Paranormal Survivor (TV Series 2015– ) Poster

(2015– )

User Reviews

Review this title
44 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
I Don't Get The Negative Reviews
AudioFileZ19 September 2016
I don't care a whit for all the ghost hunter shows that bring in a team to try to document something paranormal with their equipment and claims. To this viewer they're trying to sell a fantasy and if you watch objectively they have no proof. That said I don't get the negative reviews here? These are the actual people that experienced various forms of the paranormal. They didn't want to ever be on TV and they certainly didn't want to experience the things they did. So, in the format of this show I do believe these people actually exist and only by the producer's due diligence do we get to hear of these stories. The difference is they're not going in trying to retroactively find something unexplainable, but in this show real people's real experiences are recreated with the actual participants recollections.

Because I've seen no ghost hunter show of any ilk actually capture anything remotely paranormal I'd rather see real people who truly experienced the paranormal. That is the premise and reason for this show. It's far more interesting and entertaining to me. I even actually have empathy for these people who have suffered. Sometimes they can stay by having the spirits move on and sometimes they have to move. There is no one "fits all" ending. This rings far truer to me than than the ghost hunter ilk. Yeah, if you are going to watch ghost/paranormal shows this is far better.
20 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better Than You'd Think
shomikusakurin12 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
So, I'm not counting these descriptions at spoilers, but... It's not the GREATEST paranormal-experience show you can watch. It's like "A Haunting" but with less budget. And slightly cheesy, as I'm sure everyone else would agree with me. The acting is "meh" sometimes, depending on the episodes and who they choose to re-enact the stories. The stories themselves are excellent. You can tell how sincere the people who have experienced those moments are, how those experienced have changed them, and sometimes the acting can spoil it a little. Again, it just depends.

Some of the episodes can be creepy, sometimes touching. The only thing I REALLY dislike are the misplaced screams / evil laughs / groans of the "spirits" at certain points in the show. If the people sharing their experiences couldn't hold my attention, I wouldn't watch it. However, it's a nice little show to watch that has a decent creep-factor, interesting stories, and... somewhat-decent actors. If you have Netflix, I would recommend it, even if only you're at home, and have finished all of your favorite shows, and boredom is setting in.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Eh
trosenthal-4590626 October 2019
Some stories are interesting, some are just stupid. I just fast forward through the really rediculous ones. I never found myself actually believing any of them though. Maybe it was because the reenactments are THE WORST and the narrator is AWFUL. whomever was in charge of hiring actors and writing the scripts for these parts are equally to blame!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spaghetti
im_too_sexy-569-72128417 January 2018
It would seem that the eyewitnesses are geniune and the Canadian low budget nature of the reinactments are reminiscent of the old ghost shows such as "A Haunting" so it was quite nostalgiac. Also every single reinactment dinner scene uses nothing but some cheap looking spaghetti marinara.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Totally wrecked by constant interuptions
annie-565356 April 2024
What a great program, BUT having to keep my finger on the fast forward button is a nuisance. These women who constantly interrupt my viewing with their annoying repetitive and useless input spoils the whole show. We don't need these annoying people spoiling what could be an excellent program.

People who watch this type of show are fully aware of what an emf meter is, and don't need to be reminded every ten minutes of what it is and what it does, nor do we need these womens opinions on what can and can't be done. Keep your stupid opinions to yourselves please ladies, and leave us to enjoy our show without your useless input.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
has gotten a lot better
PRVanAken24 January 2016
The first season of this show had elements that made it seem like an amateurish production. Most of it was due to using ordinary people to do the re-enactments and some low budget ghost effects. Both, I would assume, were due to budget constraints. With season two, however, things have gotten better. They have been able to hire professional actors for the re-enactments, and the special effects have improved somewhat. I am surprised by the level of acting ability of the season two episodes. Of course, you know it's just acting (not the actual event), but it's just such an improvement over the stilted and unnatural performance of their season one cast. Some of those actors in season two are very good; I assume they are all Canadian, since the production company is in Canada. There is a large pool of fine under-used actors in Canada to choose from. Apparently, the production company of this show have taken advantage of that. I'm happy that a Canadian show seems to have been able to catch on with viewers. I live in Toronto. By the way, this show now has a narrator who sounds just like Anthony D. Call, the narrator that very long running American production called A Haunting.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Who are these people?!
bs-3343514 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is your standard TV ghost story show that, unfortunately, tells the same story over and over again, but there is something I love about this show (more on that later). People are "interviewed" about what they experienced, actors reenact events. After a while you realize the interviewees are actors too, which takes away from it. Also, the interviewees seem to be better actors than the ones doing the reenactments, oddly enough. Although it's not hard to see why, they are not bad, they are mind blowingly bad. I feel like the director just sits off camera yelling "look scared!" All day while filming, because that's the level of interaction you get. But what's great? 1 thing. There's an episode in season 1 where a gay couple is being haunted. As I watched I stopped it several times to point out to my wife that the re-enactment actors didn't resemble their counterparts at all...and then I realized I had it switched, THIS WAS THE BEST / WORST THINV IVE EVER SEEN! Literally one guy is bearded with glasses representing a short bald heavy set guy. You have to see it to believe it. And be faded when you do, it'll save your life. It's so, so funny. Gay haunted couple gets a star. Otherwise, crap show.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's a story show
gotanyweekeendsleft9 March 2019
The show is not to prove ghosts exist. The stories might be exaggerated to make a better story, but as far as I know the actual hauntings did happen. The difference between good and bad ghosts are pretty cool.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Actual Evidence Never Shown.......hmmm...wonder why that would be..
daver63 January 2018
I have seen several episodes of this programme (I am watching an episode as I type) and very often the "survivors" claim to have installed CCTV in rooms and basements and captured footage of things being thrown about, entities, taps turning on etc etc. Never does this programme show any of the footage. In the episode I am currently watching a couple who own a tattoo shop claim their CCTV captured their shop being trashed by a ghost one night, and that photographs taken in the basement captured a large threatening figure at the far end of the basement. Guess what? The footage and photos are never revealed. Instead the programme provides a ridiculously laughable reconstruction of what the "survivors" claim they captured on CCTV/camera. The claimed footage/photos would be gold, a smoking gun, near irrefutable proof. Why is it never shown? Because it never happened. This programme is so fake, and so dull. And please, do not say that people lose things over time. Not that kind of stuff and not by every "survivor". Dire indeed.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
S5 E10 Evil Intent best ever!
patriciahydes1 September 2019
The second story about Bethel haunting was chilling. The paranormal expert was on her game, and I loved seeing both tried and true, and high tech methods used to try and solve conflict respectfully between the living, and those who have gone to the great beyond. Keep these compelling stories coming. And I'd like to see more of this particular paranormal expert 😀. Love this show and love this particular episode the most to date!!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
One of the paranormal investigators uses the Ghost Radar app?!
bps301331 January 2018
Ridiculous. The only saving grace (barely) is the interview segments with the actual witnesses. Everything else is laughable. Same locations being used over and over for different stories, actors who don't even remotely resemble the actual people, cheesy sound effects, cheesy visual effects... pretty much par for the course. And where's the evidence that witnesses keep telling us about? We keep hearing about video / pics / EVPs but instead of the actual evidence all we get is corny overly dramatic recreations. The only real entertainment value is laughs.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Is it real stories ??
giorgakisnikolouzos31 January 2019
I mean can it actual happened. Am young and hadn't really travel into many places to know everything about life. Is it anybody in here have ever lived any kind of this energy/activity in your lives ?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Im now mad
bbutterslee22 January 2019
Every time I watch this you guys say something wrong there's a difference from an incubus to a malevolent Spirit trust me I know I do this for a living an incubus or succubus is demonic malevolent spirit is not demonic it's just a vengeful spirit
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lynn's Lake House Season 2 Episode 13
Astanax Knight3 June 2018
My wife has been binge watching this show on Netflix or Amazon Prime, one of those two. She has subtitles on, and all I see in between the talking captions are, "Foreboding music" and "Eerie music". I just happened to pass by when on this particular episode of "Lynn's Lake House," someone mentioned they all went downstairs to try and collect more evidence. That person then said while downstairs, they all saw something moving on the porch and an investigator decided to take a photo.

This caught my interest, being a photographer by trade. It showed a cropped image of a woman appearing in her late twenties, early 30s in old fashioned clothing on what looked like a raised porch that required steps to get up on. She was lit up from the bottom, and was semi transparent. Then the program showed the rest of the image, and a man's semi transparent head, lit up by the same light from below, was also seen in the uncropped photo. It was as if the man was trying to position the off camera flash for the "ghost". They then passed the "photo" around the kitchen table, just showing the white backs of what were to be oversized photos, without showing the actual photos. Then the reenactor, I guess portraying Lynn, the namesake of the episode, said how that was indeed Aunt Helen, and how she owned that house for sixty years and didn't want anyone in it. I could of sworn that I saw the same man from the photograph sitting at the table while they were passing the photo around.

I was saying aloud, "If this is supposed to be the actual photo, then this is definitely not Aunt Helen!" My wife then turned to me and said, "Well, it is a reenactment of what happened!" I told her, "One of the investigators for the show took the photo. It is supposed to be of Aunt Helen in ghost form on the porch. Why must they need to recreate the photograph? Are they needing a signed model release from Aunt Helen? Is her ghost going to have her lawyer sue them for using her likeness in this episode?" It was then that I saw the reviews here of the extreme lack of evidence and decided to add my own review.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wrong way to wield a blade
bbutterslee22 January 2019
I think it's funny how you guys make people whield blades it should never face the inside of the arm it should face the outside I mean it is kind of Common Sense that the sharp edge should never be faceing yourself but rather ur target also common sense that you can slice not just stab I mean I've never scene anyone hold a blade that way and if you do you're surely going to die principal learn how to wield a blade
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Fun ghost stories, but that's all you get
mdkocal14 August 2017
I am amused by people's ghost stories. This program uses dramatizations to portray a personal experience, and "paranormal experts" that validate them somehow. I get the sense that a lot of the people are seeking attention. Of course, these are all fictional accounts of people that have either convinced themselves they experienced a paranormal event, made it up completely, or exaggerated a creepy moment or feeling. For all the accounts where paranormal investigators looked into a "haunting" and are interviewed, it's pretty clear it's phony when they claim there were strange things going on, but they don't have any evidence - which obviously is what any skeptic would expect. This is more or less how all these shows are, and even when so-called evidence is shown, it's at best a strange phenomenon and not proof of ghosts or demons. People carry all types of energy, feelings, experiences and superstitions, and psychologically, many factors contribute to these events, but they are not hauntings. If you watch, do it for entertainment purposes.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Info
bbutterslee22 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Exactly but you guys need to explain what a incubus or succubus is I'm going to tell you what it is the spirit actually is but it has to do with sex or the birth of an unnatural birth such as spiritual can we get the full info that would surely help your show
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Half-hearted cheap ghost stories show.
earthsign19 March 2016
I made the mistake of watching this show after watching through all the episodes of the show Paranormal Witness.

Paranormal Survivor is really bad, here's what I disliked most about it:

They've used the same settings between different shows, the same house used a few times, the same attic used on two different shows/stories.. so you know the house the person is telling the story about is not the house being shown. This made it difficult to become immersed, because I knew the stories weren't actually taking place in the house I was looking at.

This show contains a hefty dose of cheesy American production techniques. There's cheesy smiling ghosts even though the person says "they had a dead stare on their face". No, in the re-enactment they're smiling broadly. There's also cheesy looking 'demons' with red make up, horns and outstretched 'scary fingers' so bad I laughed and shook my head in disgust.

The actors in the re-enactments are very poorly directed or just amateurs. All the actors look like they were drama students practising acting. "ok, now look surprised!" :O "now look scared!" :{ Also, quite a few of the actors look nothing like the person telling the story which left me confused in a few episodes as to who was meant to be who. In more than one episode a skinny person is played by an obese person. It's distracting and again, kills the immersion.

They dump various paranormal "experts" into episodes without any background info so that I was constantly asking "who's this expert??". They also said nothing of any importance, they just gave justifications for things like "sometimes when people die, they don't know they're dead", and "it's normal to feel a cold patch when a ghost is nearby". After just a couple of episodes I started fast-forwarding whenever the "expert" would appear and start saying nothing of any importance. It's just like they felt obliged to have completely unknown "experts" talk because other shows do too.

The only positive was that I enjoyed the ghost stories themselves true or not.

Honestly though, if you want a quality production with excellent and enthralling re- enactments, avoid this and watch Paranormal Witness instead. The only thing I loathe about Paranormal Witness is the cheap, cheesy and laughable jump scare right at the end of the credits. It's such a pity American TV has a tendency to equate ghosts with cheap jump scares "boo!". That stuff is just really unscary and I don't know why TV shows seem unwilling to let the cheap tactics go.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You got me.
brandilovesbeauty20 December 2017
I love these type of stories on tv that expose the activities of the paranormal. And this show is included. I know in the beginning it wasn't its best and obviously the people probably thought the cast and producers were a bit off, but you can tell they've gotten better and more comfortable with what they're doing. And it shows. I do wish they included a little more information or follow ups on smaller stories or any story really.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Actors
bbutterslee21 January 2019
I feel like your show would be a little bit better if The actors have a genuine look it seams fake because of your reenactments your actors make it cheesy there trying to play a tough person or something like that just making genuine Plus when the Survivor says something or like they did something in this way or or they look here and then did this but your actors kind of do it differently that's kind of bad I suggest you guys review your shows and figure out what I'm talking about
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Need a medium to cleanse the show
df420513 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Really hits the over-drama button in Season 3. While I sometimes enjoy watching shows of this genre, taking them with a grain of salt as an "interesting campfire ghost story" sort of mentality. This show really flies off into the wild blue yonder in its third season. While the first 2 seasons had an occasional story that pushed the boundary of making you roll your eyes, season 3 your eyes roll right out of your head, get in the car and head for Mexico. The stories become cookie-cutter : "I moved in a house, I got unnerved by the most mundane occurrences, I dealt with it for years before getting off my rear end and calling a "medium" who in season 3 is conveniently my sister/brother/neighbor who comes and does a cleansing which come season 3 moves from a simple cleansing ritual to an out and out scene from the exorcist movie. Honestly the way the re-enactments are portrayed you would think 8 foot demon battles were a normal everyday occurrence. Sometimes the reasoning behind a 'haunting' is downright ludicrous. From the evil "Skull and Bones floor-mat that 'invited' the dead inside" to the "Tarot cards are basically the same as a Ouija board right?!" The stories really fly beyond a "ghost story" to an inconceivable fight with "the Evilist Evil that ever Eviled". Sometimes even the "victims" can't even keep a straight face during the telling when they have to say something ridiculous. The same medium or paranormal team shows up time and time and time again (must have a wide coverage area). While in seasons 1 and 2 the "medium" would tell them to stay and fight the presence, season 3 rolls around and they give them the exact opposite advice stating "It's just too evil to fight, and you should sell your house and run!" So, like so many other shows of this genre, it starts off as at least an interesting set of stories to a sad attempt at over-dramatized ratings grabbing nonsense. So my advice if you're going to watch it for stories sake...stick with the first two seasons....unless you just want it for ridiculous cheesy schlock...then feel free to carry on.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Professional
bbutterslee22 January 2019
Actually the guy who explains what are the spirit or certain spirit or demon and what things are like EVPs so on and so forth keep him you can lose the girl
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Too much drama
train107721 May 2019
Overdramatic sound added with the stories of the imaginations of children and easily scared people who are not connected to reality. No, and I mean absolutely No credibility.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wrong info
bbutterslee21 January 2019
I know that some of your guys knowledge on entities is incorrect such as one episode a lady smells rot and decae I know exactly what she meant and it's the smell of rotten egg that is the smell of sulfur not a malevolent spirit malevolent spirit is a pissed-off spirit vengeful there's nothing demonistic about it the smell of sulfur comes from a demon now there are demon spirit it differs from a original demon a demon that was created a demon spirit is a twisted demon the spirit has been altered there is a difference I would like you guys and your professionals to get this right
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"Paranormal Expert" is also playing the ghost?
guabaalex17 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
On the third episode of the first season.Theres a paranormal expert,bald guy, crooked nose. Around 37:35-37:40 minutes into the episode hes talking about the tarot cards. right after he's done talking they show a close up shot of the "ghost" and it looks just like the expert just with make up on. They must have had a really low budget for this show. Its so cheesy its good
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed