Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Onanistic TORTURE!
15 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
We were trapped in the middle of the row when we realized, 30 minutes into this self-serving, meandering, meaningless, selfish ego trip, that the story was going absolutely nowhere. Nowhere! Dull, plodding, pointless scenes, punctuated, not too infrequently, by a very pretty balloon. There were moments of charm with characters who initially grabbed our attention. However, these little vignettes of the life of a single mother, her son and their nanny kept increasing in number, like some chaotic bush fire... only without the heat, and all the ashes of wasted time. It kept going and going... and going... and going... people, fortunate enough to sit on an aisle seat gradually walked out, but we were trapped in the centre row of Toronto International Film Festival Zombies, watching intently as the story wandered like a drunk old man recounting days gone by to his trapped grandchildren on Thanksgiving.

If you go see this film, bring a pillow.
12 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A barely contained piece of spiritualist propaganda
14 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched this film at its premier at the 2007 Toronto International Film Festival. While I enjoyed the acting abilities of Catherine Zeta Jones, Guy Pierce and especially the young Saoirse Ronan, the script was such an affront to the true Houdini that I almost gagged. In fact, I spoke up and asked a very uncomfortable question to Gillian Armstrong during the question and answer period. "How do you answer to the legacy of who Harry Houdini really was - a skeptic who spent his life energy successfully debunking anyone offering supernatural claims... inspiring such people as the great James Randi, who, like Harry, offered large sums of money to anyone who could prove, under scientific conditions, the existence of supernatural phenomena. To this date, the money has not been claimed... Harry championed the rational, scientific approach to studying phenomena. How do you justify the blatant spirituality shown in your movie?" The answer was vague. Ms. Armstrong pointed out that if Harry was such a skeptic, why was he so obsessed with the afterlife. Moreover, at the end of the film, there is a title card that describes the séances that have tried to contact Harry after his death, all with no success. Okay. Right. People are going to remember a few lines of text and NOT the angels swimming through the water, the visions of Harry's dead mother as he hung upside down in the Chinese Water Torture tank... the lights going out as little Benji writhed on the floor speaking perfect, fluent German, the "psychic connection" Mary had to Harry the moment he died (incidentally, Harry died at Detroit's Grace Hospital of peritonitis from a ruptured appendix at 1:26 p.m. on October 31 - Halloween - in Room 401, 1926, at the age of 52! Does Guy Pierce look 52 to you?). Ms. Armstong even did an informal poll of the audience - she asked "How many people here think that Benji was really channeling Harry's mother?" To which about half the audience raised their hands. Yikes. Do these people also believe in the tooth fairy? Yes, this is a Hollywood fantasy. However, it treats Harry as an unfaithful, vision-seeing pseudo psychic. It is an affront to everything Harry stood for. As a piece of fiction, it is enjoyable. If you can stomach its historical desecrations, you will enjoy wonderful acting and great cinematography. If you know anything about who Houdini was or value what he stood for, you will be frustrated by this blatant attempt to make our world even more demon-haunted than it already is.
41 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Half Brilliant
19 August 2007
Babylon 5 is sorely missed, and this chance to walk the halls of Brown sector again is greatly appreciated. However, Brown sector is known for its foul odor. Babyon 5 Voices in the Dark suffers from both the best and worst of the epochal television series that predated it. Moments of brilliance are interwoven with corny, pedantic dialogue that almost leaves one with a foul aftertaste. However, in pure Babylon 5 tradition, there is enough brilliance to override the bad, leaving Voices in the Dark as a worthy addition to any B5 fan's DVD library. The first story, involving a bizarre decision to employ the services of a Priest for an exorcism, fails to make the grade as a good B5 story. It's JMS at his worst, which is odd. He's usually very good at making stories work logically, yet, there is no reason for Lochley to jump to the conclusion of an exorcism. In a universe that has seen the likes of the Shadows and Vorlons, many deep space creatures have been encountered that employ similar abilities as "the prisoner". The priest, brilliantly acted by lan Scarfe, delivers the most rational, and well written dialogue in the first half, making Lochley look a little off her rocker. Moreover, why does JMS always rush to the Christian Bible when dealing with Spirituality? There are a myriad of faiths on Earth that have terrifying demonic spirits in them, and to be honest, the whole "Omen" thing has been done to death. It smacks of writing in a closet. Finally, I would have wished the Priest would have interrupted Lochley's boring soliloquy near the end with "Okay. We get the idea." Talk about hammering a point to death. Fortunately, Tracy Scoggins handles the plodding dialogue expertly, and it is wonderful to see the character back in action, despite Lochley's religious irrationality. Fortunately, the second story, involving Sheridan's run in with Galen the Technomage is much more up to the quality of JMS at his best. We have a very tough moral decision forced upon President Sheridan, and he handles it in true Straczinsky fashion: If someone gives you two options, both of which you hate, do your damndest to find a third. And he does in a way that justifies both Galen's dark demeanor and Sheridan's brief but frightening detour from the moral high ground. Bruce Boxlietner is a delight as Sheridan, and he breathes life into a role that is dearly missed. Peter Woodward Shines as Galen, perhaps one of Straczynski's best and most complicated characters to emerge from the B5 universe. I was so relieved when the second story played itself out. It was emotionally satisfying in all the right places, and balanced out the weaker first half. The special effects are great, save for an obvious, painfully long CGI shot in the hang bay when Father Cassidy disembarks. Having a fixed perspective shot, to incorporate live action elements without moving the camera, is an old trick held over from the Matte Painting days. This ranks as one of the worst because the background is too detailed. Less is more (see the final shot of Raiders of the Lost Ark). Here, they tried to get as much movement in the shot as possible, without moving the camera (which would have required expensive motion control cameras on the green screen set). The result is a visual noise that distracts the viewer from the centre of action. At the end of the day what we have here is a great addition the B5 library, despite its obvious faults. The fans want more B5 and they will get it here. The casual viewer will have some work to do, however. Just as watchers of the original series had to endure the first season's horrible acting, so to will the casual viewer be required to do with the first half of this DVD. I am hoping for more stories from the B5 universe because there are many left to tell.
19 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed