"Devs" Episode #1.4 (TV Episode 2020) Poster

(TV Mini Series)

(2020)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Strong return to form after last week
elijah-tabere19 March 2020
What episode 3 lacked in credibility and artistry, episode 4 displayed magnificently, marking a return to the strong form we've come to know from anything Alex Garland produces.

Lily is still on her quest for Sergey, but it's from this episode onward, that she truly realizes what she's gotten herself into and who she's up against.

I still can't say that she's a very likable character - I find myself rooting for the Devs team more than for her fate or the fate of her pointless boyfriend, who even she has all but forgotten about at this point (with Jamie back at the horizon).

At this point I'm ambivalent: I'd be happy see either side win and would rate the show equally, regardless if it's Lily or Forrest who prevail in the end.
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautifully Executed
muvax10019 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This episode was really phenomenal. From the scenes with Lily and Kenton, to the scenes in the Devs facility. Forest's character is very complex and his screen presence is very strong. The idea of him rejecting many worlds theory is powerful and the show does not pretend to know all the answers. The scenes themselves are shot beautifully and the music is just on point. The season is gong strong in my opinion!
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Episode 4 reveals Devs to be the real Sci-Fi deal
jay-9557820 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Speaking as someone with a degree in physics I've been really impressed with this show so far. This week particularly. I realise that most viewers won't understand what the characters are talking about half the time, and some viewers will smugly think they understand but actually don't. This show is not giving us standard nonsensical Sci-fi babble like you might see on doctor who. The ideas they talk about are genuine philisophical and physical problems thrown up by quantum mechanics. The machine itself is at least theoretically possible, although I'll concede that it is absurd that a thing with such power might exist.

I'd go so far as to say that the plot around Lyndon's code which allows the machine to accept many world's into its algorithm is nothing short of masterful. The machine is not magically seeing into other parallel universes, instead it's creating a simulation of possible pasts that could have converged on our present by extrapolating back from present conditions. The machine cares not whether what it's seeing is accurate or not, it simply calculates. It's not too different to saying "okay, there's a cricket ball on the floor in my living room, my window is broken, and my son is in the garden with a cricket bat looking sheepish, therefore I can extrapolate back into the past to work out that my son probably broke my window". Except the machine uses data at the quantum level, and unimaginably vast amounts of it.

Lyndon's idea was basically to make the code so that the machine can simply disregard working out a solution to the problem of whether Schrödinger's cat is alive or dead. Instead it simply picks an option at random as it interpolates back in time. That this might make the picture clearer than running a code which has the burden of assessing the state of the metaphorical cat for every quantum interaction through history is a stroke of inspiration. The only problem then is that what the machine calculates won't be the past that we actually lived. It'll show us a past that might have been - hence why Forest says that every time they use it they'll get a different Jesus. In a sense he's right to call it a "party trick". What use is having a machine that shows you what could have happened in the past (or what could happen in the future for that matter) but out of an infinite number of possibilities?

That writer Alex Garland has managed to weld these Qunatum Physics conundrums into something genuinely emotional is impressive. Watching Forest slowly witness the clear image of his daughter's face appear through the fog gave me chills. He stands there knowing that what he's seeing isn't real but it feels so real that he can't resist connecting with it. As he says: "It's dangerous because it's seductive". This is simply Sci-fi of the highest order.

Sadly, I don't think you'd properly understand this show unless you actually know a thing or two about physics. Hence why some of the professional TV critics' reviews have been mixed (and some of the IMDb-ers' reviews, unaware of their own ignorance, have been scathing). Perhaps making a show too dense for someone without specialist knowledge to understand is a fault in and of itself. For me though, I'm just delighted that we've reached the point where a TV programme can strive for the same unpopular realms as art film and yet still be commercially viable. Barely 5 years ago that would have been nearly as unthinkable as the existence of Forrest's machine.
32 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I feel like I unscrewed the top of my skull and what I saw inside made perfect sense!
IndridC0ld22 April 2020
Ever so rarely, you encounter a story that feels like it was written especially for you. Devs is that kind of story, and this episode was as close to perfect as the midpoint of a story could be. Episodes 1-3 were interesting in their allusion that says "hey, this looks different."

It's like when you are on a giant rollercoaster, and you feel the servo motors kick in, and you look up and see the tallest drop you've ever even imagined rearing over you as the car is dragged higher and higher. You know that whatever your expectations were, you are about to greatly exceed them.

This episode is where I became totally invested in the story. There is absolutely no turning back because this story has hooks and barbs that latch onto the mind like some crazy fishhook and you are being reeled in. No matter what, you care about what happens to these characters and ESPECIALLY, where this story is taking you.

What happens to Lyndon is going to feel so familiar to some of you that it is going to HURT. It's a twist that I totally didn't see coming!
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Logic falls apart
fenggstar11 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The whole show has been pretty good, but it all falls apart by the end of this episode. SPOILERS AHEAD.

1. Lily could have easily refused to see the doctor, sticking with "I don't feel like it". The guy can't kill her for that. Plus her whole reaction and interaction with the homeless guy was a dead giveaway that she's suspicious.

2. She really believed the doctor when he said everything is confidential? Your enemy took you to see a doctor of his choosing and you actually tell him things to be used against you? Really?

3. WHY would she go to Jamie's house and give HIS address for the cops? Poor jamie.

So many plotholes made this episode very hard to watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Ugh
bamacdonald21 March 2020
This may have appealed to me when I was 15. It is frustrating the show tries so hard to be deep while in fact it shows a very shallow understanding of both physics and philosophy.
17 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unbelievable
nachos-2604214 February 2024
This show is just truly unbelievable. The main security guy is in his 60s but young men in their 30s can't kick his butt. Even the buff Asian guy couldn't have easily kicked his butt especially after being in a severe car accident. I'm sorely disappointed that it's totally unrealistic.

If the producers were going to make the audience think the head of security is some unstoppable stud, then they should have casted a muscular guy in his 30s not someone beer-bellied 60 year old.

I'm so glad this show wasn't renewed and this is all there is.

The future predictability stuff just isn't believable either.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed