Reviews

34 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Don't be fooled..
18 February 2009
The only reason I gave it two stars was because of the two leading actors. Pacino gets a star and so does De Niro. Unfortunately it isn't enough to save this disaster of a film. It really has the feel of something that was thrown together after getting the confirmation these two great actors had agreed to do the picture. Some of the scenes seem forced and are edited together in rapid-fire fashion that was a real turn-off to me. Hour-long prime time television dramas aren't cut together this poorly. It would be rather unfortunate if this is going to be one of the last times we get to see these two legends on the same screen together.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hancock (2008)
6/10
Great start...then forgettable real quick!
16 February 2009
Starts out with a great premise for a superhero story. A superhero who has damaged his credibility with the public and reluctantly tries to build up some star power by enlisting the help of a public relations manager. However half-way through a plot twist comes your way and if you are paying attention, you see it coming. Then before you know it the film ends rather abruptly. Will Smith is gold as usual. He doesn't play his charming all-American good guy. Think more about Dr. House than Superman.

I wanted more from the film because I like the initial concept. I expected more from a script that was penned by former X-Files writer Vince Gilligan too!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Taxi Driver (1976)
9/10
So that's what a cab driver is thinking about...
13 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
After watching Scorsese win his first Oscar last month, it dawned on me I had yet to see any of his early films. Taxi Driver was on the top of the list. A cult classic among De Niro and Scorsese fans, this dark noir tells of Travis Bickel (De Niro), a pent-up ex-Marine who takes the late shift driving a New York City taxi. Travis' long nights working in the seedy underbelly of the city begin to take their toll on him. Travis goes from a somewhat shy person, who asks out a young campaign worker (Shepherd) with the best of intentions, to a gun-toting madman. In the midst of his transformation, he befriends a young prostitute (Foster), who he feels somewhat compelled to try and save before the dark underbelly of the city swallows her up. All of this comes to a head in a fantastically crafted scene as Travis shoots his way past the young girl's pimp (Keitel) , the brothel's manager, and a client, all on his way to her room. As Travis sits there covered in blood, the camera starts to fade away from the room and the apartment building, police moving in. And of course a much talked about ending, which can be interpreted in many ways.

Taxi Driver is certainly Scorsese's darkest film in terms of subject matter. It's a morbid look inside the mind of a man that is fed up with the failures of his society. However, a young De Niro is absolutely captivating as the deranged cab driver. It's fascinating to watch his mental transformation over the course of two hours of running time. Finding out that De Niro's "You talking' to me" scene in front of the mirror was in fact not in the original script, speak to the excellence of both De Niro and Scorsese.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
How did that rumor get started?
13 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Rumor Has It... takes an interesting premise to serve as a lead point in the story. What if The Graduate, starring Dustin Hoffman and Anne Bancroft, was in fact based on a true story. Furthermore, what if the woman who seduced the younger man, was in fact your grandmother? And what if this man also had an affair with your mother a week before she got married to your father. Mix in the detail of your birthday being more or less nine months from their wedding day and the fact you never feel you have anything in common with the rest of your family and you have the plot line for this Rob Reiner comedy.

Jennifer Aniston plays Sarah Huttinger, who while attending her younger sister's wedding for a weekend in California discovers this very secret from her grandmother, played by the comedic genius, Shirley MacLaine. As the weekend winds down Sarah just can't ignore the fact that this man who was romantically involved with her mother, can in fact be her real father. Further explaining her unattached feelings for her family and her fear of commitment with her fiancé (Ruffalo). She never makes it back to New York with her fiancé, she sets out to find the mysterious Beau Burroughs (Costner), but turns out to get more than she bargains for. When she doesn't receive the answer she wants from him, an unexpected attraction develops and Sarah is conflicted over her feelings for her fiancé and the charming Burroughs.

Rob Reiner weaves a complicated tale, mixing in comedy along the way, but the film has most of its laughs at the start. It turns out to be a film about one woman discovering herself and deciding what she wants out of life. Aniston seems to play her Friends character in this film. I'm not sure I see much of a real acting job here. Costner is charming as always but in her limited screen time Shirley MacLaine steals the show. She delivers her lines with such ferocity and venom as the grandmother who is still somewhat insulted that she didn't get another shot at Costner's character. The film starts to drag a little towards the end but as a whole I thought it was a well crafted film. Certainly an original premise and has a great cast.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Laughs are few and far between
7 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
John Heder stars as a, surprise surprise, nerdy New York City meter-maid who decides to boost his self-confidence by taking a secretive class taught by Billy Bob Thornton. Dr. P (Thornton) is anything but friendly, highly abrasive with the class of individuals who are struggling with their manhood. Thornton evokes his dead-pan character from Bad Santa here. When Roger (Heder) shoots to the head of the class, he is in for trouble when he finds out Dr. P is putting the moves on the woman, Amanda (Barrett), in his apt. building who he wants to date. The slap-stick antics ensue as he enlists the help of some of the other students from the class to exact his revenge.

If you are expecting the same sort of humor that director Todd Phillips delivered in Old School, you'll be left waiting for long stretches as I was. The laughs are in fact few and far between. The film is actually more of a light romantic comedy than anything else, which was unexpected. I found the funniest scenes to include Amanda's roommate played by the hilarious Sarah Silverman. Heder seems to continue to be cast as these nerdy individuals, talk about type-casting. Thornton has a knack for creating these sinister characters, but this one is a far cry from his Bad Santa. I give the film credit for having a nice romantic feel between Heder and Barrett. However, you'll keep waiting for the big laughs that you expect from the filmmakers and they never come, that's why this film disappointed me.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Scatter-brained and without emotion
4 March 2007
Based on the memoir of the real life Augustan Burroughs, this film adaptation tells of Burroughs' unusual journey through adolescence. As if that isn't enough he must deal with his neurotic wannabe poet mother (Bening) who decides he would profit from living with her therapist while she sorts through her own personal issues. Augustan (Cross) is introduced to a household that is anything be ordinary. A mother who enjoys snacking on dog kibble, a daughter who has an unhealthy attachment to a cat named Freud, and finally the therapist himself who finds premonitions coming from his toilet (Cox). Augustan also befriends the younger daughter (Wood) who seems to be the only one who has their head screwed on correctly.

From the get-go you can tell this story is far from conventional, however director Ryan Murphy fails to bottle-up any consistent thread of drama or comedy, which makes the film really disjointed and cold. There are actually some poignant moments but they are overshadowed by the shock-value of certain scenes, which Murphy seems more interested in. It's rather unfortunate because there are some great performances here from Bening, Cox, Cross, and Joseph Fiennes, who plays the adopted son who lives in a shack in the back of the house.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Revenge of the Nerds, baseball-style.
28 February 2007
Grownup nerds Schneider, Spade, and Heder decide to get their revenge on growing up being bullied by forming a three-man baseball team that must compete in a tournament against little-leaguers.

It has some laughs but it becomes very tired. Jon Heder seems to be playing the same nerd in this film as he did in Napoleon Dynamite. Spade provides some of his patented one-liners. Also provides some cameos from ESPN personalities Dan Patrick and Sean Salisbury.

It certainly provides some stupid humor, as you would expect from the same comedy minds that brought you Happy Gilmore and Big Daddy. However, it seems to use up all its good material in the first half of the film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Half Nelson (2006)
9/10
Searing Performance by Ryan Gosling
26 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Gosling plays an inner-city high school teacher who happens to give the majority of his history lessons while fighting a hangover. His secret is safe until one of his students, played by Shareeka Epps, finds him strung out in the girls locker room after a basketball game. What starts off as an awkward situation for both blossoms into a friendship. Both provide the other a sense of comfort as they discuss their personal problems.

Ryan Gosling gives a performance that can be considered Edward Norton and Hilary Swank-like. Both actors really gained Hollywood stardom from roles in independent films such as Half Nelson. Much like American-History X and Boys Don't Cry, Half Nelson deals with a somewhat morbid subject matter, in this case its drug addiction. Gosling's character spends a majority of the film slipping in and out of his drug euphoria. You never really know if he is high or coming down. What makes his character so heart-breaking is the realization that his student is an acquaintance of his drug dealer. He fights with the reality that his protection over Drey (Epps) is somewhat hypocritical considering his own drug addiction. Epps herself also deals with the conflict of staying clear of the life that landed her brother in jail but can also see the pros of dealing drugs.

Ryan Fleck effectively captures the unique friendship between Gosling and Epps but I must say the camera work was rather poor. The frames are extremely shaky throughout the film and are very distracting especially during closeups of the actors.

Overall Half Nelson is a great triumph for Gosling and the young Epps as well.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant Sci-Fi film that deals with relevant issue
14 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
After what I considered to be disappointing Matrix sequels, the Wachowski brothers bring to life a graphic novel that hits closer to our current society than one would think.

The story revolves around a masked man who begins to terrorize what has become a totalitarian government in a not too distant future in London, England. He tells of his plan to detonate a bomb that will destroy the British Parliament in a year's time. In the meanwhile he exposes the dark and secretive history of some of the government's highest ranking officials, which fuel his vengeance and also explain his past. The masked "V" befriends a young broadcast worker (Portman), who he confides in to help him with his destructive plans. She struggles between living in the flawed world she knows and rebelling against it to make some semblance of change.

First-time director James McTeige brings with him a wealth of knowledge on how to craft this sci-fi tale, having been an assistant director on the Matrix films. The visual stylization makes every frame feel like it is jumping right out of the comic book. Plus, beautiful special effects that are not overly-gratuitous. While you never see his face, Hugo Weaving's delightful voice shines through V's mask. I could not think of any other person I would have playing this part. Weaving gives the character such a human depth that you can almost see the expressionless mask he wears, show emotion. Natalie Portman, who plays V's confidant Evey, also gives a surprisingly deep performance and a flawless British accent to boot. Stephen Rea and John Hurt also round out an excellent cast.

While the film's conclusion is somewhat rushed, Vendetta as a whole is a brilliant piece of science fiction, uniquely blending fantasy with today's reality.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
White Russians, a Dude, and Bowling!
13 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
So a broke stoner/bowling lover wants revenge against hoodlums who mistakingly urinate on his living room carpet. Let the games begin! Bridges stars as "The Dude" Lebowski who enlists the help of his friend, ex-Vietnam vet Walter (Goodman) to exact revenge against a wealthy businessman with the same namesake. It turns out he gets way more than he bargained for; agreeing to find the millionaire's young wife, who has gone missing. It turns out he is not the only one looking for this woman or the ransom money. The Dude encounters an eccentric cast of characters, from the millionaire's daughter (Moore) to a gang of German Nihilists (including Red Hot Chili Peppers bassist Flea).

The story is extremely wacky which lead to lots of hilarity in some scenes. The best part is that the film never takes itself seriously, its more of a dark comedy than anything else. The glue of the film for me is the great pairing of Bridges and Goodman. Goodman's character constantly looks to associate every situation with the Vietnam war. Bridges is brilliant because of his laid-back appearance, including a robe and sandals.

However the story seems to hit a few snags along the way and for me makes the film far from perfect. These snags for me are segments that seem to make the film drag a bit, time-wise. There seem to be too many characters that pop-up and then we are forced to revisit them later in the film.

In conclusion, its a great dark comedy that doesn't follow conventional plot lines, a Cohen brothers trademark. It's worth watching for the scenes with Goodman and Bridges alone.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best of 06'; truly magical!
12 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I had not heard much about this film before going to see it. Word of mouth was it was fascinating and it was hailed as one of the top films of 2006. I can say that not only is it one of the best, but probably the best.

The film tells the story of a young girl named Ofelia, who goes to live with her pregnant mother in the countryside home of a Spanish Captain, who her mother has recently married. The Captain is a cruel man who wants little to do with Ofelia and her mother, but directs more attention to the unborn child. Going on around them is the fascist rebellion of the 1940s. To cope with her morbid surroundings Ofelia let's her love for fantasy tales and active imagination take her on a journey. In the garden of the home, is a labyrinth which provides Ofelia with the basis for her magical world.

Guillermo del Toro has created a fairytale that is more graphic and darker than normal, hence the R rating. It does show that you can tell a tale of fantasy that doesn't necessarily pertain to children, which is different from the norm being that the main character is an adolescent. The balance between the two worlds is perfectly achieved by del Toro. The special effects are excellent and so is the beautiful cinematography. Ivana Baquero who plays little Ofelia is also a joy.

This film is a delight for those who have maybe lost faith in the magic of movies.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A must see for all!!!
10 February 2007
No matter what side of the fence you are on politically, this is essential viewing for anyone living in today's society. This film provides indisputable evidence that global warming is fact not fiction. Quite simply; if more serious measures are not taken quickly, then the world we know will be a distant memory.

This documentary follows ex vice president Al Gore as he travels the globe giving an informative presentation on the global warming issue. While the focus is on his presentations, Gore also narrates the story about how he first found out about this topic back in his high school days. For those who think this is a political platform of an angry ex presidential candidate, you are sorely mistaken. The film ends up being more like a public service announcement not just to our government, but to all of earth's people. This film should be required viewing for all ages.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Miami Vice (2006)
7/10
Little to do with the series but still great fun.
4 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
While Michael Mann's updated version of the 80's hit has little to do with the series, it turns out to be a pretty slick action flick.

Rico (Foxx) and Sonny (Farrell) must investigate the murders of three under-cover FBI agents during a drug deal gone wrong. The trail leads them to a drug lord and his mysterious wife. Rico and Sonny then go undercover to infiltrate this network and pose as drug buyers. Conflict of conscious occurs when Sonny becomes romantically linked with the drug lord's wife.

Michael Mann has become a true artist in terms of cinematography and overall "look" of his films. Mann also mixes using both normal film stock and digital video, which he used entirely in Collateral. As a result, the action scenes make you feel like you're watching an episode of Cops, instead of seeing a big Hollywood shootout. Another staple of Mann's films is moody music and it is once again in this one. There's some great featured tracks by Audioslave, Moby, and a remake of Phil Collins "In the Air Tonight" by Nonpoint, that really are a big part of the film's soundtrack.

While the approach is totally updated and fresh, the overall film is loosely based on the series. One thing that seems lost is the closeness of the relationship between Sonny and Rico. I thought it would be more of a buddy movie, but it turns out that the characters spend a good portion of the movie in different locations. When they are in the same scenes you really don't feel a sense of camaraderie. One other gripe that I had was with the dialog and story. Several key scenes have quick and incomprehensible dialog that make the film confusing in some specific aspects. It seems that there is a lot of technical police jargon that really isn't that known by common people. I think the film suffers a little because of this and while you get the general idea of what is going on, it makes you feel like you missed something that you should have picked up on.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
How Leatherface got his.....face
3 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
So a group of young people get stuck in the middle of southern Texas. They end up at this strange house with a guy who wears a mask.....wait...I think I have seen this one already.....yup....I was right.

This pointless prequel essentially copies the same boring story line from the first film. It adds little side stories like how Leatherface makes his human mask and how Sheriff Hoyt becomes a man of law enforcement. Other than that expect the same gratuitous gore, violence, and screams. Like the 2003 remake, this film fails to capture what made the 1973 original a horror classic, it shows too much. These last two "updates" are too stylized in terms of dark cinematography and grotesqueness. The original didn't necessarily show all that much and is much more scary because of it. This film has some scare-tactics with its moody music and "pop-ups", but it becomes very bland and tired. I thought this film would take a chance and tell us a little more about how Leatherface gets so demented and psychotic, but no such luck.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Need a middle-aged single mom? Call Diane Keaton.
2 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
In what has becomes her calling card Keaton plays a single mom who is looking for love. Too proud to admit it, she concerns herself with the lackluster love-life of her youngest of three daughters (Mandy Moore). She takes it upon herself to place an ad on the internet to find the perfect "mate" for her daughter and the predictable banter ensues. Her daughter is then torn between the successful businessman who her mother found via the ad and the musician with a young child. When all her daughters get fed up with her antics, they tell her that it is HER that needs more of a love life.

It has some laughs but its entirely predictable and extremely sappy. Besides Keaton, the film has some credible actors like Lauren Graham, Stephen Collins, and Tom Everett Scott. As much as you try and give it a chance, if you have seen some of Keaton's recent films, you'll really feel like you're having de ja vu. Keaton has become the older female version of John Cusack/Hugh Grant playing these same roles over and over. From someone who really admires Keaton's earlier work, its kind of disappointing to see her fall into this trap. Unless there is nothing else to see, I would wait till this one becomes a rental.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Previews don't do it justice
2 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Immediately upon hearing about this film, I thought of Dangerous Minds. This made me hesitant to see it, thinking maybe it was just another retread. However upon learning that the film was based on a true story, it made me more interested in seeing it.

Hillary Swank plays Erin Gruwell, a teacher who ends up working with racially charged teens at a Long Beach, California high school. She starts out with a naive mentality that all she has to do is teach them and they will care but eventually she realizes that a change to her approach will get their attention. Her discussions end up revolving around the hate and violence that plague the students' everyday lives, bringing the students to realize that they have more in common than they initially thought. Along the way Gruwell must battle with conservative teachers within the school, who object to her new methods of educating her students. What ends up interesting the students and where the title comes from is the notebooks they are encouraged to write in by Gruwell. She gives them the freedom to write about whatever they want and it becomes a personal journal for most.

As mentioned, the story has been done before, but I enjoyed that the film concentrated equally on the students as well as the personal life of Cruwell. The film has plenty of emotion and is a constant reminder to those who are more fortunate than others in this world, that sometimes what most of us consider horrible in our daily lives, is nothing compared to others.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than I expected, which wasn't much.
30 January 2007
I finally got around to seeing this after all the talk about Meryl Streep's performance. While she was good, I found Anne Hathaway and Stanley Tucci to be on her level.

When a young and somewhat naive woman, Andy (Hathaway), goes on a job interview for an assistant position, she gets more than she bargains for when it turns out she is working for an icy editor of a prestigious fashion magazine, Miranda (Streep). Her focus remains with being a journalist, but to get a crack at that job she must get through the tedious task at working for Miranda. To put herself in the good graces of her demanding boss, Andy ends up distancing herself from her boyfriend and friends. Soon she begins to question whether she is actually growing further and further away from her career aspirations.

While the critical acclaim has gone to Streep, I really enjoyed Hathaway. It's rather refreshing to see a young actress who isn't blonde and rail-thin. While Hathaway is known for her Princess Diaries fame, she might just be on her way to higher profile films. Staring opposite Streep might be a good start. Hathaway reminds me of a younger Julia Roberts. Stanley Tucci also stands out as the magazine's art director, who turns out to be Andy's confidant, helping her stay on her feet and handling Miranda's ruthless demeanor. A secondary character in itself is New York City, which is beautifully captured by cinematographer Florian Ballhaus.

In closing, the story is somewhat syrupy with its conclusion, but its actors make the film enjoyable.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Will Smith is worth the price of admission
27 January 2007
What this film lacks in real story depth, it makes up for in the emotional depth of Will Smith's tremendous performance. While I haven't seen Ali, in my opinion, this is Will Smith's best performance.

The story is about a real-life man named Chris Gardner who hits rock bottom financially but tries to keep himself and his young son afloat by applying for a stock broker training program. Unfortunately the program comes without a pay-check and it forces Gardner to keep at his previous job of selling high-density bone scanners to clinics and hospitals. To further divulge any of the story will really defeat the purpose of seeing the film, in my opinion. However, I have known about Gardner's story for a couple of years already. You might have already seen a feature on him on NBC's Dateline or ABC's 20/20, I can't remember which. To know where Gardner eventually ends up, its a real inspiration to see the hard journey that it took to get him there.

My only complaint about the film comes from the fact it doesn't offer much story depth. Whether some aspects were cut or not, I'll have to find out myself; Gardner has written a memoir with the same title. Where this film succeeds is with Smith. Will Smith has an uncanny ability to draw people into whatever role he is playing. He's funny and extremely genuine in this film and those two abilities are important in telling this story. I'm not sure anyone else could have played this role any better. Why it works is because you feel for the character and the struggles he goes through and his triumphs. What also must not go unnoticed is the chemistry between real-life father and son combo of Will and Jaden Smith. It certainly helps the film because the two ultimately depend on each other for support.

Inspirational true stories such as this are sometimes over-dramatized by Hollywood, but not this one. It feels real and it doesn't go out of its way to take advantage of emotional moments.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Who needs a story when you have so much action?
24 January 2007
....I do, I do. I was very disappointed with this film. I expected much better after being very high on Eastwood's last two masterpieces (Million Dollar Baby & Mystic River). Flags of Our Fathers turns out to be an overly melodramatic and unorganized war film.

The plot revolves around three surviving members of a unit of soldiers that infamously raised the American flag after the gruesome battle at Iwo Jima. After the photo of this event becomes a source of pride to the American public, the men are pulled from duty to tour the country and be hailed for their heroic display of national patriotism. Of course it's not the only reason they are doing this. They are also instructed to make speeches to the American people, encouraging them to buy war bonds to support the war effort. Each man has their own conflict with these events, while most of their friends are still fighting in the war. The film jumps from this on-going story back to the war scenes the men were involved in.

My dislike for this film is that it fails to establish any connection to the characters for me. Not enough time is spent learning about these men; as a result I really didn't feel any emotion for their struggles. It seems every time there is a chance to maybe learn a bit more about them, Eastwood is far happier jumping to a war scene. It didn't help that Eastwood choose three very mediocre actors to portray these men in Ryan Phillippe, Jesse Bradford, and Adam Beach. As a result, the emotions are very melodramatic and forced. It gets to a point that you think Eastwood actually ran out of story and stays with the war scenes much longer, just to kill time.

As far as the war scenes go, there is plenty of imitation from Steven Spielberg's epic Saving Private Ryan. From the u-boat landing, the hand-held camera ducking underwater simulating chaos, the murky color of the film, the POV of the enemy firing upon the invading soldiers and the extreme gore that has become common now in war films. I was actually surprised watching the credits that Spielberg had a hand in producing this film. Maybe imitation is the highest form of flattery? Maybe Spielberg shot the war scenes himself? LOL. However, I didn't find these scenes to hold the same weight as the Normandy invasion in Ryan. It might have to do with how common it is to see scenes like this now in any film that has a reference to war in it. Maybe I have become numb to the violence and gore?

Walking away from Flags of Our Fathers I felt nothing. I wasn't moved by the story and didn't really feel much sympathy for these men. What was an extremely important victory for the American forces at this time is poorly executed by Clint Eastwood.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great blend of comedy and life lessons
23 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
It's very hard to try and make a comedy that also has some morals to it without it being to cornball. Little Miss Sunshine proves that it can be done.

An excellent ensemble cast of Toni Collette, Steve Carell, Greg Kinnear, Alan Arkin, and Little Miss Abigail Breslin. A colorful cast of characters makes up a family that decides to travel cross-country in a crappy VW bus to enter little Olive(Breslin) into a beauty pageant. Every character has their own demons. The Uncle (Carell) is just out of hospital after attempting suicide. The father (Kinnear) is a motivational speaker who is obsessed with "winning" at life. The mother (Collette) is caught in the middle, trying to keep everything together. The grandfather (Arkin) is a druggie, foul-mouthed talent coach for Olive. There's also the speechless son (Paul Dano) who has decided not to speak at all until he gets into the air force. Then there's little Olive, determined to get to her beauty pageant but caught in the middle of deciding whether she wants to be a model and follow her father's obsessive winning attitude or just be a normal kid.

What Little Miss Sunshine does so well is that it is able to give us humor in the predicament all these characters are in, because of the extreme opposites some of them are but yet its able to spread a positive message on the importance of family and being a good person. Sometimes its good to take a step back and not take ourselves so seriously. And yet, the film doesn't go out of its way to give you a good morale at the expense of taking away from the hilarious story line.

Definitely one of the most enjoyable films I have seen this past movie year.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Creepy Judi Dench.....very cool!
23 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I caught this film today knowing little to nothing about it, other than it had been nominated for Best Actress (Dench) and Best Supporting Actress (Blanchett) Academy Awards. I was very surprised by this film. It's extremely entertaining and engrossing.

The plot revolves around the arrival of a new teacher, played by Kate Blanchett, to a London public school. Judi Dench plays a long-tenured history teacher at the school who befriends Blanchett. From the get go you can tell there is something about Dench's character that is off. Sure enough, her narration/personal journal entries reveal that she wishes her and the new teacher would be more than just friends. That would be enough for most generic films. But what makes the film interesting is that Dench finds out about an affair that Blanchett is having with a young student.

Dench is extremely creepy in a way I have never seen her. Her character boarders on the psychotic while seeming very sweet and innocent on the outside. Blanchett may be overlooked here from Dench, but I found her exceptional as well.

The story grows disturbing as it goes along, but it also sucks you in more and more. Highly recommended.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Borat (2006)
8/10
Hilarious for those with an open mind.
18 November 2006
I'm not a big Ali G or Borat fan. Not that I don't think Cohen's characters are funny, I just don't watch the shows. That being said you don't have to be an avid fan to enjoy this film.

Sacha Baron Cohen's Borat is a man from Kazakhstan who decides to travel to America to find out about our "cultural learnings", and in the process insults many unaware Americans with his own.

What is ironic about this film is that on more than one occasion Borat encounters Americans who are almost as culturally bias/racist as he is. As an actor who is totally in control of his character, Cohen never breaks from Borat in situations he easily could have. Whether he is riding around in an ice cream truck with a bear hanging out the window or meeting with a feminist group, Borat is hysterical.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Casino Royale (2006)
9/10
A darker shade of Bond
17 November 2006
This was the first 007 film I have seen in the theater since Goldeneye, ironically enough also directed by Martin Campbell. I have since seen Tomorrow Never Dies and The World is Not Enough on DVD. It felt like the stories were getting a little bit goofy and pre-packaged. I did like Bronsnan's Bond and was a little bit skeptical about Daniel Craig as the new leading man. I was very mistaken.

Daniel Craig gives Bond a very different and interesting personality. He's more of a hard-ass in truth. He's a little more angry and viscous in this latest installment. Something that gives the film a little spice. The trademark one-liners are still there and James is still the ladies-man but Casino Royale definitely has a darker feel.

The story places Bond at the start of his MI6 career, newly promoted to his double-00 status. A dangerous path leads him to be involved in playing a high-stakes poker tournament against a man who is a banker to some of the world's most dangerous terrorists. Bond of course needs significant funds to play at this table and to make sure he doesn't blow it all Vesper Lynd, played by Eva Green, is there to oversee the operation.

In the end Casino Royale is a refreshing spin on Bond. The film is dark and the violence is a bit more graphic that one is used to in a 007 film, particularly a brutal torture scene. Bond actually gets some cuts and blood on his face! I just hope the next installment gets the same treatment.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Departed (2006)
10/10
Scorsese gets back on track
10 November 2006
As good as I expected. I think its Scorsese's best since Goodfellas. Scorsese returns to his unfiltered best to make this entertaining crime film.

The film revolves around an undercover cop, played by DiCaprio, who is sent to infiltrate Nicholson's mob organization. On the flip side Nicholson sends his "son", played by Damon, into the police force as his spy. The tension grows as both men reveal the inner workings on the organizations they have infiltrated. The plot reveals plenty of twists and turns.

Scorsese always seems to bring together a talented cast and he does it again here. I always find DiCaprio to be very "hit or miss" in his roles. He does well here, very well in fact. He's never overmatched in the scenes with Nicholson and it proves to be what makes him very effective in this role. While Nicholson gets to show his creepy nefarious side, he tends to go a little overboard with the character. Damon has gotten to a point where he can take any role and play it well. He's great at playing the two-faced cop here. One thing that is very apparent is that he gets to bring on his native Boston accent ala Good Will Hunting. Nice supporting roles from Alec Baldwin and Martin Sheen as high-rankers in the department. However an actor that I cannot, as hard as I try, take seriously is Mark Wahlberg. He's so over the top in every role and he is here in my opinion.

Scorsese's use of music weaving in and out of scenes at different volumes, something he did well in Goodfellas, comes back in this film. What shines through though is his knack for shooting chaos or violence. All of Scorsese's trademark storytelling techniques come into this one with a vengeance and make very a smooth and entertaining film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Babel (I) (2006)
10/10
Outstanding and Oscar-Worthy.
10 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This one will surely be mentioned this coming Oscar season. Believe the hype. It has it all, great direction, acting, story, and visuals.

4 story lines that coincide with each other are what makes Babel a great film. I was immediately reminded about Traffic, another film I really like. They are all connected not just by the film's theme but the stories overlap as a result from previous events. What makes Babel different from Traffic is that the film goes back and fourth in time, not just between the stories. By the end of the film you will be saying "if this didn't happen then....".

This is Brad Pitt's best work since 12 Monkeys in my opinion. It's probably because he's just being a normal guy, a loving husband, and father. While Pitt is the headline star here, it doesn't necessarily mean he's in the bulk of the film, in fact he is probably in the film around 30 minutes in total. The film is strengthened by an ensemble of actors who are relatively unknown.

The plot revolves around Pitt and his wife Cate Blanchett who are vacationing in Morocco. Blanchett is subsequently shot and the mayhem ensues. The story also focuses on the couple's nanny who is forced to take their two young children with her to her son's wedding in Mexico because she can't find anyone else to watch them. There is also the story about the two young boys who fire the shot that injuries Blanchett's character. Then there is the seemingly unrelated story about a young Japanese deaf-mute. Giving away any specific details would ruin the experience.

So often in numerous films today, the director never gives us enough to have a feeling about the characters. In a film that has more than a couple main characters, Alejandro González Iñárritu lets us into each character's own personal world and dilemma. You feel for the characters and that is why the film is so great. A film with this much complexity could have easily been rushed but Babel hits the spot because it tells a complete story and gives us enough closure to be satisfied.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed