9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Orfeo ed Euridice (2014 TV Movie)
10/10
Sumptuous and surprising take on an 18th century opera
5 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I was blown away by this rendering of Gluck's 18th century opera. It's not a film of an opera performance - there's no audience, and some of the action is away from the stage. The recording is based at the Baroque theatre in the castle at Cesky Krumlov, which is full of atmosphere, and the soloists are accompanied by the Prague orchestra and vocal ensemble Collegium 1704 and Collegium Vocale 1704, in traditional dress. I'm not an opera buff - I'm someone who enjoys the occasional trip to the opera, but I'm not qualified to evaluate this from a musical perspective, but can rather give my opinion on it as entertainment - which was superb. And perhaps all the better for encountering it from a position of ignorance.

I'd never seen this opera and had a vague idea of the story of Orpheus going to the underworld to retrieve his beloved Eurydice after her premature death, only to lose her again, when he disobeys the gods and turns round to look at her. I gather that Gluck cheered the story up by having the God, Amor, reprieving them so that they return triumphantly to Earth for a celebration. But in this version, things are more complicated - it becomes clear that Orfeo's initial complex emotional state is not just driven by grief, but also by guilt. And then, shockingly, at the end, having brought Eurydice back to Earth, he appears to fall rapidly out of love with her, when she parades around enjoying the company of others, and he stumbles away, heartbroken.

Like most opera plots, this is daft, but Bejun Mehta, who plays Orfeo, is a fantastic actor, and even before he opened his mouth, I was entranced by his performance, depicting conflicting emotions as he prepares for the funeral. When he did start to sing, I was astounded, as I had expected a traditional male voice, instead of which we had a very masculine-looking man singing in a soprano voice. (I realise opera buffs would not have been surprised by this, but I was!). But it was glorious. I gather he is perhaps the most famous counter-tenor in the world, and I can see why, as his voice has a richness and complexity that is quite unique.

There are just two female soloists: Regula Mühlemann, who plays the god Amore as a rather cheeky, sexy creature - which works well as a counterpoint to Orfeo's seriousness. And Eva Liebau is convincing as Eurydice - though much of the challenge of her part is lying around looking convincingly dead.

The whole setting is beautifully done - lavish costumes, dancing, candlelit scenes. Overall, this left a lasting impression and I was very glad I had found it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Poignant last performance by Glenda Jackson
7 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The cinema where I saw this on its opening night had many empty seats, and those that were filled were mostly occupied by people who, like me, appeared 70 or over. For this age group, the pairing of Michael Caine and Glenda Jackson is magical - we remember them as beautiful people in the 1970s, he portraying casually charming rogues, and she as a prickly but strong and beautiful woman. As we've grown older, so have they, and they portray the fragility and limitations of old age unflinchingly. The wrinkles and wobbles are not disguised, and the contrast between the characters now and the scenes when they were young (played by Will Fletcher and Laura Marcus) is striking.

There is a scene where Jackson's character, Rene, who has been having "funny turns" and angina, discusses with her carer her short life expectancy - stressing the difference between how you treat life when you are young and how it feels when you are near the end. This has added poignancy if you know that Jackson died shortly after the film was completed.

The big risk for this film is that it will slide into sentimentality. The plot, based on a true story, is simple enough. 89-year-old Bernard decides to go to France for the 70th anniversary D-day celebrations, leaving Rene alone in the flat they share in a care home by the seaside. He didn't get tickets to join an official group, but decides to set off alone, without telling the staff at the home, leading to some concern at his disappearance. He makes it to Dover, boards a ferry, is helped by another man who is part of a group, and they make a sobering visit to a cemetery where both have a grave to visit. When Bernard's adventure is discovered, he becomes a brief media sensation. This modest tale is supplemented by flashbacks that save the film from mawkishness. They show, on the one hand, the strength of the early relationship between Rene and Bernard, forged in the uncertainty of war, and the demons that Bernard still struggles with from his experience at the D-day landing. Although this could have been a celebration of British heroism in war, it is much more an examination of how the horrors of war leave a mark on young men who were on the battlefield. This comes across most clearly when a young soldier who is helping at the event tells Bernard how much he admires him, and Bernard quietly tells him to stop that, and to get help for himself - recognising that the soldier is still affected by his own traumas.

Finally, the relationship between Rene and Bernard, married for 50 years but still devoted to one another, is heartwarming, and they do make it believable. Jackson and Caine are simply wonderful as old people who know how to live life to the full, despite the depradations of age.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Past Lives (2023)
6/10
For me this lacked a spark and was a bit boring
6 October 2023
It's clear I am in a minority, but I didn't enjoy this very much.

As a plus, the basic themes of chance influences on relationships, cultural identity, and changing character over time are all of interest to me, and I did find myself reflecting on them afterwards.

I also liked to see daily life in Korea - films like this help to overcome many stereotypes that Westerners have.

The principal problem was that I didn't warm to the character of Nora - she seemed ambitious, self-centred and unempathic. Having said that, ambition can be a good thing, and it was clearly something that appealed to Hae Sung and set her apart from others in Korea. But, much as I like strong female characters, I did not find Nora likeable, which made it hard to get involved in the plot, or to be sad about the ending.

There was no chemistry between her and her husband - perhaps that was intentional, given the plot, but it seemed odd that he was so devoted to her.

I found the dialogue a bit tedious.

And some of the scenes were odd: e.g. When she turns up at a writing retreat and there's nobody there - not even a housekeeper, so she walks in and settles in to a room. Huh? And then when Arthur turns up, her first sentence, after introducing herself is to say "You got the worst room". I mean, who says something like that to a total stranger?

It also seemed hard to believe that two people who were writers could earn enough to live in New York (even in a less fancy bit of New York) - wouldn't they have to have 2nd jobs to survive, especially when starting out? Things did seem to have rather fallen into Nora's lap.

Finally, and as an indication of how weird *i* am, I could barely focus on the conversation in the fairground scene (? Coney Island) because there was a carousel in the background and the horses went round and round but did not go up and down. For a Brit this is very peculiar and against the natural order of things.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oppenheimer (I) (2023)
7/10
The wrong story for the multiple timelines
29 August 2023
Lots to love about this: the acting was superb and the complex career trajectory of Oppenheimer was fascinating - I had not realised what a stark shift in fortunes he had in the years after Los Alamos, when he fell out of political favour.

But I did not enjoy the cutting from one scene to another and one time period to another - making the film a kind of montage of impressions that could be quite disorienting, especially if you weren't already familiar with the basic plot and characters.

There are stories where it works well to keep the audience having to piece together relationships between people and events in different places and times, and Nolan is clearly a master at making films where this device can be used to good effect. I just didn't think it was the right vehicle for this story - came away thinking an old-fashioned serial narrative would have worked well with this cast and material. Will be interesting to see how this stands the test of time, though. Maybe it will mature with age, or improve on rewatching.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Afire (2023)
7/10
Uneven but engaging psychological study
29 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
For those of a sensitive disposition, I can confirm that, while forest fires play a key role in this film, it's not particularly frightening or gory. There are some spectacular shots of fire approaching, but not much among the flames. And if you are sensitive about depictions of sex, there's not much here to cause upset - you hear it but don't see it.

On the positive side, the plot ticks along nicely - you're never quite sure what will happen next to the two friends who rock up at a holiday home belonging to the mother of one of them, only to find she's forgotten to mention that a niece of a coworker will also be staying there. The central character, Leon, does a good job in depicting the loneliness that you can feel even when surrounded by other people - his friend Felix bonds with the other guest Nadja, and her boyfriend Devid, with things reaching a nadir when Leon's publisher visits and turns out to be far more interested in Nadja and Felix than in Leon's book. There's a particularly sad scene when Nadja, Felix and Devid play with illuminated frisbees at night while Leon lies on his bed looking out. The others try to be kind, but can't overcome his sense of rejection.

Another positive for me were the scenes of the forest, the beach, and the German seaside town - made me want to visit.

The main negatives were several big holes in the plausibility of the plot. First, the relationship between Nadja and Leon. Leon isn't repulsive, but he's not particularly attractive. That wouldn't matter if he had some wit or charm, sweetness or even artistic flair, but he seems sadly lacking in anything other than a misplaced sense that he is going to be a great novelist. Nadja, on the other hand is beautiful, clever and kind. It isn't surprising that Leon instantly falls for her, but it is implausible that she should reciprocate - particularly when her initial attempts to strike up a relationship are rebuffed. I didn't really feel that Leon's character developed, and his ultimate romantic success seemed due to the fact that everyone else had been killed off, rather than him becoming someone who had something positive to offer a woman in terms of empathy or emotional engagement.

Also, it turns out that the book he's writing is crap. Nadja tells him so - it clearly gives her no pleasure to do so, but she sees the need to be honest. And just in case the audience think she may have been overly judgmental, we are treated to an episode where the publisher visits and reads aloud quite long passages. This was pretty odd and as far as I could see, the only purpose of this episode was to demonstrate to the audience just how turgid Leon's prose was. I kept expecting the publisher to pause and provide a critique of a passage he'd read, but he just kept on and on. Why? Was he hoping that if he read Leon's words back to him, Leon would start to realise how tedious and plodding it was? Nevertheless, after further events, the publisher has a conversation in which he tells Leon to abandon this book, but passionately reassures him that his next book will be much much better. At this point in the story, there was no evidence that this was true, so I couldn't work out the motivation of the publisher - unless maybe he'd shelled out a large advance for the next book and was hoping something better might be possible. If I were a publisher, I'd run a mile from Leon.

Another creaking hole in the plot concerned the car that broke down at the start of the adventure and so was abandoned on the road. Why not stay put and flag down a passing vehicle? Or walk up the road to somewhere with a better mobile signal and call for help? Instead, the friends abandon the car but take their heavy cases with them on a trek through the forest to find the house. And when they go into town, they are told there is no garage that can help recover the car. Hmm.

Anyway, if you can suspend belief from time to time, this is a quite enjoyable study of young adult relationships, set in a picturesque region of Germany.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Allelujah (2022)
5/10
Excellent acting but flaky plot
18 March 2023
On the positive side, the acting was great. I particularly liked Jennifer Saunders' portrayal of a dedicated, no-nonsense ward sister, and David Bradley's retired miner. The underlying message of the threat to the NHS by those that don't understand its core values is an important one. But this film was not the way to make that point.

Although, as you'd expect with a strong cast, the acting was great, many of the characters were tediously stereotyped: the charming Asian doctor who 'loved old people', the bubbly, enthusiastic nurse, a range of old people who used Alan Bennett one-liners to establish themselves as sweetly eccentric, away with the fairies, or curmudgeonly in a loveable way. You could tell just by the body language that the children of an old lady were up to no good and just wanted to fleece her. The son of the miner who had gone South to forge a successful career as a management consultant was predictably transformed from an over-confident critic of the hospital to a supporter.

The setting was not so much stereotyped as confusing. The threatened hospital did have one doctor, one nurse, a sister, and a physiotherapist, and some of the patients were sick - indeed the plot hinged on a character who was worried that if he improved he'd be sent back to a nursing home. But most of the activities that we saw suggested that the institution was a care home - the old people seemed to be long-term residents and were well enough to shuffle around doing craft activities and reminiscence therapy. A film crew from the local paper were drifting around interviewing residents. It was as if the original intention was to make a film about a care home, but they then realised that if they wanted the message to be about the NHS, they needed to make it into a hospital.

I won't include spoilers but just to say that just when you think this is going to be a totally saccharine experience, where the struggling hospital will be saved from closure, there is a plot twist that acts like a hand grenade in derailing all expectations. It might have worked if the rest of the film had been more believable, but it seemed totally unsatisfactory in the context of the rest of the film.

And then, at the end we have bolted on a section where the nice doctor is now in a covid ward, making a heartfelt plea for the continuation of the NHS, while showing devastating scenes of patients in corridors, and exhausted staff in PPE struggling to cope. I found myself wishing that Ken Loach had made a film on this theme: that would have been far more effective than this clunky treatment.
35 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Subject (I) (2022)
7/10
Watch the featured documentaries before seeing this film
14 March 2023
When you agree to be the subject of a documentary, you may not appreciate what you are letting yourself in for. This film analyses the impact on those who featured in famous documentaries, some of whom seemed happy with the experience, and others wish they'd never taken part. It raises a number of questions - should subjects of documentaries be paid, should we worry about the bias in who has the power of making the documentary - often featuring people with little power? Should documentary-makers employ therapists?

Although I didn't get bored watching Subject, I did feel that it would have been better if I was familiar with the featured documentaries - all famous and award-winning, but, alas, not known to me. The main ones were The Staircase, Capturing the Friedmans, The Wolfpack, Hoop Dreams, and The Square.

The first two focused on stories with a 'true crime' element, and it was their subjects (family members of those convicted of crimes) who appeared most damaged by the experience. They had not anticipated that the documentaries would be shown years later across the world via streaming services, and felt they could not escape from being recognised and from reliving the awful experiences they had had. The Wolfpack was about a family with 7 children who were kept segregated from society by a controlling father - the main character featured in Subject, a son, appeared remarkably well-adjusted, and wanted himself to be a film-maker. It was left unclear to me what had happened to the father. The main subject of Hoop Dreams was a black basketball player who was featured as a teenager; remarkably, the (white) director had shared the proceeds from the documentary with the subjects, so they had benefited materially from involvement - and seemed generally happy with their experience. The Square was quite different: a documentary about the Arab Spring made by an Egyptian film-maker, who had produced compelling live footage of riots in Egypt, which had subsequently proved inspirational to protestors in other countries. He had had to leave Egypt and was shown sitting sadly at the end, unemployed and away from home. It was hard to say whether he had been damaged by making the documentary, of which he himself was a subject - his final situation was not great, but perhaps might have been worse if he'd not made the film.

Subject does make you think - could things have been handled better - especially for the documentaries about crime? Or should we just not allow such documentaries? It doesn't seem feasible to prevent the bad consequences to subjects, but maybe therapists and/or financial rewards would soften the experience?

The problem is that we like sensational stories, and if they are true stories, we find them all the more gripping. I came away thinking that I'd like to see all five of the featured docuementaries, while at the same time feeling that this voyeuristic impulse was not healthy.

A final point is that the main interviews with subjects was intercut with very brief snippets of other famous documentaries. I disliked this aspect of the film - it was almost like a recognition memory test. I guess its intention might have been to just emphasise the extent to which documentaries about real lives have exploded, especially with streaming services, but there was no opportunity to engage with the individual cases, and it made the film seem bitty and a bit shallow.

Overall, Subject is a kind of meta-documentary - a documentary about documentaries, which makes you think about the genre and raises questions about whether there should be more formal guidelines for how subjects are treated. Fascinating, but raised more questions than it answered.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Daft but entertaining feel-good movie
10 February 2023
It was a shame that this was showing for just one day in one cinema in Oxford UK- as a special for Chinese New Year. I found it very entertaining and think it deserves a wider audience.

The plot is highly implausible but grabs your attention, and the theatricality of the courtroom scenes is fun, even if unrealistic. The transformation of the main character from idle, careless lawyer to passionate defender of truth is nicely depicted.

There are moments when I laughed out loud, and the ending was very satisfactory. The stranglehold of a few ultra-wealthy Hong Kong families who think they are above the law is well-depicted and the theme of the weak succeeding by cunning against the strong is very satisfying.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Read the book, then see this film
10 February 2023
I read the review by CinemaSerf and had similar reaction: I had expected much more of an exposé of the Sacklers. The documentary assumed that viewers would just take the side of the protesters against Sackler, but anyone with an enquiring mind might just wonder what the evidence was. I was in the fortunate position of having read Empire of Pain by Patrick Radden Keefe, which does a thorough and gripping account of the origins of the Sackler family and all their dodgy dealings, pushing opioid drugs to physicians, and recommending alarmingly high doses while arguing that only certain types of people got addicted. Once you have that background, any doubts about Nan Goldin's activism are dispelled, and you look in awe at what she's done. In effect, this film, which is quirky and relies mainly on vision and sound rather than words to convey messages, complements the scholarly verbal account in Empire of Pain. The Sackler story is only part of it - it sits in the context of Nan Goldin's remarkable life and career as photographer documenting the underground life of unconventional people after she escaped her dysfunctional family. It's an important film documenting an era in history, and showing how individuals can take on the rich and powerful. Nan features in Patrick Radden Keefe's book, and he features in her film, but I think that if you put the two together, it's perfect and the whole is greater than the parts.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed