Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
My Dog Tulip (2009)
I was offended by the toilet humor and smut
31 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I am an artsy, worldly person, but I was creeped out by the ever present toilet humor and the smut, even though it was animated. This movie started out appealing because it was animated, had pleasant music and was set in England. It seemed charming, creative, and well-spoken at first, especially for dog lovers and anglophiles, but it became unpleasant and offensive with graphic animated canine and human sexual functioning and toilet and menstruation humor. It was smutty. You should know this before you watch it in mixed company. It is a definite NO for children and not a date night movie either. I watched the special feature about the making of the film and I am not surprised that it was animated by a middle-aged recluse couple who appear to enjoy what they see as sticking it to middle class values, but it was creepy. And I was horrified by the scene when the main character was preparing to drown puppies. Be forewarned, that just because it is animated does not make it benign or wholesome. It is neither.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Get Low (2009)
8/10
Wonderfully atmospheric
5 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I liked the feel of the film. It felt like Tennessee in the 1930s might have felt and it was satisfying to be there. Robert Duvall, Sissy Spacek, and Lucas Black were wonderful and realistic. Robert Duvall deserves an Academy Award nomination. Maybe Lucas Black too. The period costumes, the hearse, sets, the barn, the mule, the scenery, all of the excellent lighting,and cinematography were perfect. The story was interesting. I enjoyed watching all the special features which added to my enjoyment of the movie.

Negatives about the movie: 1) Bill Cobbs as the preacher was too caricature and not real. 2) There was a scene about an assault in the funeral home that was never explained and I felt it should not have been left in the film or it should have been explained. It felt like a BIG mistake in editing. I watched the DVD twice - with and without commentary and I watched all the special features to get an answer, but that glaring error was never addressed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Art House BORE
3 September 2009
Luckily it was only 77 minutes. This documentary on Liverpool, UK, during the 20th century had potential, but it was like watching a college student's project instead of the work of a 64 year old man. The archival footage was interesting, but the negative, cynical poetry of TS Eliot and James Joyce was very depressing and dark. Here is footage of smiling beautiful Brits going about life and being happy with friends and family, and happy playing children, despite living in a poor city, and the heavy dressing poetry being read over it was ridiculous. Try living in a tough, diverse American urban center, with rampant crime & conflict and then you'll have something to complain about. The poetry was hard to understand too, and no captions available. It is pretentious to prove you are literate by using Joyce or Eliot's words (or whoever the poems were by - there was no attribution), despite them being very whiny, cynical, negative and depressing.

It was boring to me and to my male friend. We didn't think it was cute or clever to call Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, 'Betty and Phil" and to be so critical of the Royal pomp & pageantry while adoring Hollywood glitter and pomp. The commentary was unwise, immature, cynical and depressing. The special features were BORING too. Everyone is kissing butt of the director because of past work, but this movie was like a POV show on PBS.

The director could have focused on any number of beautiful things about life in Liverpool, including the beauty of the townspeople, instead of the depressing drone of complaints. I recommend to miss it or watch the footage with the sound off. One other point: in the special features they mention more than once that the song The Folks Who Live on the Hill was "BY" Peggy Lee. She sang it, but it was written "BY" Oscar Hammerstein II and Jerome Kern.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Warning: abortion guilt message in this movie
29 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I expected this to be a harmless, feel good movie about middle aged people finding love. Mostly it is, but I do want to warn people who have lost children or have made decisions to end a pregnancy or had a pregnancy end on its own through miscarriage or had a still born baby, there is a speech that Emma Thompson makes about her guilt over an abortion and wondering how the child would be now. When painful things happen in life by choice or by chance, well-adjusted people know they must go on without looking back in self recrimination. If this is going to hurt you or haunt you after the film, don't watch this movie and suffer needlessly.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Station Jim (2001 TV Movie)
10/10
Lovely, lovely Victorian era tale
10 May 2009
What a wonderful movie. There is no female nudity (what a relief), no cursing, no coarse American culture in it. There are some scary moments in it that might frighten children and frightened me somewhat, but after all of that there is a happy ending, which is refreshing. The film quality is surprisingly clear and realistic. The children are adorable. The trained dog is amazing. Thomas Sangster is so very adorable as Henry, an orphan who attaches to Jim. According to a special feature included on the DVD, which you should read, this is based on a real dog that did live and perform at a railway station to raise money for an orphanage. I highly recommend this film to people who love dogs, Victoriana, British good manners and 19th century costumes.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Visitor (I) (2007)
1/10
Awful, heavy handed political propaganda
31 October 2008
This is a heavy handed sledgehammer of political propaganda. It is NOT a comedy as listed. Not at all. It is a heavy handed drama about a guilty white man who gives the ultimate respect to Muslims (one from Senegal, the other from Syria, originally Palestinian). There was a scene that was anti-Semitic in feeling where Walter's neighbor with a Jewish name is presented as gay, silly, talking about his mother who moved to Florida & his little dog Mr. Sparkles. Walter disrespects and blows off this Jewish man. But he gives the ultimate of respect to these Muslims who somehow wind up living in his apartment without his permission, but because they are 3rd world and Muslim, Walter never is upset about strangers living in his apartment because they are 3rd world, but revels in their exotic coolness. He would not have been so kind to Anglo-Saxon or Jewish Americans. The whole film is so anti-American and guilty. Except the 2 from Syria/Palestine and 1 from Senegal/Paris want to be here. Luckily they also portray Syria as evil. At least they do show that Palestinian Syrians have money for international travel, cellphones & musical instruments. The secondary story is about mid-life, but thinking that being less white, i.e.bland, is going to make you happy is ridiculous. Just know before you rent this that it is first & foremost a political propaganda, guilty white American film. When the Senegal woman says: "That is where the twin towers were", no one says anything, like what a tragedy -- they say nothing at all!
19 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed