Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Sahara (1983)
3/10
Rifles? Rifles? We don't need no stinkin' rifles.
30 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This movie nestles nicely into the so-bad-its-great category of films. Its plot is 45% "The Sheik", 45% "The Great Race" and 10% "Indiana Jones". But while "The Sheik" was the product of a more naive time, "The Great Race" was a playful send-up of old movie clichés and "Indiana Jones" cheerfully celebrated those clichés, "Sahara" hasn't a brain in its head.

That's not to say the movie is not enjoyable. It's a strange, anachronistic throwback.

SPOILERS GALORE FROM HERE ON...

Brooke Shield plays Dale, who disguises herself as a man in order to replace her late father in an auto race across the Sahara. Seeing Miss Shields in full makeup and a mustache is truly a sight to behold. However, she doffs her disguise once her car enters the desert sands. This proves to be a fairly bad idea as she is snatched up by Saharan tribesmen. (Her roadies too but who cares about THEM)

John Rhys-Davies is the boorish Rasoul, who means to get romantic with Dale. What ensues is quite possibly the funniest scene in the movie. Fighting off Rasoul, Dale has to claw her way PAST a rack of rifles to get to a knife that she ineffectually slashes Rasoul with. Then, when the knife fails, she pushes past the rifles AGAIN to get a lamp with which to start a fire. Fleeing from the burning tent (sans rifle), she runs past unguarded horses and camels and ends up wandering through the desert sands on foot. Truly a genius, this one. The only way this scene could have been funnier would be to have her rush by a tank, a machine gun, a can of mace and a helicopter.

Now, obviously she doesn't get far and is recaptured. Rasoul is a bit peeved at her but his nephew, the tribal chief Jaffar (Lambert Wilson), is now interested in Dale. However, Jaffar has other problems. His enemy tribesman has been armed with a car/tank by some dastardly Germans.

Limping home in defeat, Jaffar pauses to claim Dale as his fiancée. Rasoul thinks she is a demon. It seems that blue eyed women are seen as bad omens and whatnot so Dale simply cannot be married to the tribe's leader.

Anyway, Jaffar has a romantic interlude with Dale at a Saharan waterfall (?) where Dale is finding the concept of enslavement to him enjoyable. So clearly, being kidnapped and enslaved is only bad if the man in question is unattractive. However, the romance is dampened a bit when Dale learns of the marriage thing since it means she can't finish the race.

The German/Villainous Tribesmen attack Jaffar's camp. Dale, fortunately, has carried a supply of dynamite with her for the auto race (as one does) and uses it to blow up the car/tank.

Later, Dale emerges in bridal dress. The marriage is on, apparently. However, it is all part of Dale's escape plan. Not that she doesn't find Jaffar hot, it's just that she has a race to win. She leaves her sleeping lover (who has left NO sentries even though his enemies had just attacked his camp) and drives off. She also abandons her hapless roadies, who had previously been tortured by Rasoul when Dale had refused Jaffar's advances. She does, however, take along Jaffar's English valet, Cambridge.

However, the strong and independent Dale is immediately snatched by the bad guy tribe. They place her in a large hamster cage (??) to await the leader.

Cambridge tells the good guys what has befallen. Jaffar intends to rescue Dale but Rasoul objects, pointing out that it is a suicide mission. Jaffar decks him and rides off. Cambridge prods Rasoul into joining the rescue mission.

Another day, another assault. Dale is fighting off the villainous chieftain when Jaffar and Co. attack. Dale gets thrown into a pit with a collection of panthers. It's OK, though because Jaffar is there with a rope. He throws it down but our action girl starts sniveling about how climbing the rope is just too haaaaaard. Dale sounds like she is wailing the lack of chocolate cake at a party rather than being in actual danger but Jaffar climbs down to save her.

Another bit of comedy ensues. Jaffar uses up his bullets shooting the pit door open and the rifle-armed villains are on the other side of door. All the villains have to do is open fire and this movie will be over. But nooooo. They have to run in and attempt hand-to-hand combat. Jaffar neatly defeats them and then throws a torch at the poor panthers, who really just want a good meal. Anyway, Rasoul uses his dying breath to tell Jaffar not to follow Dale. Jaffar tells Dale to go. Dale, assisted by her inexplicably loyal roadies, drives for the finish line. Jaffar, meanwhile, sets about revenging his sleazy uncle.

It's a race to the finish between Dale and those dastardly Germans. Three guesses as to who will win.

The German's wheels fall off two inches from the finish line and Dale is declared the winner. The roadies show up, only a few minutes behind in spite of being mounted on camels. I think I would declare the camels the winners.

Then Dale rides off to find Jaffar. Because running her father's auto business (which was his deathbed wish) clearly takes a backseat to marrying your kidnapper. Everyone knows THAT. And then there is nothing left to do except ride off into the sunset, which they do.

Okay, so what did I think of "Sahara"? Well, it was a dreadful movie but an extremely fun one. It deserves a more prominent place in your guilty pleasure collection. If only MST3K had a go at this one...

On a side note, Lambert Wilson would later take a part in a dreadful Clive Cussler adaptation. It's name? "Sahara".
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Storm the Bastille, Citizens!, um, no, wait... Storm the Winter Palace, Comrades!
12 July 2008
When I first heard of the Volga Boatman, I couldn't believe it. Cecil B. DeMille, super-patriot and rabid anti-communist made a film in which the hero was a BOLSHEVIK? And said Bolshevik played by none other than William "Hopalong Cassidy" Boyd? Needless to say, I had to see it.

I like DeMille's silent films considerably better than his sound ones and The Volga Boatman is certainly a lovely film to look at. William Boyd and Elinor Fair look splendid, the historically inaccurate but lushly gorgeous gown by Adrian are breath-taking. Communists commune, White Russians waltz the night away and the Volga looks very Volga-ish in spite of being in California.

The movie begins with a disclaimer stating that the film takes no sides. For the most part, this is true. Both sides are shown to have their heroes and villains. The problem is, the behavior and motivations of the characters make the movie seem like a French Revolution film that got the wrong costumes delivered by mistake. The mob scenes in particular made me feel like I was watching a reel of Orphans of the Storm! Oh well, this is DeMille.

DeMille hired Russians as consultants and actors but discarded any advice that they offered on authenticity. The fact that boatman had not been used on the Volga in 50 years did not dissuade him. The fact that some modern viewers would see this movie as an authentic portrayal of Russian life is disturbing, to say the least. (My source, by the way, is "Behind the Mask of Innocence" by Kevin Brownlow) The plot involves Feodor (Boyd), the titular boatman. Elinor Fair is Vera, a princess engaged to marry Prince Dimitri (Victor Varconi). Vera and Feodor meet by the riverbank and there is definite chemistry, much to Dimitri's annoyance. When the Revolution comes, Feodor rises in the ranks of the Red Army and soon finds himself in the uncomfortable position of having to execute Vera personally. What will he do? Well, the movie is available on DVD so it's easy to find out.

The sincerity and charm that Boyd would display so memorably as Hopalong Cassidy serve him well in this part. DeMille asks a lot of his leading men, to make the sometimes very silly scripts believable must have been a job and a half. Being a DeMille leading man also required a certain amount of upper body strength. Please note the whiplash inducing spin that Boyd gives Fair before their first kiss. That's a DeMille specialty. The same technique was later used by Yul Brynner in The Ten Commandments.

By the way, movie buffs should look for Eugene Palette (Friar Tuck in The Adventures of Robin Hood) in an uncredited role. He is part of the Red Army firing squad.

The Volga Boatman is a historical curio and pure brain candy. It is a fun movie to watch and it's certainly worth seeing Boyd without his cowboy hat, he and Fair give rather good performances and Varconi does a good job as the morally weak Dimitri. But as for the history... Well, best put that out of your mind and enjoy the ride.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Past-Life Mishmash from the King of Spectacle
12 July 2008
In the late 10's through the 20's, Cecil B. DeMille made two kinds of films: frothy romantic confections and super epics, both with major religious overtones. And, he made them in two sizes: big and bigger. "Road to Yesterday", like "Manslaughter" and "Male and Female", tries to combine the two plots, cementing them together with a reincarnation theme.

Joseph Schildkraut (the leading man in "Orphans of the Storm" and the leading louse in "Shop Around the Corner) is Ken, an eager bridegroom. Jetta Goudal (a now nearly forgotten Dutch beauty) is Malena, his lovely bride. They are on their honeymoon at the Grand Canyon when, on their wedding night, Malena develops a irrational terror of, well, Ken.

Meanwhile, Bess (an adorable Vera Reynolds) is a thoroughly modern 20's maiden, flirting with the idea of marrying her pesty boyfriend. All bets are off, though, when she meets the strapping Rev. Jack Moreland (a perfectly cast William Boyd, Hopalong Cassidy to you) They connect instantly and seem to have known each other forever but flaming flapper Bess can't stomach the idea of marrying a clergyman.

With Ken and Malena's marriage dissolving and Jack and Bess never even managing to get their relationship started, everything seems glum until a spectacular train wreck at the end of Act I throws Bess back in time 300 years. She is a fabulously wealthy heiress running away from a forced marriage to the dastardly Ken, Lord of the Manor. Jack is her loyal lover and Malena is an uncanny Gypsy who is also Ken's wife. The romp through history unravels many of the mysteries that have plagued the two pairs of lovers in the twentieth century. I won't give it away but most viewers will see it coming.

As with most DeMille films, it is very difficult to judge "Road to Yesterday" by the usual standards. As pointed out in other reviews, the dialog is pure Rennaissance Faire, some of the acting is waaaay over the top and the plot is just an excuse for fancy dress. But, it IS entertaining, it IS a fun way to pass an afternoon. My fairly low rating comes from the silliness of the plot.

First, the reincarnation theme doesn't make a bit of sense. Malena is terrified of the modern Ken because of what he did to her in the past. Fair enough. But he did as much and worse to Jack and Bess and they seem to have absolutely no negative reaction to him. In fact, Ken was such a villain that I am amazed that he had any friends at all by the time he was reborn for his twentieth century life.

Then, no one ever explains why Bess remembers her twentieth century self but no one else does. (Half the cast is present for the Cavalier sequence) Also, Ken's moments of mustache-twirling villainy really damage any sympathy that the viewer might have for him, especially his rape of Malena near the beginning of the film.

This leaves William Boyd and Vera Reynolds to carry the day and they pretty much walk away with the picture. They have chemistry and charm to spare. Reynolds in the cutest little flapper you could ask for and Boyd's easy, natural charm and understated acting lends a believability to an otherwise silly part. In fact, DeMille liked Boyd so much that he gave him the starring role in "The Volga Boatman", one of DeMille's strangest films.

"The Road to Yesterday" is not DeMille's greatest silent film but it is a good one. Just sit back, enjoy Reynolds and Boyd, and don't try to think too much about the plot.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Barbarian (1933)
6/10
Ramon and Myrna "Sheik" Their Way Across the Desert Sands
23 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Ramon Novarro and Myrna Loy get caught up in a torrid romance in one of the last of the pre-code "sheik" films. To anyone who has not seen "The Sheik" or "The Son of the Sheik", the two most famous examples, the plot is simple. Sexy Arab guy (or white guy posing as an Arab) falls for a Western girl and abducts her across the desert sands where red hot (for the time) romance blooms. Fan magazines of the 1920's would gravely discuss the pros and cons of the "cave man approach" to love. "The Barbarian" must have seemed like something of an anachronism when it was released in the early 30's.

Myrna Loy plays Diana, an American girl with an Egyptian mother. Neatly removing any objections to an interracial romance, this sets the stage for Jamil to enter her life. Novarro's character is a prince posing as a driverman. What exactly he is prince of is unclear since the script will alternately talk about Egypt, Mecca and Tehran as his domain. Quite a cosmopolitan, it seems.

But to Diana, he is a servant and she treats him accordingly. That is, when she is not swooning over his admittedly pleasant singing. But station is station and Jamil's love for Diana takes a decidedly warped turn when the inevitable abduction occurs.

There seems to be disagreement among the viewers as to whether or not Jamil forced himself on Diana. It seems pretty clear to me that he did.

Whether or not she liked him at the time is up to the opinion of the viewer. That does not, however, alter the fact that she was raped. If the viewer believes that she liked him, merely add "date" before the verb. Same crime, different circumstances. For an interesting comparison, try seeing the "love" scene in the equally silly "Fountainhead".

The rest of the film concerns the reactions of Diana's fiancé (Reginald Denny), who isn't really given much to do but stand about and look outraged, and the rest of the cast, who are divided into pro and anti-Jamil camps. Which man Diana will choose is fairly obvious if you know anything at all about Hollywood movies of this time. After all, he IS a prince and she IS half-Egyptian and they DID, well, you know...

So, how was it? Myrna Loy is lovely and tries her best but one gets the impression that she is smarter than the script, provided by the overrated (and supposedly liberated) Anita Loos.

As for Ramon Novarro, he is a personal favorite for his silent work but he is miscast here. Novarro, by all accounts, was a very pleasant man and he just is not convincing in the smoldering roles. He just seems too nice. He was far better with sincere, heroic characters and in light comedy. Sadly, his dark good looks and last name ending in a vowel condemned him to a certain number of Latin Lover roles. He is very charming at the beginning of the film, when is character is more of a rascal. I particularly liked the scenes of him romancing female tourists in English and German!

Is it worth it? Yes, for the glimpse of pre-code Hollywood and just how much they could get away with. It is fun to see big stars in non-typical roles. It will certainly start many discussions of race and gender relations in classic Hollywood. My interest is, frankly, more for research than entertainment. If the plot sounds romantic to you, go for it. If it horrifies you, stay away. If you're like me, you will enjoy the context and theory of the film more than the film itself. It would certainly make a fascinating selection on a DVD set concerning race in early Hollywood. Hint, hint.

PS, does anyone know what language everyone is speaking? It doesn't sound like Arabic but I am no expert.
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ever so Cute!
20 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This TV series, called "The Successful Story of a Bright Girl" in English, was my first experience with Korean drama but it certainly will not be my last.

The plot revolves around Yang-Soon, an adorable country girl who is forced to drop out of school to work as a maid to pay off her con-artist parent's debts. She is employed by arrogant young cosmetics executive Gi-Tae (Ki-Tae in the subtitles) who takes pleasure in making her life miserable but secretly begins to admire her-- much to the displeasure of his girlfriend Na-Hee. Meanwhile, Gi-Tae's rival, Jun-Tae, plots to make him penniless.

***SPOILERS! If you don't want to know what happens after the initial episodes, please skip this section.***

What had been a cute Cinderella story turns dark when Gi-Tae falls into Jun-Tae's trap and is left a pauper. Yang-Soon, who has always dreamed to saving a prince in danger, takes the opportunity to help him with results that are alternately funny, romantic and sad. However, the plot returns to a sunny state when Gi-Tae pulls himself together and beings to plot to get his company back from Jun-Tae.

Many viewers were annoyed by the ending, which involves plot elements that seem to have been pulled out of the air at the last minute. While it didn't ruin my enjoyment of the show, I wish the screenwriters had done a better job of foreshadowing.

***End of Spoilers***

While it is a romantic comedy, there are enough fights and dirty business deals to keep most guys fairly intrigued. Girls can enjoy the obvious chemistry between the leads and the sweet love story that finally develops.

The show is certainly not perfect, characters make very silly mistakes and are much too trusting of their enemies. And you had better like the two main songs in the soundtrack since they are both played in their entirety at least once and often twice an episode. For me, however, the flaws are outweighed by charming presentation.

The series consists of 16 hour-long episodes. I saw it on an 8 DVD set imported from Malaysia. Having the advantage of viewing part of it with a Korean speaker, I must say that the English sub-titles leave much to be desired. They range from grammatically weird ("On earth, what are you doing?") to absolutely unreadable. Profanities are added when the characters said nothing of the kind in Korean and sometimes subtitles are added when a character didn't say anything at all! Most frustratingly, one short scene has no subtitles. However, the language problems did not ruin my appreciation for the show, all that's required is a little extra patience.

This is an excellent show for newcomers to the world of Korean entertainment. It certainly hooked me!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Sheik (1921)
7/10
An essential period piece for film buffs
21 January 2002
The Sheik. Like it or not it is part of film history and as such deserves at least a look. The plot is pure romance novel, the budget was microscopic and it's true about it not being Valentino's best film. In spite of all this, the film manages to be a neat bit of escapism.

No one expected this film to succeed in spite of being based on a wildly popular best seller. But the female film going population had other ideas and The Sheik made a mint, spawned many imitations and caused an Arabia craze.

The plot involves the lovesick Sheik Ahmed abducting an English beauty to be his wife. Clearly, this is not the sort of movie that would get released today except as a direct to video. Because of this, rather than in spite of, this movie is very fascinating to modern viewers.

The Sheik is strangely enjoyable if one puts aside modern inhibitions and gets into the spirit of things. Even with that, this is not a very well made movie, just a fun one. In spite of cries for censorship in the 20's, this movie is very tame by most modern standards. Nothing I would show a child, but most certainly not as wild as what is on an average network sitcom.

If you wish to check out the legendary Valentino, I suggest viewing The Eagle or the Son of the Sheik which feature much better performances.
22 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Marvelous bit of old time comedy but best for Sheik viewers
14 October 2001
Ben Turpin is yet another silent comedian who has been all but forgotten. This is a great shame since he was also one of the funniest. The closest modern equivalent I can think of is Mr. Bean.

This movie is a spoof of Valentino's phenomenally popular movie "The Sheik" and it does a very good job at it. Some of the effects and stunts are impressive. The scenes of Turpin being chased by a lion and riding an ostrich were especially good.

I highly recommend anyone seeing this film to view the Sheik first since you will get many more of the jokes that way. In particular, the climax of the Sheik is thoroughly lampooned.

I don't want to give away the punchlines to many of the gags so I will just stop here by saying that this is a hysterical spoof that deserves more recognition.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Sea Hawk (1940)
Not faithful to the book but a must for Flynn fans
12 October 2001
This is probably Errol Flynn's most famous film apart from The Adventures of Robin Hood and Captain Blood. It's easy to see why wince his signature charm and athletic skills are well displayed. His wooing of Brenda Marshall (who makes a pretty, if somewhat bland, deHavilland stand in) is sweet and somewhat insecure, something different.

To steal a movie from Flynn is not an easy thing but Flora Robson nearly does so with her marvelous portrayal of Queen Elizabeth I. She flirts, fights and commands with great gusto. She's probably the best Queen Elizabeth I have seen even though she looked almost nothing like the genuine article. It just goes to show what a talented actress can do.

As for the rest of the movie, it was good but sometimes a bit ho-hum especially when compared to Robin Hood. I shan't give away the ending but I will just say that I was a wee bit disappointed.

What I really can't understand is why they named this movie the Sea Hawk. It is supposedly based on the novel by Rafael Sabatini (a very popular novelist at the time) but absolutely nothing of the original plot is allowed to remain. The main characters have different names and backgrounds, the time period shifted and so forth. I suppose with World War II raging, Warner Bros. decided that a tale of a renegade Englishman turned muslim corsair would be too far removed so they cooked up a plot with Spain representing the Axis powers.

All in all, much more enjoyable if you have not read the book (though it is quite good) and definitely worth your while if you are an Errol Flynn fan.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed