Media coverage has always cherry picked or simply omitted the side of the story they find inconvenient, which is why Kinsey's bad science has stood for so long, anything convenient to the narrative has always been excused. From Margaret Mead to Jared Diamond, excuse and license narratives have been given the veneer of science to the lefts social agenda, but it has never stood up to scrutiny.
Its amusing that the counter argument frames the alphabet agenda as a religion, accidental honesty there for you.
Both sides tend to distort science, the creationist denies evolution while the alphabet agenda denies biology and its inconvenient conclusions which frankly are damning as aberrant spiteful mutants not only undermine the health of themselves but of the groups they influence. Fertility rates spell out the dysfunction of their agenda and lifestyle.
What was said about the myth of the civil war was correct. More americans died in that war as a proportion than did in world war 2. In fact scaled for population, 6 times more americans died during the civil war than did in world war 2, most americans don't understand this, its been quietly hidden in favor of the endless fixation on ww2. This level of death left and indelible scar on society, which has effects to this very day, but since the union won, we are made to believe this myth of a moral war, when the reality is it didn't need to be that way.
In recent years we've been made to understand that tolerance isn't enough, the demand is now unreserved celebration of their lifestyles or face ostracization. The atheist skeptics laughed about slippery slopes, but the slippery slopes have been proven true.
So really the religious undermine themselves by arguing against evolution as religion itself co-evolved with humans because it enhanced the fitness of the groups which adopted it. All attempts to escape from that reality have been self deception. The protesters don't understand that they are merely a mutation of what they claim to fight against, their behavior is just group reaffirmation of faith. The difference being that their faith has not been validated by evolution over thousands of years, very far from it.
The book burning level censorship pushed by the modern left is dangerous to an accurate understanding of the world, so currently I have to stand with the people who will be a thorn in their side. The modern left fears speech and debate because at the end of the day, they have no confidence in their ideas, their ideology has become a mountain of fragile contradictions.