Reviews

38 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Shack (I) (2017)
2/10
Awful. Just awful.
7 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Everyone whispers their lines in this corny, repetitious and preachy nonsense film, full of bad cliches and stupid riddles delivered by no-one other than the film's female version of GOD. Why must films about faith always involve BORN AGAIN tragedy? Can't any Christian just live a good life without being confronted by some unmasked male sexual versions of a SATANIC source. Male savior GOD shows up for a cameo at the end, because no woman could ever close the deal by herself. Uneven in every way including the actors accents, they stray from mid-America to mid-Australia at every other line.

Faith films need to hire talented writers and better actors. This film is a mess.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fill the Void (2012)
8/10
A very sad film about oppression
5 August 2014
A tragically sad and horrifying film about a group of people who have isolated themselves into a micro-world of limited choices. Their options are controlled by a religious dogma of oppression and fear, without any weight assigned to personal emotions or hope.

Aside from child abuse, why would a young girl be forced to such choices?

Even if we think the male lead is a good man for her, why would anyone else think so? Are we all Jane Austen matchmaker scum from two centuries ago?

This is a horror film for those who think faith overrules common sense. I found it terrifying.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cuban Blood (2003)
9/10
A beautifully made memoir
12 February 2008
This film is a lyrical and romantic memoir told through the eyes an eleven year old boy living in a rural Cuban town the year of the Castro revolution. It is an obviously genuine worthy labor of love.

The names CUBA LIBRE and CUBAN BLOOD are merely attempts to wrongly market this as an action film. DREAMING OF JULIA makes much more sense. It has more in common with European cinema than with RAMBO and the revolution is merely an inconvenience to people's daily lives and pursuits. That fact alone makes the film more honest than most works dealing with this time period in Cuban history.

The excessive use of the voice-over narrator does undermine the story but the film makes up for it with unqualified clips from Hollywood films that say so much more visually than the narrator could.

The comparisons to CINEMA PARADISO and are fair game as the film does wax melancholy about movies, but there is an underlying pain at the loss of a lifestyle that surpasses lost love.

The revolution, like the film JULIE, never seems to have an ending.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Guide (1965)
2/10
Overrated here and actually quite awful!
10 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS POSSIBLE

I rented this movie as I had heard it was an Indian classic. I was very impressed by the far superior MOTHER India and since GUIDE was one of the first Bollywood musicals to get an American release, I figured it was something special. The comments here on IMDb enforced the risk of the three hour investment, but they turned out to be strictly sentimental.

What a disappointment! Previous reviewers acclaimed this as a pioneer musical and a consummate Indian film, but besides possibly establishing the absurd plot format of all future Bollywood films, (good prostitutes, distressed drunks, suffering mothers, silly uncles) the premise is strictly lifted from 1930's B level Hollywood musicals.

This is a tale about a cheerful tour GUIDE with a Tin-Tin hairdo who falls on hard times when he encounters an unhappy bride. The Bride, a crude-mouthed prostitute's daughter, is in an unhappy marriage with a wealthy archaeologist who is older and has no time for her. She indeed wants to be a snake dancer in spite of having an enormous arse that would make dancing an improbable career choice.

After many suicide attempts and melodramatic over-acted moments, she runs away with the GUIDE who alienates family, friends and neighbours in order to keep the bumble-bee-arsed dancer within his grips. Once there she melodramatically attempts to run away and spare him the anguish but seems unable to find the door and decides to practise her vulgar dancing there instead.

After chasing away his beloved mother, he guides her career to incomprehensible international success (see every bad Hollywood musical from the early sound era) where, even in Europe, audiences reward her with enthusiastic applause apparently for running with bells on her ankles and spinning in place. She becomes his meal ticket and so he marries her and they revel in their new found "shared" wealth.

Her estranged former husband, impressed with her success, sends her a copy of his new book and rewards her by sharing the family jewels. The GUIDE forges her signature on the agreement so as to avoid her contact with the man who once caused her so much pain. She rewards him by pressing charges against him and sending him to jail.

The movie then goes on an extra journey of self discovery and plot filler (see THE RAZOR'S EDGE -1946 for more information of where that was blatantly stolen from)not worth going into, for a contrived ending that would allow for the required three hour running time to finally come to an end.

The now seemingly typical Bollywood musical numbers feature people running across fields singing and dancing cannot help this movie from being mundane and badly dated even by 1950's Indian standards. Most modern Bollywood films steal from the best of Hollywood. GUIDE steals from the worse of the early Western sound films. (Satyajit Ray, why didn't you stop them!)

Stick to MOTHER India and the modern Shah Rukh Khan films with beautiful and talented female leads and avoid this mess at all costs.
2 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bamboozled (2000)
1/10
A missed opportunity
26 April 2007
Spike Lee fails to deliver his message in this video filmed satire that exploits the imagery of the minstrel show while failing to deglamorize it. The choice of filming technique and some ill-advised ad-libbing make matters worse as the viewer starts realising that the actors are as clueless as the characters as to what is happening to them.

Part of the problem stems from the TV show itself. Damon Wayans "Putney Swope" character fails to be black or white and his success defies conventional wisdom. We do not believe the show is good enough because it isn't. Surrounding himself with minstrel memorabilia like a retired Nazi, his character is beyond redemption because he never had any good qualities to begin with. And what IS with that accent? I have never heard anyone talk that way in real life.

In one scene his arrogant, but efficient, assistant (Jada Pickett-Smith) is shocked to find she is considered "hired help". If you are no longer sleeping with him, err, isn't that what assistants are? In the end Spike Lee fails to understand what made black stereotypes funny. It was the fact that we could feel superior to them. In this film they are superior to the preposterous being who inhabit them and that makes the film oddly racist.

Spike would have been better off with white leads and black voices in the background showing reason. By casting black actors in the role, the film echoes not some old time racist pastimes but rather the current charade of wealthy black rap artists going out every night pretending be ghetto gangstas. (the judgemental Mau-Maus?) His rainbow coalition audience and the talent of the two entertainers undermines his message about minstrels and gives the old shows unintended warmth.

A monumental failure in many ways, BAMBOOZLED disappoints more because of what it should have been that what it really is. Although Spike Lee fell up his own ass several films ago, this one takes the cake.

Instead of a tribute to the fine actors who were subjected to silly stereotypes by white producers he has insulted the artists, who show more talented in the few clips near the end than that exhibited by the two previous hours.

Is the movie anti-black? Yes, Mr. Lee, I think you have made a very racist film. Someday some better filmmaker may have to use a clip.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Arrest the costume designer!
22 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A sad little freckled mess of a young man arrives in big mean Limerick after the death of his father to start his new life. He decides to room with a gay man so effeminate he could practically fly away.

"Are you gay?" he asks after they have moved in together, totally oblivious to the fact that his new roommate, a fashion student, dresses like a old Jewish woman.

SPOILERS What next? You guess it! It's QUEER EYE FOR THE STRAIGHT (ahem) GUY Irish style, which apparently consists of a little mousse and some Barry Manilow costumes.

Next up are some television calibre drug dealers, some fast food workers with plenty of disposable income and the sneaking suspicion that none of the people involved have ever been exposed to any of the subject matter they are depicting.

Among the lessons this preachy movie teaches: - When your father dies, this is good time to abandon your mother - A drug run can be a good quick little income earner - A steady civil service job is the death of a poor boy - A drug dealer is a good choice to tell your troubles to - Lesbians like to sleep with gay men - All men wear make-up - Limerick has the population density of New York but just the one nightclub - After finding out your roommate is a drug runner and that there are drugs in the flat, a proper response is to say "I thought I knew you!" and mince on with your life. - Gay men are fairy god mothers that can wipe away straight boy sins

So how do you solve life's problems? Get your lead from fifties musicals and PUT ON A FASHION SHOW! Subsequently, even more shocking costumes wear the actors.

Homophobic and amateur nonsense with continuity errors galore.

And did I mention the appalling costumes?
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lilies (1996)
1/10
Awful in so many different ways....
9 April 2006
This is the sort of pretentious crap that has killed art-house cinema. The fact that the players speak English makes it more criminal to hear dialogue that appears to have been written in French and then sloppily translated. The actors speak like they are reading bad subtitles and are therefore forced to speak some very idiotic sentences indeed.

The young actors are pretty but surprisingly sexless. They come across like twelve year old girls, not mature enough to pretend they have any of these feelings. This is stressed even more by the casting of older men in female roles, at once an insult to women and to gay men.

Any film in soft focus is considered "beautiful" today and this one is particularly ugly with fantastic scenery badly photographed and endless shots of lakes and cottages that add nothing to the setting. The prison scenes are strictly 1960's bad theater of the absurd.

This play on film presents a convoluted jilted lover plot worthy of a daytime soap pretending it is saying something important about homophobia. Indeed who is the true villain here? The jealous lover who killed for his love and became a priest in his atonement or the selfish and closeted Simone, who was dumping his true love after one beating from dad. It is Simone who is the sinner here but the writer would rather not see that and blames some smitten waiter for all the crimes of humanity. Apparently Simone paid for his real sins by ageing really badly, a punishment only a gay man would understand.

Even with it's drag queen women and naked girly-boys, LILIES is not good gay cinema. But it sure is queer.
5 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hilariously irreverent...
19 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
this story of a narcoleptic transvestite hooker with more than an angry inch has the audacity to open with a musical number from the Spanish classic TOMBOLA. It's stands the Spanish musical on it's head better than even Almodovar has managed before.

For those familiar with Spanish cinema from the Franco era, this is a worthy companion piece to BAD EDUCATION. The two films together are the equivalent of a stealth attack on SARITA MONTIEL, MARISOL and JOSELITO movies.

For those unfamiliar, what remains is a camp satire of the MTV generation where style overcomes substance and drama is really black comedy no matter how tragic.

Fine performances from a great cast, particularly Monica Cervera, who manages to be ugly and sexy at the same time and Pablo Puyol as the masculine stud who likes Marieta's eight inches a little too much.

Worth seeing at once!
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of Hitchcock's best and a real treat!
26 February 2006
I have been a Hitchcock fan for years yet had never stumbled on this early classic. Although several posters have commented that this film can't keep to a genre and seems to be all over the place, I disagree. RICH AND STRANGE is strictly comedy, albeit quite dark at times. It is Hitch's most British of satires and with an adventure setting to boot.

A young couple goes off on a world trip after being advanced some inheritance money. The adventure starved office worker husband, seeking to sail the world, finds he can barely survive crossing the English channel and the subservient housewife willing to sacrifice all for her beloved quickly finds another when left alone for a few days.

The ensuing travels shift the two from spectators in Paris to participants in the middle east to victims in the far east. It all proves they belong together. Among the classic Hitchcock touches of dark humour are the indignities of transportation and a cat who rightfully believes he belongs on the dining room table.

Some scenes contain primitive experimental camera techniques that are quite funny when you think about it. The "look left, look right" Paris travel montage, the drunken scenes and the play on the number 19 are quite unique and funny in their right.

I think steak and kidney pudding and a predictable life will do just fine from now on.
27 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Debut (2000)
Surpringly touching film
12 November 2005
Having grown up in a Cuban-American family I was surprised at how similar the cultures represented in THE DEBUT are to my own. Although I am aware of both countries' Spanish colonial influence, I think many Americans from ethnic backgrounds will find the same connection to this film.

I universal story that does not shy away from its roots, THE DEBUT is actually a great film. The actors may not be the most experienced but they certainly come across more honest than most of the "polished" teen stars today.

One of the many striking performances comes out of left field from the villain tough boy with the gun (I don't know his name). When he starts getting slapped around by mama his expression is priceless and the scene strikes a cord into memories of the "tough guys" of my youth.

A memorable independent film with a heart as big as Asia. With a little sharper editing this could have been MY BIG FAT PHILLIPINO DEBUT.

Set aside your preconceptions and enjoy.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Autumn Tale (1998)
1/10
Prentious, talky and sloppy...
8 November 2005
One of those French films where people walk through vineyards talking about love. Funny how you only find these relaxed chatty French people in movies yet the real Paris is as high strung and angry as New York. Maybe they act like this when they go to the country on weekends.

Don't let this laid back act fool you, though. A stereotypical French professor lusting after his teenager students and lovesick middle aged women without anything to do is what passes for love here. The younger pretty people are so one dimensionally uninteresting they may as well be pets. It would appear that vineyard farming near a nuclear power plant is both glamorous and apparently not very time consuming. This leaves our characters plenty of time to wax melancholy about "l'amour".

Among this films many conceits is the lack of a hairbrush or a comb for miles. Shaggy wind blown hair and weeds are the metaphors here. Give me a break!
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Truly stupid and not in the least funny...
18 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Some Spoilers -if this tripe can be spoiled.

This attempt at a male fantasy comedy fails on every count. Most to blame is the implausible screenplay but the hammed up bad acting and impossible premise don't help. Several scenarios simply do not work and the maudlin "falling in love" pretence that is supposed to make these guys likable drags the film kicking and screaming into one of the lamest conclusions in movie history.

The two male leads are about as believable and charming as the skanks they may actually pick up along the way. Fortunately, the two female leads turn out to be equally reprehensible in their poor judgement and immorality although I suspect the writer and director failed to notice this. One would marry for kinky sex, the other to run away from a violent fiancée. What was she doing with that guy anyway? These guys will eventually get what they deserve but I could help feeling the violent fiancé was a much better choice.

If you are naive enough to accept any unlikely plot device thrown your way, hate women, fear gay men, and believe Washington D.C. should have no minorities, then this is the comedy fantasy for you! The film has an odd sense of 50's values that reveals it's point of view to be sexist, homophobic, ageist and immoral (and not in a good way). Add an obnoxious Will Farrell ad lib and you have one of the year's worst films.

If you must, rent it, don't buy. You will feel bad having it around the house.

If you like a sexy comedy fantasy with turn of the century attitudes, see THE 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN and stop encouraging hacks who make really bad movies like this one.

WEDDING CRASHERS is a hateful sad little pimple of a movie that made too much money in the summer of 2005 due to a sudden talent vacuum.
75 out of 177 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A day in the life of a Spanish cabby
1 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Some minor spoilers! This uneven comedy follows a Madrid cabby for a day of picking up fares. The riders all happen to be celebrities of sixties Spanish cinema and TV.

Along the way someone has left a baby in the back seat prompting a search for the day's passengers and some slapstick comedy chase scenes.

Great cameos from Carmen Sevilla, Lola Flores, Armando Calvo, Isabel Garces and Marisol with songs and comedy schtick interludes.

It it is enjoyable to watch these pros making the best out of the thin material and some of the comedy twists are indeed amusing. A true relic of Franco era Spanish cinema.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the dumbest films of all time!
9 July 2005
I was a theatre manager when this tripe was released and audiences laughed out loud at the absurd theories and assumptions.

Along with it's equally funny partner CHARIOTS OF THE GODS?, LATE GREAT asks ridiculous questions and then presents lame answers.

This movie could have become a cult film had the "take the money and run" type distribution failed. It is that silly.

A relative of the old sex education sensational films that promised everything, both LATE GREAT and CHARIOTS had massive TV campaigns and suckered large crowds for a week or two, then disappeared taking all the prints on to the next town.

Was Satan's ambassador to earth really Gerald Ford? Probably not. Are we really nearing the end of civilisation? No, movies like this one stopped being made. Does the bible predict the future? No, that would be STAR TREK. The bible is about the past.
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great source of information...
19 June 2005
For many of us, with only a passing knowledge of American musical theatre, this is a godsend. I always suspected that these composers borrowed freely from each other and was not surprised to find out that they were often each others mentors.

The section on the THE CRADLE WILL ROCK was an alarming history lesson in recent censorship and should be as much a part of school curriculum as prohibition or blacklisting. Perhaps New York would not be so quick to condemn other states if it faced its own history of oppression since the behaviour of the city has often been the forerunner of standards, including censorship, elsewhere.

The series captures the social and artistic effects of SHOW BOAT, OKLAHOMA!, WEST SIDE STORY, HAIR and A CHORUS LINE among many others and beautifully highlights the effect they had not only on audiences but also on the talent behind the scenes.

One surprising (and annoying) feature of this set is the misguided effort to highlight the contribution of African Americans by segregating black performances into sections. The final effect is an "us and them" result that will appear racist as the years go by. Surely the contribution of black talent is not any more or less important than that of any other minority in the melting pot and the series easily integrates Jewish, Irish and Hispanic contributions effortlessly. Surely there is no need to suggest that Ethel Waters brought more to the stage by way of personal baggage than Fanny Brice or Harvey Fierstein. One obvious and major contributing element that becomes an elephant in the room to anyone who has ever seen a Broadway musical is delicately footnoted. This element is the fact that these shows are usually, dare I say it, quite gay in every sense of the word. Perhaps this is a current mutation of the badly kept Hollywood secret that the studios were mostly run by Jews. Do the producers really think it unimportant or simply too obvious to address?
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Also known as WILD GIRL in English.
15 May 2005
Marisol is a low rent Moulin Rouge girl who is made a proposition to become part of an elaborate revenge scheme aimed at punishing a man who stole Mel Ferrer's wife, a dead ringer for Marisol.

The convoluted plot has Marisol playing a Sarita Montiel brand of femme fatale, revealing her possible desire for such an ongoing career now as a grown woman.

The songs are great. Marisol looks beautiful and Renauld Verley provides a sexual chemistry lacking in her other films.

The stripper element was capitalised on with the English language marketing but don't let this fool you. This is PG material at best and the WILD GIRLS are off screen.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Lady Godiva with a cause.
15 May 2005
This made for Spanish television miniseries follows the life of a real- life society woman with everything to lose who gambles her whole life away in order to support a revolutionary movement against the Spanish monarchy.

Controversial and outspoken Pepa Flores in perfectly cast at the wealthy beauty who will not compromise her scruples and who suspects that her martyrdom may inspire the revolution. I suspect Marisol bonded personally with the politically stubborn Pineda.

Well acted and filmed in actual locations, the DVD set also includes documentary footage about Mariana Pienda along with a surprising segment of Marisol's singing television appearances.

A must see for any Marisol fan or Spanish history buff.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Caso cerrado (1985)
Polical and well intentioned. Case Closed.
15 May 2005
A young Jewish bride's life is put into turmoil when her husband is questioned, then arrested for possible anti-government activity.

This last foray into the big screen by Marisol met with unfair bad reviews. Many feel this was due to Marisol's (by now Pepa Flores) outspoken communist militancy and open rejection of her career past, both factors which she has since seemed to have reconciled.

Ironically the film also starts out with a heavy passion and then also wanders off failing to make its point. It is quiet and self-righteous in a Hasidim kind of way and you tend to wonder if Marisol knew this was her last case.

Watch for a young Antonio Banderas cast as the jail buddy.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Marisol's best acting job in a passionate film.
15 May 2005
Marisol excels in this underplayed slow moving drama about a school teacher who takes a job in a small border town school during the Spanish civil war.

She keeps in touch with her revolutionary lover who is hiding in the nearby mountains by sending a student as a messenger. The lover also underplayed beautifully by her then real life husband, flamenco prodigy Antonio Gades.

A film of passion and pain, so rare in Spanish cinema, is all the more significant by starring two stars of escapist entertainment who in real life were quite politically charged.

Had this been a box office hit, we may have been able to keep the multi- talented Marisol on the screen for a few more years.

This film and as well as CASO CERRADO are the antidote to Marisol's cheerful early Franco musicals.

!Pepa, por favor vuelve!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Convoluted story of false identity, treason and murder.
15 May 2005
It was an odd choice to cast Marisol in this but perhaps that is how it got made anyway. With Marisol's desire for more adult non-singing roles and Bardem's track record, I am sure most producers would have risked it.

The screenplay obviously needed help and it feels like it was being written as they went along. British star Murray Head (Sunday, Bloody Sunday) is badly dubbed and at times I lost the plot altogether. Seeing Marisol in such an unexpected role was fun.

This is a hard to find video so the film must usually be caught on Spanish TV.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Solos los dos (1968)
Star vehicle for both stars.
15 May 2005
SOLOS LOS DOS pits star bullfighter Sabastian Palomo Linares and box office star Marisol into a contrived story about the hardships of loving a man who is always in danger.

Once the courting begins Sabastian and Marisol take walks in the park, walks in the town, look lovingly at each other and she sings songs.

Once he goes back to work Marisol mugs at the camera, swings her hair, squints, cries, takes long walks in the park, takes long walks in the snow and looks longingly at the lover she may never be able to keep.

This love story looking for a plot is really a 91 minute music video with the camera annoyingly flying up to the sky after every scene.

For Marisol and Linares fans only.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Roman Holiday in Madrid
15 May 2005
Marisol plays an Eastern European princess by day and rock n' roll babe by night. Mind you the kind of rock n' roll babe who plays in a club where the audience actually stops and listens to her brand of flesh and feather pop music.

This movie gives Marisol the opportunity for endless costume changes and varying wigs along with multiple boyfriends. It also serves as a satire of the eastern European monarchy film from a left wing source. It has a great sense of slapstick, continuity problems possibly stemming from shoddy editing.

Sloppy and fun with some great songs.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Marisol is a film star with man trouble .
15 May 2005
A precursor to the current RUNAWAY BRIDE problem, Marisol plays a film star and singer called "Marisol" who keeps getting engaged but never follows through. When her latest engagement is announced to the media, jilted lovers come out of the wood work making prior claims.

Marisol can't seem to make up her mind and her performance is extremely pretentious. This was either a sign that the grown-up Marisol had lost her ability to play it natural or her interpretation of a vain movie-star had such convincing affectation as to be unlikeable. One suspects the real person had changed and in any case and the child star had become a stunning beauty still easy on the eyes.

In the best scene (without a song), Marisol, having committed to marrying a British Royal, gets to meet The Queen. Asked what she most wants out of life, she asks to have Gibraltar back!

The screwball elements and bad editing make this a sloppy enterprise not surprisingly still missing on DVD.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An odd film in many ways.
15 May 2005
Mel Ferrer managed to get this odd film a wide US release although the story could not have been less appropriate for that. I suspect an English version of this must exist somewhere since wide releases were rarely subtitled in the sixties unless they were art-house films. Marisol and her little brother are rag merchants in rural Spain along with their tired old mascot, the title's horse, Cabriola. Their dreary world is awoken by the pageantry of a local festival that involves bullfighting on horseback. This sport seems to contain posing rather than any actual fighting, with the horse getting the brunt of the danger. Marisol impersonates a boy in order to penetrate the sport's inner circle leading to her falling in love with the local champion, also her trainer. Marisol is an unconvincing male (think Barbra Streisand in YENTL) but all this leads to some odd melodramatics forcing her to break into song. ("Ya No Me Importas Nada"). This film is well known in Eastern Europe and Russia.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Also known as LOS NOVIOS DE MARISOL
15 May 2005
Marisol and her dad are travelling in seaside Spain earning their daily meals from tourist tips. She sings and he does a phony blind man routine. They find competition from El Duo Dinamico, two young pop singers, who compete with them while falling for Marisol.

Isabel Garces, playing an American tourist, steals this film from everyone with her magnificent comic timing. "Oh my goodness!" she exclaims in English, whenever Marisol pulls a stunt, the only real sign that her character is not just another rich German.

The scenario provides many opportunities for songs and the usual "let's put on a show" ending when Marisol is discovered by a rich producer and separated from her father.

This good Marisol vehicle was designed for the local market although Marisol was already an international star.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed