Is O.J. Innocent? The Missing Evidence (2017)
Episode 3: Person of Interest
Martin Sheen narrates this new series, which throws out the idea that O.J. Simpson was really innocent and that someone else might have committed the double murders. The third episode spends its entire running time taking a look at Simpson's son Jason and the various issues that he had during the period of the murders. This includes some violent writings that he did as well as a physical assault charge. There's also talk with someone who heard him say something negative towards Nicole Brown Simpson.
This third episode is certainly a good one but there's no question that there's really nothing here that connects him the murder. I'm sure that evidence (if there is any) will happen in a future episode but what's here is a clear example that he had a temper and had various other issues that some people knew about and some even thought of him when the murders took place.
The most interesting interview here comes from Ron Shipp who was a friend of O.J.'s but testified against him at the trial. What's interesting about this interview is that he sheds some light on Jason but he is also convinced that he had nothing to do with the crime and says that all of the evidence points to O.J.. I bring this up simply to show that the documentary, so far, has been fair and balanced, which isn't the normal thing for a film like this.
Episode: A-
Episode 3: Person of Interest
Martin Sheen narrates this new series, which throws out the idea that O.J. Simpson was really innocent and that someone else might have committed the double murders. The third episode spends its entire running time taking a look at Simpson's son Jason and the various issues that he had during the period of the murders. This includes some violent writings that he did as well as a physical assault charge. There's also talk with someone who heard him say something negative towards Nicole Brown Simpson.
This third episode is certainly a good one but there's no question that there's really nothing here that connects him the murder. I'm sure that evidence (if there is any) will happen in a future episode but what's here is a clear example that he had a temper and had various other issues that some people knew about and some even thought of him when the murders took place.
The most interesting interview here comes from Ron Shipp who was a friend of O.J.'s but testified against him at the trial. What's interesting about this interview is that he sheds some light on Jason but he is also convinced that he had nothing to do with the crime and says that all of the evidence points to O.J.. I bring this up simply to show that the documentary, so far, has been fair and balanced, which isn't the normal thing for a film like this.
Episode: A-