Change Your Image
kdcarver
Reviews
Shanghai Knights (2003)
A step down from the original
The first Chan/Wilson team-up definitely tops this showing. Lacking in plot, and thinly linked to the first movie, Knights is little more than a series of stunts and Wilson comedy. Chan's fight choreography is not as impressive as some of his other films. Wilson's comedy is a bit overstated, and the "famous person rolled into the plot" schtick becomes old quickly.
Still, it is fun at moments. I would recommend renting this picture rather than going to see it at the theatre. However, if choosing between this sequel and the original, rent 'Noon.
Pitch Black (2000)
Classic Sci-Fi with a good dose of action
I am in a technical profession, and enjoy thinking about the possibilities of science fact and fiction. However, in my opinion, Science Fiction is at it's best when the technical aspects are not dwelled upon, and the development of character takes over. This is the case with Pitch Black. Passengers of a transport vessel find themselves marooned on an inhospitable planet. Fear, trust, and characters coming to terms with their own weaknesses are intertwined with the basic suspense of a classic horror picture.
The film has some rough spots, but for the most part, great science fiction. I think this did not do as well in the theatres as it could have due to the lack of sophistication in today's audiences.
Vin Diesel is great in his role, as is Radha Mitchel. David Keith's character lacks a bit of depth, in my opinion, but is interesting in the role of a holy man that doesn't have ALL the answers, yet is still faithful.
My biggest regret is Claudia Black's relatively short screen time!
Take some time to see and enjoy this film.
Deep Impact (1998)
At least it got most of the science right...
Both this film, and it's evil twin brother Armageddon, are flawed. Where Armageddon fails for inaccurate science, MTV-like editing, and a clear attempt at pop culture's wallet, Deep Impact fails with mediocre acting and slow story development.
This is not a horrible movie, just failing. However, I give it an edge over Armageddon for it's treatment of science and human behavior.
The impact effects were done well.
Armageddon (1998)
MTV meet Irwin Allen
If it weren't for the enjoyable actors, fun fx, and fast pace, this movie would not be worth a rent. Pseudo-science and choppy, MTV-esque scenes, dominate what could have been an great movie. Landing a space shuttle on an asteroid is simply not a good idea folks. Dune buggy drilling rigs are even worse. Additionally, the characters garner little sympathy, in my opinion.
Fortunately Owen Wilson, Bruce Willis and cast save the film from total oblivion with comedy and fun antics. Willis shooting golf balls at a Greenpeace ship is simply hilarious. The fx are great, flattening cities and the like.
Compared to it's "sister" movie Deep Impact, Armageddon lacks in credible science, but excels in acting ability. Storyline for Deep Impact is a bit more realistic, but slower.
If you want to have a fun ride, and are not much worried about plot and science, take some time to view this pop culture hit.
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002)
More powerful than expected...
A long time Tolkien fan, I arrived at the theatre with a bit of apprehension (or was it excitement?). The Fellowship of the Ring had not disappointed me, and was wonderful. So it was with hope in my heart that the same would be provided by Two Towers as I awaited the curtain to go up on this second installment. It surpassed my expectations.
To say that Rohan was an indescribable splendor on screen would be an understatement. The residents of Canterbury, NZ are lucky indeed to have such a pristine and beautiful place in their backyard. Peter Jackson did a wonderful job bringing the people of Rohan alive as I felt they were not in the books.
Aragorn, Gimli and Legolas are developed well here and their actors put on an unforgettable show. Astin's character of Sam shines as does Wood's Frodo.
But Smeagol/Gollum! If this portrayal of character (not just the animation) doesn't win an Oscar, I don't know what should. Superbly done.
My only criticisms may be the treatment of Arwen, Elrond and Galadriel as they seemed a bit out of synch with the rest of the movie. Also, Faramir seemed a bit harsh compared to his character in the book. Some of my friends and colleagues found the Ents disappointing, but I did not.
Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)
Disappointing as it could have been much better
Flatly acted by all, with the exception of Stewart and Spiner. The story appeared to have been hacked to pieces in the cutting room. In all, fairly un-original, and at times lacking in believability of motive for the characters.
Visual, good effects and crisp. Otherwise, the series were much better.
For a good Trek movie, see Wrath of Khan or First Contact.
Band of Brothers (2001)
Broken-up for 10 full minutes...
I was broken-up for 10 full minutes after the last episode aired. Stunning.
I have read much of Ambrose's work, and though he can be overdramatic at times, this story deserves every accolade it receives.
To Richards Winters, Carwood Lipton and the other members of the 101, I hope to meet them one day and say 'thank you'
Glory (1989)
A resounding social commentary that becomes better each time I see it.
In the same vein as All Quiet on the Western Front, and Red Badge of Courage, this film presents the horror of war, and the victory of the soul through epiphany.
With respect to slavery, and bigotry, it leaves no one innocent, and gives hope for a nation that is even divided today.
It can be summed-up in one line from Denzel Washington's Trip: "I guess we just all anti-up and kick in"
Fallen (1998)
"Time is on my side.."
This barely known movie of 1998 ranks tops in my book. As a thriller it is superb, and as a detective story intriguing. It is unique and enjoyable. Well acted.
John Goodman's Mick Jagger has to be seen!