Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
That '90s Show (2023– )
3/10
If you liked That 70s Show, skip this and keep your memories alive
20 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I'm 3 1/2 episodes into the series and so far I'm underwhelmed.

The Good Kitty & Red - they're about as good as they've always been, although the writing is letting them down

The Old Gang Cameos - their cameos are definitely enjoyable, although some seem forced. Why Kelso & Jackie showed up for 2 minutes was never really explained. But seeing them makes me wish this sequel was about them and much less about the kids.

The Bad The New Gang - They're not working for me. For the most part it seems like the writers are trying to make them like the previous generation. What's more, I don't buy them as 90s kids, not in the least. Some people are praising that they're actually teenage, which they are, but that just makes for some cringy moments.

  • Leia (Callie Haverda) had just turned 15 when filming started. I'm supposed to cheer for a girl her age getting high and drunk? And an episode or two later it's all about getting her first kiss. It's like the writers can't decide how to write for her. Is she supposed to be a "bad girl" or not?


  • Kelso's kid looks a lot like his dad, and at times acts like him. But again the writers don't seem to know how they want to write for him. One minute he's having sex in a lake, the next minute he's falling for Leia who he literally just met, and doesn't want to rush things BY KISSING HER!


  • The other characters just seem mostly forgettable. The gay Asian kid is annoying as written and would VERY likely have still been in the closet back in the day. It's great that society has evolved but in the 90s it hadn't. If he was at all open with friends it would not have extended to parents (and DEFINITELY not to someone like Red!).


The 90s Look - Lots of people have already pointed out, they've done a lousy job at capturing the 90s look and feel. The clothes, the technology, the look and feel of everything just seems off. It's not the worst part of the new show, but definitely don't watch it expecting to feel nostalgic for the 90s. It could easily be anywhere from late 80s to 2010s.

The Ugly The Writing - Get new writers for Season 2. The writing is bad. Completely undeserving of a second chance. The best lines are repeats of things the characters said in the original show. The writing was never the best thing about the original show but at least they were funny, and they created characters you cared about.

A line that passes for comedy: after being interrogated by Red where Leia is, Ozzie says, "She went to Nunya." Red: "Where's Nunya." Ozzie: "Nunya business." Big laugh from the studio audience, while I sit and wonder why I'm paying for Netflix.

Also, I'm not sure if it's the writing or the editing but the scenes seem far too short. Most seem to last 30 seconds and then it's off to something else. Maybe that's good if you have a short attention span, but for most people they appreciate a proper set up to a punchline.

Overall, I'm disappointed. This could have been a lot better, and I think would have been a lot better if they gave the fans what we wanted and made it about the original cast rather than turning it into That 70s Show: The Next Generation.

On the positive side, it makes That 80s Show seem even better in comparison.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Quickly Wears Out Its Welcome
7 August 2005
Although I have enjoyed Bing Crosby in other movies, I find this movie to be particularly grating. Maybe because I'm from a different era and a different country, but I found Crosby's continual references to the Good Old USA pleasant at first, trite after a while and then finally annoying. Don't get me wrong - I'm not anti-American whatsoever - but it seemed that the English could do no right and/or needed this brave, oh so smart American visitor to show them the way. It's a "fish out of water" story, but unlike most movies of this sort, this time it's the "fish" who has the upper hand. To be fair to both myself and the movie, I have watched it a few times spaced over a few years and get the same impression each time.

(I watched another Crosby movie last night - The Emperor's Waltz - and that, too, produced the same reaction in me. And to my surprise even my wife - who for what's it's worth is American - found the "in your face" attitude of American Crosby to be irritating. One too many references to Teddy Roosevelt, as she put it.)

As for the premise of the movie, it's unique enough for its day and the supporting cast is of course very good. The scenery and the music is also good, as are the great costumes - although I agree with a previous reviewer that the wig on William Bendix looks horrid (picture Moe of The Three Stooges).

All in all for me this would be a much more enjoyable picture without the attitude of Bing Crosby but because he is in virtually every shot it's pretty hard to sit through this movie.
10 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not A Bad Movie, But Just Not The Same...
22 December 2002
I finally managed to watch this movie. I had seen every other movie in the Hardy family series and this would, fittingly I thought, close out the series for me.

I must admit I was disappointed in the movie. Perhaps I missed it, but I thought that a little more background should have been provided. There were a few people that were noticeably absent, particularly Andy's father, James Hardy (Lewis Stone). His long-time flame, Polly Benedict (played by Ann Rutherford) was also given little mention beyond seeing her in a clip and seeing her picture.

The Hardy movies made me feel like a part of the family. However in the 12 years since the previous film a lot had obviously happened and there was little or no recap. How did Judge Hardy die? What happened to Marion's husband? How did Marion and Jimmy come to live in the Hardy house? Where was Polly Benedict?

To me the movie seemed to not know whether to stand on its own or to be simply a nostalgia picture. It tries to capitalize on the past movies but is content to introduce several major new characters with little or no explanation. I would have loved to know where he'd met Jane, or how he came to go to California. A theme that seemed to run through the movie was Andy turning into his father: he is asked by his son for "a man to man talk", Andy doesn't understand the new "buzzwords" of his nephew Jimmy's generation. Andy is now a part of the awkward older generation.

I suspect that this movie was intended to relaunch Mickey Rooney's career. That is only my guess, however at the conclusion the words "To Be Continued" seemed pretty obvious that there were to be additional sequels - sequels never made. I imagine when this movie came out movie audiences no longer felt the chemistry that had existed with the original Hardy family. Andy had been the main focus of most of the earlier Hardy movies but now he was the anachronism. He was no longer an idol for younger, hipper audiences. At the same time the supporting cast wasn't up to carrying the lead. Like so many remakes that never really re-capture the magic of the original, Andy Hardy Comes Home just made me appreciate that the producers had been able to capture magic in a bottle in the original movies.

In short, this is the last movie in the series. It doesn't completely close out the series and leaves a lot of questions unanswered, however for Hardy fans, it is still a film worth seeking out. It will make the original movies all that much more special.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed