Sibyl (2019) Poster

(2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Sybil review
bastos28 April 2020
This movie is much more confusing than it needed to be which makes the immersion in the story very challenging at the start without any big payoff for the effort. It's just a way to try and make the movie seem more interesting than in reality is. Well shot and acted.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An embarrassment of riches
Chris Knipp5 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Sibyl is a disappointment after Victoria, Triet's highly amusing previous film with the same star, Virginie Efira. I was surprised to find people consider Sibyl a comedy. It's more like an account of how a woman in recovery from alcoholism returns to drinking, and why: it that a funny subject?

Too much is going on here, and it's hard to know how to take it. There's a good basic topic (if this can be said to have one): a psychiatrist who steals from a patient's life to turn it into successful fiction. A simpler, more conventional treatment of this could have been interesting enough. But Triet and cowriter Arthur Harari pile on the complexity and obscure this theme. On top of that there's a surreal back-and-forth-flashback-montage editing technique of very short clips (a bad new fad) that's pretentious and adds confusion.

Sibyl (Efira) was a bestselling author but a painful breakup with her former boyfriend Gabriel (Niels Schneider), with whom she has a child, led her to quit writing and turn to psychotherapy (go figure). She is happy now (it would seem) with a new man, Etienne (Paul Hamy) by whom she has had another child, a little girl. She is going to meetings to conrol her alcoholism and isn't drinking. (Just wait.)

She has a younger sister, Laure Calamy (from the Netflix French TV hit Call My Agent), who appears several times, most notably to give the little girl a quick lesson in emotional manipulation: she tells her mother she "lacks the tools to deal with life." An amusing, but gratuitous, moment.

As the film begins - but it is full of flashbacks to the affair with Gabriel, including a gratuitous full-on sex scene (eschewed in Victoria) - Sibyl can no longer resist the temptation to go back to writing and to that end is dismissing her patients. There is a crudely comic scene of a patient royally pissed off at this. Tellingly, he says he has given her his whole life. Soon we will learn that she's quite likely to use it.

At least she does when she takes on a new patient who forces herself upon her for an emergency. She is Margot Vasilis (Adèle Exarchopoulos, in full hysteria mode), an actress on contract for a film to be made on and around the island of Stromboli (evidently a homage to the 1950 Bergman-Rossilini film). She is pregnant by her costar, Igor Moleski (Gaspard Ulliel), but he's involved with the film's German director, Mika Saunders (Sandra Hüller of Toni Edrmann). The emergency is that she can't decide whether to have the baby or not, and she can't bear to tell Igor she's pregnant.

Sibyl is never any discernible help in this matter, and Margot goes back and forth. Meanwhile Sibyl - who has none of the qualities of the wisdom of that name, or even any moral compass - is furiously writing a manuscript based on Margot's sessions, and presumably other stuff cribbed from people's lives. As time goes on, publishers turn out to be very pleased with the results. She's also having play-therapy sessions with a little boy grieving for his dead mother. (These seem gratuitous, and not that interesting, but that goes for much of the material that crowds this over-stuffed film.) Flashbacks frantically depict intense encounters between Sibyl and the handsome Niels Schneider.

Soon - and here is when we enter into farcical territory, though it seemed heavy-handed to me - Sibyl winds up with the film crew on Stromboli, because Margot is even more confused and desperate, but the filmmaking must go on, so she, Sibyl, is called in to hep Margot function. But due to the emotional complications with Igor, Margot, and Mika, Mika also is nearing a meltdown, her directing becoming ever more neurotic and extreme. (I couldn't help wondering if the way Mika's directing is handled might make future actors hesitate to take on Triet as a director.)

In a series of heavy-handed filmmaking sequences, Sibyl emerges for a while as the only competent person around, except perhaps for Igor, who mostly holds his temper. (This is a long-suffering and selfless role for Gaspard Ulliel and one of his most unflattering.)

In a way Victoria was a wild, disorderly mess too, with Efira in a ditsy but sexy role. A hilariously absurd courtroom sequence toward the end, and the charm and suavity of the great Melvil Poupaud, and the sweetness of Vincent Lacoste as a babysitter enamored of Efira, make that movie charming and fun. That doesn't happen here.

Eventually the responsibility - or the succession of inappropriate roles, not to mention the inappropriate behavior in assuming them, all the while breaking all the rules of medical ethics - causes Sibyl to meltdown, and her return to alcoholism is spectacular. It's also embarrassing and clumsily staged. And profoundly unfunny. While I sided with French critics on Victoria against the anglo ones who trashed it, this time I have to agree with the Anglos, and hope that Triet will have more success with her material in her next feature.

Sibyl, 100 mins., debuted in Belgium and France May 24 and the same day at at Cannes, Justine Triet's first film in Competition there. It played in four other festivals including Toronto and New York, screened at the latter for this review, Oct. 5, 2019. AlloCiné press rating 3.7 (butI Victoria was 3.8, La bataille de Solférino 4.0), Metascore (same as for Victoria) 57%.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Overstuffed with ideas which are plenty but never quite make it whole
mjfhhh31 March 2020
Sibyl wants to stop her psychiatry practice in order to write the next great French novel. But not before she agrees to treat a pregnant girl who is in love with a famous actor. Fast forward a few weeks, and Sybil is suddenly in the middle of a Love triangle (or is it trapezium?), that opens old wounds and make her question her perception of reality. Who needs therapy now?

Independent director Justine Triet has been praised by the critics for her previous works that underline social and political problems. Here we deal with a crisis of a domestic nature and one wonders if the film is based on the director's personal experience. SYBIL cannot be called feminist even though it features plenty of strong women making tough choices. The problem is that those female characters are all despicable and hardly inspire any sympathy from the viewer. The story is patchworky and, while intriguing, it takes a long time to get to the meat of things. Erotic scenes while well made seem irrelevant and the plot itself is hard to define - it's like it was re-written in the last minute. And we are left wondering what it was all about.

Filled with great performances from all Involved, and with its decent cinematography, the movie mostly suffers from the story's inconsistencies and a lack of focus. Overstuffed with ideas which are plenty but never quite make it whole the film struggles to find its identity and borderlines on any piece of entertainment's worst enemy - which is boredom!
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
so many good elements -- put together as nonsense
random-7077810 December 2019
I can't recall seeing a film with so many good and great elements: cinematography, acting, a good deal of great dialogue, that was assembled into such a let down of total experience. It is like observing a kid who is smart, has everything, goes to he best schools -- yet goes nowhere in life.

I don't know where this project went wrong. Was it deep flaws from the beginning and they went ahead without resolving them, or was it some kind of creative fight in post production, perhaps about comedy vs drama as the goal in editing?
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A surprisingly crafty take on an otherwise boring subject.
shanbhattacharya_13 November 2019
I was somewhat skeptical before entering the theater, thinking it would turn out to be another boring film about white people surrendering themselves to hordes of therapists, french woman suffering from romantic distress and so on. However, the writer/director cleverly managed to create a layered portrayal of the protagonist shrink and the world she lives in - blending in her present life, her past, the fiction novel she's writing and the movie her patient stars in. The script is mature, quirky and unpredictable enough to handle these four layers without becoming pointless and confusing. The performances are stellar, especially of Sandra Huller as the temperamental film director.

There is no dearth of past french films handling similar material. Yet somehow this film appears fresh and profusely entertaining.
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Disappointing
Elisabetha4912 October 2019
Too many scenes' discrepancies...., story/script way-out irrelevant ... ; what a waste of ( potential ) talents!?....Editing is , at best, ... irrelevant !?
4 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An ersatz of Providence
FrenchEddieFelson26 May 2019
The trailer was classically misleading. I did not expect a pale remake of Providence (1977) directed by Alain Resnais.

In short: 1) Sibyl has a few undisclosed skeletons in the closet and manages them while drinking abusively. 2) Sibyl is a shrink and the border between her private life and her professional life does not exist. 3) Sibyl is a writer and she draws inspiration from her own surroundings. Thus, given these three points, fiction and reality are quickly confused, for Sibyl first and for the audience even more.

Although the actresses Sandra Hüller and Adèle Exarchopoulos are outstanding, this story of a lost woman suffering of emotional distress is globally boring.
48 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mulholland rue
humate8025 June 2021
It could be a kind of french Mulholland Drive. The materials where there: the affections of the past, the psychological insight, the fiction inside the fiction, fantasies, memories...

A failed writer retakes her old dream to write a beautiful novel, but her lacks of inspiration block her... until she met an actress, who tells her about her troubles. Quickly Sibyl sees a paralelism with her past, about her frustrated love with a man that bring her a passion and then another trauma related with a son they had. Sibyl lost her literal aspirations and her love and in ten years she discovered herself having a life that is safe, with some client as therapist and a husband that gives her estability. But none of these are now valid items to her.

The materials, as I said are good, but by one side the dialogue is too melodramatic, sometimes the scenes turns cartoonish and melodrama doesn't fits very well with the tone of the film, a psychologial drama. The scenes are also too repetitive, once we understand her old past love was very passionate, we don't need three more scenes of kissing and stuff.

By other side, the other characters, aside form Sibyl, doesn't feel with depth, something is missing with all of them.

It's a pity, because the idea is very good. A lost opportunity.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sibyl is detestable
Ishmael_227 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The main character named Sibyl infests and destroys every thing that she touches. She is a shrink who sleeps with her patients, has a kid with one that she keeps out of the it's life for verdictive reasons. She manipulates an actress into having an abortion which ruins the relationship of the actress and the actor who got her pregnant because he wanted the child. Sibyl then sleeps with the actor after ruining his relationship. This woman is the definition of cancer.

Whoever wrote this movie either knows someone like this or is twisted inside.
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Who's the shrink and who's the patient?
kosmasp25 May 2021
Actors can be ... difficult. But Psychotherapists can be insane too ... wait what am I trying to say here again? I guess I am trying to make a point ... like the movie is. Kidding aside, people in general can be tough to read and even tougher to "cure" - especially when the one doing the curing has issues of her own.

A strange little movie that can, but that also is strange to say the least. You have to suspend your disbelief quite a lot and go with the flow. Having a love for making movies and understanding what can go on behind the scenes (it almost feels like someone is doing their own curing by doing the movie - the writer, the director, producers ... all of the above and more?) ... Interesting aspects and quite a lot of sexual tension! And one of the best drunk acting performances put on film! A strange drama/thriller, that will appeal to some and will annoy others - but it is very well done!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dark and depressing piece ...
anxiousgayhorseonketamine15 October 2022
... Which is in a way a follow-up to the film called in bed with Victoria or in French simply "Victoria".

  • Again a career woman in this case a psychotherapist in the case of Victoria a lawyer Virginie Efira confused Unsure of herself going through a breakdown and connected to writing this time she wants to write. This is so depressing I bailed out after half an hour you could see where it was going and it was nowhere good.


  • The main actress is so mesmeric so beautiful so captivating; but this time even her beauty couldn't keep me there. This is made by the exact same director who made Victoria and it seems to me that this is the same story but stretched deeper in the direction of darkness; a tale of an exploding careerwoman.


  • I shouldn't really be reviewing this since I didn't see the whole thing but I got a sense of it a sense of doom and despair and hopelessness which did not make me wanna carry on seeing this...saw "20 ans d'écart/It Boy" One night Victoria the next and this is the third night.


So basically I went from a really funny comedy to tragicomedy into this the depth of the bowels of the volcano following the works of this actress

It is obviously well put together in terms of filmmaking the director Justine Triet is very competent but Jesus do we need more dire stories about lost aimless people??? .... as others wrote in the reviews waste of opportunity.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
very silly people
bmoroncini14 August 2022
This film is a mess of unsavory characters and bad, ridiculously unlikely decision. Some of the acting is good, the storyline is silly, the sex gratuitous and graphic. There is not one interesting character. Despite the attempt to give some background to why sybil is so messed up (an absent mother from whom she distanced herself and a sister who gives sybil's children lectures on how to be manipulative) it's a fail all around.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Disappointing
mike-0936821 March 2024
Having watched and been enthralled by Triet's superb Anatomy of a Fall featuring an excellent Sandra Hüller, I sought out their previous shared feature Sibyl with some excitement; only to be sorely disappointed. Here the oblique and allusive style fails to entrance or in fact even entertain. The image for me is of that carefully constructed style aimed perhaps rather over thoughtfully like a hammer at an intricately fashioned nail...... and being brought down well wide of the mark. Sadly much less than the sum of its parts. Complexity for it's own and not the story's sake. Cloyingly erotic rather than sexy I'm afraid, and emotionally flat.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I keep trying to like French dramas, but ...
phdfromnyc23 September 2023
So often French dramas are sad, depressing, and confusing. That is the case here. I wanted to like somebody! Everybody seemed like a big mess. I do like to see Adèle Exarchopoulos because she has a way of drawing you in with her smile or even her messy crying. She's gotten even better since "Blue is the Warmest Color" (which was another depressing French movie, but not confusing. The love story was clear, even if it was sad).

The male characters in Sibyl were shallow, not well-developed, and almost interchangeable. But clearly this was not about them. It was about a woman who lacked self-awareness, despite her education and even her job as a psychotherapist.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Imagination is a lie
alexskysun6 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The prologue of the story begins with the phrase that "imagination is a lie about a life". And this lie goes like a thin red line through the whole Sibyl's life. She lives from one passion to another, changes her addictions but she didn't change herself. First, she has an obsession with a young lover, then she was dependent on meeting with one her client, an unbalanced actress, then she has a romance with alcohol, and finally, she says "my life is a fiction, I can rewrite it as I need. "It looks like she cannot live in the real dimension, she constantly needs a fantasy about herself, about her own children, about patients. This movie is a cynical erotic tragicomedy about a woman who thinks she can control her life, her emotions. In fact, she slowly and inevitably destroys herself.
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Surprising , more a drama than a comedy
lemienici13 October 2019
Such an unconventional movie, with a great cast . The story is twisted , in many directions but it comes to Sibyl's conclusion , "my life is a fiction ...." Then perfect setting with the Stromboli ;) Sensible , smart , great photo... . and bravo to Virginie, Adele, Gaspard and Nils .
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not a Comedy
derek-duerden14 July 2021
This is quite an interesting film and, unlike some other reviewers here, I really enjoyed the central performance. Disturbingly like Jennifer Lawrence at times, Efira handles the variety of tones and context very well, I think - despite the film deliberately taking her all over the place emotionally. I used to think that "Blue is the Warmest Colour" was the most snot-laden film I had ever seen, courtesy of Adele's copious crying, and she is well-chosen to deliver similar over-the-top distress here. In contrast, I didn't much like the director character, and for me the men were a bit too interchangeable.

Worth a look though.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Dramatically comic
sergelamarche16 August 2022
First, the acting is less than perfect but as the film advance, it is more and more right on. The story is complex and simple and psychological and makes sense hilariously. We see gifted people and the replies keep in originality. Nothing predictable and all characters are bright. A delight of a film that has many loose strings hanging after it's over.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
an absolute delight
therzog-553-7997397 December 2023
This film kept me in its grip, and I enjoyed every twist and turn as the plotlines unfolded. The acting was superb and the main characters were complex, compelling and elusive.

I'm quite surprised to see such low ratings, but to each their own! To me, the film's seemingly disparate elements/themes (e.g. Trauma, depression, addiction, grief/loss, desire, deception, vanity, power, exploitation) came together to paint a beautifully absurd portrait of the human condition.

In particular, the film seems to emphasize the ways that we naively cling to earthly vices/pleasures and deceptive/delusional narratives in our fights against feelings of disillusionment, meaninglessness and hopelessness.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed