The Nightmare Worlds of H.G. Wells (TV Mini Series 2016) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Not very good
CrazyArty19 June 2022
Four short horror stories set in Victorian times. Stars Ray Winstone.

The tales are short and creepy. Terrible reviews but I enjoyed the first 2 episodes. The second 2 are weak. Probably watch the first and then leave it there.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pitiful attempt at gothic horror
Snootz31 May 2020
The negative reviews here are spot on. This is a disappointing and pointless series. Consisting of four episodes, not a single one can be lauded as creative or ingenious. The story lines are trite, seemingly written by middle school students rather than a master of literature. No, this is unfair; many middle school students could do far better.

Potential viewers would better spend their time on better fare. Which in this case means pick a random film and watch it; it is surely to be better than this unimpressive presentation.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Woeful TV miniseries is a complete waste of time
Leofwine_draca20 May 2016
Well, what a waste of time this turned out to be. THE NIGHTMARE WORLDS OF H. G. WELLS is a four-part TV miniseries that adapts four of the author's short stories into mini-movies. The series also features Ray Winstone as the titular author in perhaps the worst case of miscasting since Denise Richards played a nuclear scientist in THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH.

The reason behind this show's existence seems to be the success of PENNY DREADFUL, at which point the Sky producers went back and mined some other classic literature for inspiration. They've even cast Harry Treadaway's lookalike brother, Luke, in the first episode. The problem is that these productions are so low budget that they look like amateur films; there are no real sets here, just black backgrounds, and I've seen more convincing stuff on Youtube.

The first story is THE LATE MR ELVESHAM, a predictable body swap effort with an equally predictable conclusion. It's a waste of time and features Michael Gambon at his worst. The second story, THE DEVOTEE OF ART, is about a painting that comes to life and is even worse; I don't know why they bothered trying to do effects on this kind of budget. THE MOTH is the third tale and is the most potentially terrifying, but the poor FX, gross out scenes and some dodgy zooming camera-work ruin it.

The last story, THE PURPLE PILEUS, is about magic mushrooms and features black actor Shaun Parkes in the lead role, playing a character who is described in the story as a man with a 'pale face'. This episode manages to go outside of the set for a brief scene in a forest, but the staging continues to be ludicrous. This series is, as a whole, unwatchable and seems to have been made on a budget equal to the price of a pint of milk at my local shop.
25 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not very good
hello-4167921 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The first episode is the best, in my opinion, about body swapping. The rest are awful, especially the moth episode. Nothing happens. Some guy goes insane from a moth that no one else case see ... um, OK. And of course, British media has to include interracial relationships (like they do in every program) in 2 out of 4 of the episodes, even if the stories take place in early 1900s, over 100 years ago when it would have been non-existent.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Enjoyed
eve-4150616 October 2017
As a Wells fan, I found the series entertaining and true to the authors sensibilities. A good choice of actors that I've come to enjoy viewing. It is not on the par of today's horror genre. Very story and character driven. If you appreciate the works of H.G.Wells give it a view. I wasn't disappointed and have watched it twice.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Should and could have been better
ozzieboo4 October 2018
Ray Winstone as H.G. Wells as narrator ruined it for me. Not only does he not embody Wells in any believable way but his presence is so distracting that it destroys any sense of narrative flow or drama. Too bad.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed