Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Gerry (2002)
A couple of thoughts about Gerry
17 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
* A number of reviewers mentioned that they fast-forwarded through parts of the movie. I don't think there is a problem with not liking a movie, but I think there is a big problem with somebody that would take the time to comment on a work of art without taking the time to fully engage in it.

* Would you really pontificate about the meaning of life if you were lost in the desert, like one would in any work of fiction? Or would you just shut up and walk? Gerry does an excellent job of choosing the more life-like, un-cinematic, scenario.

* The acting in the film was amazing. It is never over-acted, even in a situation that would normally call for histrionics. The understated tenseness reaches a boiling point during the manic makeshift-map-in-the-desert-scene without ever boiling over. Incredible. This tension is actually resolved in one of the final scenes in a way that can only be described as perfect.

* I was completely ready to enjoy an existential movie, with absolutely no motive or cohesive, underlying meaning. As somebody interested in existentialism, I am surprised to find myself not only thinking, but enjoying the opposite side of that coin. Scott Tobias' review on The Onion AV Club points out that when we are introduced to the characters, the act of the casual hike seemed particularly joyless. What can be dismissed as a scene of 'establishing' nature is, I think, one of the most important in the film. The two characters simply have nothing to say to each other, and seem to be going through the motions on their hike, as well as, presumably, their life. At his most personal, all the Damon-Gerry can say is 'don't cry' which seems so empty he seems more like an alien than a human. In a completely non-pretentious way, I think that Jerry is very moralistic, obvious, and thematic: if you wander through life without any kind of aims or feelings, you will be lost in a desert. And its not going to get any better. When I saw Ian MacKaye (Fugazi, Minor Threat, Dischord Records) at a speaking engagement he said: If you go through life without thinking about what you're doing, you are simply awaiting instructions.

On the surface, I thought my conclusions violated tenants of existentialism.

If grand schemes are ultimately meaningless, how can I applaud Gerry for having a theme? I've decided that it is one thing to live life without meaning, and another thing to come to the conclusion that life is without meaning. They are, in fact, two very, very, different things.

* SPOILERS. Two elements of the end of the movie have stayed with me. The ending made me realize that this was not a Van Zant – Damon – Affleck mindf***, but a serious work. (Although I can't believe people describe it as such when the cinematography was done with such great care.)

First off, the Damon-Gerry has a premonition of being rescued. I did not at first realize that this was the meaning of the dream. The way this was handled was nothing short of brilliant.

Secondly, the final embrace, the awkward comfort that they can give each other is a scene that will stay with more for a long time. These are humans that seem to lack the skills necessary to be a human. Yes it takes a long time to get this point, but without the other 90 minutes of the movie this scene would not have had the necessary weight.

* I'll be buying a compass before I go home tonight.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Two movies in one, One very much worth seeing
20 June 2002
One has to admire Mark Kines for making a truly independent movie.

Unfortunately, the first story is a little weak and I agree that Melanie Lynskey is underutilized. She is supposed to have a boring life, but the vignette doesn't rise up to the challenge of making a boring life seem interesting to a viewer. However, Will Wheaton does have a great role as the awkward neighbor.

I understand the second story is loosely based on an incident in the director's life. It is unfortunate that this could not have been the subject of a full-length feature. Corin Nemic (of Parker Lewis Can't Lose fame) is great, and I'd like to see him again. Unknown Yelena Danova is also excellent. I really cared for the characters and those in supporting roles. Yelena's host parents are interesting and the Father has some unexpected character development. The hilarious and telling scene in a bookstore featuring Martin Mull is an added bonus. The secondary theme of Cultural Variations and how strange Americans can be to foreigners is expertly handled.

Overall it is a great first outing and I'd recommend it to any indie fans.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why?
9 August 2001
How can Henry James' novella "Turn Of The Screw" swallow me in whole while I find his other work wordy and arrogant? And how can the same director that has made the two most boring movies I have ever seen, "Two Friends" and this one, also be the same person behind "Sweetie" and "Holy Smoke" - the two finest examples of a movie drawing real characters in real places I have ever seen? This film left me in a state of semi-paralysis.

Being a fan of slow-paced, foreign, and period piece movies, I was pretty surprised at how much this movie bored me. I'm writing this review to try to sort out my feelings of bewilderment.

I think one problem is the use of John Malkovich. We've seen him soar to great heights in the paradoxical "Being John Malkovich" and "The Glass Menagerie", but here his monotone is overly droll and predictable, almost as if he is playing off himself in a Saturday Night Live sketch. In fact the most enjoyable part of this movie was the scene where Mr. Malkovich twirls the umbrella in an ambiguously literal attempt to hypnotize Isabel. If only there were more of these elements in the film....

Then there's Nicole Kidman, whose underachieving attempts at acting has managed to ruin films by not one but two of the greats: Ms. Campion and Stanley Kubrick. Her delivery was similar to Gwyneth Paltrow's in "Mr. Ripley" -- obviously lost. She's just another pretty face thrown into a role of substance after receiving excessive amounts of hype. Watching them act gives me the same feeling I get watching the members of Milli Vanilli try to sing. In their element, they can be undeniably sexy or cute, but in deeper roles the viewer is left completely clueless to their characters' motives. Is Isabel supposed to be docile, alluring, witty, in-control, charismatic, or not-in-control? We can't tell.

In this mess, Barbara Hershey and Martin Donovan as the sickly cousin were both very good. But alongside the weak link Kidman there was little they could do. And Campion made some extremely unusual stylistic sidetracks, the very sidetracks that work in the Holy Smoke India scenes. But in a period piece the fading dream suitors, inexplicable intro, and Chaplin filters seemed inappropriate, although one has to admire her for trying. Even when I don't agree with her methods I respect her sense of adventure (but let's face it, I'll love her forever because of Sweetie). With a little more humility from Campion, a different Isabel, and a more invigorated Malkovich this film might have worked.

For a good treatment of James, try to scare up a copy of the 1961 film The Innocents.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed