Reviews

Sketch (1) : A beautiful, funny and elaborate sketch in most respects. The presence of Ismail Hassan and Suhaib Quds is enough to make the scene comedic to the greatest degree. I don't like Fahd Al-Butairi, but his role in this sketch was beautiful and his performance was wonderful ..

Sketch (2): Mohammed al-Dokhi dominated the performance, the idea was somewhat spent, its events were expected, the rest of the actors performed normally, and there was stuffing in the events and stretching to increase the time. I liked that at the end of the second sketch in One-shot, the third sketch began ..

Sketch (3) : The idea is awesome, and Ibrahim Al-Hajjaj's performance is amazing, even though it is one connected event and there are not many events that are one event, but the somewhat terrifying pace of the event, which makes you nervous and makes you aware of the existing excitement, was beautiful tricks ..

Sketch (4): We don't need to talk about Abu Shahri's performance, but let's talk about the sketch. We have been trying for a while to improve the reputation of the Saudis and the Gulf abroad, and we want to change the foreigners' perception of us. If this is shown on YouTube, I can accept it, but it is shown on Netflix in the Middle East, and you have more than one topics to talk about. It is not necessary to mention this thing, even if it was comic, although the sketch was devoid of comedy, Karenj to the greatest degree, except for the monthly, as I told you..

+ Regarding some reviewers, I see some young reviewers, scrutinizing all the details that one does not notice in foreign works, as if they were looking for a slip; I mean, like, for example, he tells you that Mike appeared in this scene + this one had extra makeup and things that did not affect the level of the story. You knew how, so calm down, boys, The unnecessary external shots are sometimes affected, but not always, and this doesn't mean that the story is ruined because of the mistakes that happen behind the scenes. In the end, they are human beings and make mistakes. The scrutiny and constructive criticism is based on the content of the story, its events, the idea and the main points, not the unimportant points at all ..

My Rating : (7.0/10)

"After more than thirty years of service as one of the Navy's top pilots, and evading progress in a rank that would elevate his position, Pete Maverick finds himself training a group of Top Gun alumni for a specialized mission they have never undertaken at all".

More than 36 years later, Top Gun returns to us with a new look and in an innovative way different from the first part ..

A very beautiful experience and becomes more beautiful when you watch it in cinemas, as I said earlier that movies for me do not differ from them, whether I watch them on mobile phone, laptops or cinema, but the evaluation can vary slightly and the experience is somewhat and such films that rely on visual and auditory effects. It is necessary to experience it in cinema and in the best theaters ..

A special thriller drama movie, although it has some expected and repeated scenes, but this is what the viewer wanted, like the viewer's habit, wishes that things would end well and that the hero would win, not this dilemma because that's what we want, but I wished there was at least one victim in the movie other than the flashback that we saw with ..

At first I expected the flight scenes to be CGI but was surprised that they were real and the actors reacted real about flying in the air and having this unique experience, except Tom Cruise because he is used to these risks ..

I liked the story of the film from its first part, but when I watched the first part, I wished they had done one with the same story in our time with technical developments, because the first was catastrophic other than its technical disasters. There were artistic disasters in the performances of the actors and the story, thank God they did the second part in our time because the second was very beautiful and the same as what we wanted ..

Tom Cruise as usual restrains skeptics of his abilities, as Tom Cruise is an actor of action-action movies and the like, every time he proves himself and responds to them while at this age mastering his roles and poetic drama scenes, a creative actor in every sense of the word ..

The cast selections were great, especially Mils Teller, in which he is very similar to his father's role in the movie Guss in this thing, but Joe introduces you with the movie as well as let your mind connect the topics automatically ..

Maverick's and me's nice relationship has increased the film's aesthetic and I'm surprised by some people who didn't like their relationship on the contrary. It was very nice, sweet and appropriate with Maverick's personality, it was when he hesitated to take a decision to resort to it ..

Spontaneous comedy dialogues always give a great mix to the viewer and in this movie we have seen a lot of them ..

I was never disappointed in the movie except the point I mentioned in the beginning and the experience as a whole, I mean ..

My favorite scene in the movie when Maverick was kicked off the bar and saw Roster playing and reminded his classmate of the profession, it was a sad and expressive scene and we delved deeper into Maverick's character .

((Performance is not according to the plane specification. But with the skill of the pilot))

My Rating : (9.0/10)