Reviews

9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
A lesson for all TV shows to learn from
31 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This episode does not attempt to truly fit into canonic form, abandoning staple X-Files enticements for want of something more. Its focus is entirely on creating the character of the mysterious "Cigarette Smoking Man" (CSM) who, until this point, had remained largely two- dimensional in the context of the show, appearing only as a menacing (though influential) background figure. So often characters such as these are given little or no development, and until this point there had been little exception in the case of CSM.

As such, it's both a break from (brilliant but) routine storyline, and a break from TV show tradition, for the X-Files to create something of this nature.

The mysterious past of CSM, including what made him the person he is today, is partially revealed through memories and flashbacks, which help us build up a personality of what previously had been a soulless individual. What we in fact discover is somewhat revolutionary. This is a man who does his work, but has not let it consume him so completely as we have been led to believe (and, indeed, is normally the case for similar supporting characters in other TV shows). He previously appears to have no remorse, emotion, or doubt; all a front, as is revealed here. It leaves you almost with a sense of pity, and even sympathy, with his plight - and for the series' chief antagonist, that's an amazing feat.

CSM carries out several of his more infamous tasks of the 20th century in this episode, which include the assassinations of Martin Luther King and JFK. He displays his ruthlessness and power. These actions are then contrasted with scenes of him handing out Christmas presents to his co-conspirators, or "colleagues" in this context, before going to his own, sparsely decorated apartment, completely alone, and wishing it were all different. We see snippets of him writing novels on his most cherished possession, an antiquated typewriter, as he pursues a burning, life-long ambition: to become a writer. Nothing more.

And finally, after years of constant rejection, and set close to the present day, we see CSM open a letter from yet another publisher to say they will be printing his work. His joy is without bound as he finally has hope once more. His transformation is so total that, on the morning of the publication, he types out his resignation from the Syndicate to which he belongs. Then on buying the magazine he finds that, once more, his talents and skills have been manipulated and abused by others. It may be a different context from his MiB duties, but the end result is the same. Demoralised and embittered, he tears up his letter of resignation.

CSM has been transformed in this episode. Perhaps it's unnecessary. There will always be those die-hard fans of Mulder/Scully who'll say, "but where were they in this episode?", and quite probably, they'll dismiss it with the same callous disregard as displayed by those people whom CSM works for, be it the Syndicate, or the publishers. We didn't NEED this episode. But with its inclusion, we are given something that only advances the series' artistic nature, its originality, and its willingness to create real, believable characters in all quarters.

In short, it's little short of amazing, and one can only hope future TV shows produced from this point will show as much respect and devotion to its characters, and their histories, as this one has.
60 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dead Ringers (2002–2007)
The Lord of the Ringers
26 August 2003
NOTE: While there's no plot to spoil as such, specific characters and scenarios are mentioned in the following review.

There are many impressionists currently displaying their wares on British Television, such as the slightly-overrated Alistair McGowan or the fading Rory Bremner. If ever the genre needed fresh blood in the mix, it was now. Step forward the incredibly successful Dead Ringers, who in one bound appear on our screens, leaving their radio careers on hold for a few moments.

Like all impressionist material, Dead Ringers focuses largely on current issues, particularly with its portrayals of George Bush Junior, Tony Blair, and several other high-ish profiles from the political world. However, this series does not bury itself knee-deep in time-sensitive material, and there are plenty of sketches that will appeal to those not even aware of who the characters actually are.

This is the world of impressionists fused with that of Cleese and co., for there are many similarities between this series and the Monty Python sketches, despite the differences in the styles of comedy themselves. For instance, who can forget TV historian Simon Schama describing the reign of Henry VIII with a deck of cards, some scales, and a Victoria sponge cake for illustrative props? Or the battles between Ian McKellen and Alan Rickman as they fight to become the token British bad guy in the new Hollywood blockbuster?

Dead Ringers is also eager to take on international figures, such as Darth Vader helping out in the stormtroopers' bakery ("the crust is strong in this one"), and his nemesis Obi Wan Kenobi trying to purchase a second-hand car ("I'll give you two thousand now, plus fifteen when we get to Aldershot"). The numerous Doctor Who sketches are immortal, too, but mostly the comedy caters to a British market. It is unlikely other nationalities will understand all the references given in the majority of the sketches. That said, remember that this series was written for fun, and digs at the Government, not to sell itself abroad.

Now that we've established the sketches themselves as being flawless, the only thing left is to look at the impressions themselves. They are honestly some of the best currently on television. I can think of only two characters (Harry Potter and Arnold Schwarzenegger) where the voices are not instantly recognisable, although the visual effects go some way to countering this. And some are obviously camped up a little, but the majority are so authentic that it's scary.

With a second series finished at the time of writing, we can only hope that more are being prepared. Perhaps with a few fresh faces, and a few less Bush sketches. But to all the writers and the cast - and particular mention must go to Jon Culshaw - well done, you've entertained a nation. Now go back and do it again.

God bless pancakes.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shackleton (2002)
10/10
Unbelievable.
5 April 2002
NOTE: Contains brief plot summary!

If this was a fictional story you watched in the cinema, you would leave thinking how unrealistic it was. You would know, after all, that keeping twenty-eight men alive in the wastelands of Antarctica, stranded and starving, is an impossible task, particularly set at the beginning of the twentieth century with the limited technology available. However, this is fact. This story did happen. And this is one of the most accurate films depicting the story of the "Endurance" expedition that you could hope for.

The story of Shackleton has passed on into legend. His attempt to cross the Antarctic continent on foot ended in disaster; his ship, the Endurance, crushed by the ice fields, leaving its crew on the ice sheet. Determined to survive, and displaying all the valour and courage he had demonstrated in his previous expedition (the "Nimrod", in which he turned back less than 100 miles from the pole in order to save the lives of his men), he began an incredible journey to the uninhabited Elephant Island, before having to contemplate a trip to South Georgia: a trip of 800 miles in a lifeboat...

This wonderful two-part adventure is accurate to almost every detail. A lot of research went into this film, consulting books, articles, experts, and even the diaries of the men themselves. And it doesn't make the mistake of solely confining itself to the story of Shackleton's heroism; indeed, the first two hours concentrates largely on the effort Sir Ernest put into forming the expedition, and the many obstacles that stood in his path - financially and emotionally.

Directed by award-winning Charles Sturridge, the casting is superb, particularly in the case of the protagonist, who - it must be said - looks a little like Shackleton himself. Well done, Celestia Fox! From Kenneth Branagh, a resourceful and irresistible Ernest Shackleton, down to to ex-Coronation Street's Ian Mercer as the simple Holdness, every character is brought into the 21st century with as much life as they had on the frozen shores of Elephant Island, thanks partly to a bombastic score of Adrian Johnston's invention.

There are only a couple of criticisms that one could make; for example, there continue to be references back to England, but there is no reunion at the end of the film between Shackleton and Emily, which could have been a way of saying "I'm back". I feel, however, that this continues to give "Shackleton" more character, as Sir Ernest only felt comfortable when exploring; never when at home with his family.

Another slight flaw is that there is next to no mention of the fate of the Aurora expedition, the crew assigned the task of aiding Shackleton to the other side of the continent (had the expedition gone to plan, of course!) However, this does not really relate to Shackleton himself, and indeed Sir Ernest seemed to forget about them until his men were brought over from Elephant Island.

Really, there is nothing major wrong with this film. It fully deserves 10 out of 10, and despite the DVD having no extras whatsoever, it is still worth the £15 for the pure entertainment you are given for the most enjoyable four hours of the small screen.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bye Bye Love (1995)
10/10
Touching, in a humerous way. . .
13 September 2001
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING: This review contains a couple of PLOT POINTS and

SCENE SPOILERS; if you do not wish to find out too much about

this movie, then please DO NOT READ.

This film is often billed as a comedy on television, but in fact this is

not entirely accurate. People often associate comedy with films

such as "Airplane!", or "Hot Shots", but anybody looking for this

kind of humour is going to be a little disappointed. "Bye Bye Love"

simply tries to bring the subject of divorce, with all the benefits and

the costs it can have, in a comical fashion, admittedly, but it does

not let the production be ruled by laughs and gags. In fact, it is

doused with only a sprinkling of laughs, particularly in the middle

of the film itself.

The film itself is also incredibly effective at relaying the message it

brings, and leaves the audience with some doubt as to whether

divorce is the answer to an unhappy relationship - but it also

enforces that it is not the end of the world.

When the jokes do come in, to relieve some of the tension in the

film, they are usually quick and simple, and all the cast deliver with

skill. The real star of the show, however, has got to be Randy

Quaid (Vic), who plays a spectacular performance and brings out

the best comical content in his scenes, particularly those involving

his wife's porch, his date (played by Janeane Garofalo, a good foil

against Quaid) and his reactions to Dr. David Townsend (played

superbly by Rob Reiner).

In all, the film tackles some important issues about married life

and the problems that can happen, without ever taking itself too

seriously, and in the end, it's hard to say how the film might have

improved itself.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bostock's Cup (1999 TV Movie)
10/10
Better than watching Grimsby away.
4 January 2001
This is a true gem of a TV film. Based on a completely untrue story, it follows the course of the down-and-out football league club through their course in the English FA cup, where mayhem ensues and the players all sport seventies styles. The ending is unexpected, the performances are great, and Nick Hancock shows that he CAN do something other than host sports shows. My only regret is that I didn't tape it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A New Era in Cartoon History
4 January 2001
This era was not just the dawn of sound in cartoons, but of a cartoon character which would go down in history as the world's most famous mouse. Yes, Mickey makes his debut here, in this cheery tale of life on board a steamboat. The animation is good for it's time, and the plot - though a little simple - is quite jolly. A true classic, and if you ever manage to get it on video, you won't regret it.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A film almost as good as the series
30 December 2000
The first Monty Python film to contain no jokes from the series, the film is remarkable and truly memorable. Some of the scenes are hilarious, while the script in places is just wonderful and the characters vary from funny to hilarious. Cleese and Palin are at their best here, while the others seem to attempt to hold their own. Although most would agree that Terry Jones' Sir Bedevere is more annoying than funny, this is a remarkable film that only falters in the final minutes
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Motor Mania (1950)
9/10
So true, so true. . .
30 December 2000
NOTE: CONTAINS BRIEF SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Disney here combine two themes to create this cartoon. One is their version of the classic Jeckyl/Hyde story, the other being an exaggerated account of motorists when in their cars. The comedy is brilliant, the animation is superb, and although the cartoon is not the greatest thing since sliced bread, it is certainly one to look out
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
They just don't get better than this!
30 December 2000
This could possibly be the greatest cartoon ever made. The usual slapstick comedy found in Goofy cartoons is here combined with the talent of Doodles Weaver as the commentator of this insane hockey nightmare. Like many of Goofy's other outings this cartoon has some great ideas, but this time there is a quiet note of genius in them. You won't have laughed so much at a cartoon since you were a child
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed