In attempting to give an historical overview of this episode, IMDb has prevented me...you're on your own. the editorial comment is overwhelming, and I fear I will no longer contribute. It is far too difficult to adhere to standards that I understand not, nor are delineated when I am refused comment.
I have no understanding of the criteria used by IMDb, nor, as time goes on, do I care.
I merely attempted to give an amateur historian's viewpoint, perhaps I should be shot for my effrontery.
Sebastion, not one of the three known progeny of mistresses, but not really an issue: history is not merely written by the winners, it's written by those with a horse in the race.
I have no understanding of the criteria used by IMDb, nor, as time goes on, do I care.
I merely attempted to give an amateur historian's viewpoint, perhaps I should be shot for my effrontery.
Sebastion, not one of the three known progeny of mistresses, but not really an issue: history is not merely written by the winners, it's written by those with a horse in the race.
