Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Hilarious
20 October 2018
This film, a wildly original take on zombie movies, comes in three acts.

**Non-spoiler alert. The next paragraph may look like a spoiler, but it's not. The real surprises come much later.**

In Act 1 a film crew trying to make a zombie movie is attacked by real zombies. That's not a spoiler. The idea has been around ever since people have been making zombie movies. Carnage abounds for a good 40 minutes.

Act 2 is a surprise. But it's short, so don't leave.

Act 3, the denouement, is recommended for audiences with strong hearts. I was still laughing the next day.
45 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
John Wick (2014)
3/10
A retired hit-man takes vengeance when the psycho son of a mob boss kills the dog left to him by his dying wife
21 December 2016
I'm all in favour of a revenge movie (especially when the bad guys kill an innocent animal). But two necessary features are that (1) the bad guys don't realize what they are up against and (2) said bad guys pose a credible threat. This film fails to meet either criterion.

First, the vengeance-taker John Wick (Keanu Reeves) used to be a hit man for the mob, so they should be prepared for the worst.

Second, they are not. The way that the goons conveniently break cover and shoot to miss would be risible if it did not go on and on and on. Who knew there were so many incompetent bad guys?

And what is a good actor like Reeves doing in this film?

A big disappointment.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A film with more than one interpretation
15 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The double meaning in this film makes it well-worth seeing. Based on a story by Doris Lessing, it probes the life of Victoria, a French-born woman of African ancestry who gives birth to a daughter by Thomas, a white Frenchman who is the scion of a left-wing but rich Parisian family. Far from being racist, the rich family rejoices in their newly-found grand daughter and showers her with gifts and affection, much to Victoria's discomfort. By inviting us to tease out the reason for Victoria's alienation, director Civeyrac offers an analysis of racial conflicts in modern Europe.

Or does he?

Perhaps there is a different way to look at Victoria's life. There is little overt racism in the film. Victoria's best friend (also black, and the narrator of the film) bounds through college, lands a perfect job as a reader for a publisher and moves easily through the mixed race society of Paris. Watch the film carefully and you might discover more reasons for Victoria's pain than the colour of her skin.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lake Placid (1999)
8/10
Very funny -- after a few beers
9 May 2015
I came across this spoof of the standard "an underwater beast is eating all the tourists" film on Netflix, so I feel no regret: I did not have to pay extra for it. But I am not kidding, the film is better appreciated under the influence of alcohol-induced euphoria.

Bridget Fonda, Bill Pullman, Brendan Gleeson, Oliver Platt and Betty White have fun here. Either that or all these talented actors are slumming. Which I doubt.

This genre began way back with The Creature from the Black Lagoon and was best done by Stephen Spielberg in Jaws. The principal conceit is that lake or sea water conceals danger -- you never know what's gonna jump out and get you.

Sit back, enjoy and don't take the film seriously.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Miss Violence (2013)
10/10
As the mystery unravels, the tension increases.
4 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Of the 40 or so films I have seen so far at the Vancouver International Film Festival, this is the best. No. Wait. It is the best film I have ever seen. In the opening scene, Angeliki calmly leaves her eleventh birthday party, steps over the balcony of her family's Athens apartment and drops to her death. The reason for her suicide drives the rest of the film. Of course, your first guess is that she is being sexually abused, probably by her grandfather, the only man in a family consisting of two women, one teenage girl (besides Angeliki), a 10-year-old boy and an eight-year-old girl. But not so fast. The grandfather, brilliantly played by Themis Panou, overcomes his embarrassment over his grand-daughter's death and leads the way in helping social services uncover the dark secrets of his family. And under the skillful direction of Alexandros Avranas, who also co-wrote the script, as the secrets are revealed, so the tension increases. But suspend your suspicions until the last ten minutes -- they may surprise you. Great acting by all the cast. I am reluctant to paste the cliché "riveting' to any film. Except for this one.
59 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Anonymous (I) (2011)
It's not about the Shakespeare-Oxford controversy
12 November 2011
Hamlet is about Hamlet's resentment of his uncle; Othello is about Othello's possessiveness of Desdemona ; Twelfth Night is about Viola's love of Orsino. You would think, therefore, that Roland Emmerich's new film Anonymous, which promotes the theory that the 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere, wrote Shakespeare's plays would be about a tussle between de Vere and Shakespeare.

Nope.

In the two hours' passage of the film, Oxford (a wooden Rhys Ifans) and Shakespeare (played as a fame-seeking semi-illiterate bumpkin by Rafe Spall) meet rarely and then only in passing. The real conflict that drives the film arises from a plot to place one of Queen Elizabeth's bastard sons on the throne of England after she dies. Opposing the conspirators is Robert Cecil, Elizabeth's Puritan adviser, played with appropriately gloating malice by Edward Hogg.

As the plot develops, de Vere -- the father of one of the would-be usurpers -- occasionally passes manuscripts to playwright Ben Johnson (Sebastian Armesto), who arranges for their production.

And that's about it for the controversy.

As a piece of conspiracy drama, the film succeeds. The acting is competent (although Vanessa Redgrave is given little to do as the aging Elizabeth) and the plot -- apart from the authorship issue -- is well-constructed. But it is not particularly about who wrote the plays, nor about Shakespeare, so do not see it with the expectation of an erudite dinner conversation to follow.

Emmerich, best known for his FX-rich end-of -the-world epics such as The Day After and Independence Day, cannot resist over-the-top action. So there's a scene in which a mob storms out of a production of Richard the Third intent on killing the hunchbacked Cecil and runs into an ambush of heavily-armed soldiers. Slaughter ensues. I suspect this is a piece of fiction, dreamed up by writer John Orloff as an excuse for Emmerich to insert some computer graphics.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dendera (2011)
A highly original story or a septuagenarian fantasy?
14 September 2011
Well, this one's original. An unnamed village has a unique way of celebrating a woman's seventieth birthday: she is ceremoniously carried up a nearby mountain and abandoned above the snow line, where she is expected to await entry to heaven.

When this happens to Kayu (Ruriko Asaoka), she is rescued by a group of survivors who are scraping out an existence in a community they call Dendera. Led by a centenarian fireball, this gang of hobbling old women plans revenge: Kayu's arrival gives them enough troops to launch an attack aimed at massacring the entire village. We watch as Kayu's initial resistance to the harebrained plan morphs into conditional support even as Dendera's population is whittled down by bear attacks and an avalanche.

The film's cache is that it carefully navigates the thin line between fantasy and plausibility.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sarah's Key (2010)
A young girl's desperation to rescue her brother amid the horrors of the holocaust
30 August 2011
Films about the holocaust are always grim, but the French production Sarah's Key adds a couple of twists that increase the stress.

The story begins in Paris in the summer of 1942 when the collaborationist Vichy government of France launches a round up of Jewish families. And here is the first cruel twist. It's not German troops breaking down doors, it is the Parisian police force, ever polite in its brutality. The second twist is more harrowing. Hearing the crashing on the front door, 10-year-old Sarah Starzynski (Mélusine Mayance) stuffs her younger brother into a secret closet (camouflaged as part of the bedroom wall) and locks the door.

Sarah and her parents are herded with thousands of other Jews into the Vélodrome d'Hiver, an indoor cycling arena, and left there without food, water or toilets. Here, Sarah's overarching struggle begins. She must rescue her brother.

From here on, Sarah's story is inter-cut with episodes from the present day when French-American investigative journalist Julia Jarmond (Kristin Scott Thomas) and her architect husband start to renovate the apartment once occupied by the Starzynski family. Learning of the sad history of the "Vél d'Hiv", Julia starts digging into the apartment's history and tracing the fates of Sarah and her family.

The first two thirds of the film focus on Sarah's struggle. Separated from her parents, she seeks to escape from an internment camp and get back to Pari. As we follow her, we also watch as Julia discovers that, while both the adult Starzynskis died during the war, there is no record of what happened to Sarah and her brother.

And here is the dramatic oddity of Sarah's Key. The culmination of Sarah's quest occurs at about the 75-minute mark of this 111-minute film. The half-hour coda is necessary to tie up loose ends such as the fate of Julia's troubled marriage and the joys and disappointments of her search for Sarah. But the tension that carries the first two acts is lost.

Despite that loss, Sarah's Key packs an emotional wallop that will stay with you after you leave the theatre.

So its weak reception in the United States (it grossed just over $100,000 on just five screens when it opened there) is dispiriting. Perhaps the U.S. fear of subtitles is to blame: a good two-thirds of the film is in French with English subtitles. In fact, I suspect that writer-director Gilles Paquet-Brenner could have made the entire film in French, and that making Julia bilingual was his attempt to lure an American audience.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The music is grating, but the theme is intriguing
30 September 2008
I have never been a victim of religious conversion. But I still find the phenomenon intriguing. And this film is about conversion.

First, the historical facts.

Sydney-born Arthur Stace was an alcoholic, First World War vet, who wandered into an evangelist's soup kitchen on 6 August, 1930, and walked out as a Christian obsessed with the task of spreading the message of "eternity" to all who would listen. Or read.

Stace got himself a stack of chalk and started writing the word "Eternity" (in beautiful school room copperplate) on walls, sidewalks and windows around Sidney. The appearance of the godly graffiti baffled residents of Sidney for decades until the Stace's identity was discovered in the 1950s.

Now, the film. This is a short (just over an hour) opera describing Stace's life.

Now, normally, I love opera. Verdi, Wagner and me -- we are as thick as thieves. I even like Shoenberg, Berg and Adams. But the score of The Eternity Man left we yearning for something softer. Like the screech of bare nails over a blackboard. Be warned. The music is very atonal.

But the narrative is stunning. Staces wrestles with his alcoholism and his sexuality (drunk though he was, he helped his tipsy sister run a brothel, a job that gave him time to spy on the whores and their customers). Then he gets redemption. What to do? In a marvelous sequence, he hits on the graffiti idea. And his black and white nightmare is transformed into a natural, coloured landscape of trees, leaves and sky.

The film then follows Stace through the remaining 30 odd years of his life. Historical events such as the Second World War and the Vietnam war (in which Australia participated) are shown as grainy newsreels projected on building walls. As Stace, dressed in a sombre suit, walks by, armed with chalk.

If you like atonal music, this film is for you. But even if you don't, it is worth a viewing. You'll probably see it only at film festivals. (I caught it as a filler at the Vancouver International Film Festival.)

You might want to bring ear plugs.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Helen (I) (2008)
5/10
A good idea gone wrong
28 September 2008
A college student, Joy, goes missing and the police enlist the aid of another student, Helen, to re-enact Joy's last movements. Helen, an orphan brought up in an institution, lacks everything Joy possessed - family, personality,intelligence, a boy friend. But as her impersonation progresses she starts to hijack Joy's life, including her family and boy friend.

This great idea for a film is sabotaged by poor direction and acting. Apart from the lead actress, the actors are wooden (and occasionally downright bad -- I think I could do better myself!). The direction is amateurish.

Camera work and editing is professional and well done. The script is adequate.

I suspect the producers found themselves financially strapped and had to make do with second rate actors. Helen has the seeds of a good film; seeds that fail to sprout.

Worth seeing if you are studying film
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
How bad editing can kill a great work
12 August 2008
There is one name that stands out in this hideous production of a great opera. That name is Gianfranco Fozzi, director and editor.

Gianfranco Fozzi. A warning label.

Fozzi cannot restrain himself from proclaiming "Hey, I just graduated from film school. Look at how clever I am." And like most children wishing to exhibit cleverness, Fozzi comes across as a fool. And destroys the opera.

The problem? Editing. Fozzi cannot let a scene dwell upon your eye for more than two seconds without cutting to a new angle. As a result, viewer is jerked from view point to view point as though shaken on a spring in the auditorium. Let's look at Rigoletto in a head-and-shoulders shot. No, done with that. Cut to Gilda in a three-quarters shot from below. Now let's get her from the top. Two seconds later, a big setting shot of the Duke's play room.

Musical director Keri-Lynn Wilson does a great job leading a competent cast. But all their efforts come to naught under the lunatic scissors of Gianfranco Fozzi. I guess if you turn off the video and just listen, you will enjoy it. But I stopped watching half way through Act Two.

I checked out Fozzi on the IMDb and thankfully he has been silent since 2005. The film world may have been saved.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Culture clash in Germany
10 September 2007
A band of Chinese workers ("they came like ants" according to a German supervisor) disassemble a German coke refinery and ship it to China.

(You get coke (not the drink!) by burning coal until all the tarry impurities are gone. It is very useful in producing steel.)

Interaction between Germans and Chinese is intriguing -- the Chinese blithely disregard safety rules as the Germans ("old foreigners", as the Chinese call them) insist on filling out the required forms!

But questions remain. Why did the Germans surrender their plant so easily? Why didn't the Chinese simply take the blue prints?

Good interviews with German engineers and poorly-paid Chinese workers. Yet there is envy. What the chief Chinese engineer wants more than anything else besides a successful disassembly of the plant is – a Mercedes.

A great documentary.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Toi (2007)
3/10
A woman leaves her husband and young son for another man
10 September 2007
A juvenile film about superficial angst. The main character, a self-absorbed woman, takes up with a lover and leaves her husband, which gets her all knotted up, drunk and abusive. We are expected to suffer with her for more than an hour. Merci non, madame.

Many of us have been through marriage breakup. We did not get drunk, have promiscuous sex, slash our wrists or abuse our children in the process.

The subtle process of couples drifting apart has been done infinitely better before -- check out Scenes from a Marriage by Bergman, an adult.

The cinematography was competent.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A sharp funny film with a serious message
19 December 2006
I saw this film at the 2006 Vancouver International Film Festival the same day I saw The Fountain. Both films delve into the question of what constitutes the self. In spite of its pricey stars and special effects, The Fountain fails. Regarding Sarah, less than 20 minutes long and shot mainly on a single indoor set, succeeds. In an attempt to preserve her self (as opposed to herself), Sarah posts cameras throughout her home and spends hours editing the daily results. This bothers and bemuses her friends and her lawyer (who gets very nervous making statements that are being recorded). As the cameras multiply Sarah's days are overwhelmed by the job of saving and editing film.

In spite of its serious theme (you cannot preserve the past and your memories inevitably slip away), the film is funny and sharply written, directed and edited. It is too bad that short films like this never reach large audiences.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
49th Parallel (1941)
A great chuckle for Canadians
23 October 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Canadians find this WWI Brit propaganda film a real knee-slapper. It encompasses every cartoon of Canada found in both the British and American stereotype canon. That canon holds that Canada is about the size of Maryland (or Lancashire) and populated by Indians, trappers, Eskimos and Mounties. Anyway, here's the plot.

A German submarine hunting in the Gulf of St Lawrence runs low on fuel. So the captain decides to take ship and crew to an outpost on Hudson's Bay. Getta map, Helmut! Canada ain't Switzerland. That's a few thousand nautical miles. It's easier to get to Hamburg from the Gulf than it is to get Hudson's Bay!

Nonetheless, they arrive and send a landing party. The outpost seems to be populated by the entire Chinese population of Vancouver masquerading – furs and all in the middle of summer – as Inuit. But wait. Here's Laurence Olivier as a Quebecois trapper. Un vrai homme. When he finds out that his visitors are Boche he gives them a real tongue lashing. 'My father, 'e was in the first war. Ah, we really gave you guys a licking then, ma foie!'

The landing party, stranded when the sub is sunk by an air patrol, steals a plane and flies to Winnipeg. Winnipeg? Okay. Halifax would have been better, but whatever. Then, hearing that a way of escape lies through the port of Vancouver, they start to walk – yes WALK – from Winnipeg to Vancouver. 'Ere. 'Old on, mate. In't it a bit far for a toddle? Well, yes. About 3000 miles. Eee. Blimey.

After several adventures that reduce their numbers, the Huns arrive in – you might guess this – Banff, Alberta. Which is, of course, crammed with native persons tarted out in feathered head dress. And red-coated Mounties of course. And Trevor Howard, playing an English recluse who lives in – you guessed it – a wigwam. To make things more hilarious, he decorates the inside of his tent with original paintings by Picasso.

Don't stop now. There's more. One German survivor gives up on the Vancouver escape and travels (who knows how?) back to Ontario where he hops a freight train into the United States. In the freight car he meets a drunken Ontario farmer, played by Raymond Massey, who offers him a swig of home produced wine. In the only realistic sequence in the film, the German takes one swallow of Ontario wine and, looking nauseous, hands it back. When I was last in Ontario, I visited a local 'winery' and I have to agree with the Hun. Ontario wines are instant emetic.

The film ends when the German arrives in the U.S. only to find the Americans have (finally!) joined the war.

If you are Canadian, this film is well worth the rental price. In addition to the laughs, there is a short appearance by the drop-dead beautiful Glynis Johns, object of several of my erotic fantasies when I was 13 years old in 1954.
55 out of 100 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed