Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Neds (2010)
9/10
Dark, disturbing, funny and emotional. A class act again from Mullan
11 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
*****MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS******

N.E.D.S is a fantastic coming-of-age story with remarkable authenticity and outstanding performances from a young and untrained cast. Peter Mullan has captured the essence of Glasgow gang culture impeccably while challenging oft-heard current notions of "it wasn't like that when I was a boy".

The film is brutal, touching and, thanks to an excellent script which oozes with the tension and volatility of the darker side of Glasgow's character, it carries an ever-increasing level of tension which culminates in an explosion of violence and emotional turmoil that is heart-breaking as much as it is disturbing.

The dialect is definitely a potential stumbling-block to the film's chances of appealing to a world-wide audience, despite it's themes of tribal-like warfare on the streets ringing true in all corners of the world. However, those who can deal with the relentless (and utterly realistic) F & C-words and interpret the thick Glaswegian lingo will be rewarded with a hard-hitting experience that will evoke hugely varied responses.

Interestingly, I found moments in the film very funny when they quite probably shouldn't have been. An uncomfortable laugh of recognition for these types of character and their "poetic" use of language. Many's the time while growing up that I saw people like this hanging around the streets or witnessed these animalistic and unprovoked square-offs or challenges for dominance between young guys protecting their turf of the local play-park (which also served as an under-age drinking/smoking area). An innocent boy passing by and being threatened with violence, merely for existing it seems, by a lad (often smaller than him) trying to prove how "hard" he is to the other members of his pack was a regular sight.

The film captures these incidents with a style that is bordering on documentary it is so authentic and I simply couldn't help myself but laugh at these moments. Others, such as two gangs standing at opposite ends of a foot-bridge "tooled-up" with anything sharp or heavy enough to inflict injury, taunting each other with "verbals" about each others' mothers and preparing for battle, before stopping to allow a lassie with a pram to pass through unharmed, carried a dark sense of humour about the rules of engagement adopted during these fracas. Indeed these battles reek of ancient battles such as Stirling Bridge or Bannockburn and carry a bloody brutality that echoes with the same passion and hatred for challengers to territory.

Despite a couple of dips into unnecessary weirdness, such as the Jesus- vision, the film maintains a solid pace and, while a little long for some, it captivated me well enough that I never became disinterested. The characters are magnificently portrayed and the break-down, attempt at redemption and ultimate open-ended journey of the leading man is pulled-off tremendously.

The film is visually as raw as the content of the story and has a very Ken Loach-style to it, which aids in giving a much more stomach-churning impact to the violence and the effects it leaves behind.

The film concludes with a lack of real resolution for the character, but rather an almost frustrating sense of uncertainty about what is in store. He is left (almost literally) thrown to the lions, unsure about where he will go and what he will do, dragging the ball and chain of his previous atrocities behind him with no-one left to turn to, no-one to back him up, everyone has given up on him and left him behind.

Peter Mullan has delivered yet another fine film with N.E.D.S and one that will no doubt bring mixed reaction through both it's realistic and uncomfortable portrayal of Glasgow youth and its unwillingness to adopt a sweet and audience-satisfying end which gives a conclusive answer to all that has gone before. Having met Peter Mullan while I was at university, I know that he is not one for happy endings or giving the audience what they want. He is far more in favour of showing what happens in the real world. Frankly, it doesn't always end up nice and Rosy.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (2007)
5/10
Not great.... but not BAD.... just NOT Halloween!
12 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I'm really undecided on this movie overall. As a huge fan of the original (the first film to really scare me) I was really concerned when I heard about a remake. It's never going to live up to the classic original, so why bother other than to line the studio execs pockets with an easily marketable product to an existing fan-base?

Fair play to Rob Zombie for at least trying to add to the original story by delving into the background of Michael and how he came to be the evil killer we all know. However, this is exactly where the problem with the film lies, the back-story humanises Michael and completely vanquishes the fear factor in the movie.

Myers just isn't scary when you can see his motives. In fact, you find yourself rooting for him for most of the movie because every one of his victims seems to deserve it. His abusive, alcoholic step-father, his abusive, delinquent sister, the school bully... it feels as though Zombie is supportive of Michael and uses every stereotype in the book to back up his later actions. The performances and the script are all good , but it's kind of red-neck melodrama rather than horror movie material. Thinking back to 1978 and the mask being ripped off the face of young Michael, that was so creepy and iconic... because he was a kid with no motive - other than pure evil. While Daeg Faerch is excellent as young Michael in this, he's too likable. He's a sympathetic character who reaps vengeance on his tormentors.

So, rather than the soulless monster from the original, he's something of an anti-hero. No mystery, no suspense - no FEAR.

The thing is it's not a bad movie, but it's just not "Halloween". In fact the whole of the first movie is kind of vacuum-packed into the last 45-50 minutes of this, and even then it's just a rehash of the original with more sex.

Visually, it's very faithful to the Carpenter version, but that's not enough. It just doesn't ring true as Michael Myers - and if anything's essential to the essence of Halloween, He is! That said, good enough for a viewing, but don't expect to see something that has the impact of the 1978 version.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed