Reviews

43 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A decent enough commercial representation of a real life episode which deserved a great movie.
8 October 2019
Mission Mangal is reminiscent of most of Akshay Kumar's well-meaning social issue movies; perfectly nice and watchable, but tinged with a slight regret that more could have been done with such an interesting theme. What could have been an ambitious effort in the right hands, a stab at posterity, instead turns into a decent enough, yet not wholly memorable experience. This falls right in line with other attempts by Akshay Kumar such as Toilet-Ek Prem Katha and Padman.

The movie starts off with a look at a failed launch of a lunar probe, for which the head of the project, Kumar's Dhawan, takes the fall though the primary misjudgment lay with Vidya Balan's character. Banished to the outlands of the far from feasible (so they think) Mars mission, he is joined by a guilt-ridden Vidya Balan. They are joined by a team of mostly inexperienced ISRO members, each of whom have their own arcs. Most of this is believable. For example, Nitya Menen plays a character who worries about getting to look like an 'aloo', while desperately wishing for a child with her husband. Tapsee plays a woman wanting to learn driving in order to become more independent. There is an older member of the team who is just counting the days till retirement. Apart from these, there are some standard tropes which a movie usually introduces to show that it is also 'topical'. Kriti Kulhari plays a Muslim divorcee who finds it tough to get rental accommodations, while Sonakshi Sinha is the typical 'modern' woman who sleeps around and prefers to work for NASA than ISRO. Sharman Joshi, in a relevant film after a while, plays a bachelor hoping for his kundli to match for marriage rather than for a successful Mangal mission.

But it's really Vidya Balan's character, as mostly happens in a film starring her, who steals the thunder here. Her Tara Shinde is, at the outset, the typical Indian working mom. She takes care of most of the household chores, has a mostly unsupportive and mildly chauvinistic husband, gets all the blame for kids going haywire and keeps a respectable job. But there is more steel to her than meets the eye. She is perfectly capable of standing up to her husband in a firm, yet gentle manner and keeping her kids on the straight and narrow when it's needed. In fact, the more I think of it, the more it seems it's her character which saved the movie from total mediocrity. And it's her idea of saving the fuel to make up for lesser funds which kickstarts the whole process. From then on the film mostly follows the standard underdog template, though they do a reasonably good job of dumbing down the science for us mere mortals to grasp the specifics.

There are some parts though where the film flounders in trying to conform to Bollywood tropes. Seeing the ladies with brooms trying to dance around was hugely not in tune with the rest of their characterizations. Also, did there really need to be such an obvious antagonist to Kumar's Dhawan in Dalip Tahil? But, as I said above, Akshay Kumar's movies do tend to reach more people than the average critic-friendly film. And if his attempts at social education does help important topics get more traction, maybe we should begrudge the effort but instead should praise it for what it does well. All in all, I would say this is a fine example of a family friendly social entertainer.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Traffic (2011)
8/10
An enthralling ride
9 August 2017
Whatever be one's opinion on the movie as a whole, there can be no denying the impact it had for the better on Malayalam Cinema. This was a landmark film in Malayalam movie history simply because it marked the definite turning of the tide from the mediocre and mostly sub-par work which was being churned out of this once luminous film industry. Speaking as someone who was depressed at the state of Malayalam cinema in the first decade of the 21st century, I am eternally grateful to the whole team behind this masterstroke of a movie, especially its director, Rajesh Pillai. Because post this, it looked like our cinema just couldn't stop being experimental. I can unabashedly say that I am a huge fan of new age Malayalam cinema and its embracing of modern storytelling themes. But without this to lay down the marker and challenge an audience which seemed to be creeping into acceptance of the superstar parodies of neighboring states, the change may not have taken wings.

The premise is simple. A famous actor's daughter is dying and needs a heart transplant. An accident happens and a matching donor is suddenly found. Now it's a question of getting the heart from one city to the other in the middle of rush hour traffic in a couple of hours so that the transplant can be done before it is futile. But the emotional trip this puts us through is what the movie is all about. Adrenalin rush at one point, emotional outbursts at another point, a whole host of characters are brought together in intersecting story lines. They all perform well, but special mention must go to Lena and Kunchako Boban, both in stereotype defying roles which probably resurrected their careers. However, after a long time in Malayalam, here was a movie which rather than being noticed for superstar actors had instead a superstar script, and found overwhelming acceptance from a state known for its acceptance of good films but deprived of the same at the time.

Sadly though, Rajesh Pillai passed away recently. His first movie was the forgettable Hridayathil Sookshikaam (Kunchako Boban and Bhavana in the lead) and he disappeared from the scene for a while before unleashing this thunderbolt out of the blue. His subsequent movies didn't live up to the almost impossible expectations this one set, though I did like the pleasant Milli. However sad his passing, we can have the consolation that he left behind such an epoch defying movie for us to savor.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Modern Masterpiece
4 July 2017
This is an almost genius piece of film making. Dileesh Pothen's 'Maheshinte Prathikaram' brought Fahad Fazil back into the fold in a big way but it was a movie which grew on me, after being a little underwhelmed by it on first viewing. But here, he grips you from the start and never really lets go till the end credits roll.

Fahad Fazil continues his fine form, but I would consider him to be more of an admirable supporting foil here. The movie's main protagonists are the couple played by Suraj Venjaramoodu and newcomer Nimisha Sajayan. After a realistically humorous mix up on first meet, they have a furtive romance before tying the knot. While traveling in a bus, a thief (Fahad Fazil) is caught in the act of stealing her gold necklace. While she is adamant that she saw him gulping it down, he protests his innocence to the police.

In fact, I would say it is the scenes at the police station that elevates this film to another level completely. The brilliance of the narration is in the way it makes everything seem so utterly realistic, and yet peppy and satirically humorous in its enactment on screen. The police officers here are not black or white, but like most people occupy the gray area in between. While genuinely wanting to help resolve the conflict here, they also cannot help but try to twist things to suit their perspective at various points in the story. The resolution when it eventually comes is probably the best they could have done with this wacky beautiful film.

Performances are uniformly brilliant. Suraj Venjaramoodu has been finally stepping away from his trademark buffoonery act in recent times, but this has to be one of his finest roles. The utter realism he brings to screen of a common man stuck in a little bit of a muddle and trying his best to resolve it is exemplary. Nimisha Sajayan maybe a newcomer, but she seems perfect for this – again a realistic blend of spunk and sass, yet vulnerable to the events around her. Suraj's chemistry, both with her and with Fahad Fazil is another clincher – it couldn't be better. The police officers, led by Alencier Ley, are all obviously fine actors who have got roles to shine and grab the opportunity.

Movies like this don't come along often. When they do, they deserve every accolade and recognition they get. A must MUST watch.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Take Off (2017)
9/10
Wow!
29 June 2017
Brutally gripping and brilliantly realistic, this is all that Airlift tried to be but couldn't. Not just the best Malayalam movie of the year, but one of the best of the year overall. Parvathy amazes with each role she takes up, every one of them different from the other, and she carries this movie on her able shoulders. Fahad Fazil, Kunchako Boban and others provide admirable support, but the biggest kudos should go to the director here. Based on the incident where Indian nurses in Iraq were kidnapped by Isis, and their eventual release, this movie deserves as wide an audience as it can get, and Parvathy and its director deserve all the accolades they can get for it.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A genuinely different family/romantic drama
29 June 2017
A surprisingly very good look at a middle class family's trials, mostly on matters of the heart between the older couple and the younger one. A no nonsense and sensible take on old/young relationships and the trials and temptations that throw themselves into our paths. Biju Menon, Asha Sharath and even Asif Ali were pretty good, but the newcomer Rejisha Vijayan steals the show here.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Snehaveedu (2011)
8/10
Reliable Comforts
29 June 2017
One way to look at this film is as clichéd Sathyan Anthikadu reworking his timeworn themes of village life and life lessons. Another way, for the less cynical, is as a lovely little ode to the quintessential Kerala village and its denizens. The sense of comfort one gets from this predictable but well made movie is probably more for the homesick Malayalee.

Mohanlal, is of course typically reliable in his role as a bachelor who lives for his mother and who is genuinely thrown off balance by the sudden appearance of a teenager claiming to be his son. The culmination doesn't really matter, it's all about familiar comforts and quintessential Sathyan Anthikadu.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Guppy (2016)
8/10
A nice little gem...
23 June 2017
This movie flew under the radar when it came out, but it's a lovely little tale on the human psyche without ever getting preachy or manipulative in its storytelling. The child actor Chetan brilliantly portrays growing pains of a boy who despite the tough lot life appears to have handed him, still manages to find love, laughter and fun in his surroundings. The tussle of wits that he engages in with the recently arrived engineer (Tovino) is the plot point, but it serves more as a window into exploring the souls and lives of these two disparate characters. Add some amazing cinematography into the mix and it's no wonder this is one of the best of the year
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Charlie (VII) (2015)
9/10
A Palette of Color
18 January 2016
Charlie is a shout out to the inner spirit within us straining to get out of its self-imposed restraints, a joyous call to the wild and free. This is not as much a movie of strong plot line as a palette of fresh colors and exuberance, at the center of which are two characters unrelenting in their search for meaning in the disorderly and their sheer rejection of the order which familiar society tries to impose on them.

The story? We have Tessa, played by a luminous Parvathy escaping from the confined environs of her extended family (and from a job in Bangalore), especially her mother, who want to impose order and compliance onto her supposed wayward lifestyle by getting her betrothed to one of the present party. She ends up in a ramshackle rented room in one of the less savory parts of Kochi, and is captivated by the fascinating remnants of the life of the previous occupant (Dulqar Salman) of the place. As she tries to trace this seemingly almost mythical presence, she gets further emotionally drawn into this kindred spirit who appears to have perfected the art of living for anecdotal episodes of an unpredictable life, while at the same time leaving a mark with his humanity on the lives he has touched.

The episodes with disparate characters are wonderfully captured. There is the thief who tries to break into his place, but who ends up being accompanied by Charlie on a night of unpredictability. The young woman whose life is indelibly influenced by Charlie also has a poignant tale to tell, while the long suffering Kunjappan (Nedumudi Venu) may hold the key to the hopeful final meeting of the two. The story arc involving Kalpana is another touching and bittersweet portion of the movie which endears all the characters to us. This is one of my favorite Malayalam films of the year and also one of the best pairs I've seen in a while, though the actual number of scenes in which they are together is quite few. The climactic reveal amidst the vibrant colors and pomp of the Thrissur pooram is delightfully handled, and this is one movie where a sequel may be genuinely warranted, if only to see where these characters end up.

Speaking of which, Parvathy finally seems to be holding up her end of the bargain and finally fulfilling the immense promise she showed from her Notebook and City of God days. Here she captures the viewers as the throbbing heart of the movie and wins us over. Dulqar Salman as the titular character also exudes some great screen presence and has great chemistry with Parvathy. The supporting cast too is flawless, and adds on to make this one of the best movies of the year.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Highway (I) (2014)
8/10
Alia Bhatt's coming of age
1 January 2016
I was starting to think commercial cinema had ensnared Imtiaz Ali in its tempting web with the quality of his movies progressively declining each time. However, this has reaffirmed his stature as a once promising film maker. A story of suppressed sadness and rage and a quietly building crescendo of emotions, the unlikely pairing of Alia Bhatt's spoilt rich girl on the eve of her wedding, and her would be kidnapper, Randeep Hooda works magic as they traverse a route on some even more magical landscapes. As she struggles with her long suppressed inner demons and discovers a freedom she hadn't ever experienced before with her captor, Alia Bhatt is the heart and soul of this movie. Her emotional outburst towards the end of the film was one of the best pieces of acting I've seen from a Bollywood actress in recent times and gripped me enough to not lift my eyes from the screen.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Double Barrel (2015)
4/10
Sigh...
3 September 2015
This was one crash and burn like none other. As an ardent admirer of the Lijo Jose Pellisery school of film making and an even bigger admirer of Prithviraj (and to a lesser extent, his brother too), this was one flick I was betting the year on. Lijo's first movie was an under-appreciated little gem 'Nayakan' with Indrajith in a role which should have catapulted him to the big time, but didn't. Sadly, his second movie, and probably his best, City of God, was commercially noticed even less, but was one of my favorites of that year. But considering the huge supporting cast of big names and the Tarantino-sque trailer for this one, plus the fact that Lijo had finally cracked the commercial approval code with 'Amen', this had to be a surefire winner right?

Nothing could be further from the truth. Speaking as someone who loves experimental Malayalam cinema, I have to say I found nothing really to recommend here. The first sequence, in fact, was quite promising – with the arguing couple, the silent gunman and the explosive culmination of it in a black comedy of errors. But from then on in, I could only watch with growing disbelief as the movie descended into farce of unbelievable proportions. The silent gunman, played by Sunny Wayne, was probably the best part of the movie, and not nearly enough time was devoted to this character. A farcical tale on the pursuit of two diamonds, Laila and Majnu, which together are valuable beyond your wildest dreams but worthless individually, a whole cast of characters come together (or blow apart) in its chase. Leading the pack are the duo of brothers (Prithvi and Indrajith), small time crooks trying to break the big time. Chemban Vinod Jose and Arya play another track of small time hooligans trying to bury a couple of bodies their mobster boss killed. Speaking of which, how in the world is Arya such a huge star in the neighboring state? His lack of emotive skills and even poorer dialog delivery shows exactly why he probably could not make any in roads into the currently competitive Malayalam industry.

The ingredients were all there for a wild and quirky romp in a Mallu stoner attempt at Tarantino. Unfortunately, the biggest problem here is that the situations and dialogs are just not funny. What was meant to be rib tickling funny fell flat most of the time. Most of the story lines (apart from the silent assassin one) did not connect and it was way too long, clocking at a mammoth 2 hours 40 minutes.

There is almost nothing redeeming in this misadventure – except maybe for the fact that every director is allowed a misfire, and considering this is Lijo's first, he will hopefully bounce back with a bang.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Riveting cinema!
3 December 2014
It's been a while since I wrote a movie review, but so blown away was I by this masterpiece of moody suspense that I had to pen down something. I have seen only two Korean movies in my life so far and both have been among my favorites – this one and Oldboy. If that's not a sign to watch a few more of Korean cinema, I don't know what is.

At its heart, the story is based on a real life incident in the 1980's in a small province in South Korea. A couple of women are found murdered - their corpses mutilated and their faces gagged with their underwear. It's a brutal crimes, the kinds of which has probably not been witnessed before in this sleepy town and the bumbling local detectives prove themselves hardly adept at apprehending the perpetrator. Crimes scenes are muddied over, evidence mishandles and suspects brought in on a whim to be tortured or otherwise brutally interrogated by the two cops put in charge. A third detective, who comes from Seoul, is assigned to help them and his evident disdain for the local cops' methods and his reasoning of this being in fact the work of a serial killer puts him initially on the wrong foot. However, when a third murder in similarly creepy circumstances is uncovered, the serial killer theory appears validated.

That may seem like another cop movie on serial killers and their hunt, but it is anything but. The story is taken as merely a canvas to paint a wide tapestry of human emotion and character which focuses more on the internal demons which haunts each of these characters. The cinematography and music perfectly captures this mood – slow burning, understated, grime tinted and devastatingly effective. This is not a neatly wrapped up ready to order thriller. This is a movie where the cinematic techniques and writing are at their most superlative. The ending can be considered open ended, unsettling and maybe unsatisfying for some, but bear in mind – this was based on a true story, and this was never meant to be just about the case. A more popular movie which it brings to mind is David Fincher's underrated but very good movie, Zodiac, in terms of its similarities of theme and approach, but I would say this is still miles ahead of that little gem. This is brilliance painted on the canvas of our movie screen. One of the rare 10's I'm giving.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1983 (2014)
8/10
One of the best Indian sports movies probably...
28 August 2014
A finely crafted, nuanced tale of a cricket obsessed youth in a cricket obsessed nation with some beautiful cinematography of the lush landscapes of a village in Kerala. The sense of nostalgia this may evoke in those who have lived in similar setting is enough to recommend this movie. But, on the other hand, this is also a carefully plotted coming of age tale of youthful desires, the slow progress of adulthood and reality and opportunities lost as well as eventual redemption. There are no real villains here apart from the gradually encroaching tentacles of time, but this is an example of the recent breed of Malayalam Cinema's new age creators at their best. Nivin Pauly is an actor who never really convinced me till now, but this year he seems to be coming into his own with some delightful turns. Add in some fabulous supporting actors and great technical aspects, and we have a real winner here. And, as with all great sports movies, you can be totally immersed in this even if cricket is not your cup of tea.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Honey Bee (2013)
7/10
It's definitely trippin'!
16 September 2013
Honeybee is like one of those delectably enjoyable sweets which linger slowly onto your taste buds and remains there. I have to admit, I was prepared to dislike this film or pass it off as one of those very average meaningless flicks which get a great run at the ticket windows purely based on the majority audience's tendency to promote mediocre fare in the name of entertainment.

Full of meaning it may not be, but genuinely fun and endearing it surely is. But a word of warning to older viewers or those who don't like much cuss words and alcohol/drugs in their movies – stay away. I'm not a fan of promoting intoxicants in the movies, but this was done very naturally here and you do tend to believe that there are plenty of groups of friends like that shown in the movie. However, I do think it takes a younger audience to appreciate it more fully.

The basic storyline is nothing much. A group of friends live and party together in some part of the city and they seem to be involved in organizing dance shows or performances. This aspect is not focused on much in the movie. Two of this group is Seb (Asif Ali) and Angel (Bhavana) who are a bit closer to each other. However, all is fine till the days up to Angel's wedding, when she confronts Seb and asks whether the love bug ever bit him. Though he answers in the negative then, later in a state of drunken stupor he realizes the folly of letting her go and hatches a plan with the rest of the gang to kidnap her from her home the night before her wedding. What happens next after they wake up the next morning and Angel's fearsome brothers (led by Lal) decide to hunt them down forms the rest of the story.

What works here big time is the camaraderie and chemistry between the friends. Of particular mention should be the antics of Baburaj and Sreenath Bhasi who prove to be the life and soul of the film and provide genuine hilarity. Both have been growing from strength to strength in the last couple of years, though ironically both are at different ends of their careers. Asif Ali and Bhavana are fine, but I can't shake off the funny feeling that both are pretty lucky actors who have made by in their careers with some pretty average abilities and the luck to be associated with some good filmmakers and supporting actors. Maybe they will prove me wrong yet, but this is not the movie for that. Lal (the director's father) appears as the head of the gang of fearsome brothers and is amply supported by Suresh Krishna and the others.

All in all, a genuinely fun watch with some original comedy rather than the recycled muck the superstars and old time filmmakers keep dishing out – but like I said, may not be suited for all families.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mumbai Police (2013)
8/10
A police procedural with a difference - Engaging and bold
8 September 2013
Mumbai Police is a revelation. I cannot proclaim it to be the best thriller I have seen, but it has to be applauded for what it tries to accomplish. Roshan Andrews has gone a notch above the standard genre fare we have come to expect in Indian thrillers and gave us something which will, in turns, haunt and genuinely surprise. This is in no small part to the accomplished writing duo of Bobby-Sanjay and the brilliant Prithviraj.

ACP Anthony Moses (Prithvi) is just about to solve a crime and report it to his boss, Farhan (Rehman), when he is caught in a bad accident which leaves him without any memory of his past. Farhan tries to help him jog his memory and get the name of the culprit, but Anthony has no clue to his past or to his impending future. However, his reflexes and training from his previous life are still in tact and he realizes he would need to use these to piece both his life and the case together again. The crime is of a very personal nature to both the officers, as it involves the murder of their colleague and close friend, ACP Aryan John Jacob (Jayasurya) while he was receiving a gallantry award. Together, the trio had been known as the 'Mumbai Police' owing to their earlier presence in the Mumbai police department. As Anthony re-pieces together the jigsaw, he realizes everything is not as it would seem and the seemingly bizarre directions and conflicts the investigation takes as opposed to the initial attempts in the case alienates his team and further confuses his already addled mind. All this ultimately leads up to a climax which can only be termed as amazingly bold and genuinely shocking in its denouement.

Apart from the climactic reveal, the movie also must take plaudits for its mostly different approach to the standard police thriller. There are hardly any bombastic dialogs and mustache twirling here. The investigating officer is not exactly the epitome of all vices, as he himself realizes in the course of his second life. The introduction of alternative sexuality into Malayalam commercial cinema has to be hailed as a landmark in this generally conservative segment of viewers. Background music is pretty apt and gripping for the most part and there are no songs to break the flow.

The supporting characters all do a great job. Jayasurya, Rehman, Aparna Nair and Riyaz Khan (in a cameo) are all commendable. There is also a surprisingly strong performance from the veteran, Kunjan, as one of the officers on the team. However, this is Prithviraj's show all the way. He has done tougher roles than this and will probably have bigger hits. But the conviction of a mainstream actor of his stature to take up a role which pushes the envelope in terms of what is 'acceptable' for commercial leading men in Indian cinema has to be thoroughly appreciated. I have been a fan of this guy for a while now, and he keeps giving reasons why, despite all the unfounded criticism against him, he will always be relevant. Take a bow, Prithvi, Roshan and Bobby-Sanjay, for hopefully bringing in a much needed wind of change in this industry.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Akam (2012)
7/10
Intriguing and intense character study
5 September 2013
Akam is an intriguing addition to the recently burgeoning stable of new age Malayalam cinema. While the movie has its flaws, it is still an engrossingly made film relying mainly on mood and pathos to take things forward.

At its core, it is about a young and confident architect, Srini, who seems to be reaching a good place in his life with great career prospects, an opportunity in the US waiting for him and a loving girlfriend. However, in the blink of an eye, everything changes. The accident which ensues leaves him almost hideously disfigured on one part of his face and a limp in his leg. But more telling is the impact it has on his personal life and confidence. His girlfriend, Tara, leaves him out of her own confusion on how to deal with the startling turn of events. The self pity and pathos Srini delves into is the fulcrum on which the movie is made. He meets a mysterious lady, Ragini, one day and they quickly become close. Despite his disfigurement, she seems to have no problems loving him and they end up getting married. However, Srini's boss and friend, CK, believes she is bad news and allegorically compares her to a yakshi, sucking human blood and flesh. Slowly, Srini descends into a state of confusion and self loathing and starts to literally believe what his friend suggested. The rest of the film deals with his response to Ragini in the light of this perceived revelation and the effect this has on certain other people around him.

I haven't read the original novel on which this is based, so I can't say if the ambiguity in the character of Ragini is intended or if this was a feature lost in translation to the big screen. While it starts off in a intriguingly moody and spooky manner, later on this same sense of mood serves as a dampener as the story seems to virtually halt at a point. Whether Ragini is, in fact, what Srini thinks her to be or not doesn't seem to be an important question in the director's or storywriter's mind as this is left as open ended as possible for the viewer. It is here that the movie falters in the second half, going the way of so many art house fare in seemingly mistaking vagueness for profundity. Ultimately, the movie does not achieve the aim of either being a spooky horror flick or an intense character study (though it does better in the latter, primarily because of Fahadh Faasil's performance).

However, for those of you who like to dabble in the unconventional, this is definitely worth a watch. The performances are mostly amazing, led by the dependably awesome Fahadh Faasil as Srini. The depressive intensity, self hate and doubt are captured perfectly by this poster boy of new gen Malayalam fare. The ladies both do a great job, as Tara and Ragini. With a bit more fleshing out, Ragini could have been a great character. One of the best things about the film is the perfect cinematography which elevates this piece to an entirely different level. The bustle of the metro, the claustrophobic interiors of plush apartments and musky old cinema halls, and the green of the open countryside are captured exquisitely on screen. The minimal background score serves very well on this kind of film too.

While this is not one of my favorites and has its fair share of shortcomings, Shalini Usha Nair is definitely someone to watch out for and I definitely would be waiting for a second effort from this team.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An ambiguous visual masterpiece
12 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Kutty Srank is shrouded in enigma, much like its primary protagonist. I first caught this film in a small cinema in Thrissur soon after its release back in 2009. While I found it to be an interesting work of art, I was left confused on what the actual intentions of the movie was.

Is it a treatise on the many masks a man is forced to wear to adapt to his changing surroundings? Is it about the enduring effects of love on the human psyche? Or about the strength of the female form and the nature of the bonds she can have with a man?

The movie kept playing at the back of my subconscious for a few years, before I finally decided to re visit it. Once I started it, I was caught in the spell it weaved on me. Lush, lingering and beautifully shot, this is a film which has to be soaked in its moments and one which the viewer should allow to subtly and evocatively make its mark on him/her.

Essentially, it is about a dead sailor who washes up on the shore and the different women who recollect him from their perspectives to the local police. Perspective is probably the key word here. Each of the women seem to recollect a different man from the one the other remembers.

First up is Revamma, a quietly powerful performance by the dependable Padmapriya. The daughter of a rich and influential man, she had lost her innocence at a young age, because of the cruelty she seemed to have witnessed her father inflict on others. The blood which splatters on her face keeps coming back to her and she left home a long time ago to Ceylon. Now she is coming back and her father has big plans for her. Kutty Srank is his trusted helper, and he trusts his master to the point of blind devotion. When he goes to receive her, she has come with a young Buddhist monk in tow. Fearful of what her father might say, her uncle and aunt force Srank to keep it a secret from him and hide the young man in a dilapidated home. Srank feels the guilt at what he perceives to be his betrayal when Revamma abandons a party her father had held for her. He manhandles the young priest but is stopped by Revamma who tells him that she plans to run away and become a monk with him. The story unfolds in Srank being betrayed in turn by his master and in him helping Revamma escape.

The second story is my favorite of the three. Pemanna is portrayed beautifully by Kamalinee Mukherjee with an underlying sense of allure and seduction. She has always been an actress who, at least in Malayalam, wants to do only strong roles that offer her scope for performance, and she doesn't disappoint here. After helping Revamma escape, it appears they end up somewhere close to Cochin, where he gets involved with a local drama troupe headed by Pemanna's brother Loni. For the lead role, he chooses Srank, which upsets one of the regular actors, Joppan. Pemanna is entranced by her co-lead in the drama and very subtly tries to seduce him. There is a scene here which is probably the first nude scene I have seen in Malayalam, but it is so aesthetically shot that you can only marvel in the mood as Srank walks in on Pemanna in her state of undress. The jealousy in Joppan forces him to try and turn the public opinion against Srank by confiding and colluding with the local priest (Siddique) to defame him. The priest sees Srank as an affront and adversary to the control he holds over the local citizens using the fear of God, as Srank is skeptical of it all. The tale ends up in one deceit after another with more than one death involved. The acting in this piece is exceptional, but I have to give special mention to Suresh Krishna as Loni. Sadly typecast in commercial mallu fare, here he finally gets a role where he can display his range and comes up with an exceptional performance.

The final part of the recollections come from a mute woman who is adamant that the dead man is not Srank, and who should know better, as she claims to have been married to the man and is carrying his child. Considered a curse and harbinger of misfortune by the local village she belongs to, she met him when he was actually coming to finish her off, as his boss Unnithan (Saikumar) feels she is the reason for his family's misfortune. On seeing her pitiful condition and her fear, Srank could not bring himself to do it and instead becomes her protector and friend. The progress of their relationship to one of love is captured by Unnithan's daughter in law, who seems to be caught in a cage of her own in the household and finds in Kali and Srank an outlet for her suppressed desires, as she writes about them.

The cinematography is absolutely breathtaking. Kerala on its own is a enthralling beautiful place and it becomes a sight to behold when framed through a creative lens. The acting is almost flawless for the most part, though I don't think Mammooty is the only one who deserves credit here. In fact, I would say it's the powerful supporting characters I took away the most from the movie.

But at the end of the day, if you ask me what it was all about and what was the point, I may still not be able to give a concrete answer. However, maybe that's not the point. Like all great works of art, Kutty Srank is an experience to be savored in the moments. Just like life.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Brilliant Effort...
1 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I haven't written a review here for some time now, but the critical reception to what I feel is one of the best movies to come out of the Malayalam film industry in recent times moved me to pen down my thoughts.

Critics seem to have not been very favorable to this work of art, which is quite beguiling. The desperate desire for change which most lovers of Malayalam cinema have been holding onto since Malayalam films took a turn for the worse at the turn of the century seems to be finally arriving, and while a few fine efforts are getting appreciated (eg. Salt 'n Pepper), this one doesn't seem to be. I can only assume it is because of the lack of commercial elements, which I guess something like a Traffic (while it is a good film, I get a feeling it was so appreciated because of the commercialized aspects of it) did well.

The movie explores the lives of two individuals living on two socially opposite edges of a metro. While Fahd Fazil plays a sophisticated, rich and young corporate honcho who is also an inveterate flirt, Vineeth Sreenivasan plays the role of Ansari, a sweeper in a supermarket. Arjun and Ansari would normally have never had to interact with each other, as both live lives of vastly different circumstances. Arjun has the arrogant, confident outlook of someone who has probably made achieving things (professional and personal) a habit. He does not notice most of the grime surrounding him in the city and has no problems sleeping with his secretary, Sonia (Ramya Nambeesan), while at the same time planning his wedding with Ann (Roma). Ansari, on the other hand, is someone who has always been timid and used to being beaten down by life.

Arjun, on a spur of the moment decision, records a lovemaking session he has with Sonia on his phone camera. When Sonia finds out about his impending marriage with Ann, they have an altercation in a café, which leads to Arjun losing his phone. As fate would have it, Ansari picks it up. From then on in, the story becomes a cat and mouse game as Arjun tries to get back the phone from Ansari, worried as he is that the clip he recorded will end up on some website. Ansari, on the other hand, experiencing having power over someone for the first time in his life, plays around with Arjun getting him to do things Ansari could not. The game ends in a gritty, raw and thrilling denouement with one of the best fight sequences picturised in Malayalam.

Fahd Fazil is brilliant and carries the movie. A perfect role for him, he exudes the uber cool handsomeness and arrogance needed for this kind of role and I sure hope he continues doing stuff like this in the future. Vineeth Srinivasan provides an able foil as the down on his luck Ansari. Remya Nambeesan was a revelation. It was so refreshing to see a leading lady in Malayalam who is not your coy, village belle kinds and who doesn't mind expressing herself on screen. Nivedita as Ansari's colleague and burgeoning love interest is also nice. The music by Rex Vijayan is quite interesting and different from the usual fare seen mostly.

While good movies like Salt 'n Pepper are getting the critical and commercial appreciation they deserve, I hope this one also does not fall under the radar and gets the recognition it deserves.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kerala Cafe (2009)
9/10
A Wonderful Experience...
17 February 2010
I finished watching Ranjith's experiment, Kerala Café the other day. Ten different short stories by ten different directors combined to form a single movie. The experiment has been done, of course, in other languages, including in Bollywood (Dus Kahaniyaan). However, in the barren wasteland of creativity that Malayalam cinema has become since the turn of the century, Ranjith is one maker who keeps trying to revolutionize the industry, almost as a one man army out to repair the damage.

The movie has various stories from 10 directors, some established and some new. The opening is a story of NRI angst and memories, in a story fittingly called Nostalgia. Though this is not among the best, it does in a way capture NRI attitudes with respect to Kerala, and Dileep does well portraying a character with shades of gray.

After this, we see Prithviraj in all his effortless dashing best, talking about Jesus, Frankenstein and Mangalassery Neelakantan and about his 'bitch'. As only he can do these days, he pulls it off, in what turns out to be a touching story of a gathering of people from different walks of life, who bear common witness to a tragedy which affected them all. Called 'Island Express', this stars Jayasurya and Rahman as well and is one of my favorites from the collection.

The next was a story on adultery by Shaji Kailas with Suresh Gopi. It's a relief to know that Shaji hasn't totally lost it. Another decent effort to add to. After that is Uday Ananthan's Mrityunjayam, which has Fahd Fazil in a new avatar as compared to his last outing a few years back in his dad's venture. A horror movie, it does manage to send a chill or two down your spine, but still not one of the best here. Despite that, Fahd definitely does look much more assured now.

The next story is Anjali Menon's Happy Journey. This one beautifully captures the mind of a middle class Keralite male(Jagathy) who, on a night journey in a bus, tries to get flirty and touchy with a young co passenger next to him. What follows is a brilliant game of oneupmanship between them, which keeps the viewer guessing. I do hope that Anjali's Manjadikuru gets a release in Kerala. If this short feature is anything to go by, her full length movie must be great. After this, there are a couple of nice efforts including one on the effects of recession (brilliantly acted by Siddique and Shweta Menon) and another by Shyamprasad. Good to know he can do the light hearted ventures too.

However, one of the best here is Anwar Rasheed's Bridge. A brilliantly metaphorical and hauntingly sad tale about a son who tries to lose his mother, much the same way as a dad tries to lose the stray cat his son had brought home. The story talks of themes of helplessness, desolation and love and is beautifully acted (mainly Salim Kumar). Amazingly, this is done by Anwar Rasheed, the same guy who did those mindless potboilers with Mammooty and Mohanlal before this. I sure hope he continues on this path rather than go back to those.

PuramKazhchakal, starring Sreenivasan and Mammooty, is the last one, and another fine one. Sreenivasan is a traveler on a bus thinking of his past, when suddenly a man in a hurry gets on the bus. Throughout the journey he pesters the driver and gets ridiculed also, while trying to get the bus to move fast. The ending of this is touching and speaks a lot of how we may not realize why someone does what he does. Mamooty is shorn of all his star power here and does brilliantly.

Seeing these 10 minute stories, I couldn't help wondering… If these guys can do so well with short stories, why the heck can't they start replicating this onto their longer counterparts?
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ghostwriter (1992–1995)
9/10
I Loved this Show....
17 January 2010
I just finished watching another episode of Ghostwriter. For the uninitiated, Ghostwriter was a popular kids show during the 90's which involved a gang of kids in NY and their invisible ghost friend, who they couldn't see, but who could make words out of letters. With the help of this ghost buddy, they went around NYC solving various mysteries. The episodes were always in 4 or 5 part mysteries, and I used to love them. I remember in Saudi, as a kid, i would want to wear pens around my neck just like they used to. Got a couple of my friends to do the same too.

Anyways, the funny thing was, i just realized how much i still like the show, 10-15 years after i first saw it. Now when i revisit it, i realize the show was not only entertaining, but also dealt with a lot of issues which a lot of adults would do good to take note of. It celebrates the power of togetherness and friendship, as well as showing glorious examples of steadfast loyalty to the ones you love, passion and determination, as well as an aversion to violence in any form. I remember the show was probably one of the first ones i saw where the kids who made up the gang where all of different ethnicities. There was Jamal, the African American, Tina the Chinese American, Alex and Gaby, the Hispanics as well as Lenni, the true blue American. Yet, without ever getting preachy, it managed to make us care for these kids and put across the point that with tolerance, understanding and friendship, the differences don't really matter. Another thing i liked about it was the importance given to writing. It genuinely encouraged kids to take up writing more.

The poignant thing is though, all the kids who played a part of this have now all gone to the 'Where are they now' list. I looked up their limited profiles available on IMDb, and it looks like hardly any of them went onto any more acting assignments. Though they all seemed to have graduated from university. That was surprising for me, considering they all seemed to have the natural flair for the screen. Especially the unmentioned leader Sheldon Turnipseed (Jamal) and Blaze Berdahl (Lenni), who seemed to have it in them to carry it off on the big screen.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Avatar (2009)
6/10
Wth?
6 January 2010
Gawd, I really wanted to like this movie. After hearing so much about it for weeks on end, I was waiting so that I could catch it in its best version, namely in IMAX 3-D. Well, finally I did get a chance over the new years weekend with my friends in Mumbai. If this is what the best version had to offer, I can imagine how much I may have disliked it in normal 2-D.

First of all, I do like good big budget actioners, which also have fresh characters and credibility of plot. The Dark Knight or the recent Star Trek are recent movies which I really liked. However, I have never been able to enjoy or like a movie which just has exorbitant special effects and no screenplay, dialog or character development. This is probably why I actually managed to sleep through some time of the mayhem that was the second half of the first Transformers movie, and didn't bother to watch the second one. However, I did expect James Cameron to not just make a showpiece of a movie. One of my all time favorites, T2 was done by him. You never felt in that movie that he was compromising on script, characters, dialogs or intensity for effects. I even liked Titanic quite a bit. But this one was plain disappointing. Credit has to be given where due. The idea and beauty of Pandora, and the basic premise was amazingly interesting. But the screenplay left a lot to be desired. Some of the lines uttered by Sully's and Neytiri's Na'vi characters are so cheesy and clichéd that you feel even the most run of the mill romantic comedies do it better. On top of that, the various scenes look like they had been picked up from a collection of good movies over the years (like the brilliant LOTR trilogy). And what in the world was all that sudden spirituality thrown in at the end? It just did not fit in credibly with the story till then.

But I guess these days, most of these movies do well. Which would explain why Transformers 2 and Avatar are among the biggest hits of the year, and Avatar will probably challenge Titanic for all time Box Office earnings. And why something beautiful and complex like Watchmen was probably not watched by half as many people as who saw Avatar. Sad though. I never thought I'll be disappointed with Cameron.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aparan (1988)
7/10
The Birth of one of Kerala's Finest...
28 November 2009
I managed to get around to watching one of the old Malayalam movies lying on my laptop. This was a movie by the deceased Padmarajan. The movie itself was a prime example of how Malayalam movies have deteriorated in the current millennium. The movie in question, Aparan, was released in the late 80's or the early 90's, probably what can be termed as the golden age of Malayalam Cinema. The movie was a throwback to the good old days, when Malayalam Cinema, despite operating on shoestring budgets, were powerhouses of story lines and performances. Those days, i used to take pride in the fact that, unlike Bollywood or the amazingly crass Tamil Industry, Malayalam movies never catered to the superstar culture. The story was the superstar. Alas, these days, the superstar effect seems to be more evident here now more than even the Tamil Industry. Its rare nowadays that a story based on a great actor comes out where the story is given precedence. It seems that the 'story' is woven around the star.

The movie marked the debut of Jayaram, a wonderful actor, who proceeded from then to give us some wonderfully sensitive and comic portrayals in a number of good movies. Here he plays the role of the typical unemployed graduate in desperate search of a job. In one of the uncountable interviews he attends, as he steps out for a coffee break, he is accosted by a couple of people and the police who believe that he is the one who has swindled them out of their hard earned money. Its only when the police inspector(Mukesh, in an inconsequential role) recognizes him as an old friend, that the confusion is resolved. Yet, the fact remains that there is someone who looks exactly like Viswanathan, on the run from the law. Viswanathan goes back home not telling his parents anything which transpired. However, he gets an appointment in the same city where he was mistaken. He takes up office and things seem to move normally initially, and he even manages to find a romantic interest with a girl in his office, Ambili(Shobana). But then his evil look alike rears his head. From then on the movie continues in a gripping manner till the thrilling climax.

The film has been made in a very taught and tight manner, without any unnecessary frills, in the usual unique Padmarajan style. The way the character deals with his helplessness, moves you to feel for him. Jayaram is excellent in his first movie, while the supporting cast (which everyone else is) does a fine job. His future wife, Parvathy, plays his sister in the movie and veteran actor Madhu plays his dad.

For those of you who grew up on a diet of great movies by Padmarajan, Bharatan et al, it is a way to get back. For the present generation of lovers of Malayalam Cinema, its a way to acquaint themselves with the glory days of Malayalam cinema and watch the flowering of one of our best talents, Jayaram.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2012 (I) (2009)
5/10
Blah!
15 November 2009
I really got to stop wasting my time and money on these kinda crapfests. I mean, I guess I deserve it. What was I expecting? The Dark Knight? But still, I had actually liked one of Emmerich's earlier movies, Independence Day. At least that had charming characters you rooted for.

This one was simply a CGI fest, and not too good also I felt. Somehow the effect of the world getting destroyed was just not there. This is what too much of CGI can do. Or it probably is just a vindication of the fact that no matter how much special effects you have, you cannot replace a good script and good acting.

I don't want to give the impression that I'm some sort of art house fanatic or that Cusack and Ejiofor are bad actors. I loved movies like the recent Star Trek and The Dark Knight. Its just that these guys were plain cheesy and over the top in this one. For starters, why the heck are we rooting for Cusacks family when the rest of humanity is going under? There is hardly any connect with the characters, which is required in this kind of flick which focuses on a group of survivors. I can get past the clichés of Cusack and co. escaping from every danger in the nick of time with hardly plausible scenarios. But this was plain bad. Even the supposedly "deep" scene between two monks near the Himalayas somewhere seemed laughably funny. Something about emptying your head and all. Yea, makes sense, if you want to enjoy this movie.

I guess I should not be ranting when it was pretty obvious what will be in the movie. But it is sad when these kind of fare make hundreds of millions and genuinely felt movies hardly rake in anything. I think I will be giving Emmerich's movies a break for some time now. Add that to the Michael Bay list (unless of course, he makes another Bad Boys, which by the sheer force of Will Smith's and Martin Lawrence's charm actually is quite enjoyable).
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Soloist (2009)
8/10
A true look at a heartbreaking disease...
7 November 2009
The Soloist was a movie I had an inkling I would really like. And, as it turned out, I did. This was in no small part to the great performances the two leads, Jamie Foxx and Robert Downey Jr. Of course, the direction by Joe Wright (Atonement) was wonderful.

Based on a true story, Downey plays New York Times columnist, Steve Lopez, who in the search for a juicy story, comes across a homeless guy (Jamie Foxx) playing a violin in the park. The guy tells him that his name is Nathaniel Ayers and he used to be in Juliard. Lopez sees the possibility of a juicy story and decides to follow it up. Over the next few months, the movie traces how their relationship grows from merely one of a reporter and his subject to that of two men genuinely growing to be friends and caring for each other. Lopez, though always uncomfortable at Ayers placing too much of trust and affection in him, realizes that he too cares for him and tries all he can to help him out.

What marks the movie out are the way Foxx's characters dementia is handled and shown, as well as the bond between the two men. It seems so rare these days in Hollywood to see a true story of friendship and love between two guys in a totally non-Brokeback way. One of the few I do remember is that modern classic, The Shawshank Redemption. In the end, the movie is honest in portraying Ayer's condition, but at the same time, hopeful of the changes that love and friendship can bring about.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Vintage 80's cop drama
7 November 2009
Somehow, I just love the feel and styles of the '80's. The music, the fashion statements, the hair styles and the movies. Maybe it's just because I was a kid in the Eighties, and the days of your childhood are mostly what you have a longing for.

So, the other day, when I started to watch 'To Live and Die in LA', I knew there was a very small chance that I would dislike the movie. And I liked it. From the opening sequence soundtrack to the style and swagger of the lead character, to the ladies. The movie is about a daredevil cop, Chance, who likes a bit of BASE jumping along with his job. His partner is about to retire from duty in a few days, but gets killed while trying to track down a lead on counterfeit money being produced in LA. The counterfeiter, Rick Masters (William Dafoe in a wonderfully wild and wicked role) shoots him down and leaves him to the dead. Chance decides he wants to track down the killer no matter what the methods used. He gets assigned with the seemingly by the book, nervous Vukovich. However, as Vukovich starts to work with Chance and trusts him, he slowly begins to come around to his way of thinking. The rest of the movie deals with how Chance and Vukovich, with the help of Chance's ultra sexy informer, tracks down Masters. The climax is something worth waiting for, as it hits the viewer unexpectedly and suddenly.

The acting is good enough, though not great. The look and feel of the movie reminded me a bit of Michael Mann's Miami Vice TV series in the eighties. Though William Peterson was good as Chance, I did wonder how it would have been if the more suave and sophisticated Don Johnson had played the lead. Oh, and there a pretty explicit sex scene between Chance and his informer as well.

All in all, a pretty good watch for anyone who likes cop movies, and a must watch for the fans of the eighties.
26 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Defiance (I) (2008)
7/10
Defiant...
7 November 2009
I generally love Zwick's movies. His last, Blood Diamond, is one of my all time favorites, and I love the movies he has done with Denzel (Courage Under Fire, The Siege). He seems to mix the perfect amount of emotions, story and action to take a film forward.

So it was with high expectations that I approached Defiance. I wouldn't say I was disappointed, but it definitely is not one of his best. The movie is based on the true story of the Bielski brothers, who escaped from the slaughter of Jews in Eastern Europe during WWII, into the Belarussian forests and their attempts to build a self sufficient village there for all the fleeing Jews, as well as their attempts to join the Russian fighters. Over there, through a mixture of compassion, understanding and force, they manage to survive for the years till the war was over.

Daniel Craig is great as the older Bielski brother, who does not believe in violence unnecessarily, and who believes that we should not be like the ones who hunt us. His line "We may be hunted like animals, but we will not become animals", is a wonderful reflection of his views. Probably turning in an even better performance than him though is Liev Schreiber as the second Bielski brother who, unlike his brother, believes in using violence to achieve the means, and joins up with the Rusian fighters. The younger brother, played by Jamie Bell, also is convincing as the boy who matures into a man by the end of the movie.

Apart from this, the cinematography is also breathtaking at times. while not one of his best, this movie keeps up Zwick's good record.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed