Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Weak Predictable Plot, Unsatisfying Ending, But Decent Action
15 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This adventure drama takes place in the Pacific Northwest during the depths of the Great Depression when hobo-ism was prolific due to joblessness.

Ernest Borgnine is Shack, a legendary sadistic railroad agent of the Oregon Pacific Train #19, determined that no "bo" is ever going to ride one of his trains. He delights in wreaking whatever havoc he can on the hobo unfortunate (or stupid) enough to attempt to ride "his" train.

Lee Marvin is A#1, an equally legendary hobo, who goes and rides whatever he pleases. He is just as determined to ride Shack's train to prove he is "King Of The North". Keith Carradine is Cigaret, a young brash hobo who challenges A#1 in word and deed, but actually admires him.

There is some truly fine photography here and the depression era atmosphere is captured perfectly by realistic sets.

But there is not much plot and what there is, is mostly predictable, leading up to the exciting final confrontation between Shack, A#1, and Cigaret.

I found some of the dialog especially between A#1 and Cigaret to be obtuse, more like a couple of philosophy student dropouts talking, rather than the earthy exchange we would expect between hobos in the 1930s.

Still all 3 turn in decent performances, with Borgnine exceptional as the antagonist. A good bet if you like these actors and/or this historical era. This film is a must see for steam train lovers and the viewer may even learn something about railroad operations.

All said, I found the plot weak and the ending unsatisfying. I just am not as enthusiastic as some of the fans on IMDb and while not a bad film I wanted it to be better.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very Educational - But Could Have Been Better
15 July 2006
This series from the History Channel covers all 43 presidents from Washington to Bush and it runs about 6 hours in length.

Each president is covered in some detail with descriptions not only of the key historical events of their presidency but more importantly what each was like as a person.

Both their strengths and weaknesses are discussed and the coverage seemed fair.

There is a little baseball-like "trading card" that pops up for each president that summarizes what they were like that grew on me as the series unfolded and marked a clear start of the next president.

There are some decent extras as well to round this offering out.

I was disappointed that only interview actually conducted with a still living president was with Jimmy Carter and I would really would have liked to hear a few words from the others.

The coverage of the early presidents actually seemed better than those of more recent vintage.

Trying to stayed focused and involved as much as possible, I found the pace slow at times but clearly some presidents were more interesting than others so perhaps that is understandable. How much gripping information can be provided about someone like Millard Fillmore?

I also would have liked a little more discussion on the election campaigns. Who was the opponent and what were the issues? Why did this man win over the other? This aspect is covered pretty extensively for some presidents but is often non-existent for others.

Recommended for those interested in politics and/or American history, but perhaps a little dry for others. Still I learned a lot of new things that surprised and sometimes amused me about American presidents.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed