Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Kart Racer (2003)
1/10
I don't know what's sadder...
1 October 2006
I don't know what's sadder, the fact that this movie exists, or the fact that people are complaining that its not realistic.

Racing movies are all the same, it doesn't matter what happens in the first 80 minutes, because the hero will just pull ahead at the last minute anyways. And the way they glamourized this sport was hilarious. I mean, this is the same crap people are racing at theme parks and carnivals, and they expect us to believe that it would draw crowds like that? Hey I know, let's make a movie about how some underdog unicyclist has to reconnect with his father and then perceiver to win the Unicycle Cup. At the last second he'll put it all on the line, pull ahead, and win it all.
14 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
VERY disappointing
12 September 2004
Well, mark off yet another franchise ruined. This movie was disturbing, but not in the horror movie sense. No, it was disturbing because of how similar it felt to House of the Dead, quite possibly the lowest grade zombie movie made in the last 10 years. The really sad part is, House of the Dead had more horror in it than Resident Evil 2 did! This movie was practically gore-less, no doubt to keep the ratings low to attract the cash kiddies.

Like HOTD, Resident Evil 2 feels like the director ran around Toronto with the cast, going "ok, a grave yard, this will be a cool place to film". It felt scriptless, like it was made up on the spot. While some may thing that this would lend a little spontonaity to what might otherwise be a formulaic movie, they'd be wrong. All the lack of direction added was a boat load of cheap one-liners, bad dialogue, and the worst attempts at European accents I've ever heard. It felt like the director simply came up with ideas on the spot; anything he thought was cool he'd add it, regardless of it not fitting at all. "Hey, wouldn't it be cool if Alice drove a motorcycle through the stain glass window to get into the church!". This sort of stuff isn't mindless entertainment, I'm a big fan of mindless, but this was just idiotic.

The whole movie plays out like a music video, with fast edits, and machine gun cuts. HOTD also pulled this trick numerous times. Both films even share a similar flashback sequence where they show all the previous events in the film strobing to the drum beat in the background music.

All in all, I think this movie REALLY lost the scope of the first film. The first Resident Evil, like the game, was a "survival horror". It featured people trapped inside an enclosed space with deadly zombies and mutants. In RE2, the whole scope is broadened too far, making it feel more like Escape From New York rather than a survival horror.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Doctor Snuggles (1979– )
classic, inspirational fun
18 April 2004
Back when I was younger my parents borrowed an old Beta tape from my uncle which contained several episodes of Dr Snuggles. To this day that tape still resides somewhere in their house, along with the Beta VCR to play it. I used to watch that tape endlessly and could probably recite what happens in nearly every episode that was on there shot by shot.

The show was inspiring and creative, with a real sense of adventure and wacky invention-based problem solving. The characters were all funny, but somehow quite believable. Likewise, the inventions, although impossible (a robot made of soup cans for instance), still made sense in the context of the show.

I remember wanting to be an inventor when I was younger and this show really had me hooked on the concept. These days, while I'm not an inventor of rocket ships and soup can robots, I'd like to think that the creative direction my life has taken is, in part, due to growing up with Dr Snuggles.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Foolproof (2003)
9/10
Foolproof is foolproof!
3 October 2003
This movie was outstanding! Clever, funny, exciting, and Canadian. I'm quite proud to see this film on the big screen. I'm even more proud of the fact that the film makers decided to base the story in Toronto. Too often has Toronto doubled for other cities in films, it was refreshing to see the "T dot O" being its good old self.

Until I saw this movie, Ocean's 11 (the remake, not the boring original) was hands-down favourite heist movie. In my opinion, FoolProof is practically dead even with Ocean's 11 on sheer cleverness. I don't want to spoil anything, but suffice it to say that the plot surrounding the heist and the "thieves by mistake" is brilliant, twisting, and...foolproof!

The characters were expertly played, with Ryan Reynolds really shining in his performance. He came across as smart, quirky, and of course very funny. His comic timing blended very well with the tense heist drama.

The great part about FoolProof is that, unlike Ocean's 11, it didn't try to hype itself up with some veteran all-star cast to try and sell more tickets. Ryan Reynolds has significant star power, but I'm not sure if the fratboy fans who say Van Wilder will warm up to this much more dynamic role. Only time will tell I suppose. Either way, if you're a Canadian, support your film industry and check out this stellar movie!
25 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I like the MIB cartoon a lot better
7 August 2003
This movie was way too over the top. All the mystique that the MIB agency had in the first was lost in this one. I mean, there was a Burger King in their central terminal thing, come on! The only part that seemed to maintain the quirky mystique from the first film was the beat boxing post office workers, that was truly clever. Frank the dog, however, was irritating and unfunny; seeing a dog in a suit singing I Will Survive doesn't make me laugh! Normally, I'm a big fan of special effects, but not in this case. The effects were plentiful and all horribly done. Jonny Knoxville's character looked especially bad with the neck moving in the most unnatural way possible. The subway scene *could* have been good, but that too was ruined by bad special effects. I just gave up once the cars and spaceships started flying everywhere, but I'll bet all the kiddies got a kick out of the PS2 controller Wil Smith used to fly the car.

I wish the writers had looked to the MIB cartoon. That cartoon had better plots, better acting, and better effects than MIB 2 did! It didn't try to turn quirky dead-pan into goofy "Fresh Prince" one liners like this film did!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Equilibrium (2002)
Fahrenheit 451 meets The Matrix
3 July 2003
This movie was truly a hidden gem. Although the plot is not entirely original (it reminds me of Fahrenheit 451 a great deal), it is a good one and ties in well with the settings, characters, and action sequences. The sets and backgrounds were beautifully bleak, monolithic and stunning. Finally, the action sequences, these are absolutely some of the best gun fights I've seen in any movie. Considering this is a straight-to-video release, the production is incredibly well done and makes use of every penny they had in the budget.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bio-Dome (1996)
I didn't laugh
20 August 2002
Sure, this movie is intended to be stupid, but I seem to have missed all the so called "jokes" that were in this movie. Exactly why do the select few Pauly fans actually find him funny? Bio-Dome, Jury Duty, In the Army Now, Son In Law, etc. None of them seem to contain any real comedy. More like just some quirky guy who giggles a lot doing some "totally outrageous" goofy stunts. To me it's as if some kid purposly falls off a skateboard and faceplants into a curb expecting to get some laughs for his effort. Sorry Pauly, your "faceplants" aren't making me laugh.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
xXx (2002)
Disapointing
14 August 2002
I went in to XXX knowing full well it would be a brainless action movie. I knew in advance that the movie was mostly just a vehicle to display some over the top "X-TREME" sports (Vin battles evil on the skateboard ramp). But even with these cautiously low expectations I was still very disappointed. The action scenes, for the most part, were pretty exciting. The problem was all the bits in-between. They plodded along at a snail's pace with no conceivable direction whatsoever. For instance, characters who were introduced in the beginning disappear, only now they're evil and promptly get shot minutes later. Predictable T&A and shots of expensive cars are thrown in for the male viewers, while scenes with Vin walking around in saggy underwear is thrown in for the girls. All they needed to do was toss in a few scenes featuring a computer generated robot and every teen on the planet would have gone to see it.

As far as dialog goes, imagine a bad Arnold Schwarzenegger movie fused with a James Bond film. Why, you'd have True Lies then, wouldn't you? But where True Lies worked with the humour of the unlikeliness of Arnold being a secret agent, XXX falls flat. While Vin seems to be capable of rattling off his lines in a convincing tone, the one-liners were out of place and poorly written. The dialog was wooden and often very redundant. What one character explained in an earlier scene is then re-explained by another character.

Finally, the action, the real reason anyone goes to see a movie like this. Bad acting, poor script, no problems right? as long as we see lots of explosions we're happy. For the most part this holds true in XXX, the stunts are pretty exciting. However, almost everyone who has seen the film would agree that the stunts he performs are so over the top they'd be impossible to execute. What I found annoying about the action sequences is how they seemed to find a way to tie in the extreme sports aspect into everything. For example, if XXX needed to jump a fence then he suddenly discovers a dirt bike. If he needs to disable a radio tower on a mountain why it do it by snowboarding infront of a giant avalanche. If he needs to escape a sniper then a lunch try will easily double as a skateboard with which to rail slide down 5 flights of stairs. This guy is incapable of escaping a situation normally; he couldn't just run away, he'd have to rollerblade away or something.

Probably the best character in the whole movie was XXX's equivalent to James Bond's Q. This guy's snappy upbeat delivery as he showed off the gadgets really made the whole gadget segments a lot more enjoyable.

So to conclude, this movie was a major letdown. I went in with low expectations but this movie was too boring and unoriginal to even meet those.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The credits listed TWO continuity coordinators!
28 June 2002
I never knew stock footage of monkeys and birds could be so funny! Every other shot in this film features some exotic animal frolicking in slow motion. The zombies were great too, some looked disinterested, others looked like they were break dancing, a true collage of talent in that department. Fortunately, the highly skilled (read: ridiculously disorganized) janitors, er, SWAT team are there to thwart this relentless menace. But how do you kill the undead? Shoot it in the head of course. How do *they* kill the undead? They don't for the most part, instead they shoot them everywhere *EXCEPT* the head. Naturally, when the zombies don't die they ponder their situation for what seems like hours as the zombies approach. And can these people ever travel! On a single tank of gas they somehow get from Italy, to a remote jungle, to the planes of Africa, to a sea shore (with a convenient boat). I don't know how this film got away with such massive gaps in continuity considering there were TWO continuity coordinators listed in the credits!

Probably the best part about the whole movie is the DVD box. "eye popping gore, jaw dropping dialog, and the terrifying use of unnecessary stock footage". The box didn't take it seriously, and neither should you. Rent it, buy it, do whatever you have to do to see this movie, it will make you laugh, it will make you cry...with laughter.

Five out of Five turkeys for this one!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
decent once you get past the layers of patriotic over dramatization
19 June 2002
Warning: Spoilers
***POSSIBLE SPOILERS***

This movie borrowed a lot from movies like Shawshank Redemption. At times I even expected to hear Morgan Freeman begin to narrate "Andy was a quiet man...". Still, at its core, this movie was decent and worth watching.

Unfortunately, most of the story gets buried under heaps of irritating American patriotic dramatization. Saluting, drumming dog tags, praising the flag, singing war songs; after a while it gets very annoying. Just about everything Robert Redford's character says winds up with him giving some long winded speech about what it is to be a soldier. And are American soldiers truly that obsessed about their flag?

Anyways, the plan that the prisoners hatch is fun to watch unfold even if some of the elements seem a bit far fetched. It truly was the high point of the movie and was worth sitting though all the military politics to get there. To be honest, this movie seems as though it started out as a cool prison breakout-style movie but heaps of "go USA" sentimentality tacked to cash in on the latest "war" the US is currently fighting. I'm sure a lot of "non-Americans" like myself were groaning at all the cliches.

To conclude, the movie *was* worth watching, the acting is legitimate, the plot, although not original, was well executed, and despite all efforts of the producers to practically smother us in American patriotism, this movie was not only bearable, it was rather entertaining.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
there's no excuse for it to be THIS bad!
9 June 2002
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** Right from the start this movie was on a collision course for disaster. The fact that Shannon Elizabeth was staring in it should have been the first clue. The whole movie simply *reeks* of Hollywood-ism, as if it were made up by the same Armani-wearing, Laté-drinking, ghoti-touting hipster who thought up S-Club 7. From the custom tailored raincoats that Cyrus' crew wore at the beginning, to the designer `ghost goggles', the movie is simply dripping with style, when it should have been dripping with blood.

The premise for the movie isn't a bad one (family inherits haunted mechanical mansion), and the idea that people can only see the ghosts with the special glasses *could* have made for some creepy moments. However, I felt absolutely no connection to the family at all. They had no chemistry whatsoever, as if the actors simply rattled off their lines and then went to their separate trailers. At no point in the film did I feel at all empathetic towards them, I didn't care at all if they got out of the house alive. The worst of the bunch was the nanny who was a feeble attempt at adding comic relief to the movie. Instead, she comes across as yet another one-liner barking token black actor. Only Matthew Lillard's character can compete with the nanny in sheer cliché one-liner-spewing volume. Honestly, who is responsible for coming up with the lines for these people? Yet another failed attempt at hip-afying character dialog that is totally inane and out of place in the first place. Just about every remark these characters make is doused in horribly tame sarcasm.

The only saving grace in this high budget, low mileage flop is the ghosts themselves. I didn't find the idea of a well lit glass mansion to be at all scary. However, the variety of monsters was formidable and the makeup and costumes were excellent. The iron cage around the `Jackal's' head, and the vomit covered man-child were particularly nice touches. Unfortunately, the `Marylyn Manson music video' stuttering effect, which is used whenever the camera is focused on the ghosts, becomes old and overused *very* quickly.

The `surprise' appearance by Embeth Davidtz, who plays the lady with the book of spells, certainly *was* a surprise to me.it surprised me to see someone who was a worse actor than Shanon Elizabeth! I was tempted to fast forward through the parts where she hopelessly tries to spin a tale of mystery and lore behind the ghosts. She does so using veritable buckets of mumbo jumbo and tries desperately to look concerned about the family's predicament.but fails miserably. All in all, her performance comes across as something more suited to an episode of VIP than a big screen movie. What's worse is the `twist' that was added, where it turns out she was working for Cyrus' all along. It was so ludicrous and obviously tacked on at the last minute, I couldn't help but laugh.

But, like all movies, this one had to end. Once everyone gets bored watching people run away from invisible ghosts in a glass house the director decides to wrap it up. The ending was particularly useless as the film makers scrambled desperately to tie up the loose ends. In the span of about three minutes Cyrus gets thrown into the spinning machine by the ghosts, the nanny then breaks the machine, the dad `saves' the kids (ie: pointlessly jumps inside the whirling rings simply to comfort the kids), the family gets a brief glimpse of their ghost mom, and the nanny spouts off every one-liner she didn't get to say during the first part of the movie. To top this speedy dispatch the musical director felt it would be most fitting to roll the credits with a *spooooky* rap song! Good call! I mean, how do you expect to sell the Thirteen Ghosts soundtrack if you don't insert a bunch of crappy commercial music in, right?

Conclusion, this movie feels like it was thought up one afternoon by some Los Angles movie-making yuppie on his way to an appointment with his hairdresser. A *lot* more money than talent was funnelled into this project, and it shows. There is no excuse for big budget horror films like these to not be scary at all. Maybe the producers were too busy trying to inserting product placement for the sunglasses into every shot.

Rating: 2/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
above average first half
10 May 2002
I must say, I was expecting a lot worse from this film. The whole first half is genuinely scary. Although the brother and sister's rivalry was played up just a bit too much, their characters were still a lot more believable than most modern scare films. Their dialogue was especially natural, and didn't contain a single "oh my god, like, did I just totally see, like, an undead demon, or is it just me?" which I praise the writers for (there's only so many times Buffy the Vampire Slayer can say lines like that before I start doing a little slaying of my own). Despite the constant squabbling the kids do, you can still warm up to them enough to feel empathic about their plight. The cinematography was excellent, my favourite scene being the long pan up the side of the church. The music and sound were cued perfectly and conveyed a true sense of fear, anxiety and isolation.

Unfortunately, the second half of the movie really suffers. Like so many other movies, once the killer/monster is revealed the whole thing goes down hill. It goes from relying on X-files-like suspense to bland gore and a cliché monster suit. Top it off with some overacting "we're not taking any crap" police officers and a poorly acted psychic lady and you turn what could have been a gem of a scary movie into a second rate dud. The biggest disappointment was the end. It was horribly tacked on in a desperate attempt at being a shocker.

Other then the whole second half, the only other complaint I have is regarding the DVD. The menus show clips from the movie which essentially run in sequence, and if you pay attention to them, they spoil just about everything. Where they are, what the monster looks like, etc. I haven't bothered to watch the menus all the way through but with any luck they spoil the ending too (but that's not really so bad in this case).
55 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cool fights...when they happened.
24 October 2001
All in all, I'd consider this movie a flop. The plot *could* have been decent had it not been so slowly drawn out. The fight scenes were great but too few and far between to keep the movie interesting. Ever since the Matrix I've been addicted to gravity defying impossible kung fu battles through the use of wires and computer effects. I know not everyone would agree with me, but I think Jet Li's already fantastic martial arts abilities are (usually) enhanced by the use of wires (the firehose battle in particular comes to mind). Sadly, even Jet Li's matrial arts acrobatics couldn't save this movie, and his debut North American film had me returning the DVD before I even finished watching it.

Fortunatly Kiss of the Dragon redeemed Li and not only proved to the purists that he could kick ass without the use of wires, but he could act too.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Swordfish (2001)
A decent action film with a liberal does of hacker lingo
13 June 2001
After the recent Travolta disaster known as Battlefield Earth, I went into Swordfish with cautiously low expectations. Perhaps this is why I didn't think the movie was totally bad. In comparison to Battlefield Earth, this movie is a masterpiece, however, the same holds true to just about any movie when held up against THAT bomb. Thankfully, Travolta's outrageous over-acting didn't spill over so much this time, which gave Hugh Jackman some time to shine. One thing that seemed odd was how Hugh's accent seemed to shift back and forth between Australian and Californian, as if he was struggling with it. Personally, I think he should have just stuck with his natural Australian accent, it would have sounded much cooler!

The positive aspects of this movie generally lie in the audio and visual categories, although the ending had a nice The Usual Suspects-style twist to it. The opening sequence where the bomb explodes, sending hundreds of ball bearings flying everywhere, as the camera does a super-long 360-degree slow motion Marix-style pan around the entire scene is absolutely spectacular. The audience in the theatre was giggling with effects-lust during the entire shot. Unfortunatly, this is about the only special effect worth noting, and despite the coolness factor, seemed fairly tacked on and out of place from the rest of the movie's effects.

The techno soundtrack was one of my favourite aspects of the film. For the most part, composed and arranged by legendary electronic musician Paul Oakenfold, who composed several new tracks specifically for Swordfish, as well as including several remixes he'd done. The music is low key and minimalistic, while remaining floor pounding and intelligent. The style is somewhat new compared to the usual brand of Oakenfold trance, and could almost be mistaken for the Crystal Method at times.

All in all, the movie was decent. I didn't feel ripped off, but I doubt I'll want to see it again.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Channels (1992 Video)
80's glam rock meets 90's rubber aliens!
24 May 2001
This is by far, one of the silliest movies I've ever had the pleasure of seeing. I mean, it was so asinine I just *had* to rent it on three separate occasions to prove to different groups of friends that such a monstrosity could be made! It was released in 1992, but feels more like it was made in 1982!

The `hero' is the `bad boy' or radio, Dangerous Dan O'Dare. Dan treats his listeners to publicity stunt after publicity stunt, with the odd 80's glam rock song thrown in for good measure. An alien lands in what appears to a giant novelty light-up yo-yo and proceeds to take over the radio station which just happens to have a nation-wide broadcasting range on frequency 66.6.

The alien uses the radio signals and the sound of Dan's voice to target young women listening to the station, and capture them in little glass tubes. However, before the women are transported, they hallucinate that they're in music videos which take place in the locations they're at. There's nothing funnier than seeing some rockers straight out of the 80's appear in a diner and try to give a convincing performance.

Naturally, a movie of this calibre is full of holes. Dan figures out pretty early on that his voice was being used to target the women, but instead of shutting up, he goes on and on describing the aliens and telling people not to listen, which, of course, they ignore and keep on doing.

I laughed at the cliché small-town cop who must have been paid a set amount each time he discredited the alien's existence. The entire town he's patrolling says they saw an alien, and several of the women were reported having vanished into thin air. But this cop chalks it up to them all being drunk or something. Even when he sees the alien first hand he gives the `sarcastic cop' routine, and tells everyone to move along.

The `music videos' are all terrible, covering all sorts of the least favourable genres. Glam rockers invade the diner, a grunge band causes a ditzy cheerleader to seductively gyrate during band practice, and the crème de la crème, Psychotik Sinfony performs a clown metal piece in the hospital, causing a nun to mosh and play bass guitar.

Back in the operating room, the doctor is operating on a patient who earlier was infected by the alien fungus. When the nurse suddenly disappears, the patient bolts up in amazement. Which begs two questions; what kind of doctor lets his nurse listen to Dan O'Dare while he's performing delicate surgery, and why the hell didn't he use any anaesthetic on the patient!?

The climax is about the least exciting thing in the whole movie. Dan accidentally discovers that fungicide hurts the alien, and the radio station just happens to have a whole box of it! Dan frees the women by randomly playing with the alien's controls and the alien splits open revealing a weird Venus-flytrap-like monster within. Together, Dan and the women they stand around within arm's reach of the alien and spray it with fungicide in the least dramatic way possible. Dan tries to liven things up by shouting `die you rat ba**ard' a few times, but it has no effect.

The reason for the alien capturing the women is never explained, nor does anyone ever consider looking for the space ship that landed only about a mile away. If the radio station was broadcasting nation-wide, why were the only people being abducted from the surrounding town? And how did the alien infect the guy at the beginning before it had even landed?

I could go on for ages, but it'd simply be easier if you were to go out and rent it yourself. You'd at least expect the movie's description on the box sleeve to at least attempt to make it sound like a scary sci-fi horror feature, instead touts it as a `hilarious rock and roll adventure of sci-fi comedy'. You know something's wrong when even the box sleeve doesn't take it seriously.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed