Hold Me (2016) Poster

(I) (2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
An emotive film about a serene topic.
peterp-450-2987165 April 2017
"Hold Me" is as serene as the chosen topic itself. No calamities or hectic situations. It's a fragile picture of the choices people make to end their life voluntarily. A procedure that requires medical care and psychological support. A support Hannah (Hannah Fierman) provides by being present during the last minutes of a dying person. And preferably dressed up the way that person wishes. One last memory. A last craving. An intimate and happy farewell. One last hug and embrace.

Not only does the film focus on the emotional aspect Hannah is facing, but also the legal aspect. Worldwide there are still many countries where euthanasia isn't legal, so these procedures take place illegally. This is also the case with Hannah. The result is that she has trouble in processing the grief. She has no outlet for her feelings and she can't tell her personal story to anybody. Not even to her mother. When she's being confronted with a legal fact, the illegal and anonymous nature of it could get her in trouble. In legal terms, that is. Hence, the resulting confrontation with Vincent (Robert Krakovski).

"Hold Me" isn't exactly the type of movie you'd choose to enjoy a pleasant evening in front of your TV. It's a pretty sad topic. Nobody likes to be confronted with the loss of a loved one and subsequently saying goodbye in a serene way. Also, palliative departments aren't exactly the most happy places to reside in a hospital. Melancholia is omnipresent in this film. The soundtrack contributes to that as well. A superb fitting sound which reminded me of certain songs performed by Marilyn Manson where the same depressing piano tones are being used. Personally I thought the music was a wonderful addition. Normally I don't pay much attention to the accompanying music in a film. The fact it did struck me here, says enough.

Naturally Hannah and her mother (Laura Kenny) represent the most central characters in this production. At first glance I thought Hannah Fierman was the actress who played in "Starry Eyes" the part of the resolute Sarah. Maybe that's why I expected a sinister turn somewhere (Well, that's what happens when you never read the summary of a film in advance). But frankly I found her acting performance magnificent at times. The transformation shown in a mirror where a loving, mischievous smile replaces her sad expression, was beautiful to see. Laura Kenny's acting performance was wonderful as well. A worried mother who's only concerned about being a burden to her daughter, even when she suffers from a serious illness.

The only downside I could find was the predictability. Early in the film you can feel which way the story is heading. And some of the performances weren't that spectacular. Some were rather stiff and forced. Despite these minor flaws, I thought "Hold me" was a fascinating film anyway. No doubt it will lead to extensive discussions about whether or not to perform euthanasia. Personally, I'm in favor to make it legally permissible. As long as the person concerned has taken a carefully considered decision about the matter. As individuals we didn't have much to say about our birth. Before you knew it, you were walking on the face of this planet. Nobody asked you if you felt like doing that. So why wouldn't you let an individual make a decision to step out of life with dignity and say goodbye to relatives in a human way? Yet again, this is just a personal, humble opinion about the matter.

More reviews here : http://bit.ly/1KIdQMT
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's a movie that asks to watch twice.
dnsambati28 May 2017
From a general point of view 'Hold Me' deserve attention. The history is catchy and you feel some sort of sympathy with Hanna from the very beginning of the movie. Also, it was very clear to me that there was an attempt to escape from cliché narratives or values, leaving the spectator free to develop their own thought. From this point of view, it is a movie which I recommend to watch. However three main points (which are interconnected) could have been a developed better in my opinion, and which can be summarized in a lack of general plainness in the narrative: 1. In plenty of moments I missed some sort of fluency in the words of the characters. In other words, the dialogues were used several times in a very straight way to frame the thought, the values and the state of mind of the characters. Such strategy seemed too didactic and unnatural; 2. the rhythm in the first half of the movie. Somehow I felt distressed, because the cutting between scenes were sometimes enforcing the slightly unnatural narrative of the movie; 3. The work of the actors. In this sense I believe that their acting was very impaired by the points above. However, it is important to say, none of these three points make the movie a bad one or one unworthy to watch. I saw some details which I believe be some references to Ingmar Bergman's piece 'Cries and Whispers': similar thematic, similar flow and even techniques.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Moving character study of a young woman who gets paid to hold people as they die during physician-assisted suicide
will-0506125 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Not sure how much of a spoiler this really contains, but just in case, get ready.

In one sense this film is about doctor assisted suicide in an uncertain time and place (but clearly North America) where it is illegal, mostly from the perspective of a young woman who provides physical/emotional support to the people who are ending their lives, "holding them".

That is in many ways a back story, though, to a deeply psychological character study of the woman "holder" and the other people closely involved and the various kinds of burdens and heightened emotions of all kind that surround the choice to end one's life--and the deep pain for those emotionally involved on both sides of that choice (living or dying).

It is not a film for everyone, and certainly it is not a film to watch at the wrong time. You should try to see it on a big screen and when you have time and energy to pay attention. It is not a high-budget film and if you want action and special effects, this isn't the film for you.

The acting is tremendous across the characters, the film is almost entirely close-up dialogue between interesting characters going through very difficult, often repressed emotional pain, that as an audience member I could feel about to burst out throughout the film. It felt very real across a range of complex emotions and the basic need for love and and physical human connection in life and in death.

Such an important topic, and the perspective and portrayal from a basically anonymous other who nonetheless clearly connects and nurtures and in some sense is being nurtured herself is moving and can't help but leave a lasting impression (if you see the film in the right environment).

We learned from the host that the film is also meant to be educational and to open up discussions about physician-assisted suicide / euthanasia, the choices that surround it, and the real need to start talking and thinking about this issue from a human perspective, whether we support or oppose its legality. I suspect most of us don't start to talk and think about at all until we face it with one of our loved ones).

Wonderful film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed