Bonded by Blood 2 (2017) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Better than expected
nigedoc124 June 2017
OK it's not going to win any Oscars but I've seen a lot worse, biggest surprise was Casey Batchelor acting skills, she's actually a good actress. Plot wasn't the best but it had it's good moments. Worth a watch if you want to pass an hour or so just don't be expecting too much out of it though
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
All down south. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
andyplasterer28 November 2021
Why are all these films set in the South of England. I remember the 80s in the North and it wasn't for the faint hearted. Bad ass southern people. I don't think so. You should have been and lived in the North during these times.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Doesn't Worth Your Time
niaz_islam8 June 2017
It is mostly a gangster movie filled with people with bad temper. There aren't much substances in it. When there was a sudden opportunity to become the most furious gang, everyone tried to prove that they are the toughest and merciless gang of all.

The story was okay but the acting was quite mediocre. Some of the actors and actresses hardly knew how to do a convincing acting. Some of these actors and actresses had important role in the movie. But because of their poor performance the scenes were not that effective which affected the overall movie experience.

Not Recommended.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of Time.
ajaypatialu23 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is waste of 2 hrs approx. Only dialogue which can be understandable is "F*** U" or "F*****g"...... Don't know why this movie have even get 7 rating, it's not even worth of half of that. This movie is like u cannot even watch just doing forward also. Well as like some user's posted here, "Awful" is the correct word for this movie.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No substance
bencarpenterpp16 July 2019
If you like seeing angry people being horrible to everyone they come into contact with, then you have a 90 minute treat ahead! Without any meaningful storyline or redeeming features, no charactor arcs or consistancy. This film was massively disappointing. The first movie was is a good film within the genre, With good characters and directing. This film is weak and predictable and Unfortunately they replaced everything good about the first movie with constant over the top posturing and aggression. Avoid
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Aren't You a Bad Boy
nogodnomasters2 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Dean (Sam Strike) and Damon (George Russo) are Essex boys who meet in prison. After they get out, they work for a drug dealer who owns a bar. Dean is quiet and takes on a menial position. The group has issues within and without as the police attempt to bring them down.

The acting wasn't there. The plot seemed a bit simple. A film that was more drama than action.

Guide: F-word, sex, nudity. I had difficulty with the accent.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worse than 1
stephenbishop-2292527 March 2019
Another badly acted B rated Brit flick from the usual actors trying to look hard. The Essex Boys story has been milked that many times, you would think the producers would take a break. This one is bad. Really bad. Unbelievable. Terrible script and dialogue. Don't bother wasting your time.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
don't waste your time/ money watching this
AMAZINGzingzing6 October 2017
bonded by blood 1 was excellent, tamer hassan vincent regan, terry stone all physically big, and believable as menacing gangsters

bonded by blood stars sam strike and martin delaney, these two look like schoolboys and are about as threatening as a poodle

in this movie every scene involves smoking and saying " f1king c1nt" the director seems to think smoking makes you a gangster,

the storyline was boring, they tried to add a romantic aspect to the movie, this is supposed to be a hard hitting gangster movie, not the notebook

none of the characters were likable,some had terrible fake cockney accents

there was far too much swearing , every other sentence had the F word, and way too much shouting

the only positive was that it didn't star danny dyer, if it did it would have gone straight to DVD

hopefully this will be the last of the " essex boys" movies
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Pretty damned good
meldavies7422 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
OK it's not going to win any Oscars but I've seen a lot worse, biggest surprise was Casey Batchelor acting skills, she's actually a good actress. Plot wasn't the best but it had it's good moments. Worth a watch if you want to pass an hour or so just don't be expecting too much out of it though

Get out here and buy it's on the shelves you tow rag Mike!!!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Advert for smoking
iainsmith-180618 August 2021
Poor poor , everytime you see the character Dean he's always smoking so it could've passed as an advert for smoking.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful
jono-8248427 December 2020
All that is bad about a so called "gangster movie".

Avoid at all costs.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bad film
elliotjeory29 July 2020
Didn't have a plot and not related to the first film which was decent. This shouldn't of been made it were terrible.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's awful
bishysbus3 September 2021
Mr Kipling makes exceedingly good cakes. Jonathan Sothcott produces exceedingly bad films. This mish-mash of a would-be gangster film is so bad that you have to continue watching it to see if anything good happens.

Based on the book by Bernard O'Mahoney, which instantly means that you cannot believe it's authenticity, the casting is terrible with a Cast of amateur British actors all out to try and win oscars for their abysmal performances.

Why this film was ever made is beyond me. But the director and producer should go back to working at the burger bar.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely terrible please don't watch
curtis-ratcliff24 November 2023
As per usual this is mainly ruined by terry stone playing a hard man it's completely unbelievable and is just damn right cringe worthy it really needs to stop, the story is bad the acting is bad it's just all round a terribly bad movie that shouldn't of been made, the fact that they are still to this very day milking the Essex boys murders to make these terrible movies is pathetic and they desperately need to come up with some new material instead of putting these disgusting criminals up on a pedestal, again though most of these downright cringe fests have the same faces in them mainly terry stone the most unscary hard man to every grace your screen, so anyway please take my advice and avoid this at all costs and anything else made by these clowns.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed