Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Event Horizon (1997)
2/10
would make a cheese sandwich...
28 April 2004
to begin with, the person who claimed that this was the scariest movie they ever saw gave away the actual source of this movies supposed frightening qualities: they were in grade school! and as person was to progress back through grade school, ei fifth grade, fourth grade, third grade, etc.. i would imagine it would become scarier and scarier.

the heart of the matter and the facts as they appear to this observer is that this movie is nothing more than a poor man's synthesis (read: RIPOFF) of hellraiser, 2001, and solaris. but the movie the black hole?

i don't think that guy saw either the black hole or event horizon.

someone said that the people like this film must have been on lsd while watching it... i think that is mistaken.. a combination of psp and alcohol would make more sense in terms of making this movie more interesting.. if such a thing were possible. lsd might have made this movie interesting but that is extremely dubious. personally the only thing that i can think of that would make this movie interesting would be sleeping through it. and as far as acting and characters laurence fishburn was better as "cowboy curtis".

my warning to you. do not take internally.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
worst film i've ever seen
28 May 2003
Folks, we watch a ton of movies. And I've seen plenty of bad ones. Prometheus Bound simply has to be the single worst movie I've ever seen, and I don't state this casually. With many films I consider bad, it's just because I didn't like the story, or that it wasn't my taste etc. No, this movie is bad (in my opinion) because the acting was inexcusable (especially the bad guy Deacon. Yes, that's his name, not an actual deacon). And the cinematography was awful, it was very grainy through out the entire film. I assume it's a lame attempt at "gritty realism", not to mention out of focus at other times. There were scenes that are entirely blown out, or so dark you barely see what's occurring. The editing was inexcusably bad, with cuts that are disjointed, and it's obvious that they either didn't care and\or couldn't be bothered to make an effort, or just are inept. It was simple things that could have been easily corrected. As an example, there is a scene where a character is standing at one location, then suddenly a disjointed and unnecessary cut, and this person is stand a few feet away from where they had been. Don't they mark the place where you're standing in order to avoid inconsistencies such as these? And the story itself seemed entirely implausible to me as well. Oh, I almost forgot the terrible audio job they did too. It cuts in and out entirely (and I do mean out of nowhere voices cut out into utter silence. Suddenly you're watching a silent film for seconds on end!) and in places where it couldn't be more conspicuous. Volume levels are mismatched through out and when they add audio that clearly came from another source (such as chirping birds) in the places where the primary audio drops out, it is so painfully obvious that you are hearing something from another source. This due in part, to the fact that they have these incredible levels of white noise (hiss) that you can easily hear underneath the dialog. Then when they attempt to intercut with other audio (the aforementioned chirping birds for example) the white noise is gone for a moment, then returns when they cut back to the main\primary soundtrack.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst excuse for a movie ever...
26 May 2003
Folks, we watch a ton of movies. And I've seen plenty of bad ones. Prometheus Bound simply has to be the single worst movie I've ever seen, and I don't state this casually. With many films I consider bad, it's just because I didn't like the story, or that it wasn't my taste etc. No, this movie is bad (in my opinion) because the acting was inexcusable (especially the bad guy Deacon. Yes, that's his name, not an actual deacon). And the cinematography was awful, it was very grainy through out the entire film. I assume it's a lame attempt at "gritty realism", not to mention out of focus at other times. There were scenes that are entirely blown out, or so dark you barely see what's occurring. The editing was inexcusably bad, with cuts that are disjointed, and it's obvious that they either didn't care and\or couldn't be bothered to make an effort, or just are inept. It was simple things that could have been easily corrected. As an example, there is a scene where a character is standing at one location, then suddenly a disjointed and unnecessary cut, and this person is stand a few feet away from where they had been. Don't they mark the place where you're standing in order to avoid inconsistencies such as these? And the story itself seemed entirely implausible to me as well. Oh, I almost forgot the terrible audio job they did too. It cuts in and out entirely (and I do mean out of nowhere voices cut out into utter silence. Suddenly you're watching a silent film for seconds on end!) and in places where it couldn't be more conspicuous. Volume levels are mismatched through out and when they add audio that clearly came from another source (such as chirping birds) in the places where the primary audio drops out, it is so painfully obvious that you are hearing something from another source. This due in part, to the fact that they have these incredible levels of white noise (hiss) that you can easily hear underneath the dialog. Then when they attempt to intercut with other audio (the aforementioned chirping birds for example) the white noise is gone for a moment, then returns when they cut back to the main\primary soundtrack.

I realize I've not given a synopsis, or done a "proper" review here. But then, that wasn't my intent. My intent is two-fold. One, to warn everyone to steer clear, and two, an attempt to publicly shame these people. There is no excuse for such a p*** poor job. I've seen student films, and independent films done with low or no budget that have turned out far better then this. Look, the people who did Blair Witch did far better. Heck, look at what Sam Fuller did with little to nothing. Or what about Orson Welles who turned out some beautiful work while using used film stock that was often mismatched!

This film was so completely awful that it actually caused me to become angry, and that has never happened to me before.

I just can't believe the people responsible actually released this knowingly. I personally would have been ashamed to let this loose on an unsuspecting public. If there is any justice the people behind this production, the will fail and disappear from the film world forever.

So in closing I'll say this: I am fully aware that this is all my opinion. Someone out there will most likely enjoy this. But I'll wager everything I have in this world that most would rent this and come to similar conclusions.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed