All Hallows' Eve 2 (2015) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
34 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
A decent movie for those without YouTube.
itsachriskimmel26 November 2015
For sure, it could be said this entry lacks that which made the first something more special. Is it using old shorts from YouTube? Maybe. Is it the lack of a proper foreground story? Probably.

But nonetheless, it's a fine combination of horror shorts - obviously some lesser than others but that's a very subjective opinion. None of the shorts are overly gory and the ones which stand out stand out VERY well and it's quite clear why they should be featured in this movie. The cinematography and acting is surprisingly solid throughout all shorts and the effects aren't too shabby either.

All in all, it's not a terrible waste of an hour and thirty minutes of your life - but I wouldn't plan a movie night around it.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not really a sequel
darksyde-6350828 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed the first film in this series. It was a short, tight three story anthology filled with gore and fright, and were all connected together by the horrifying Art the clown, and each story had a beginning and an ending. The end of the first movie also ended unlike most modern horror films, in the fact that it reminded us that this is a HORROR film and that EVIL is supposed to win. Then they came out with this "sequel", which to me, is only one in name. Absent is Art the clown, replaced by a pumpkin headed entity who until the end of the movie, is just kind of there and rarely seen. In the first movie, there was actually a getting to know the three main characters watching the VHS tape. In this sequel, we really have no connection to the woman watching the tape. Like the pumpkin headed entity, she's also just kind of there This sequel is also MUCH longer than the first movie, and to me, seemed like it wanted to be an "ABC's Of Death" clone with numerous stories being told, each of varying length. Not many of them were able to keep my interest, although there were a few I did like. My favorite being a tale of a monster under a little boys bed All in all, I don't think this was a needed sequel. If it had stuck to its predecessors formula, it would have been much better
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
THIS IS SO REAL.
nogodnomasters4 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is another anthology with the shortest segment running about 4 minutes. The first two segments (second one was my favorite) deal with Halloween while the rest do not. I found 2-3 segments enjoyable and the rest was meh. Perhaps the most amazing aspect of the film was the woman had a working VCR attached to her TV set and not in a closet.

I have never seen a pumpkin carved that easy, quickly, and precise with a large knife.

Guide" F-bomb. No sex or nudity
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not great but still worth watching if a horror movie fan
jackmeat19 October 2015
My quick rating - 4,7/10. Another horror flick in the anthology format. If you are unfamiliar, these are short stories bundled together into one film, usually bound by an underlying central theme. This one, as the first one was (and also the "VHS" movies) is centered around a mysterious videotape appearing and the contents of it. That plot is nothing more then fodder to bring the stories on. This one had a few good shorts, some average, and the rest garbage. Pretty typical of anthology flicks. Not going to break them all down, that will be up to you but the first "All Hallows Eve" was definitely better and also had a much creepier encompassing story to it. Make sure on this Halloween to save some trick or treat candy for sweet tooth ;)
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Where's Art though?
BA_Harrison2 November 2021
Whatever happened to the art of the horror anthology? In the good old days, they would consist of a handful of terrifying tales topped off with a suitably ghoulish resolution; nowadays, anthologies seem to comprise of numerous brief creepy vignettes with no story arc, no character development, and no satisfactory conclusion. All Hallow's Eve 2: The Reaping is a prime example, not one of its many chapters making the slightest bit of sense.

In the opening part of the wraparound story, a young woman finds a VHS cassette outside her apartment and pops it into her player (as if anyone has a video machine these days); on the tape are several spooky tales...

In the first, a babysitter carves a pumpkin in record time for the boy she is looking after. She cooks the seeds in the oven for a snack, but when eaten, pumpkins rapidly grow inside their bodies. This one is fairly gory, but logic plays no part, and the result is confusion.

In the second, a group of young trick or treaters menace the residents of what appears to be a post-apocalyptic town. It's a real head-scratcher, as the kids turn into horrific versions of their costumes (a ghost, a demon, a witch, and the grim reaper), with no adequate explanation for what is happening.

The third story sees two men making an offering to an unseen creature, but forgetting the vital ingredient. This tale left me totally non-plussed.

Next up is the story of a woman who witnesses the murder of her friend, and, six months later, finds herself trapped in a lift with the killer. This episode had potential, but blows it with another weak finish.

Part five is hardly worth mentioning: a carnival sideshow allows people to take their aggression out on masochists. It's so short and inconclusive it barely qualifies as a story.

Tale number six sees a young boy (who wears huge glasses) afraid of a monster that he swears prowls his bedroom at night. His mother does her best to convince the lad that his room is free of nasty creatures, but in the film's extremely predictable ending, she realises how wrong she is.

The penultimate story sees a man decorate his lawn on Halloween, using real corpses as props. Had this been a decent anthology story, the bodies would have come back from the dead to turn the killer into one of his own decorations. The actual ending just leaves the viewer hanging.

The last story is entirely in Spanish. I didn't have a clue what was going on.

The film closes with the girl watching the video being killed by a creepy figure in a pumpkin mask who emerges from the TV.

2/10. A huge disappointment, especially considering that I really like Art the clown and I was hoping that All Hallow's Eve 2 would give me the fix I needed until Terrifier 2. But he's not there! Not even a brief glimpse.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No Art But That's Not the Issue
brent-basil5 October 2022
I liked Art in the first one, but I didn't need him to be in the sequel for it to be good. In fact, I do appreciate that he isn't in it, because I don't want to see him become a cash cow that gets milked whenever someone wants to make a buck.

That said, the reason Art worked in the first one is that he tied the stories together. I felt that, overall, the shorts didn't connect, at least not for me. I didn't mind most of them, but they were too short to make an impact. Just when you start getting into them, they end. I think fewer shorts, each getting more time to develop, would have made this better.

I also didn't feel any connection to the woman watching the films. I liked Katie Maguire in the first one. The woman in this one is forgettable.

Overall, fun, but not great.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surreal and original anthology.
parry_na3 March 2019
Anthology films are few and far between recently. This project uses the structure as a way of showcasing nine often very short vignettes independently created by a different team and shown as a collection of unsavoury tales collected on a videotape. The tape falls into the hands, or rather is left at the door, of a young woman (Andrea Monia). The purpose of the videotape forms the enveloping story-line.

I won't go into details about the instalments, because their originality is very satisfying and it would be a shame to spoil that. Sometimes, instead of any detailed story, they are simply moments, like in a dream, of surreal occurrences which are nevertheless detailed and grounded enough to satisfy on their own merits. There are moments that had me turning away due to the graphic special effects, but this is far from drenched in gore. Rather, each weird tale builds up an ambience that is deliberately uneven and unpredictable.

This is a sequel to the original 'All Hallows' Eve' (2013), which was directed and produced by a different team. According to some reviews, the original was superior to this. This excites me, because I haven't seen it, and for the most part, I found this refreshingly original and generally well made.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
.. master of none.
southdavid29 October 2021
I like to watch a portmanteau style horror film every once in a while, so with an idle afternoon Amazon Prime recommended me "All Hallows Eve 2". I haven't seen the first one, I'm hoping that it doesn't matter. Unlike some other films like this, where the short stories were created specifically for the film, these appear to have been a selection of previously produced shorts, some even as much as 10 years old at the time the film was released. It is, as with a large proportion of films like this, mostly rubbish.

Calm to the point of idiocy, a woman (Andrea Monier) is delivered a VHS tape by a pumpkin masked madman, carrying a knife. She watches the tape, the stories of which make up the bulk of the film. Then the least surprising thing happens.

The first is "Jack Attack" in which a young boy Jack (Tyler Rossell) and his babysitter Elizabeth (Helen Rogers) are preparing a pumpkin for Halloween celebrations. Having roasted the seeds, they each eat some, but soon discover, to their horror that the pumpkins are growing inside them. The visual effects were pretty good on this one, but the story was over before it really got started.

The second "The Last Halloween" sees for young children trick or treating in a post-apocalyptic world. Though rewards are small, and danger is high, it's not until they're refused access by Jack (Rob Basch) and Kate (Emily Alatalo) that the true dangers of this world come to life. This was better, the effects work perhaps a bit less impressive but a better story. It also had Julian Richings in it, as the films first recognisable face.

"The Offering" sees a father (Bob Jaffe) and his adult son (Jared Mark Smith) driving to a remote location to prepare a ritual offering for an unseen force, arriving at the site, the father discovers that he has forgotten a key aspect of the offering and must made an unthinkable choice. All in the mind and the performances this one and was all the better for it.

"Descent" sees a woman, Andrea (April Adamson) discover her friends' body, and have to hide from the killer in a cupboard. Weeks later, she's trapped in a lift with the same man and has to maintain her composure, as she works other whether this is a co-incidence or something more sinister. A nice twist in the tail of this one, but the performances are so-so and the short (from 2004) has dated more than the others.

"M is for Masochist" is an ultra-short, where three young man stumble upon a circus and are offered the chance to hurt a "masochist" for the chance to win prizes. Two of the boys begin immediately, but Sam (Fin Kobler) is reluctant. When the masochist's mask comes free, Sam discovers that the victim is his father, who beats Sam at home. He takes his chance for revenge. It fills the running time, I suppose but it's not particularly interesting or well made.

"A Boys Life" was a confusing one. Lengthy and well shot, and starring a young Griffin Gluck, it felt like a psychological chiller, where a boy who hears a monster in his room and is scared sets traps to capture it. But it could just as likely be unprocessed grief over the death of his father, a military man. Until the last minute which, though classic horror fare, undermined the work that had been done before. It felt more like a proof of concept for a larger film, than any of the others.

"Mr Trickers Treat" sees Mr Tricker (Michael Serrato) torture and kill two men and then use them in his front garden Halloween display. It's . . . Not particularly well done - let's just leave it at that.

Finally, "Alexia" which despite being entirely in Spanish and presented without subtitles, was entirely the best. I'm guessing a bit at the plot here, a man (Sergio Beron) is closing down the facebook account of his girlfriend Alexia (Pilar Boyle), who has taken her own life. He has a conversation with his new lover, whom he has invited over and at the conclusion of that, his PC and then his flat is haunted by the ghost of his ex. The visual effects on this one were really well done and this is the really the only one I actually found at all scary.

So, as predicted the film is mostly a waste of time, but a couple of the films are worth your time, particularly Alexia and The Offering, maybe skip to those ones or hunt them down outside of this film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Missing the best character!
pumpkin_queen-489035 October 2021
As a massive fan of Art the clown, from the first film and Terrifier, i was excited to watch this... He's on the picture, but not actually in the film, which is pretty disappointing, and this film lost a few stars from my rating because of it. Otherwise it's a good film, but still prefer the first!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Like an erratic heart, it skips a few beats sometimes
quincytheodore30 December 2015
Anthology can be a trick medium, you have many short stories told in such limited amount of time and with different direction. This formal is prone to consistency issue throughout, which is what happens to this particular anthology. The quality of each one is also varied, depending on the runtime as well as underlying concept, it can feel jarring and detached, especially on the longer less interesting ones.

This is a string of stories made in one theme, a woman watching a mysterious VHS of many strange occurrences. The similarity is vague, some stories might just end abruptly or simply too bizarre, creating a messy undertone. A couple of them even drag for a bit without too much pay off, this not only creates dull moments, it also hampers the pace for the other tales that follow.

At best it's a varied degree of successful short clips of campfire story. They don't have much depth in terms of narrative as many of them end in five or ten minutes, and the shocking revelations might not be satisfying. Others collection of short stories have presented nifty twists in the same amount of time, and while there is decent use of practical effect here, it's not the same level of dread.

The overall theme and quality displayed are not refined enough for more than average short bursts of thrill.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A pitiful attempt to re-do "V/H/S" with a dumb grinning clown acting as MC.
fedor812 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Perhaps the lamest horror anthology movie ever.

The blonde that's watching the "VHS tape" makes a comment how important it is to have a VHS player because "Texas Chainsaw Massacre looks so fake on Bluray". But then she proceeds to watch this "VHS tape" with Bluray quality. Duh. Not a great sign of things to follow, this lame intro.

Story 1 is pointless. A boy and his babysitter eat pumpkin seeds and it kills them and that's pretty much it. Really stupid, overly simplistic even for a horror story.

Story 2 at least has some kind of an end-twist, lame as it is. Though we don't quite understand what's the deal with the first two houses where the kids go trick-or-treating.

Story 3 is like a tiny excerpt out of a lame horror feature. It explains nothing about what's going on. And that's why we don't give a hoot about the characters, because we have no idea whom they're giving the sacrifice to, for what purpose, nor why the old geezer forgot to bring the meat because he "got nervous" (duh) considering they do this thing annually. This appeasing-the-woods-monster shtick isn't worth four pages in a pulp fiction comic-book, let alone a story on the big screen, not even in this lame anthology.

Story 4 is very stupid. It does have a plot-twist i.e. has a beginning and a conclusion, but it's a dumb conclusion.

Story 5 is only 2-3 minutes long and is marred by horrible amateur acting.

Story 6 is perhaps the longest, and the most tedious one, with a particularly lame ending. The sort of Z-grade crappola you get on the worst episodes of a lame horror-story TV show. You mustn't exceed an elementary school education to write something this corny.

Story 7 is another simplistic, dumb tale that has no beginning or conclusion, just drivel.

Story 8 is somewhat eerie, which is more than can be said for the others, but it's standard predictable stuff yet again.

And then the connecting story ends in the lamest possible way. They even have the cajones to use the same shtick - that they ripped off from "Ringu" anyway - that they used in the first anthology, which was better. Did I say "lame" a lot? You'd too if you reviewed this dross, but you won't because I warned you not to watch it.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wow, What a nasty surprise - Loved it!!
heratyplant11 October 2015
Firstly, the reviewer who rated 1 star should be ashamed of themselves, that's absolutely ridiculous, and should be deleted. He seems to suggest that it's no good because he wasn't scared out of his mind, why does that make a good film good, a mild scare is fine for me thanks very much!

I tuned in expecting be disappointed within minutes at the poor quality, storyline/ whatever, as with all other similar looking movies, but, something kept me going and I was soon hooked. I'm really difficult to please & don't really like 'small' films, I think I've been 'damaged' by big budget special effects & expect too much now, but this movie manages to pull it off, or should I say movies, as they're all totally indie films, sewn together with a VHS plot device.

They're all short & to the point, so before you've even a chance of being bored you're on to the next one, and pretty much everyone leaves you wanting more.

Only pass for me was 'Masochist' with the kids at the fairground.

Stand out was the Spanish one at the end - Wow! Amazing feel & production values, this team is Hollywood ready, expect more great things from them.

I liked this so much, I'm gonna watch again - unheard of ;-)
7 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty good horror anthology
Woodyanders9 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A woman finds a VHS tape on her doorstep that features a bunch of grisly stories that might be real. Meanwhile, a pumpkin-faced killer is using said VHS tape to close in on his next victim.

First story, "Jack Attack" - This one has a great gruesome punchline.

Second story, "The Last Halloween" - Cool apocalyptic sci-fi/horror outing with a real doozy of a closing shot.

Third story, "The Offering" - This one boasts some spot-on spooky atmosphere and makes good use of a wintry forest setting, but is a bit too vague.

Fourth story, "Descent" - Tense and gripping thriller with a decent end twist.

Fifth story, "M is for Masochist" - Nifty and gory yarn set at a carnival.

Sixth story, "A Boy's Life" - By far the weakest segment. Basically a sappy drawn-out build-up to a predictable ending.

Seventh story, "Mr. Tricker's Treat" - Short, but pleasingly gruesome ditty about a too realistic outside Halloween display.

Eighth story, "Alexia" - Sturdy supernatural chiller with a neat computer hook.

The wraparound segment concludes on a pretty obvious, but nonetheless still effective note. Overall a somewhat uneven, yet still worthwhile omnibus outing.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
T his is an average addition to the genre that's worth watching once but a huge step back from the first All Hallows' Eve
kevin_robbins22 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
All Hallows' Eve 2 (2015) is a movie I recently watched on Tubi. The storyline follows a randomly found VHS tape 📼 by a young lady at home on Halloween. The movie contains several killings by a man in a pumpkin mask. Is this a home made movie of real killings or fiction? This movie is directed by Bryan Norton (Penny Dreadful) and stars Andrea Monier (Monsterland), Damien Monier (Meet the Blacks), Helen Rogers (V/H/S) and Julian Richings (Urban Legend). The storyline for this picture is a huge step down from the first picture. There's a choke scene opening that sets the movie up to have some potential, and there are some entertaining and fun scenes to watch unfold, but the movie isn't as well executed, intense or gory as the first film. The acting is still mediocre and the cinematography is inconsistent. Overall this is an average addition to the genre that's worth watching once but a huge step back from the first All Hallows' Eve. I'd score this a 4/10 and recommend seeing it once.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
More a compilation opposed to anthology
In most every way this one was better than the first... except for one big part. The lack of the character Art the clown left this one as much more of a compilation of short films and not so much an anthology. While I'm sure they wanted to do something different with this one, Art was not only a wildly creepy addition but was also the connecting factor and cohesion throughout.

The actual over arching storyline between the shorts took a huge backseat and was very lacking which was unfortunate. Plus the pumpkin man severely paled in comparison to Art, but it didn't seem like they even tried tbh. In general it just felt a bit lazy.

Now, in every OTHER way this one was better than the first. The picture quality, the stories, the acting, the level of engagement and intrigue... all better. Because of this it kind of evens itself out to its predecessor landing pretty middle of the road. 5.5 rounding down to a 5. Would recommend.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
All Hallows' Eve: The Reaping
jboothmillard12 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
All Hallows' Eve was a precursor to the spin-off Terrifier franchise, featuring Art the Clown, this follow-up is a standalone sequel with no relation to the original, simply a film with the same format from various directors and a new connected antagonist. Basically, a Woman (Andrea Monier) is being stalked by a man wearing a Jack-o'-lantern mask, the Trickster (Damien Monier). She evades the pumpkin-faced weirdo and gets to her front door, finding a VHS on the doorstep. The video tape contains a series of gruesome tales that could be real. The first segment ("Jack Attack") sees babysitter Elizabeth (Helen Rogers) looking after young Jack (Tyler Rossell), and they carve a pumpkin together. While she roasts the pumpkin seeds, she texts her boyfriend Elliott (Steve Anderson Jr.) who she hoped would come over, but she believes he is sleeping with another woman. Jack tries on his scarecrow costume, starts eating the pumpkin seeds, and feeds some to the dog, Oscar. A moment later, Jack is gasping for breath and collapses to the floor. Elizabeth tries to give him an improvised tracheotomy with a knife, but it fails. Suddenly, Jack's bleeding neck sprouts creeping vines, and his stomach starts to expand, and a growing pumpkin explodes. Having consumed the seeds herself, Elizabeth's stomach starts growing, she panics and grabs a knife to get the growing pumpkin out, but her intestines spill out and she dies. Moments later, the same fate befalls Oscar the dog. The second segment ("The Last Halloween") sees a post-apocalyptic future, with four children on Halloween dressed as a Witch (Zoe Fraser), the Devil (Brendan Heard), a Ghost (Jake Goodman), and the Grim Reaper (Drew Davis) wandering the ruins of an evacuation zone trick or treating. They encounter a Wary Woman (Angela Besharah) who warns them to be careful and an eerie Chatterbox (Julian Richings) talking gibberish who drops dead animal remains into their bags. They move on to a house where a man named Jack (Ron Basch) answers the video doorbell, but he tells them to go away. His wife Kate (Emily Alatalo) pleads to let them in, but he angrily refuses. She disobeys him and lets them in, but they transform into grotesque versions of their costumes. The Witch (Kristina Uranowski), the Devil (Adrian G. Griffiths), the Ghost (Ali Adatia), and the Grim Reaper (Alastair Forbes) kidnap the wife. After the trick-or-treaters leave the house in costumed form, the house explodes, and it is shown to be a hellish apocalypse. The third segment ("The Offering") sees a Father (Bob Jaffe) driving with his Son (Jared Mark Smith) in a pickup truck to a deserted area. There, they present an offering of meat to an evil entity. It is revealed the offering is not enough and the father locks the son out of the truck, leaving him to be taken by the entity. The fourth segment ("Descent") sees a woman named Andrea (April Adamson) visiting her friend Vanessa (Renee Madison Cole, aka Renee Intlekofer) to find her murdered and the Killer (Robert McLaughlin) still in the house. He stalks her but she escapes. Six months later, Andrea is working late and gets into the elevator to leave. She is shocked when she recognises the killer getting in. Andrea is petrified when the lift breaks down and the man speaks to her. Rattled, she stabs him to death with a pen. Once the elevator reaches the lobby, she sees the same man yet again, first as a police officer, then as a clerk. Andrea screams as the two men are shown to be different people, she has hallucinated seeing the killer and murdered an innocent man (Steven Bordelon). The fifth segment ("Masochist") sees a sideshow carnival barker Sade (Bill Oberst Jr.) inviting three teenagers, Sam (Finn Kobler), Fat Pat (Zion Healy) and Rick the Dick (Reno Selmser), to play his spinning wheel game. They agree and are instructed to choose any number of weapons and tools to throw at a man (Jonathan Nation) strapped to the wheel to make him bleed. Each takes their turn with a nail-covered baseball and butcher knife. The third uses a nail gun, but the man strapped to the wheel is revealed to be his father. The victim pleads for help, but the boy has been abused by his father, the boy shoots him with the nail gun and then throws a running chainsaw at his head. The sixth segment ("A Boy's Life") sees a boy named Max (Griffin Gluck) who is grieving the loss of his father (Brian Majestic). He has been having nightmares about monsters under the bed, but his mother Loraine (Christie Lynn Smith) assures him there is nothing to be afraid of. The following day, while Max is drawing creatures, Lorraine talks about her experiences thinking that scary things were in her room when she was younger. She is concerned about seeing a black demonic monster in a drawing. She then sees Max in an army costume setting up various traps. During the night, Max's traps are triggered by something, but Lorraine is angry and insists there are no monsters. Seeing that Max has taken his father's army tags, she calms down and decides to roleplay as a fellow army soldier to "defeat" the monster. Believing she has helped him to overcome his fear and bond with each other, she tucks him into bed. Before she leaves the room, an unseen monster grabs her and drags her screaming under the bed and Max screams in terror. The seventh segment ("Mr. Tricker's Treat") sees an untidy man, Mr. Tricker (Michael Serrato), holding teenagers PJ (James Markidis) and Patrick Logothetti hostage, one in a cage and one handcuffed in the kitchen, feeding them only on candy, causing them to be sick. He drags one of the boys to his front porch where he sits him on a bench. Then he grabs the other teen, takes him into the front yard and hangs him to death with a sheet over his body. The first teen wakes up and the man returns to slit his throat with a box cutter. A neighbour, Monica (Carrie Seim), screams in shock but then calms, assuming the dead bodies are realistic-looking decorations. The man smiles and knocks her out to add to his other "decorations". The eighth and final segment ("Alexia", in Spanish) sees Spanish teenager Franco (Sergio Berón) looking at social media, lamenting the death of his ex-girlfriend Alexia (Pilar Boyle). He starts having an online conversation with his new girlfriend, Melina (Paula Carruega), which becomes flirty. But he is freaked out seeing a ghoulish apparition on the computer screen which he then unplugs. Melina comes over to hang out with Franco. He momentarily leaves to use the bathroom, and Melina watches a video on his computer. When he returns, the dead ex has replaced the girlfriend and attacks him. The Woman finishes watching the VHS and is feeling fearful after watching all these strange stories. After ejecting the video, the man in the pumpkin mask appears behind her and slits her throat. Also starring Anthony Backman as Brad ("Descent"), Andy Dylan as Security Officer ("Descent"), Jamie Neese as Security Desk Clerk ("Descent"), and Kalie Acheson as Female Masochist ("Masochist"). The cast are all fine, it repeats the format that watching the video is what summons the killer, "Jack Attack" and "A Boy's Life" stand out as the most interesting of all the short stories, while the rest are average or silly, and there is a fair amount of gore to get your attention, it is only a mildly watchable horror anthology. Okay!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unwatchable
rogersdean76 October 2015
I wish there had been a real review of this movie out there before I paid money to rent this.

There was absolutely nothing about this movie that approached frightening. possibly a child under 8 years of age would be scared.

Please do not waste your money on this. It is not clever, scary, concise, funny or any other adjective you may want out of a horror flick. It borders on theft. I had only one thought when it was over: how do I get my money back?

Be warned. Do not waste your time. Rent some older movie instead, you will be more startled by a good movie which you have already seen.
10 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good for the Type
alanw-809196 June 2021
If you go into this movie expecting a high budget mainstream Hollywood production, prepare to be disappointed. It's obviously a low budget film with no big names. If you're into Horror and looking to be entertained, however, this movie is for you.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
All Hallow's Eve 2
dcarsonhagy14 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I watched the first installment of this series a couple of years ago. It was not that bad. In fact, it was kinda' creepy because the antagonist was a clown...and I HATE clowns.

Part 2 did not change from its predecessor. A woman finds a VHS Tape (of all things) on her doorstep, after she has noticed some goon standing outside her apartment holding a knife in one hand and wearing a REAL BAD pumpkin mask. She (of course) plops it into her tape machine and is treated to some short stories--most of them bad. However, as in the first installment, it seems Pumpkin Man is trying to come through her television.

Anyone who saw the original could tell it was cheaply made, BUT at least it tried to entertain. Part 2 was completely unoriginal, non- scary, and just an overall mess. If the people involved with this want to have another installment, I suggest they actually sit down and try to write a better script AND leave a "CD" on the doorstep. I don't know of anyone who still has a VHS player.

Rated R for violence.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You know what? It's not half bad
Amthermandes4 November 2023
Has the feel of an indie straight-to-tv movie, and yeah, there's plenty to criticize. From bad acting to cheesy attempts at scares, this one's far from perfect, and falls a quite a bit short of its predecessor. But that doesn't mean it's not a good, Halloween-themed thrill ride.

The over-arching plot starts off basic. They rush the first few segments, and rush the breaks with the main arch in between.

The first segment is actually really, REALLY cool. It's short, but kinda shocking, and leaves the audience going "whoa." And as a bonus, there's a bit of a John Carpenter's "The Thing" element to one certain part. It's fun, shouldn't disappoint.

The second segment feels like a production of Spirit Halloween. Has an interesting premise, some cool aspects with the kids, but has a cheap execution. Very rushed, feels like an early Peter Jackson short. Not to say it's bad, but it's far from great.

Third segment is interesting. It's rushed as well, very short, and hardly any context is provided. Yet, somehow you're able to piece together what is happening, and create your own theories what led the father and son to this point. Acting's not bad. Nothing shocking on screen, but it feels like a campfire story told in 3 minutes by a scout leader to a bunch of wide-eyed cub scouts. And when the scout leader is asked by the scouts to explain everything, the scout leader takes a pull from his flask and tells them to shut the hell up and figure it out themselves.

By the 4th segment, we're only a third of the way through the movie. Starting to feel like the "ABC's of Death," only with more scares, thought, creativity, budget, and talent. And less rushing. Still, this segment isn't half bad either, despite trying to hard to be clever.

By the 5th segment, you may be wondering how many freaking segments there are. And this segment is just stupid. Maybe it could have been better, but, and I hate to sound like a broken record, it's WAAAAY too rushed. Feels like filler.

6th segment (holy crap, is that Pam from "The Office?!?" Wait, no it isn't) tries to tug on your heartstrings a bit. There's more context, time to think. Throw in a disturbed kid, a parent in mourning, cliche drawings of a child, it becomes real easy to predict. Kid's a great actor though. Characters do earn some sympathy points. And she gets the "Mother of the Year" award.

7th segment, well, it catches the spirit of Halloween no doubt. Despite it apparently being made on someone's mid-2010's smartphone using random people around a Californian neighborhood for actors. It's weird, not bad, but not great.

8th segment tries to be with modern tech. It's ok, some freaky imagery, but otherwise it's a bit weak. And the guy really needs some decor in his apartment.

That's......pretty much it. Some lows, some highs. 1st and 3rd segments were my favorite. The main story arch is entirely forgettable. Whole thing worth a watch, nonetheless.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretty Lame
myoscar198715 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
No scares, aside from the last one out of the 15 stories they throw in here and even that's been seen before which at best plays as creepy.

Doesn't in any way compare to the first All Hallows Eve or it's third installment, Terrifier.

Too much build up to the most disappointing ending you've already seen in the trailer, not kidding, they show the entire beginning and end in the freaking trailer.

Acting is beyond terrible. Effects are terrible.

And the absolute worst thing this movie had going against it is that Art the Clown was not in this film. He was marked as the best part of the first film it doesn't make sense that they wouldn't bring him back. At least this was rectified with Terrifier.

If you've seen All Hallow's Eve and enjoyed it, skip All Hallow's Eve 2, go straight to Netflix and watch Terrifier it'll save you 1.5 hours of your life.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Vast Improvement!
vengeance2021 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
So, I went into this one a little skeptical given the so-so first film which I felt was too repetitive & had an anti climatic ending! But, nonetheless, I went to see this one to see if it was much cop!

The film sees a woman finds a VHS tape on her doorstep that shows a series of gruesome tales that could be real! But the true danger is the pumpkin-faced killer that's using the tape to find his next victim!

I found the film to be a vast improvement over the first! For one, the tales on the VHS Tapes were all varied & not just that actually pretty good, gory & full on with violence & terror! There was more than just 3 unlike the first one! The wrap around story I felt was better too & a bit more imaginative this time around!

The runtime is longer at 1 hour & 26 minutes & has decent pacing to go with it! The films concept is much the same minus Art the Clown, which I think isn't bad at all! Art was good, but the creepy clown concept has been done to death let's be honest!

Overall, it's a vast improvement over it's predecessor! The wrap around story & segments are far better & more varied which makes for a good film overall! With a sinister, scary Halloween themed feel & fast pacing & a 86 minute runtime, you can't go wrong with this sequel!

9/10.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
15 minutes of entertainment.
djangozelf-1235126 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
It started out as a copy of the movie V/H/S. Each story gets less interesting and goes more to thriller. The first 2 stories got the most horror but because of the time factor are poorly explained.

Overall problem is build up takes to long.

Scenes are to short and with out real reason.Less would have been better I think.

It's a B-flick anthology horror.Not a very good one. Can't remember if the first one was like this?.

However.I don't recommend this.

A bit of a boring attempt.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Weak
epa1015 October 2019
I first saw the most recent film in this series, "Terrifier", and liked that. I saw the first "All Hallows' Eve" and found it decent, but not as good as "Terrifier". I thought that this film was far inferior to both. It felt almost like the material that wasn't good enough to put in the first one.

There are eight short films (some very short) that make up the film all together. The wrap-around sequence is similar to that from the first film in that a young woman all alone is left a VHS tape, but there is no babysitting this time. So little of the film is dedicated to the wrap-around that it is hardly worth including. The ending is absolutely pathetic, especially after the first film had such a shocking ending.

Of the eight films, the best ones are "Descent" and "Alexia". These two justified the three stars. "Mr. Tricker's Treat" seemed to be doing well, but it ended so soon that it didn't feel very satisfying. I felt bored during "The Offering". "M is for Masochist" was so short that it was pointless to include.

One last point is that there is a lot less gore in this film than in either the first "All Hallows' Eve" or in "Terrifier". It still has an 18 certificate here in Britain, but I can imagine that some people might have found the other two too gorey to stomach. I can stomach a lot of gore, but I thought that I'd mention it for those who are not so keen.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Surpasses it's predecessor...
Krackoon7 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Unlike the first film in the franchise, 'All Hallows Eve 2' gives us more bang for our buck.

If you're going to limit your anthology film to just three short stories, you better make sure they're both entertaining and fun. Otherwise, you should take the approach most anthology films take, and that's throwing in as many short films as possible. Because eventually, someone is going to hit on something special, to make up for the several bad short films that infest this type of horror film. 'All Hallows Eve 2' does have a few fairly solid, entertaining short films. My personal favorite being 'Descent.' Solid little paranoia short about a woman trapped in an elevator with a possible serial killer.

Most of the stories lack gore, and just about everything required to keep people entertained on Halloween. Luckily, each story just flies by, leaving you hoping for the next gem - You just aren't going to find it.

Random Ramblings of a Madman: We shouldn't be seeing a third film in this franchise until next year, around Halloween, which is probably the best story of all. Written/Directed by @Krackoon.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed