Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Ben-Hur (2016)
4/10
Loses the race
31 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I have watched the 1959 version maybe 10 times and I love it, as does my 19 year old daughter who has seen it at least as many times. Neither of us is a believer in God, but we are fascinated by movie magic and we went together to the opening. I was actually a bit fearful when I went to the theater but still hoped that I wouldn't be too disappointed. But ...

Yes, I know this is a movie in its own right and one should not compare to the classic '59 masterpiece - but how can you avoid it?

Seen as a pure action movie it is quite okay and well crafted. The acting is ... well, okay - except for Morgan Freeman who is unbelievably wooden as an almost God-like figure, a nice Big Daddy who steps in to explain and arrange everything for the best. Jack Huston as Ben-Hur, though, is rather good.

But the movie just lacks the poetry and magic of the 1959 epic (the 1925 version is actually more worth seeing). Yes - the cinematic technique is of course better than in the predecessors, especially in the galley scenes, and it is visually stunning. So why isn't it as gripping and exciting?

Pro primo: The tragedy of the "original" (I refer to the 1959 epic although I know it is NOT the original movie) story is that it begins with the accident that sentences Ben-Hur to the galleys. An accident! In this movie Ben-Hur is actually hiding a rioter which makes the whole premise a bit shaky. In a way you have to understand Messala's decision to through "his" people into jail - or he would probably himself be cast into roman prison. The character of Messala is designed to attract more sympathy than in the "original", and it does and you feel sorry for him, but ... as a consequence the story just fails to build up to the climax - one really doesn't care who wins or loses the damn race.

As technically spectacular as it is, this version manages to distort and bungle the greatest action sequence in movie history: The chariot race. It is drenched in fiery music to build suspense and chopped to pieces in editing so that you hardly understand who is who and what is happening among the clouds of dust. Just like tens of dozens of other action movie sequences with or without crashing cars. Oh, what a pity.

The 1959 chariot race is pure nail-biting suspense for about ten minutes ENTIRELY WITHOUT MUSIC to boost suspense. Just the sound of the hooves, the shouts, the lashing whips and the roars from the crowd. And it is the most thrilling action sequence ever made, without any CGI tricks. What a feat! I always suspected this race sequence couldn't be topped, and it obviously couldn't.

This movie also lacks the beautiful score by Miklós Rósza, a musical masterpiece in itself (in the 1959 version).

One absolutely ridiculous thing is when the end credits start sliding around the race track gathering dust! Why?? We couldn't help ourselves laughing out loud instead of feeling elated and moved by the love message.

If you ever get the chance to see the 1959 Ben-Hur in a really good movie theater: GO! It is still unsurpassed among the great epic blockbusters and truly moving - whether you believe in Jesus or not.

I hope that young people as a consequence of this movie may get curious and discover the Ben-Hur of 1959.
24 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Actually ... it's really funny!
1 August 2016
I liked the original movie, and I like Bill Murray. That doesn't mean those old guys should be in every subsequent movie on ghosts ever to be made. The innuendos that he and Aykroyd were "forced" to appear here are plain silly. I bet they got good money for it. And I like this one too, and see it as a homage to the first one. Not a timeless masterpiece, maybe, but quite good, warmhearted and really funny. Why the persistent comparison? Why the hate?

What seems to be happening here with the vile reviews is the usual stuff: Men (i.e. overgrown boys) feeling threatened by women - especially funny women. In the theater where I watched the movie yesterday people were laughing a lot, and heartily. So did I. Maybe the Swedish sense of humor works in strange ways? Maybe we have fewer misogynists compared to, for instance, the USA? Or maybe we just don't find female comedians the most despicable thing on Earth. Horrifying, isn't it?

But beware, you whose childhoods were "ruined": Some of these days in the future people will laugh their pants off at your absolutely ridiculous reactions to this movie and your obsessive efforts to sink it.

I'm giving it a 10 because of the wonderful comedians. Female or not, being funny is the hardest acting job, and they do it so well.
10 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Totally captivating
13 May 2008
I will not write a lot about the story since so much is already said in the preceding comments. However I will tell how I came to watch it.

It was very late one weekday night and the rest of the family had gone to bed. I was dead tired and just about to turn off the TV - and there was this film, All Or Nothing, about to begin in one of the two non-commercial public service channels (which might be one explanation why it transfixed me - no interruptions with inane requests to buy anti-wrinkle cream). And I was just completely enthralled! I was dreadfully tired, my eyes were red and swollen from exhaustion but I just couldn't stop watching. When the movie was finished at around two o'clock my eyes were also red and swollen from crying - and yet I was completely sober and so unprepared for this absolutely gripping film experience with the most wonderful actors. One of the best ever!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed