Reviews

27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Excellent look at old-time contactees.
21 November 2002
I'm glad someone did this before it was too late. In some ways it really *was* too late, as some of the old-timers were already gone by the time this was filmed. This is an objective, even sympathetic, document of pre-abduction contactees.

The Aetherians, including George King (aka "Aetherius") are here. There's some great B&W footage of King channeling the Space Brothers, and some more recent footage of his followers in Hollywood charging the psychic battery. Watch for King in his regalia, talking about Jesus. It doesn't get any better!

Howard and Connie Metzger are here, talking about the good old days of contacteeism (including Giant Rock), plunking on the piano, telling jokes, ridiculing more recent abductees. He shows us the model in his garage, too. She really loves him. You tell 'em, Howard!

The Giant Rock footage includes film of the great George Adamski himself. He died long before this film was made. I'm glad some old footage of him made it into the film.

Dan Fry is here. He doesn't say much... just sits on the nursing home porch, rocking and laughing to himself at something unseen. At the joke he pulled on all of us, perhaps?

There are others: Rev. Frank Stranges, the Unarians, the Blue Rose Ministries, and others who I've forgotten for the moment. All are worth the price of admission.

If you have *any* interest in what the early UFO movement was like, pick up a copy of this one-of-a-kind film. You'll be glad you did.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Devil Monster (1946)
1/10
This is the stupidest movie I've ever seen.
19 November 2002
And I've seen a lot of them. There is more stock footage in this thing than any movie I know except "Jungle Hell" (1956). The only difference is that "Jungle Hell" was all elephants. This one's all sea lions. On and on and on about the stupid sea lions while the stupid crew in their stupid boat looks for stupid Juan Francisco.

Much of the stock footage that isn't sea lions is native women of the South Pacific. I don't know if the editors were blind or what, but whoever was in charge of splicing the stock footage together didn't seem to mind that the women were mongoloid one minute, negroid the next, and caucasoid the next. They change races with surprising speed.

There is another prominent stock footage scene. An octopus in an aquarium (you can see him stick to the glass, and you can see the reflection of lights on the glass) battles a moray eel. The eel is defending all his little fish buddies from the mean old octopus. I'm not making this up. This is presented as if it were happening in the ocean for crying out loud. Who wins? Watch and find out!

Lots of stock footage of men fishing provides for some humor as the overdubbed voices say things like, "Watch out for my face." But it gets tiring after several minutes of the same stupid footage of the same stupid men catching the same stupid fish.

Alas, there is one more big stock footage scene. This one's of the devil monster. It's not a devil, and it's not really a monster. What is it? Let's just say it's not the kind of monster you were hoping for. Juan, who they did find at the end of all those sea lions, battles the "monster". Again, you'll have to watch to find out what happens.

What really surprises me is that the IMDB says this was edited down from a longer, older movie. That tells me that (1) someone thought the original was worth redoing, (2) someone thought this version was better, and (3) the original must've been worse. I can't imagine.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jungle Hell (1956)
2/10
How many elephants does it take to make a Sabu movie?
18 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I can't believe there's any stock footage of elephants anywhere that I haven't seen now. It's all in this movie. I mean *all*. "Jungle Hell" isn't a descriptive title by any means. "Elephant Hell" might be better. This is where bad elephants go when they die. This movie contains more stock footage than any movie I've seen - even more than "Devil Monster".

Here's the plot. Dr. Paul Morrison works alone in a small village in the middle of the Indian jungle. For some reason he has running water and electricity in his office. Doc's buddy Sabu (a grown man in a diaper-like loincloth) believes in his modern medicine, which creates some conflict with the local medicine man, Shankar. When Morrison cures a local boy of what appears to be radiation burns (all it takes is a little salve), he cables London for some help investigating the source of the burns. A Dr. Ames comes to his aid and *gasp* she's a woman!

Once this awkwardness is sorted out - she's pretty good-natured about it - Morrison gives her some spare women's clothes he has lying around. She lost hers in a plane crash, but why does bachelor Morrison have women's clothes in the first place? Then they're off in search of the "burning rocks" that may or may not be uranium ore. That's not really how radiation works, but it's just a Sabu movie so I guess it's close enough. Dr. Ames lost her scientific instruments in the crash along with her clothes, but they show up again when they finally find some more rocks. Oops.

Another explorer wants to find the rocks as well, but only for the potential profit. A friend of Shankar's helps him in exchange for a bag of gold. A mysterious and poorly drawn flying saucer seems to have something to do with the rocks, which are buried beneath trees. Both groups battle wild animals while they do their best to avoid the myriad elephants in the neighborhood. I have to admit the stock footage of the tiger jumping into the water and killing the crocodile was pretty cool. I didn't know they did that.

SPOILERS

Nothing gets resolved, and the movie ends the way it began - with Sabu narrating against a backdrop of stock footage of crowded mother India. He reveals that Morrison and Ames get married, that the flying saucer was controlling the tiger and the elephants, that its mysterious beings were using the Earth as "incubating grounds", and that to wonder why is "distraction". The End.

Wait. Did he say "distraction" or "destruction"? His accent is kind of thick, so I'm not really sure. I played it a couple times and couldn't figure out which it was. Either way, it's rather bewildering. If they weren't able to show the ending, at least they could've written a better one for Sabu to read. I don't get it.

Now, if they had replaced the elephants with dinosaurs this would've been a movie to reckon with!
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Apple (1980)
1/10
I hope 1994 *never* gets here!
15 November 2002
I really struggled with an appropriate title for this review. I mean, there were so many to choose from. How about "Each song worse than the last!"? That was one. How about "It really *is* worse than 'Voyage of the Rock Aliens'!"? That was another one. How about... well, you get the idea.

I can't add much that hasn't already been said, except that I am now one of the few who has seen "The Apple" and lived to tell about it. I know how Alfie and Bibi got their names, and I can guess how Mr. Topps got his, but I'm still not sure about Mr. Boogaloo. And I wish I had known to watch for Yma Sumac. I didn't realize she was in this thing until I saw her listed here. I also didn't realize there was *another* George Clinton. I only knew the one from Parliament and Funkadelic. You know, the cool one.

My theory on the pan-and-scan (the lack of it, I mean) is that the video transfer guy couldn't stand to watch the movie while it transferred so he just set the pan-and-scan thing to the middle of the screen and went on break. My favorite result is a shot of a lamp on Mr. Boogaloo's desk while all the action takes place off-screen. It's when Alfie and Bibi are in his office trying to decide if they should sign his contract or not.

In case you were too overcome to notice, there actually is one funny bit in this movie. It's when Alfie sneaks up behind his landlady and grabs her bosoms. It was unexpected. The rest of the film is deadpan serious. That is its undoing. Well, that and lousy writing, lousy singing, lousy acting, lousy costumes, lousy effects...
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Badly made, but strangely compelling.
12 November 2002
I know this movie is bad. I know I shouldn't like it. But there's something about it that holds my attention when it plays. Something in its crude simplicity compels me forward to the end. It happens every time I watch it. I don't know what it is.

Guru (odd name for an orthodox priest) is a bit hammy but not overly so. Carl delivers his lines in one of the oddest intonations I've heard. He later appeared as Detective Eric Dorsey, a minor character on the Barney Miller show. Olga, who apparently is a vampire (?), can't seem to speak her lines fast enough. Pay attention or you'll miss 'em! Igor is fun to watch, as is the cute girl (Nadja) in the attic who befriends him.

Watch for the modern claw hammer, the modern scissors, the steel bars on the windows, and the prisoner wearing corduroy pants!
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My niece's favorite movie!
11 November 2002
Let's see... If I were to assemble the ingredients necessary to make a really bad movie - I mean so bad it lowers your IQ to watch - I would list (1) made in the '80s, (2) bad science fiction, (3) failed comedy, (4) lame rock musical, and, uh, oh yeah, (5) stars Pia Zadora. Add all ingredients together in a large (flying) saucer, stir vigorously, and voila! you have "Voyage of the Rock Aliens". That's not "rock" like rocks on the ground; that might've been worth watching. No, this is "rock" like rock 'n' roll. And I mean BAD rock 'n' roll. Did you expect any other kind?

There are so many kinds of "bad" when it comes to bad movies, and this certainly isn't the worst movie I've seen. (From what I hear, it's not Pia's worst, either.*) Except for a few moments of unintentional humor this is certainly one of the hardest films to watch that I've come across. It appears to be little more than a Pia Zadora vehicle, and that vehicle is on a collision course with a tree. No, make that a rock. A rock alien, that is.

There's a music video sequence that Pia does with Jermaine Jackson near the start of the film that has nothing to do with the plot. It's about some sort of '80s biker-gang-war thing. Man, I'm sooo glad the '80s are dead and buried. Let's make that ingredient (6), shall we? Unrelated music video sequence with the least-popular Jackson. The events in the video are never referred to again, nor do we see Jermaine Jackson again. (There's an "up" side to it after all!)

I guess the Devo-like aliens' scenes are the easiest to watch. I mean "easiest" as in "least painful". They almost steal the show when they're on. My niece loves STUVWXYZ (pronounced "Stoovix") the best. He's the dumb one. Well, actually they're ALL dumb. STUVWXYZ is the dumbest. Can you guess how the other aliens' names are spelled?

I think the producers were going for a "Grease"-in-space feel, or maybe a "West Side Story"-in-space feel. Hmm... maybe it's a little of both. The turf war between Frankie & the Pack and the aliens is decided by a battle of the bands in the little town of (ugh) Speelburgh. You'll have to watch to find out who wins!

-----

* Those who know say "Lonely Lady" is her worst. If you expected me to say "Santa Claus Conquers the Martians", well, that one's odd enough to be tolerable once in a while.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fantasy Island: Pilot (1977)
Season 1, Episode 1
The Dark Side of the Island
8 November 2002
The previous comments seem to relate to the TV series rather than to the pilot. I haven't seen this in 25 years, but I remember it being far darker than the series. I remember people getting their fantasies with horrific consequences, much like the classic "Monkey's Paw" horror story, or the tale of the genie who grants wishes with literal precision only to have them go horribly awry. Mr. Roarke seemed malicious if not downright evil, and Tattoo was a scary little imp who made you uneasy because of his ability to appear and disappear unseen. I know they had to tone it down to make it a weekly series, but it wasn't too many seasons before it turned into another "Love Boat" where every episode ended with Barbi Benton falling in love with Don Knotts.

Am I the only one who remembers the original made-for-TV movie as a horror movie? I used to tell people that you would never see the pilot on TV again for this reason, but I think it's been long enough. They could show it, if the demand were there. I see Amazon wants $50 for the video; that's too much for my pocketbook. Maybe I'll find a used copy somewhere and answer my own question.
33 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Haunts of the Very Rich (1972 TV Movie)
7/10
Another cool made-for-TV movie from the '70s.
8 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Why doesn't TV make movies out of cool ideas anymore? There were a bunch of them made in the early '70s - "Haunts of the Very Rich", "Kolchak: The Night Stalker", and "The Love War", to name a few. I saw these as a youngster and they made a big impression on me. Thanks to the magic of video and the internet, I can watch them again.

SPOILERS FOLLOW!

"Haunts" starts out with a great idea - they're dead and they don't know it. Perhaps my early viewing of this movie is what later drew me to films like "The Matrix" and "Dark City", both of which execute a similar theme with greater force.

It's funny how memory works. The most vivid image I had of this film is the scene where they find the dead fish floating in the water. Yet when I watched it again this week for the first time in 30 years, there were far fewer fish than I remembered and the scene was only on-screen for a split second. But that's the scene that led me to rediscover the title, thanks to the IMDB Message Board's "I Need To Know" section.

My only complaint is that the ending seems more comical than scary to me now. If I were to remake this movie, I might rearrange things to make Robert Reed's return from the peyote ceremony the end. His vision of ultimate nothingness is far scarier to me than Lloyd Bridge's eternity with his codependent wife. Watching him and Cloris Leachman run off into the solarized jungle for a full minute or more did not achieve the affect in me that the writer probably wanted. It almost seems like an attempt at a Twilight Zone twist. After the revelation of their true status, another twist wasn't needed.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I didn't mind it that much.
7 November 2002
I went into this one with low expectations so I wasn't disappointed. It's just a lame little Bigfoot movie for kids. Dawn Wells tries, but I think she emoted better on Gilligan's Island. I still love her, though. The kids are funny to watch, just because they're so unbelievable. Dana Plato (she plays Evvie Jo) ended up on her own TV series later on, and her acting was probably the best. Bruno's was probably the worst. We always crack up when he tells the kids he'll beat them at fishing. Best of all, it has a song. They sing it twice. For some reason, a lot of Bigfoot movies had songs. I don't know why that was. It's a decent song. It's not the best song in the world, but it fits the mood of this movie perfectly. Watch it when you're in a silly mood, or watch it with the kids and see what they think.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robot Monster (1953)
Classic badness that's fun to watch.
7 November 2002
"Robot Monster" is just too silly to hate. After all, look at the seven-year-old boy hero and you'll realize who the target audience was. Ro-Man has got to be the most memorable alien of the '50s, and that's saying a lot. I mean, a guy in a gorilla suit wearing an old-fashioned diving helmet? The guy who dreamed that one up should've gotten an Oscar for originality! The bubble machine, the iguana fighting a stuffed baby alligator with a tailfin, the stop-motion triceratops, the visible hand when the space station blows up - you've got to love it! My only complaint was the it's-all-a-dream ending. Just leave it real! I was OK with it. But I guess all the seven-year-old boys in the '50s would've had nightmares. So let it be a dream! Let his older sister marry the handsome archeologist! I don't care. In the immortal words of Ro-Man: I must! But I cannot! I must! But I cannot! I must! But I cannot! I must! But I cannot!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
They forgot Star Trek!
6 November 2002
The most famous use of the Theremin is Alexander Courage's theme music for the original Star Trek series. It is not mentioned here. It is probably the only part of Theremin's musical legacy that is not mentioned, because this is one long movie. Too long, I'm afraid. It was interesting seeing Theremin, Rockmore, even Moog, and I was not aware of his abduction until seeing this movie, but it really needed a good editor to keep it short and interesting. Nice try, though. I'm glad someone documented his life.
2 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Meh.
6 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS!

This is a horror movie that attempts to build suspense but doesn't quite get there. A group of amateur spelunkers get trapped in an old mine for weeks. They somehow survive on one canteen of water for that entire time, but finally hunger gets the better of them. They decide to draw lots and eat someone's arm. Not everyone agrees, but they do it anyway. Sure enough, no sooner do they eat the arm and they are rescued. The group decides to keep the deed a secret. Any accusations by the unwilling victim will be dismissed as the babbling of a madman who was injured in the cave-in. The cave-in is blamed for his missing arm.

Five years later the leader of the group receives a severed arm in the mail. The group reforms to discuss the event. One by one they are attacked by a hatchet-wielding killer. Some are maimed; others are killed. Soon we meet the one-armed man's daughter, whom we assume is the real killer. It becomes apparent that she isn't, but we're pretty sure it isn't the obvious choice. At the end we find that we were right - it's the one-armed man's son, whom we never knew about until now - with the help of the daughter. The one-armed man is in a catatonic state because of his arm. Seems unlikely, but that's the way it is. Rather than maim or kill the last survivor of the group, they lock him up in a small room with nothing but a knife. When he gets hungry enough, he will eat his own arm. The end.

This is the darkest movie I have ever seen. I don't mean dark noir; I mean dark no lighting. Over 99% of this thing was shot at night or in the dark - even the majority of the interior scenes are dark. It's really frustrating not being able to see.

Some bad movies are amusing to watch. This one is just bad.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not bad-good, just bad.
6 November 2002
This one's hard to watch. I've watched a lot of infamously bad movies and enjoyed them, but this one's a struggle. I do like the tarantula-girl dance scene in the Mexican bar, but there's not much else about this one that I care for. Jackie Coogan is younger and thinner here than he was on the Addam's Family, and Katherine Victor appears in her first big screen role. She later appeared in most of Jerry Warren's films. Most of this movie is spent on the mesa, which is an overgrown indoor studio lit up just enough to make you think it's night. Some bad movies are unintentionally funny, but this one is too boring to fall into that category. Not worth the hype it has received. Sorry.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hooray for communism!
6 November 2002
"Aelita, Queen of Mars" is a silent film from 1924 filmed in Russia. It is based on a Tolstoy novel; unfortunately science fiction wasn't his forte. Maybe in the ‘20s this made for good reading and viewing, but I'm afraid it didn't withstand the passing of time. The Martian sets are abstract enough to be interesting, and I think that Aelita's costume is meant to indicate a third breast. I also found the incidental presence of a public toilet stall on a Russian street of interest. That's something you don't see in America. Other than that, this is one long, boring flick.

What really sets this movie apart is its message. When our Russian hero gets to Mars, he finds a capitalist government oppressing the people. Can you guess what he does? Why, he teaches the proletariat about Marx and starts a rebellion, of course. Hooray for communism! (Scenes of oppressed Martian workers bring to mind similar scenes in Metropolis [1927].)

Interesting for sci-fi history buffs, but not the general public.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superman (1987)
1/10
Redefines "super".
5 November 2002
Indian Superman began as a rumor. My brother-in-law was always a big Superman fan, and one day he mentioned a rumor of a version filmed in India. I didn't think much about it at the time, but as Christmas approached I remembered his remark and wondered if I could actually find a copy to give him. The internet being what it is, it was simply a matter of spending several nights checking numerous combinations of keywords on a variety of search engines until that magic night when there it was! It was a bootleg copy, taped off of English TV with weird commercials intact. (Things like this don't get sold at Wal-Mart, you know.) I gladly sent my money, and a couple weeks later I held in my hands a copy of Indian Superman. Of course, they don't call it that in India. They just call it Superman, or whatever the equivalent is in the local dialect.

I didn't watch it right away, and when I did, well, I couldn't watch it all in one sitting. This thing is long. I mean really long. Two-and-a-half hours long. It's all in Hindi with no subtitles. Like any Bollywood production, there are dancing-girl scenes every 20 minutes that have nothing to do with the plot. Unique to this film, however, are the Superdad girls. I don't know what their names are in the film, but they were wearing Superdad t-shirts so that's what I call them. They are teenage henchmen who know a few kung fu moves. I mean, they almost know them. They work for the bad guys. Did the director not realize that Superdad shirts came about because of the popularity of the Superman movie in America? I don't think this was deliberate irony because not all of the girls are wearing the shirts.

Other incredible scenes include young Superman bending a garden hose to prove his strength, and a party scene where he breakdances to a Michael Jackson song! The special effects are excruciating, being a mix of bad models, nauseating attempts at mimicking flying (two crew members are visible on the stage in one such scene), and scenes stolen from the American Superman! I guess U.S. copyright laws don't extend to India.

Needless to say, Indian Superman was worth the effort it took to find it.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nukie (1987)
3/10
This movie needs a friend!
5 November 2002
Nukie. It's a bad E.T. ripoff filmed in Africa, with production (and some footage) handled in Germany. It's in English, so I'm not sure where the targeted market was. Nukie and his brother Meeko are ugly little aliens with big heads and runny noses who fly through space using some sort of personal energy rather than ships. They are tempted by the beauty of the earth, fly too close, and crash. Nukie lands in Africa and is relatively unharmed; Meeko lands in the United States and is immediately picked up by NASA. At least, I think it's NASA. Its logo appears in several places, but the stock-footage building exterior is definitely not NASA. Nor is it ever called `NASA'. It's called the Space Foundation. And there are beer cans in the break room! But since NASA is the only space agency in the U.S., that's what it has to be.

Scene after scene begins with an exterior shot of `NASA'. The voice-over gives the date and time (sometimes the times don't synch with the amount of daylight shown), and more often than not he follows with `nothing unusual to report' before telling us that Meeko has escaped or some such. If that's not unusual, I don't know what is.

While Meeko suffers in America, Nukie meets the quirky inhabitants of a small village in Africa. He befriends twin boys named Tookie and Tiko, and a chimp named Charlie. Nukie and the boys search for `America', which they think is the name of the evil-doer who is holding Meeko. They must avoid an American chopper pilot working for NASA (watch out - he's a `player'), local poachers, and a pesky nun (Glynis Johns) while they do so. It all ends happily, of course, because this is a kids' movie. Nukie and Meeko fly into space amidst stock footage of fireworks, and they bring along one of their new friends from Earth. Who is the friend? You'll have to watch the movie to find out!

The producers must've expected a big demand for Nukie merchandise, because every time the word appears it has the little `TM' after it. `Nukie' is trademarked, for crying out loud; none may use his name without permission. I doubt the demand for merchandise materialized, otherwise we might be seeing Nukie lunchboxes and action figures for sale in thrift stores.

People don't believe me when I tell them this, but I kind of like Nukie. Did you ever have a friend who was your friend just because you felt sorry for them? I like Nukie because I feel sorry for it. I think it needs a friend.
37 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Another goofy Jerry Warren film.
5 November 2002
I'm surprised at the vehemently negative tone of the other reviews. I know it's a bad movie - a VERY bad movie - but I enjoyed watching it. It's just plain goofy on a multitude of levels. The unintentional humor is great, and watching the few instances of intentional humor that fall flat is also funny. Watch Batwoman try not to smile during the seance! The go-go dancing, the Batgirl pledge, the crazy twists and turns of the "plot" - this is what bad-movie watching is all about. This is my second-favorite Warren film. "Frankenstein Island" will always be first.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Kind of a mess.
5 November 2002
Not the best movie I've seen but, hey, this is Jerry Warren we're talking about here. The title itself is kind of odd - "Creature of the Walking Dead". What does that mean? I like the original Mexican title better - "The Mark of the Dead". This one's about a mad scientist who stalks young women for their blood, which he needs to perpetuate his eternal youth. Not much going for it in that department, though the Mexican stalking scenes are a little creepy. But it's pure Jerry Warren when Katherine Victor holds a seance in the American part of the movie! Still, the editing wasn't too bad and if this toured the drive-in circuit then maybe no one noticed there wasn't much of a story.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Man Beast (1956)
6/10
Not bad for a '50s B-movie about the yeti.
5 November 2002
This was the unequaled Jerry Warren's first production. He didn't write it so it's not as goofy as, say, "The Wild World of Batwoman" or "Frankenstein Island". For a low-budget B-movie it does alright for itself. There are probably too many shots of people hiking in the mountains, but the dialogue seems realistic in most scenes and the story does build nicely to an unexpected climax. In fact, Varga's revelation is kind of creepy. I probably wouldn't go out of my way to find it, but if it came across my path I'd check it out.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not as bad as they say.
5 November 2002
This movie is legendary in some circles as a bad kiddie flick from Italy, but after watching it I have to say that it isn't that bad. It's basically a sequel to the fairy tale we all know as Snow White and the Seven Dwarves. Just when you thought she was living happily ever after with Prince Charming, along comes war and intrigue and the political problems that any prince must deal with. He's double-crossed so the dwarves go to help him. Their adventures along the way do get a little long near the end, but finally they help the prince and princess and save the day. While most of us are used to seeing the Snow White story aimed at a very young audience, this one's probably more appropriate for kids just a little bit older. Don't get me wrong - I wouldn't buy it for my own kids, but for a movie made in an Axis country just a few years after WWII ended it's not bad. I would like to play it for a youngster just to get their reaction. They might even like it, just for the dwarves' antics if nothing else.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Those who do not remember the past...
3 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS! (As if it were possible to spoil THIS movie...)

I'd like to add some fun details to what's already been posted. The four "Major-Generals" captured by the Japanese are French Major-General Pierre Latrec (Lautrec?), English Major-General Robert Foster, American Major-General Abraham Lincoln(!), and African Major-General Guvoyise Secallo (sp?) I can find no information about Latrec/Lautrec. There was an Air Marshall Chief Robert Foster attached to a British squadron immediately after WWII, so it's possible he was in the service during the war as well. However, if he were a war hero I think info would be more readily available. Lincoln looks more like General Sherman - gray uniform and all! I wonder if the American actor playing him knew he was in a WWII film. He clearly mouths "Abraham Lincoln" when he introduces himself. I'm sure I'm misspelling the African Major-General's name (he represents ALL of Africa?) so I can find nothing on him.

The four Major-Generals are captured by the Japanese somewhere between Alaska and the North Pole! Then for some reason they are taken to Luxembourg for holding. This is where the Fantasy Mission Force must find them because in four days they will be taken to "Tokyo City" for "propaganda". I'm not sure if the movie is set in Hong Kong where it was made, but it seems that Luxembourg is a long way off. Why not wait until they get to Tokyo City? In the end, the FMF DRIVES to Luxembourg! I'm pretty sure more than four days pass before they get there.

The people considered to lead the FMF have their pictures shown via overhead projector. They are "007" (an illustration of Roger Moore as James Bond), the "Bald Detective" (another illustration), "Snake King" (I'm pretty sure it's an illustration of "Snake Plissken" - Kurt Russell's role in "Escape from New York"), and "Captain Black Bart (a photograph of a woman with an eye patch and Russian fur hat). 007 is on assignment in South Africa, the Bald Detective has defected to the enemy, Snake King has been dead three years, and Captain Black Bart has retired to raise a family. So they settle on Lieutenant Don Win.

After many adventures they finally get to Luxembourg. The POW camp has two Nazi flags, one green, one yellow. The Major-Generals are gone because other Nazis driving Mad-Max cars have taken them. The cars are all late '60s/early '70s American models. When the FMF finally prevails, Major-General Robert Foster is missing. This is never explained, so I can only assume it is a continuity error.

I also don't understand about the money. The whole incentive for the FMF to rescue the four Major-Generals is half a million dollars. I assumed this was a reward, but in the end it turns out that it's modern American money hidden in the POW camp.

I paid $.97 for my copy (DVD). I'll be showing it to many unsuspecting friends!

Lili is my favorite.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Truly one of the all-time worst movies.
23 October 2002
And I don't mean that in a good way. This is not bad entertaining; it is just plain bad. So bad it hurts. Big budget + big ego = big flop. Kevin Costner couldn't do worse if he tried. I can't believe it's not in the Bottom 100 yet.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My new all-time favorite movie!
17 October 2002
It's finally on DVD and boy was it worth the wait! This is a real jaw-dropper. There is one amazing scene after another. The dialogue is simply surreal. It arrived in my mailbox last week and I've already watched it twice. Amazing. It just doesn't get any better than this.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid B-Movie Horror from the '50s.
17 October 2002
I finally bought a copy of this movie off of eBay because I had heard the Roky Erickson song of the same name like a billion times. I expected a cheesey flick, but instead watched a good, solid feature. It's definitely a B-movie, but that didn't mean "bad" back then. It just meant unknown talent and lower budgets. This is a decent story about an exiled mobster and a German scientist who reanimate the recently deceased with atom rays, and control them to take revenge on those who once testified against the mobster. A well-done but obscure flick.
31 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I just saw it!
29 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Believe it or not, I found a copy of this thing. I just watched it. Wow. That's all I can say. I have to comment on it further now that I've seen it again. This has got to be one of the worst movies I've seen, and I've seen a lot of bad ones. I've seen Herschell Gordon Lewis' "Jimmy the Boy Wonder". I've seen "Nukie", "Indian Superman", "Devil Monster", "Return to Boggy creek", and many more. But "Santa and the Ice Cream Bunny" is really a wonder of bad, bad cinema. I can't say that enough. I can just see the producer telling everybody who questioned him during production, "But it's a KID's movie. It doesn't MATTER." Like that's an excuse for this sort of thing.

As I said in my previous comment, I saw this in the theater when I was ten. I think it came out in the spring, which caused some confusion about the Ice Cream Bunny. I mean, is that supposed to be the Easter Bunny or what? And why is Santa Claus in it? I didn't understand then, and 30 years later I still don't understand. Anyway, here's the story.

A skinny dimestore Santa with a large sweat stain on his butt is stuck in the sand on a Florida beach. That's a very surreal image for a kid from Minnesota who's used to seeing Santa in snow. His reindeer (shown in stock footage) got too hot and flew home without him. Santa falls asleep and sends a telepathic message to kids living in a nearby housing development. The message stops time until they respond to it. They all come help him with their pet animals - a horse, a cow, a sheep, a pig, a donkey, and a guy in a gorilla suit. Must be a pretty lax housing development to allow those kind of animals. Nothing works, so Santa tries to cheer the kids up by telling them the story of Thumbelina. The poor audience (us) doesn't just hear it; we see it, too. It's a movie within a movie! When it rolls, we see the credits and everything. That's pretty darn confusing to a kid who thought the movie already started twenty minutes ago. Soon we learn that it's also a movie within a movie, so we're seeing a movie within a movie within a movie! AHH!!!

Whew. The movie within a movie is narrated by a tinny loudspeaker at a cheap amusement park called Pirates World. When the speaker talks, we see a closeup of it. This happens way too many times to count. The young lady who plays Thumbelina is an excellent singer, and I can't help but like her. Trouble is, her story goes on forever and ever and ever. The sets look like something from a high school play. They make Santa on the beach look pretty good!

Then just when you think the movie has turned into Thumbelina and you've given up all hope of seeing Santa again, it ends. It even says "The End" on the screen. So you're getting up ready to run out of the theater and there's Santa on the beach again! After an hour plus of this business we finally get to see the Ice Cream Bunny. He's driving an antique fire engine through the woods to the beach. He's so close now. Please hurry, Mr. Bunny. Save Santa and end the movie NOW! No, wait - now he's taking a long shortcut through Pirates World! HOW'D THAT HAPPEN???

OK, now he's back on the beach. It still takes several minutes to cross those last few hundred feet. Turns out he and Santa are old friends. He gives Santa a ride on his truck, and when you're wondering why they left the sleigh behind it blinks out of sight and magically returns to the North Pole. The kids point at the sky as if they can see it flying. The end.

Wow. Did I mention the really bad singing in the Santa part of the movie? Did I mention the endless kazoos, and the talk-singing into the kazoos? I watched much of this standing up, pacing.

If you're brave - if you're really brave - there's another copy for sale on half.com. I haven't seen it on ebay or in Amazon Z Shops, and I've been looking for a while. Here's your chance.

My head hurts. Me go now.
64 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed