Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Lost: Across the Sea (2010)
Season 6, Episode 15
1/10
Appalling
12 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The worst episode, certainly, by a long shot. Does not bode well for the last 3.5 hours. I would rather have watched every single Deanna Troi-themed "Star Trek: The Next Generation" episode in a row than that rubbish. And very poor acting -- does that even matter at this point? Is this what we can expect from the conclusion of the series? Answers that say nothing? Ridiculous emanations like -- I am going to put the wheel in here, add light and some water, and go home! What? Was he serious? Not only does such dialogue insult our intelligence, it devalues all we have seen previously. The only thing of quality in this episode was the music. To wit, see Alex Ross in this week's New Yorker: newyorker.com/online/blogs/alexross/2010/05/the-music-of-lost.html Appalling.
48 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cold Case: Hubris (2004)
Season 1, Episode 11
10/10
Superior episode with an aesthetic bent
29 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The crew try to solve a decades old murder of a coed undergraduate who was having an affair with her art history professor. The case hinges on recognizing a particular picture by John Everett Millais, leading light of the English nineteenth century avant-garde artistic group, the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. In the late lamented series "Inspector Morse," one episode (season 8, episode 1, "The Way Through the Wodds") similarly revolved around a picture by Millais, who has unwittingly, and very much posthumously, become a favorite for TV mystery writers on either side of the Atlantic. Lucidly directed by Agnieszka Holland, and featuring particularly committed performances by Kathryn Morris and Danny Pino, the episode aims for an enlightened sense of aesthetics, and even weaves in a discussion of ideas of post-modernism to the plot. That being said, a scene with the detectives reading various Shakespeare plays with stupefying levels of general ignorance, is gratuitous and largely unnecessary in advancing the plot -- it is simply there to further set them off from the educated professor. If Chief Inspector Morse, or Detective Jane Tennison, assumedly know their Shakespeare, there is no real reason why five detectives in Philadelphia, home to excellent theaters and a thriving arts scene, should be portrayed as so thick.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lost: Exposé (2007)
Season 3, Episode 14
10/10
Superior one-hour entertainment
5 April 2007
Perhaps the best episode of the season, it reminded me of an old E.C. comic from the 1950s--a single, short, spooky tale, cleverly told and with a terrific twist. Such a show is, for me, very much superior to the continuity based episodes, such as the following week's, which limp along at a languid pace and reveal little. And it was not marred by the tendency to use musical overlay to dramatize situations and to help the viewers empathize with the characters. By contrast, this episode contained superior writing and tight directing and sharp performances. As such, it represents a high-water mark for the series, and a continued revelation of the absence of community within the ostensible community of beach survivors. Plus, little mention of the now-tedious Others.
43 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Combat!: The Volunteer (1963)
Season 1, Episode 16
7/10
Good work from Altman
8 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Another fine episode by Altman, with good p.o.v. shots throughout, especially from the perspective of the young Frenchman, Gilbert, who tries to join the troops. The forest scenes are well handled, with spinning camera-work framing the chaos of both situations and mental states. In the end, when the orphan boy kills the German soldier who had shown him kindness, and who had spoken to him of his family, his sense of confusion is finely handled, and the fade gives a brilliant encapsulation of the face of war ravaged France. Interesting is a running thread of fine art used as symbolism throughout--from the print of Raphael's "Sistine Madonna" on the wall of Gilbert's house (ironic on multiple levels, of course, because not only is the picture in Dresden, and escaped the bombardment by the Allies, but it also features in Ingres's "Vow of Louis XIV" in Montauban Cathedral, a symbol of French lineage and divine authority). In the end, framed by the cross above the bed, and the Raphael on the wall, it is clear that Gilbert will choose pacifism over combat.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Combat!: I Swear by Apollo (1962)
Season 1, Episode 10
8/10
Altman at the helm, and taking his time
8 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Superior work by Altman in this episode, which he did not pen. An extraordinary amount of tension is developed along the way. From the initial scenes of the patrol skirting along a graveyard, where a group of nuns are interring a sister in a scene that could be from centuries before. A gust of wind and the papers of the French collaborator are dispersed, and then he is caught by a land mine. They take him to the convent and radio HQ for a surgeon. In an wonderful vignette, that anticipates the drollness of M*A*S*H*, the surgeon is seen in his tent, casually lancing blisters, while a superior officer tries to convey to him the need to save this Frenchman for the allied effort. Death lingers throughout this episode, from the initial funeral, to the expiration of the surgeon from a heart attack on the way to the convent, to the loss of Pvt. Temple despite a blood transfusion. A smug German surgeon is captured and brought in to operate on the Frenchman, with the help of one of the convent disciples who used to be a nurse. And the genius scene is in the chapel, the patient on the table, every candle in the convent brought in to provide light, while Temple (the name now takes on a meaning) lies dying below, and Altman slowly, in a measured build-up of force, cuts from face to face of each protagonist, in a show of meaningful pace frankly unimaginable in today's television landscape. It ends with another burial. Religiosity pervades Altman's work on this series. And it is most directly referenced in this episode.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Entertaining, but with one scene not recommended for younger kids
7 October 2006
An entertaining adaptation, and far more opulent than the same studio's "And to Think that I saw it on Mulberry Street" of the following year. The panoramic landscapes and colorful interior and exterior shots are well crafted. But my four-year-old had to cover her eyes during a scene with a guillotine and an executioner. Not recommended for younger kids. That being said, the Marxist overtones and political themes will be of interest to adults (as are the subtexts of so many of Dr. Seuss's books) and all will be delighted with the extravagant hats. Kudos to the IFC Center in NYC for showing this short in their "Rare Dr. Seuss films" festival. While some of these shorts are available on DVD, there is little comparison to seeing them in a theater with other kids.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Intensity of nature, solitude of war
17 September 2006
Scott's early feature reflects the aesthetic predilections of students at the Royal College of Art and other similar schools in England in the late 1960s and early 1970s--that is an intense vision of nature related to the art of the radical painters in the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood in the mid-nineteenth-century. This represented a rejection of then-dominant modernism in art. Scott's exquisitely photographed (in black and white) natural scenery relates to paintings by John Everett Millais, William Holman Hunt, and Arthur Hughes, then enjoying a renaissance of sorts. In the relation of natural innocence, poignant ruins, and war, the short anticipates Malick's "The Thin Red Line," and here can easily be seen as a reflection on the disaster that was Viet Nam in 1971. In addition, one wonders if Scott studied Winslow Homer's works in art school, for one of the most famous illustrations and paintings by the American artist who chronicled the Civil War was one of a sharpshooter in a tree, wielding a newly invented firearm that could slay at great distance--a coldly mechanized aspect of this particular war. Scott's protagonist reflects on that seemingly unfair advantage, from the position of someone who experiences the heat of battle both behind and in front of the barrel. An impressive early feature, very much of its time.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Fatuousness masquerading as art
2 January 2004
Trying to be deeply symbolic and evocatively moving this film is like a bad coffee table book, saddled with the obligatory concluding gunplay necessary in every supposedly laudable North American film that deals with emotionally desperate characters ("In the Bedroom," "21 Grams"...).

The difference between Jesus Christ (JC) and Jennifer Connelly's (JC) character here is that Christ was wounded in not one but all four appendages, and he died for everyone's sins, whereas Jennifer Connelly, for the sin of the county (society) against her, and her inability to off herself not once but twice (Christ's doubt in Gethsemane), leads to the deaths of three people, a cop goes to jail leaving a wife and two kids, and a seemingly very nice mixed couple are thwarted out of buying their dreamhouse. All so that she can learn the most important lesson of that particular Northern California fortnight: THAT SHE MUST MOVE ON.

For me, it is total justification.

Horrendous. I do not care about production values--the concluding Vanity Fair shoot on the pier was unforgivable. Ach! I forgot the dead seagull! Add that Chekhovian slander to the rolls. Skip it, friends.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Depressing, if essential viewing
7 November 2003
Political neophyte and open-eyed observer Hoffman leads us on a trail through the Presidential campaign and election of 2000. The film is a depressing illumination of the selfishness pervasive in America (as a synonym for Libertarianism in the Conservative movement), of the events leading up to the election of George W. Bush, and the stifling of public debate and protest along the way, and of the crookedness of the election results, which put into power the most self-interested administration and one less committed to genuine altruistic compassion than any other, elected by deceit and money, and the impotence of a voting public, that in large measure sees itself disenfranchised by corporate and party domination.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Eau (1997)
7/10
Despair in the Congo
7 November 2003
Can a twelve minute, black and white short, convey any true sense of the devastation wrought by the lengthy Belgian occupation/colonization of the Congo, and its disregard for its people in the aftermath of the civil war that put Patrice Lumumba in power, and then the machinations that led to his death? This one gives it a very fair shake.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Others (2001)
4/10
Walk, do not run
20 August 2001
By far the most tedious film of the summer. Nicole Kidman walks through the same eight rooms 33 times. To mix it up she sometimes holds a candle, sometimes not! Useful only for its superb referencing of the Caravaggist candle-lit paintings of Georges de La Tour and Joseph Wright of Derby, and some evocative interiors influenced by Wilhelm Hammershoi's fin-de-siecle art. I guessed the ending. There it is. Instead of buying into this muck, go see "Ghost World" again.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed