Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
X-Men (2000)
Well done...
17 July 2000
Having read the X-Men since childhood I was prepared and eager for a major motion picture to be made for over twenty years. Given the lack of technology, inspiration and motivation by Marvel comics when they were still a strong company, it has taken these many years.

With the initial facts of casting, location and rumors of possible story ideas I was sick with what Hollywood was trying to do with this enjoyable, mind provoking story. Then I saw the first Internet teaser. Hmm... maybe I wasn't giving this movie enough credit. Then, the first full length theatrical trailer, and the second and the third. I wanted to see more and more as the days went on, leading to July 14th. I reverted from a complete adult loyalist and fanatic to a kid bursting with anticipation to see his heroes on film.

Singer does a fine job of translating a chapter from 40 years of X-Men history to film. Where I hated the casting choices before the movie, and still uncertain about some even after, I have to say my biggest doubts were overcome in Wolverine. Hugh Jackman, a virtual unknown from Australia, lists in his profile that he is 6'2" and weighed 160 pounds before filming. Can you say, beanpole? For the readers of the comics we know that Wolverine is so likeable because he is short, mean, sarcastic and "...the best there is at what he does." Upon hearing Jackman's casting as the little, ferocious furball I was ill.

As it turns out, Jackman, with the addition of 15 pounds of muscle, delivers the best performance from the ensemble cast. Of course the two heavy weights, McKellan and Stewart, were good as usual. Though there was no back story and extremely little detail of the other characters, aside from names and powers, it was fun to see them all transformed on film. The biggest problem this movie had was the complete alteration of an already complex, mind blowing story. I guess Hollywood has to do what it's got to do. The plot was extremely weak as well. With that 40 years of history they could have come up with much better, but then I guess that's why they went through 9 writers before they finalized this current script.

All in all it's a great ride and just the right amount of time. In this day of 2.5 to 3.5 hour long epics, X-Men comes in at a wonderfully short 1.5 hours. Tell the story, get to the action and move on to the sequel. Singer has done just that for this first installment of what is sure to be the rival superhero franchise in films between Marvel and DC.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sleepy Hollow (1999)
8/10
A great interpretation of a great classic
20 November 1999
I thoroughly enjoyed this collaboration between Tim Burton, Andrew Kevin Walker and Washington Irving. Combining such incredible talents as Mr. Burton and Mr. Walker proved quite the appropriate recipe for recreating the Irving classic. I have read may other comments about this movie and I find it very disturbing that most people either compare it to Star Wars: Phantom Menace or complain that it is too far removed from the original story.

For these people I have a few comments. First, the only connections and comparisons to Star Wars are the actor Ian McDiarmid and the actor/stuntman Ray Park. Beyond that there is nothing within this movie that comes remotely close to a comparison to Star Wars. In my opinion this movie was better than that box office behemoth. If *****had spent as much time on his script for ***, perhaps it would have been as intriguing as Sleepy Hollow. Next, for those who were not satisfied with the movie's departure from the Irving classic I have but one piece of advice: read the story again. Washington Irving was masterful at creating scenes and setting atmosphere but The Legend of Sleepy Hollow was a 20 page examination of the little village and the loves of Ichabod Crane (women, food, writings et al) The Horseman, though mentioned a handful of times, did not appear until the last couple pages and then it alluded to the idea that Brom Bones was the culprit, in disguise, to frighten the poor hero Ichabod.

There have been other writings and interpretations of the Sleepy Hollow story that focus more on the spectral form of the Headless Horseman. I believe this movie was done in the spirit of those other works and is among the best. It brings to life the setting of this little valley and attempts to recreate the feeling that Washington Irving described best in his story. It was indicated that Sleepy Hollow was a magical and dream like place, thus the name "Sleepy Hollow." In this little upstate valley the strangest things occur and such ghosts and goblins roam freely if only in the mind of the inhabitants. Tim Burton manages to capture that sensation and allows the audience to feel as if they stepped not into a theater, but another world.

Andrew Kevin Walker's workup and translation of the story also makes for a compelling movie. Allowing the changes for the movie adaptation were a sign of genius. Displacing the hero and introducing him to the Sleepy Hollow atmosphere along with the audience, enhanced the experience. Giving a clear background for the Horseman, which is only briefly provided in the original story, was also an improvement to the movie's story. Let's face it, if they had made a 105 minute movie that tried to replicate the original short story there would have been whole theaters full of "sleepy" patrons.

The acting was also superb giving a hand to Johnny Depp and Christina Ricci for fabulous performances. As for the rest of the cast? Fantastic. To see all of these wonderful actors in secondary roles was a treat. Starting with Christopher Lee as the chief magistrate in New York; Jeffrey Jones, Michael Gough, Ian McDiarmid, Michael Gambon, Miranda Richardson and even Casper Van Dien all did magnificent work.

Though the story lagged at moments, they were few and far between. The editing in the beginning was a bit choppy but ran more fluently after the 20-30 minute point. An excellent adaptation of a great story. This was definitely a movie that Burton was born to make.
95 out of 122 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (1978)
10/10
One of the best...
9 July 1999
I saw this movie at the tender age of 7 in a packed theater on that cold, October night in 1978. Michael Myers and that death white mask changed my view of horror movies from that day forward. I laughed at Freddy and Jason, they were nowhere near as frightening as the Shape. It was a superb story that used terror rather than blood and gore to get to its audience. That is the most prominent thing I remember about the film, the fear it instilled in me. By far the best horror/slasher film ever made.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed