Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Thale (2012)
2/10
Sorry, a waste of my time.
18 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I really didn't like this movie. Perhaps because I am unfamiliar with the myth it is based upon, perhaps because my Latin culture is so different from that from the Nordics. The acting seemed flat to me; the responses to climatic moments are emotionless and stiff. Both the male actors gave dull performances. On the other hand, the FX are quite good for a shoestring budget and the photography and lighting are quite well done.

The movie starts with an interesting gory tone. And it has some classic elements of suspense, horror and fiction movies. But it sadly never reaches neither a suspense nor a scary climax. Yes, there is a tale about a mythical creature, but her purpose in the plot is nowhere to be seen. I felt no bond to any character in the film. They seemed to be just a couple of actors reciting lines which most of the times were cut short before actually saying something. The plot made little sense to me.

Go smell a flower instead, take a walk. Spend your time on something else; don't waste your time on this. Unless you are Norwegian; perhaps then this will click for you.
13 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too many clichés, logic holes, but still a tad enjoyable.
8 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
An interesting idea mash-up of 1984, Lord of the Flies, Logan's Run, reality shows in general, with (good) special effects, albeit the ones you see all the time from Sci-Fi films realised in the US.

The plot: in the future, the Government holds a yearly contest among forcibly chosen youngsters from different conquered towns. They are shortly trained and later released in a small woods area with minimum equipment, letting them kill each other. The whole series of events is transmitted to the population on TV. The winner will take... well, I think nobody knows what he or she will win. I am not even sure if it is food, given the obscure name of the movie.

Even though the plot has some freshness to it, the movie stumbles constantly with horrendous clichés. It takes only three seconds from some scenes to know who the bad guys and the heroes/heroines will be and who are going to be only cannon-fodder. Lots of coarsely sketched characters, with whom you don't feel related to at all.

The mix between digital and real is confusing: digital monsters which can be harmed with real weapons? Digital fire which can burn the skin? Meh...

There's also plot loopholes a plenty, as well as illogical, poorly- explained or hard-to-believe situations: the inhabitants of a starving town seem to be completely attentive facing TV screens, even though they've been running then for several days, instead of working in order for them to get food. At the mere signal of the heroine on the screen, they start fighting the guards, even though they didn't lift a finger when the kids were taken away to be slaughtered. -_-

The film is not particularly bad, but it's also no big deal. As an additional frustrating detail, this seems to be only the first part of many. Go watch it only if you don't have anything better to do. If you are into WOW, THOSE ARE INCREDIBLE SPECIAL FX and that's what you normally care about from the movies, then you're in for a treat.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unrest (I) (2006)
1/10
Boooooring. It's back to history lessons for the writer.
18 September 2008
Unrest was shown on Germany's Fantasy Filmfest 2006 and I could not watch this film back then. I thank my lucky stars, because I watched this film on the TV and it sucks big-time. It falls under the usual Crap layer which comprises 90% of the movies which unluckily tend to plague this kind of festivals.

The plot? Medicine students with a compulsion of showing off their bodies every 20 minutes start suspecting there's an obscure story behind one of the corpses destined for class. Ooooo, now... there's a story I hadn't heard of before.

There's a relevant mention of the discovery of an Aztec tomb... in Brazil. I can see now what did the screenwriters' strike in the US really mean for its film industry. Come on; even when a screenwriter hasn't got the urge to flip a book thicker than Dick and Jane's adventures, 5-minute googling the Aztec civilization up would have shed on him/her a little light. Shameful ignorance.

If your idea of being scared is watching flesh being cut with a scalpel, ripped notebook sheets with EERIE texts written with blood, or blackened organs suddenly expelling gas, then this brick is the right thriller for you. This movie is as boring as it is uninventive. Half-baked clichés, stereotyped characters, predictable scenes... and no suspense, no sense of scariness at all. Hell, where's the cat jumping out of a drawer when you need him?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Dawn (1990)
8/10
Some incredible acting and a treat of "black "Mexican history.
30 December 2007
When I saw the film as it was released in the theaters, I thought it was a superb film. More than a decade later, a part of such awe is gone. The plot? A middle-class family undergoes the violent events happened in Tlatelolco, Mexico City, in 1968.

The sound recording and editing was most probably done by butchers. Clumsy ones. The firing sounds seem to be stolen from a Pink Panther cartoon episode. I suppose –though– that the budget was small, so I will not insist too much on it.

There is nonetheless some VERY good acting in here, performed by Héctor Bonilla, María Rojo and Demián Bichir. My highlight performance happens when Bonilla angrily addresses his sons at the family table, after arriving from work. Sadly, most of the other actors perform poorly (Bruno Bichir, although decently acting,is decidedly overshadowed by his brother). The pamphlet girl's acting is wooden and many other actors seemed to have been simply borrowed from a student theatrical company. The cops (judiciales) are almost a caricature and -even though they can be brutal in real life- suffer from overacting.

The scenery is flawless and honest. Lighting is OK, but nothing out of the ordinary. Some dialog lines are marvelously embellished and made "real" by Bonilla's and Rojo's delivery, although the dialog lines in general tend to sound kitschy, biased and overdone when dealing with political issues.

Recommended to those who want to analyze the evolution of the recent Mexican cinema and to evil cops who are looking forward into improving their verbal intimidation techniques.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Too much glitter... but nevertheless total gaudi
28 May 2007
This movie is about how a child growing up in a small village in the south of Germany, startled by the thought of being guilty of his mother's death, tries to find a way to find the secret to eternal life -in a funny, twisted way only possible in the mind of a kid-.

One of the great virtues of this movie is that it captures the essence of Niederbayern. Not the busty girls in Dirndls, stocky men with enormous moustaches eating Brez'n or the other usual paraphernalia surrounding the Oktoberfest: this is the REAL life in the small villages. The violent/loving affection demonstrations among acquaintances and family is there, the house interiors, the rugged language, the tell-it-like-it-is attitude, the insane tales and explanations about life told by parents to their children... Nothing is missing here.

What I resented about this movie is the lack of good acting in many of the actresses/actors and the evident US sixties and seventies' fashion and music references that seemed to permeate the director's mind. This insistence in referencing Woodstock, Elvis and hippie mysticism glitters unnecessarily in an almost uncomfortable way, polluting an otherwise amusing tale. (The kid's mother was into a hippie lifestyle while being born in 1969? Come on, she should've been more into padded shoulders and checkered patterns!) There's even a particular shot to the face of the radio DJ that seems a carbon copy of the classic "camera round trip" of the basement pot-reunions in the TV program "that 70's show".

Asides from that, it is an enjoyable movie that pays a lot of attention to detail and provides with laughs and insights into how can we perceive the world while being kids. And of course, a vivid portrait of the rural Germany, the one you don't get to see on Thomas Cooke's trip brochures.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed