Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Manhunter (1986)
5/10
Give me the file! Preferably through the slot in the fence
25 May 2024
Lecter shouts: "Give me the file!"

that is, the paper thin file and if possible give it through the slot in the fence which is thinner than the thicc space between the bars It basically sums up the movie: insulting to intelligence.

The there are these claims/premises: 1. False claim of a seemingly intelligent pyscho: 'you can't catch a Lecter unless you're one yourself' 2. False claim of seemingly intelligent police: 'we either need Lecter on our side or us to think like him in order to catch a Lecter' although Lecter himself wasn't caught this way.

The movie alternates ordinary life with dream-like scenery backed by eery 80s music, including aptly picked Comfortably Numb.

One never feels the thrill and angst, because everything is only sonically tensed and graphically very controlled even the broken mirrors, clinical, sterile, like a TV ad for profiling. Even the prison in which the profiler asks his 'colleague' Lecter for help, seems sterile, cleanly clinical, almost like a biotech lab.

Lecter even remarks that Will got tanned, that he is in contrast with the prisonner, a moth under artifical light, but also implying he may have been doing any other kind of work or activity, but not that of a profiler. Hence, the need for the visit.

Hopefully, the sunscreen cream does it's job just like the aftershave lotion minus the smell that kept Lecter for 3 years yearning to re-experience it.

In the end, the blonde family holds hands in the blonde sun near the blue ocean, a sign of surviving yet another night, yet another fullmoon.

The movie is artistic without doubt, but the merits end here as its premises are insulting.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Gave it 10 stars for the songs
20 May 2024
For the songs I gave it 10 i gave it 10 just for the songs it's the songs I gave it for they deserve it all the more then the movie is quite dumb as dumb are the characters so the sound redeems both image and play it watched like a fable on frailty of the human prey deliverance of it in a buddhist array the songs work in setting the mood of dreamlike Maya negligence, carelessness of fallen prey in karma's chained food

vanity'd been broken down in its own palace there's no more attachment for Alice for she went down all rabbit s*tholes mostly out of boredome, then by necessity alone in the end there's no more alice nor is there malice no fooling around just enlightenment of numb soul on its journey from selfish to selfless broken down yet unbound

A cautionary tale the film of a travel sale a coming of age and subsiding of rage.

Will there ever be a part two?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Hombres (2023)
1/10
Dumb plot, not enough funny and violence for nothing
17 April 2024
This movie seems to be made by intellectuals who grind their pen in violent genres or by amateurs with no idea of what could go right with this direction. The fight scene in the desert is of utmost stupidity and hilarity. That is if you can go past the premise already. It's a hollow motion picture with immigrants caught in the fires of witty self-criticism of one American Laurel with his grumpy sit-in-the-car Hardy. Remember if you watch this movie, it's like a lesson, don't go out with American strangers in the middle of nowhere to dig holes for $150. No matter how desperado you are. You might get out alive and enrich your family. Only in the American movies.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aurora (I) (2010)
1/10
Ugly cinema for pretentious lovers of ugliness on screen
7 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
In "Aurora", the plot is basically: patient can't get Xanax so he gets a gun :) Thus, a failure of capitalism in Romania. (It was the early years)

In a pathetic replica of "Falling Down", Puiu's no Michael Douglas and the entire action was already summarized by another reviewer: potato peeling, domestic talk about whether Little Red Riding Hood's granny comes out naked from the wolf's belly, plus some close encounters of the third kind of male protagonist with female personnel of various businesses, lastly the shootings. This is not a Romanian "Taxi driver" and Puiu is no Fassbender in the shower either. Last one shoots people as professional hitman in his last film (I recommend that one instead, as it's just as long but more entertaining and poetic). Also, the police station doesn't look like those in the developed West and the sound quality is on par with the social interactions in the gloomy Bucharest ante-EU. Not that there was any whatsoever need for quality in sound. Or image.

Puiu's character is a twisted personality, one who wants rules bended and exceptions, just not for the people he kills and not when he "has to turn in" and to let the police do their job. A "justification" for his behaviour might be his sickness and the implied short life expectancy. The worldview of this maniac who has a college degree as an engineer and his living space chokeful of books but shares talibanic and orthodox mindset that wives can't ever divorce, is baffling and a source of absurd in itself.

This main character is neither a hero nor an antihero and this was neither a movie nor a lack of one.

It's sad this is all Romanian cinema has to come up with. Romanian cinema is dead. RIP. Previously, it was the case that the sound was poor, yet the films were great. Nowadays poor are both the sound and whatever lines their characters say. I am aware I may sound harsh and unjustified in my critique, after all it's a movie released 14 years ago. That's time even for police stations to modernise, Bucharester colon to live stress-free or at least a more streamlined acquisition of xanax and interpersonal speech. There's hope.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halo (2022– )
1/10
I'm gonna give this a 1. Read below to know why or better don't
12 February 2024
This must be the cheapest and no calories SF I've watched. CGI is fast-food in this day. It's basically about some enhanced individuals wearing lots of metal and fighting off squidheads from a competing enhancement program of an enemy behind a galactic Iron Curtain. A female scientist knows how to shape the future of the mankind, but for that she has to know the secrets of an artifact. So she sends the Master Chief, the best in her arsenal of scaresquidheads. The thing is that the artifact reveals none of its secrets, only what had been kept secret from whoever touches it.

Other than this gripe with it, it has nice male buttocks (a rare in cinema despite all the liberalism or prudism), although the front view was blocked by a beam (not a biggie, right?), Natascha McElhone's smile (seriously, perhaps the best thing in this show) at least in the first half, afterwards they put her in drama mode, a sad face, crying and fearing for her life. Downhill. Like the show.

In short, no meat, just sugar (I might call this genre Soda SF). Its strongest selling points are Natascha's smile, the Master Chief's behind and the "mysterious" Artifact, which looks suspiciously like a V from ... no, not vendetta. I got screwed by watching this. I hope the squids win.

Btw, this series has 1 and a half minute telling you what previously happened. The thing is that nothing happened.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I got burned by this.
29 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This is a tragicomedy. The thing with the ferocious hitmen is that there's no sense in killing the boy. At worse you can knock him and get his papers. Boy dead or alive at that point doesn't make a bit of difference anymore. Setting the end scene like that is sloppy.

Angelina is as committed to her role as a an air balloon is to staying put. She has much interesting bonding moments with the grieving youngster, telling him about 'saucy' blonde cheerleaders he'd be soon swapping spit with by the bonfire. Thank God or screenwriter, basically the same in this case, that she stopped at that and went no further like expected when the characters spend what could be the last night of their screen lives.

Everybody asks all the wrong questions, like who hired the hitmen and why, but nobody asks why is Hannah firewatching from the ground level? If that's how this works, then there's no wonder the increased rate of fires.

I've rated movies 1 out of 10 before, but for this one I believe negative numbers should be allowed too. It's a perfect 10, only it's the negative 10.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A parable about entering the Kingdom of Hell
25 September 2023
Future species may very well believe of human beings to be what the Bible says that animals are to humans.

It's not the gore that's really unsettling in this film. Normally, real life gore is safely hidden from us in the slaughterhouses. This filmaker thought it would be a good idea to bring it to the front. Just stage it and have humans playing... or squealing and bleeding.

The suit plays impeccably in spite of all having to do is to carry something like a Thor's luggage and board forever the same train.

The others are meh. Bradley Cooper was chosen for his seeming naivite, his wife is any feminist's worse nightmare, as she's not able to aim for dear life. Brooke Shields is smart enough in her short screen appearance and you can see that she's someone who succeeds and has no use for trains.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dramatically dumb
22 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It started interestingly enough, built suspense from then but it ended weak. It also has plot holes you can lose yourself through. The whole thing with having a sister with connections in the police that keeps you informed of the state of the investigation, the way the escaping in the huge staircase was handled, the "solving" with the wrong turn on the driveway, the nice gimmick of the photograph pinned at the tattoo store and so on. Worth a view but lame writing. Reviewers enamored with dramatic male actor Casas, here up to the task/script, meaning lame, being abused by a goth mermaid who drags him into her net, alcolizates him, ties his arms, spits in his face, brands him with common words, almost gave him a STD and set up a fatidic encounter between victim and harmer, while having the time of her life watching who will be who. The acting was good, if by acting is meant, be the dumb while he gets dumber. Nothing gave anything away to him. Normally, people who ask you to pay for their hamburger, don't actually have a place of their own. I give a 5 for the effort and it's actually the chick that steals this show, not Casas. Pun intended btw.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Poor bloke goes out unfoked
9 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
By blood-thirsty babes so cold. If you somehow end in a huge mansion with a woman ressembling too much of a vampire and none of it gives anything away to you, then you definitely got unlucky and are still not bright enough to see it, like the lady herself acknowledges at the end. I had the patience of wanting to see how this is going about. The dialogue was akward, meant to be kinda childish, innocent and the male victim goofey. I want to see vampirellas try theirs with an action figure. Since those fit and forever young damsels of hell can vanish and reappear wherever and whenever they want, meatier males shouldn't pose problems and are actually more recommended for a vampire's diet. Of course, this way all the 'fun' would go out faster than a candle in a hallway transited by airy bloodsuckers and would need a more violent setting, lots of CGI and actual action. Vampires are in this 'enlightened' age quite overused. Instead of putting effort to write something about what the fellow and the ladies could be up to, the playwright resorts to the vampire gimmick and is done with it. He unlocked screenplay without touching the damn typewriter. A vampire himself. As 'beings' capable of (un)locking doors without touching them and travelling without vehicles, vampires are a fascinating film mechanic. We kinda are vampires ourselves when we unlock our phone just by facing it. I rate this one higher than others because the thirsty dames tried their best not to eat the fellow before eventually eating him and were disposed to converse, although not so much to sex. Due to low blood levels perhaps. They took their time and so did you, fellow vampire voyeur. Nasty. I thought at moments that maybe they'll spare him, which was a nice dilemma thrown in. Like a diet change, a change of heart or a conversion act, but nay, they really unchangeable, cold-hearted bloodsucking monads capable of dialectics and steady with their raw steak.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pollen (II) (2023)
1/10
Mockumental horror
9 July 2023
I have a very big problem with this film. Its author mocks adult women with its portrayal of a vulnerable, unsecure and abused female character and I am a male myself. There's rape on the door steps already before entering the bedroom, which the main character sublimates into love. There's toxic and highly competitive corporate white-collar work climate that the female character, portrayed like a Kimmy Schmidt minus the charisma and the smile, must navigate but she constantly mistakes the working place for a mating habitat or a romantic medium, confounds males for trees, plants for men, evening dresses for work attire, even her own 'no' for 'yes'. Thre are constant breadcrumbs left for viewers to see who's who and what leads where, like for instance the used condom on the floor, the confession that the condom was both used and not used, from a man who assesses risk for a living. Since, judging by the place she works, the viewer must think of her as highly educated and long past puberty, the only explanation I came with, for the course of events and the 'story', others may not be necessarily be in agreement with, is that the film is either a mockery dressed up as a horror, a horror dressed up as a mockery or there's a mind behind it, itself troubled, who mistakes itself as creative. A poet armed with the wrong tools, a gardener with pots of weed instead of flowers. The horror atribute of this film refers to its perceived toxicity in viewers like myself. One of those films you watch because you're not smart and don't know better (I admit it) and neither did the filmmaker expect it. From me, even 1 star is undeserved.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sharper (2023)
1/10
A con in itself but with a good soundtrack
12 May 2023
For me it was all cleared in the final confruntation of iconic sneakers worn by ... billionaires. Seriously, what billionera wears Stan Smith? Wouldn't Julianne have looked like an animal if she wore say Onitsuka in that scene? The screenplay is the real con here. If a script is bad, no amount of acting can save it, save for the music. Maybe I'll even remember this movie as the one that introduced me to Mattiel's 'Count your blessings'. This whole movie is a con about implausible cons. The Pygmalion con artist who is a son of another con artist with whom he has that tabu relation and his creation, the con junkie turned to literature and romance with billionaire bookman who doesn't read but gets impressed by well-read sweethearts. What did I just see? Was I conned? Aren't films means of conning though?
0 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Midnight Mass (2021)
8/10
Eternal nightlife or from the island to the cave
21 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
"Midnight mass" is about a mass(bunch) of islanders who give up their mundane "purposeless" lives to forever live at midnight because otherwise the sunrays would age them during the day and quite fast as the end will reveal.

The show is a mockery about an island population falling prey to a wolf in pastor's sheepskin. The 'Creator' of the show uses the Bible as divine inspiration for his hellish script and it works. There the angels are frightening and people commune and consume each other's flesh and blood. He made his crew enliven these words.

The pastor suppposed to lead this pack/mass (m)utters at times sentences that don't quite follow like "it can't be undone" (mocking the belief that "all can be undone") or exhorting believers to "listen to the Holy Spirit" and to their "conscience". Said "Father" will eventually acknowledge that eternal life was a mistake (=mockery) since it's not spent with his daughter, thus not worth it, although he pitched for it this whole time.

The Churchgoers are itching for miracles, thirsting for otherwordliness and eternal life. They get their ultimate present by not being able to ever die, but neither to live anymore under the sun. A subtle paradox. They become "saved" (read this in mockery speak as "damned") via the works of father Paul and the fervent apostle Bev and have to spend eternity forever hiding from the face of God/Sun.

The show ends in the final salvation, when the mighty UV-source, the chtonic Sun-God cleanses the doomsday cultists who can't find a single ark in sight because they burned all of their "boats" (sic) with which they could have sailed the daylight to live another night. Over and over. The revelation for them is that they return to ashes, just like Riley predicted by mocking the priest with the famous Bible verse.

Definitely an original show. I think what I saw had't been done before (citation needed) and "can't be undone". Looking forward to what else is in works from this director. Utterly hilarious when Bev calls the Muslim sheriff a terrorist, probaly more terrorizing for her than any angel :) Also a badass scene from Erin and the Angel. It stands right there in the panoplia of woman characters dealing with Aliens on screen but with none of the CGI.

A slow burner with a masterful atmosphere, setting and acting, but not quite a horror, more like a gothic story, which is actually welcome as nobody does them anymore, while everyone does horrors.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6 Underground (2019)
1/10
Shoot, shoot, shoot. Mayday, mayday, mayday. Vrrrrr......
3 March 2023
Who in the H'ood spends such an obscene flow of cash to film a test drive of an Alfa Romeo painted in a way that would offend even the poorest pimp? You can't get more undercover. The first 10 minutes in this latest fixture of this director more fond of engine revving than film directing, take place in a city that saw their share of real directors in the past, and serve to introduce to us the glamorous team that will take on cruel tyrants: a billionaire always showing his mug through the aforementioned car's window, a doctor performing medical procedures while on speed, a driver that does both the driving and the drooling over local mates and both the hitting of pedestrians (crashing weddings too) and the sparing of botched puppies. It has become apparent I wasn't going to spend the remaining 2 hours in their company knowing very well that the dictator and his generals don't stand a chance against this director and his (s)crew(s). It was rigged right from the start and up until the very end. The rest was just engine revs as a poet once said.

I opted for no spoilers for this review as you can't possibly spoil this. It's like cinematic pasta. You can boil it way past the purchase date and even reheat it. The IQ level permeating from the script is concisely captured in a single line from the Parkourist: "there are so many f* vias in Italy" Right? I wonder what streets are. I was thrilled to see empowered women in this. Doing the exact same sh* men did. At this point movies seem like schemes of money laundering. A solid 1 star from me for the performances and the direction(?) and 10 for the scheme, I mean the script. Mindless doesn't even begin to describe what's on camera. The filmmaker and his crew flashes you incessantly with the most hideous car crashes and accident deaths. This is a textbook for psychiatry and both target audience and film crew are due for a check. I would not be surprised to find out that IS filmmakers were co-opted as experts for this or at least that their work was painstakingly studied.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
American Propaganda
2 March 2023
Very poor movie. Not a show but a show-off of the American Might. A movie about a cargo of "food from the poor to the poor", its crew and captain being held hostage by a capitalist corporation, all sailing under the nose of competing Somali capitalistic entrepreneurs. One of the, I admit, not that many American movies where I must root for the bad guys. Until the so-called international waters become busy with Somalian cargos and American pirates these movies are less of an artistic medium and more of propaganda. I have to also ask how come the lead actor in this is not black? It must be a very antiquated movie to present a white privileged captain as a victim and black people as guilty of piracy and terrorism. The real stars of this movie were the shipping company, the US Navy, the seals and ultimately the ship itself. I have to rate this a solid 1 star out of all of them, thumb it down on the streaming service (also a pirate in itself btw) and instruct their algorithm to never recommend me again such 'dramas'. Hollywood even hijacked Somalis to make money for them with this movie. That is in itself an Award.
5 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Copshop (2021)
10/10
It's a man's world...
22 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A good progressive film, it has all of them men: overweight, slack, corrupt, white and black, even an extrovert Hispanic klutz, some sharp and tough, one superlative psychopath, hitmen, fixers but also a cute mignon with contrasting ethic, fitness and especially gender with the rest of the staff (one that seemed to be 100% masculine, immoral and hazardous).

It's a man's world, lawless and chaotic that desperately needs a woman's touch or trigger. When the bullets start to fly, she's there to hold her ground and the workplace together but more importantly to send the last one of them back to its originator.

The movie slowly built tension through witty and tenseful dialogues some superb camerawork, but culminated in a gory and action-packed discharge.

An incendiary recommendation from this user. The rating I gave it doesn't mean it should win the Oscars (I rate badly Oscar winners because they are so privileged), but that it made me giggle enough (feminine trait?) and kept me interested until the very end(another one?).
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed