Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Mandibles (2020)
4/10
Underwhelming and strangely conventional
20 May 2021
The first time I saw Rubber, I hated it. The whole " No reason " philosophy didn't click at all with me. But it really sums up well Quentin Dupieux filmmaking process. And now, even though I'm still not a fan of Rubber for a number of reasons, I do embrace this philosophy and I care about every new Dupieux film since Réalité.

In each movie I saw from him, there is a insane idea, presented from the start, that draws you in and make you want to see more. Rubber's protagonist (a killer tire), Réalité and the quest for the greatest scream ever, Le Daim and the 100% deerskin jacket that drives the protagonist crazy. Au poste! Didn't have this one central idea but it still felt like a Dupieux movie, full of absurdities and with its own very strange universe.

Another key component of Dupieux's recent movies is a great main actor : Alain Chabat, Benoît Poelvoorde, Jean Dujardin ; they all gave life to their respective roles and dialogues, and to their respective movie overall.

So, I still haven't mentioned Mandibules since the start of this review, why ? Because I think this movie doesn't feel like it was made by Quentin Dupieux at all.

Yeah the giant fly seems quite insane on the paper, but its role in the film is really limited and gimmicky ; the movie could have been more or less the same without it, which is impossible to say about Rubber's tire or le Daim's jacket for instance.

What about the actors ? They aren't bad, I do like the main duo, but it feels pretty forced and unnatural at times, it isn't as flawless as the others I nammed earlier.

The movie is a bit absurd, a bit dumb in a funny way, but it is far away from what Dupieux usually makes. Through Mandibules I never thought once " WTF is this, WTF am I watching " which always happens multiple times with every other Dupieux movie. Mandibules felt like any forgettable comedy made by any random director.

Maybe he was tired (haha) to make niche movies and decided to remove this usual absurdity and madness to make it more accessible and conventionnal. And it seems, in France at least, the box-office tells us he was right to do so, sadly.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lux Æterna (2019)
4/10
Welp still a bit to self-indulgent
28 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Still haven't seen Enter the void (and not interested about Love) but I did see every other Gaspard Noé movie. And I must say that, even though I really like " Seul contre Tous " (" I stand alone " for english speaking folks) I'm not a huge fan of his style, especially in his later effort, Climax. " Wow look at me, beautiful camera works and sequence-shots eh ? Wow this is brutal, do you see ? I am brutal. Doesn't matter whether the movie is about nothing and the actors are mediocre, there is a cool music and a cool choreography".

I was hoping Lux Aeterna wouldn't be as awful as Climax ; maybe this time Gaspard Noé would have something to say ? And indeed this time Gaspard Noé want to talk about cinema, and more particularily the chaos surrounding the creation process of a movie.

The first third is a dialogue between a film director played by Béatrice Dalle and an actress played by Charlotte Gainsbourg. It really sounded and was filmed like some kind of interview but it allows the characters to extensively discuss about cinema. Sober but sharp directing, interesting discussion. Didn't expected that from Gaspard Noé but it really worked quite well. After that it's the downfall until the end. The second part of the movie show the gradual dive into madness during the shooting of Béatrice Dalle's movie. It's not a bad idea by itself but it is actually done with no subtelty whatsoever. You get the point after 5 minutes and then it just drags on forever. Didn't expect I could think a medium-length film is too long. Finally, the last act of the movie is pure chaos. But. Stroboscopics lights. This is what I hate the moste about this movie and Climax. " Style " over substance . And what I hate even more is that Gaspard Noé fans will tell you there is some deep meaning behind this choice of using intense stroboscopics lights. Welp it highlights the chaos of the shooting, yeah sure we got that. Does this justify to put the spectators through 10 minutes (not sure exactly but it was really long) of pain ? And even the man himself told in an interview that a knew the spectators would like stroboscopics lights, that's it. He just knows how to please his fans. Not sure this a really " artistic " way of creating a movie.

So yeah, the first part was great, I liked the direction Gaspard Noé took but then he came back to do the worst that he can do. I don't really recommend this movie, except if you are curious to see this really, really painful ending or if you are looking for a reliable way to diagnose epilepsy.
16 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed