing that this was a fake documentary, so I didn't get all whiny like the rest of the reviewers who wanted it to be true. However, I will agree that the film lacks payoff. I never expected them to play segments of the original Fury of the Demon, because the entire premise is that it's a lost film. But I did want something to happen. Instead, it's just interviews that go on about what the movie did, how it might have been made, and why it could have caused the reaction it did. People talk a while, then it ends. In contrast, look at a movie like The Last Broadcast. It is a pretend documentary that uses found footage to build a mystery, but the ending adds to the story.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Curses Are Not To Be Taken Lightly!"...
azathothpwiggins27 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
FURY OF THE DEMON appears to be a very well made documentary about the legendary, "lost" silent film of the title. While the film's creator is alleged to be none other than George Melies, it is found to be more probable that an occultist / photographer friend of Melies named Sicarius might have actually made it.

What makes this so intriguing is the mysterious story surrounding the titular movie, presented by various experts, historians, journalists, movie directors, and even Melies' great-great granddaughter.

Apparently, on the few occasions when the film has been shown, the audience would burst into violent behavior, resulting in utter chaos, and even death. Mass hysteria, subliminal messaging, as well as toxins in the film stock itself are explored. It is also explained that the movie just may be cursed. This is presented in a most convincing manner, making one wonder, even hope, that it's all true...
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Would have been better
Delrvich18 August 2021
If there had been actual clips of the movie, alleged event, or its effects on people other than just allegations.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Torn
nmn344 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is a movie that combines elements of horror and documentary. And it does handle the subject fairly well. The interviews are believable and the history is pretty interesting. But in spite of all that, the end product just doesn't work.

As a documentary, the subject matter is interesting, at least for film buffs. While I have seen some of his short videos, I don't know much about Georges Melies. So I found much of the historical research to be quite interesting. Only thing, the whole movie is predicated on a lie. There never was a Fury of the Demon, at least nothing I can confirm with a routine google search, and certainly not any violent riots caused by it. And this hurts the movie as a documentary. They delivered everything with such earnestness, I can't really tell where the lies end and the truth begins. As a result, I can't tell if the rest of the movie is true.

As a horror movie, there is a very simple reason it doesn't quite work. The movie is a "lost film." As in, it doesn't exist. There is nothing for them to show so everything is handled second hand, with newspaper clippings. There is simply no hook. Say what you will about Antrum, that its a hokey gimmick, but at the very least it presents you with something.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A smart, weirdly fascinating fake documentary
I_Ailurophile23 February 2023
The concept is utterly outstanding. Whether presented as a fake documentary, as this is, or as a conventional genre flick, the idea is ripe for storytelling: an extremely rare film that has a very particular effect on those who see it. Better yet to center true film-making pioneer Georges Méliès, known for surreal and fantastical shorts as early as the late nineteenth century; if any one person in the whole history of the medium might have genuinely made such a picture, it probably would have been Méliès. 'Fury of the demon' is lent exquisite verisimilitude by the labor poured into maintaining the appearance of a true, honest documentary, especially as it discusses the life and history of Méliès, those around him, and the fictional feature. Just as much to the point, the production values here are top-notch as a few recognizable figures are interviewed, and discussion of the subject matter is roundly comprehensive. There's speculative rumination on psychology and sociology, the physical properties of old films, the power of cinema as a medium, and much more, treating everything herein as if it were authentic cultural history. Honestly, kudos to filmmaker Fabien Delage, because this is rather superb.

I'm not sure if the result is as entirely successful as other "mockumentaries," such as Peter Jackson's 'Forgotten Silver' or Christopher Guest's 'A mighty wind,' that are played for comedic effect. One might also draw comparisons to "documentaries" on pseudoscience or conspiracy theories that the participants falsely believe to be real, or to propagandist films in which inaccurate, misleading, or false information is presented as fact; clearly such works also possess a certain power for a select audience. Yet even if this project isn't unfailingly perfect in every capacity, by and large 'Fury of the demon' is weirdly, unexpectedly engrossing. As it explores the topic from so many angles it becomes not just a movie about a fictional movie, but a movie about Méliès, and cinema, and all the little pieces around and in between. Suspension of disbelief is easily achieved, and the viewing experience becomes uniquely fascinating, almost a thought experiment. And isn't that the mark of a good film in the first place - one that makes us think, or feel, or have some distinct reaction?

The style adopted here is not one that will appeal to all, but I'm pleased with how well done it is in both writing and realization. I've seen too many conventional works of fiction that pale in comparison to what Delage has crafted in 'Fury of the demon,' and at only one mere hour in length, it's an entertaining feature for any cinephile.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Waste of Time
Dolphchiarino12310 August 2020
This is not the actual movie. It's a French documentary about the movie with everyone's opinion about the movie. Al, it does is whet your appetite to watch the movie but that never happens....
3 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
ridiculous
firma_ment16 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The whole premise of this "documentary" was so ridiculously fake, I'm really surprised anyone fell for it, and thought there really was a genuine "lost" Melies film out there that drove people mad.

First of all, the talking heads in this are bad actors, and it's obvious they are putting it on for the camera. There is nothing genuine about their wooden performances, whether they are real directors and film people is neither here nor there, they can't act.

Second of all, there is not a snowball's chance in hell that Melies directed anything that would scare people are drive them crazy. Anyone who knows anything about the films of Melies knows they are lighthearted fantasy romps with no actual terror or horror. The whole premise of this sham "documentary" is ludicrous beyond belief. It's like asking you to believe that Charlie Chaplin made a horrific silent film filled with such terror that it drives people mad.

Pull the other one, it has bells on it!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed