37 (2016) Poster

(I) (2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Good if it wasn't for the exploitation of a tragedy
journeytokilimanjaro20 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
On its face, I would give this film 7 stars because it has gripping characters and story telling.

If it had just been a film about 3 children growing up in a lower middle class complex in Queens, it would be effective in showing the turmoils of their lives in 1962. The acting is great, the cinematography and directing are effective, and the characters are very engaging.

Where this film failed, and the reason it lost 3 stars in my estimation, is in that it exploits the tragedy of the Kitty Genovese murder for no purpose other than to attract viewers. The attack is barely addressed at all, and there are huge holes in the story once "it" begins. Now, there's nothing wrong with making film based on, or inspired by, true events. However, this film does nothing for the story or what truly happened on that day to merit its use of those events as a way to draw an audience.

There are a lot of lessons to be learned from what happened that night, and if this film addressed those issues, it would be a legitimate tribute to Ms. Genovese and would at least teach the audience about the bystander effect. Instead, this film does not teach anything as most of the characters, except one, are completely unaware that anything was happening (for different reasons). Shame on whomever used this tragedy as a marketing ploy.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A total disrespect to the death of Kitty Genovese
Glenn_K98 October 2016
I generally don't take the time to write reviews however having just watched the documentary The Witness and the agonizing investigation her brother did to bring peace to himself regarding his sister's tragic death, this movie was completely weird and did not make one iota of sense! How the children depicted in this film would be up at 2:00 AM having dysfunctional issues with their parents is beyond me. This movie is like a psychedelic bad acid trip. The murder itself is belittled and was so irrelevant to a bunch of meaningless circumstances that supposedly had all 37 characters preoccupied at the same time and in the same neighborhoods. It is just a pathetic epic fail to sell to the audience. I felt like an idiot to have kept my nose stuck to the screen for the agonizing amount of time it took for this movie to finally end.
44 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
37 Don't waste your time on this film.
mlamond-3149520 February 2017
This movie was a disjointed mess....The title and brief information given about the movie have nothing to do with the movie....I don't believe that victim's name was even mentioned during the film...I can't believe that this crap was funded...somebody had to be looking at this mess as it was being filmed and edited??? They should not pay the director for this garbage....Furthermore, I seriously doubt that there was one shred of truth to any of this film, with the exception of the opening title and information line....This film should be deleted from the planet....absolutely no redeeming qualities....it doesn't deserve a "one" it deserves a "0".....WOW what a piece of crap!!!!!!!!
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Beyond its myriad inaccuracies it's just a terrible film
bob_meg23 December 2016
I won't repeat all the justifiably outraged comments this film deserves by distorting not only the basic facts of the Genovese murder but also perpetrating misguided fiction. If you decide to make a movie based on any *real* case, at least do basic research. Even before "The Witness" (an amazing film) was released it was well-known that the Times had fluffed the apathy angle to stoke sales.

No, what makes Puk Grasten's film irredeemable is it's utter lack of a story or any compelling (strike that --- NON-repellent), even interesting characters. These fantasy "neighbors" are all given stereotypical bad-sitcom dilemmas and we watch them yell, kick, scream, and drag for the longest 85-minute run-time I've endured this year. None of the subplots has any bearing on the crime (you could be watching a really dull Law and Order) and Grasten falls back on primitive symbolism such as the innocent all-seeing nature of the child vs. jaded self-absorbed adulthood.

Maybe "37" is what it appears to be --- a glib, inauthentic, attention-seeking morality-play payday. But if "37" *is* a sincere attempt at making a meaningful or engaging film, its dismal failure doesn't make it any less a waste of anyone's time.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Nothing but Sophia Lillis here
nospammikenator27 November 2019
I would give this movie a 0, but there is Sophia Lillis here, and I am a fan of her. Even Sophia Lillis fans can safely skip this movie though: they'd better watch short movie Lipstick Stain, that movie is shorter (just 10 mins), and you get more of Sophia there.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
While the film is supposed to be about a murder which 37 people missed, it seems more about 3 children coping with the parents they were given.
Amari-Sali11 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Trigger Warning(s): Sexual Assault & Child Abuse

Main Storyline

In this one building filled with eccentric people, the focus primarily is on three families. One being 5-year-old Troy's (Marquise Gary) family comprised of his mother Joyce (Samira Wiley) and much older father Archibald (Michael Potts) who are struggling with how to raise Troy in 1960s America. Then there is Billy (Evan Fine) whose mom Mary (Maria Dizzia) is on edge, a housewife with a husband, Bob (Jamie Harrold) who may have lost her job, and while she is trying to keep her cool, between Billy's antics and how distant Bob seems at times, she sometimes seems on the verge of nervous breakdown. Leaving Debbie (Sophia Lillis). Debbie is an odd little girl who counts her steps in fear that one too many may mean a disaster. Because of this, and a rumor going around about her family and insurance fraud, only a nice tutor named Kitty (Christina Brucato) seems to take time with her. Not to imply her grandparents aren't kind, but the circumstances of them getting Debbie implies there is more going on than revealed to us.

Highlights

The Lives of The Three Children: To me, if you focus solely on the eccentricities of the adults in the film, then the film is a muddled mess. However, if you focus on the kids then you see how these adults and what they've been through, and are going through, are affecting their children. Take Troy for example. His father, despite the boy only being 5, is already trying to mold him into a man. Has him boxing with him, and trying to make it seem the dreams Joyce has for him, going to college, aren't realistic. Not because the boy isn't capable, but because of Archibald's upbringing and his understandings of race and opportunity. Much less, this pride in not having to ask for anything.

The other children as well have parents whose issues with themselves are inflicted on their children. Debbie seems to be trying to figure out a way to deal with her mother's absence, lack of friends, and grandparents who just don't understand. She finds some solace in Kitty, who is sweet on Debbie, but unfortunately, Debbie is 12 and Kitty is an adult.

Billy experiences something similar but rather than an adult being his confidant it is his older brother. For, you see, Mary is always giving Billy strikes for disobedience and if he gets enough he has to wear a sign that he has been bad and isn't supposed to be talked to. On top of that, he gets spankings, from his dad, when his mom really feels pushed to the limits.

Low Points

Too Weird For Its Own Good: An element of this movie is Billy's belief that aliens are going to come down and this is played up far too much. Almost to the point you'd think aliens really are going to come to this building in Queens and rather than this being a movie about 37 people who did nothing while someone was raped and murdered, it would be 37 people who hid from aliens as they abducted someone.

Overall: Negative (Skip It)

While arguably the analysis of the adults as parents, and how their parenting is affecting their children, can be seen as interesting, I must admit it took me a while to come up with that highlight. Reason being, for most of the movie I felt quite indifferent to it with its odd, sort of eerie, tone. A tone in which you do feel a bit curious as to who will be the victim that was ignored by 37 sets of eyes. However, once it became clear who the victim was and you saw everyone ignore or be distracted in their own way, and realized their distractions were not something of substance to drown out the screams and images burned into your mind, you are left with very little to take interest in. For even though the children all present interesting cases, the focus of the film is spread too thin to make any of their situations substantial enough to save this film from itself.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Too Bad This vote does not have Negative ratings
deadbull-951715 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The title and all descriptions of the movie are about a brutally murdered woman, where there were 37 eye witnesses who did nothing to help. If I did not know that this was what the movie was supposed to be about I would never have have had the slightest idea. There is no murder. There is not even the suggestion of a murder ANYWHERE in the film. All we get is a boring "travelogue" of the lives of perhaps 5 people living in an apartment building. We get a couple arguing about the proper way to bring up a child. We get a crazy girl living with presumably her grandparents, and we get an alcoholic who walks around. Oh yeah, there's an elevator operator that operates an elevator. There is one scene that lasts 15 seconds or so, where we see a lady who stumbles on a stairwell in the building and then there is a blurrry suggestion of something that looks like another figure...you see a coat....and I thought...is that a rape? Is it a person who slippped on a banana peel...what's this? That scene presumably occurs at night....everyone is inside their apartments, arguing, or cooking eggs etc. There is no suggestion of a murder or witness or anything else and there are nowhere near 37 people in the cast of this movie....... It is about the aforementioned. "Normal" people riding an elevator, cooking eggs, arguing about petty nothings. The movie should be called "The boring day to day existence of 4 random people in an apartment building doing nothing. Again, in summary, there is ZERO plot, nothing that even suggests a murder. No witnesses to ANYTHING....and a movie about utterly NOTHING. I do recommend you see it because you won't believe me unless you do. I mean, if I saw a movie entitled...The Life Story of Abraham Lincoln ...and then saw a movie about Formula race car driving with one 5 second flash of an audience scene of 50,000 people at a race track and it seemed to look like, with a blurred panning camera sweep, that someone was wearing a black tall hat in the audience...that would make more sense then this thing. It's a matter of taste. I rate this as a NEGATIVE 100.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful Movie
eop19725 May 2018
Historically inaccurate and terrible movie. Could have done without the whale music towards the end as well. It's so bad, I can't even bother to elaborate any further. Please don't waste your time.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just watched 10 minutes of it and could not be any more underwhelmed
ncormeister15 January 2018
I am glad I stopped it and read the reviews before wasting any more time on this movie that moves at a glacial pace and totally disrespects her life. Very upsetting. I love Samira Wiley, but even she couldn't save this.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I stopped at one hour ...
tyskerinden12 July 2022
The worst movie ever, totally without any useful content, bad camera flow, really poor diaglog - and simply super irrelevant.

This movie should never have been made - especially not in relation to the murder of Kitty.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Utterly AWFUL!!
taleeng8 April 2024
The story of Kitty Genovese has transcended time, and fascinated people for decades, like myself. Loving true crime stories and growing up in Queens, NY, this was a story that I've read and researched repeatedly. I had no idea a movie was made, and wish it had stayed that way. I watched this (April 2024) and could not believe how awful this movie was. My anticipation of my 2 favorite things combining (true crime and movies) led to absolute failure. Characters were not developed, there was no clear plot and Kitty was not featured as she deserved to be. There was so much potential here to tell her story and do it the justice it has deserved for 40 years now. Her story still remains shrouded in lies and ambiguity and it's a total shame. When Hollywood tries to sell you a "true" story, it's with a giant grain of salt. They have yet to get this story right and as always, they are only interested in profit, not people. There is still no justice for Kitty. If you watch this movie, you too will realize you spent 1 hour and 20 minutes of your life, that you will never get back, do anything else!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed