Anunnaki

I think those who rated this with 1 star, simply disagree with some of the concepts. The documentary presents a study of historic details, including writings and inscriptions. It's a broad view of historic content, studied by scientists in the field, with subjective correlations to what ppl believed. It's category is history, not paranormal.

This was a surprisingly informative and thought provoking movie. When I initially saw the title Anunnaki, I was initially out off due to the pseudoscience I've seen on discovery channel etc but this was completely different.

As someone who has read up and studied many of the topics dealt with, this confirned many loosely related subjects I am familiar with. Unfortunately some of the previous reviews do not share my views. This is clearly due the their lack of knowledge on the subject of ancient history and cultures. More ignorance than informed criticism. There are countless other related subjects which coincidentally come to similar conclusions.

From my own experiences from living in Ireland and Japan, I can confirm this documentary maker is so right on so many levels that he doesn't even know how deep his points can go. Highly recommended for those with a bit of experience in the subjects.

This film seems to base most of its ideas on a very flimsy platform of pattern recognition of vague or similarities and a boatload of personal opinion. Too many of the views are given without scholarly source attribution. Not only that, the logic used to connect seemingly disparate bits and pieces of historical events, many of which contain gaps measuring thousands of years, is simply jaw-dropping and would be savaged in scholarly debate. I was surprised to discover the listed production date listed as 2017-the tone and graphics seem more suited to the 80s.

At no point of the movie does the narrator actually goes out an proves something. Its just a movie made by a bunch of nerds interested in Sumerian Archeology. The movie goes on for long translating names into English or syllables.

The movies has such bad sound. The background music and the voice of the narrator are not well balance and 90% of the movie is filmed against a cgi fire in the background!

What a flake. The leaps of logic are only matched by the incredible leaps of imagination that is required to tie any of this "information"/"proof" together! Presented as factual information, without any single shred of actual meaningful data. Poorly written and directed, as well as just a plain waste of everyone's time altogether. I thought this was a fictional movie... not a extremely bad documentary.

I sometimes enjoy these ancient alien tropes, as I find them generally and laughably entertaining. In this case, not even a grin crossed my lips. Just too darn boring, and inane to even laugh at for me.

I find Giorgio Tsoukalos a laugh riot. Philip Gardiner is noTsoukilakialalaos. I call him (Giorgio) that, as I will learn to actually pronounce his name when he can be bothered to pronounce the word extraterrestrial. Since he must say extraterrestrial a few hundred times on camera every outing, you would think he would put forth the effort wouldn't you? Nope. We get "essata-estial". Even your German (English is my second language) cult leader says it better than you do.

I digress. Anunnaki is just a terrible film by any measure. A poor IMDB rating, and this is the one and only review (as of this writing) should tell you something.

Stay far, far away.