Reviews

27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Hooking Up (II) (2009)
1/10
Hunk of crap masquerading as a movie
9 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This weak, unbalanced and (mostly) unfunny attempt at a teen sex comedy left me with a new lack of respect for Corey Feldman, which is quite a feat. It's full of dialog that you can tell is SUPPOSED to be funny, but never really manages to draw out a single laugh. The opening scene is a prime example of this...if you don't laugh in the first five minutes of the movie, just turn it off because you are in for a whole lot more of the same.

The pacing of the movie doesn't make any sense. You'll see Corey Feldman (Ryan) do mean thing after mean thing to his decade-younger girlfriend, only to have her come crawling back every time, never learning a thing. You expect some kind of turnaround or revenge to come out of all this suffering, but it never does, which makes the movie's ending all the more depressing, not to mention sudden. It's as if they ran out of budget in the middle of shooting and the director said, "Okay, I guess we've got our movie!" If I were being forced at gunpoint to say something nice about the movie (which I am, at this very minute, please help), I'd say that Leah Viens-Gordon (Michele) is a cutie and probably has the potential to become a decent actress. There, I said it. Now please let me live!
26 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie makes me want to barf
9 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of my least favorite movies ever: a movie geared towards people who don't really know anything about music, and as such, reveals its complete stupidity to those who do. Mr. Holland's Crappy Opus is the story of Mr. Holland, a cranky guy who's not a very good teacher, not a very good musician, not a very good husband and not a very good father. To put it mildly, he has no redeeming qualities.

He works for his whole life on this "OPUS," and when it finally gets performed, it's god- awful. It sounds like he wrote the soundtrack to a lame movie (except the people who really do write movie scores don't spend a whole lifetime on one film). How can you work on music composition your whole life, and still have no talent for it? Is it possible? Well, in the movies, anything's possible.

The movie seems to credit Mr. Holland with inventing the pep band, which makes him all the more despicable to me. When the pep band at my high school started playing "Louie, Louie," the kids at the game didn't cheer. They would roll their eyes, and/or vomit. No movie can make me believe that being in a marching band is cool. Drumline, this means you. I was in the marching band from 6th grade until high school graduation, and it was decidedly not cool.

There's also the pointless Rowena Subplot, which culminates in a gripping scene where Richard Dreyfuss's wife reads Rowena's name on a program, discovers that Rowena is not just a celtic mythology figure that her dorky husband is in love with and consequently makes a face. You'll be glued to your seat as a spectrum of emotions from stern disapproval to disapproving sternness passes through Mrs. Holland's face, and then the Rowena subplot proceeds to go precisely NOWHERE.

Mr. Holland "touches the lives" of all these students...and each life he touches is destroyed! He tells the redheaded girl to play the sunset; she becomes a miserable politician. He gives Rowena "voice coaching" (is that what the kids are calling it now?); she runs away, never to be seen again. He hits that football player kid on the head with a bass drum beater to teach him about rhythm. (Yes. The only black guy in the movie has to learn about rhythm from a white guy.) And that kid dies! The film's solitary saving grace is the fact that it introduced Alicia Witt who, after appearing in Mr. Holland's Stupid, Life-Sucking Opus, went on to become the cutest redhead I have ever seen. She can play my sunset any day. Or something.

But what's up with that scene where the hearing-impaired people "appreciate" music by watching idiotic flashing lights? Nice going, Mr. Jackass, you've just implied that deaf people are morons. Let's wait and see whether they thank you for touching THEIR lives, dickweed. I actually found myself rooting for William H. "This Is My Deal Here" Macy, the school's evil, conservative, buzzcut-sporting budget Nazi. "Go, Mr. Macy. Cut his budget! Cut it DOWN! The school needs three new football stadiums, not creative arts education! Burn those violins on the baseball diamond!" So, if you like movies that are just ill-conceived vehicles for 60s pop rock montages (blah blah blah, fake moon landing footage, blah blah blah, Martin Luther King Jr, blah blah blah) and scene after scene of Richard Dreyfuss being a jerk, run out and see Mr. Dickweed's Heinously Barfalactic Opus.
13 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Misunderstood
6 January 2008
It's a shame how many people mislabel this as a "drug movie" (or an "anti-drug movie"). It's not about drugs. It's about addiction in all its forms. If it seems heavy-handed, it's because it doesn't waste time dabbling in the extras. This movie does what it's supposed to do with a high rate of efficiency.

Few other films simultaneously reach such extremes of beauty and brutality as Requiem does. Watching it will wipe you out for a while, but you'll be back for more in time. My main gripe is Clint Mansell's music score, which sounds more like it should be played on a $20 Casio than by the Chronos Quartet (and which, inexplicably, has become "one of those soundtracks" that finds its way into trailers for other movies ALL THE TIME).
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Van Helsing (2004)
3/10
play castlevania instead
14 February 2005
The first scene is a campy black-and-white scene involving Dracula and Dr. Frankenstein. I was so confused by this scene; at first I thought it was going to be some kind of movie-within-movie or frame story or something. At the very least, I expected a reveal that would bring reason to the campy acting and unlikely character relationships. It HAD to be intentional. Didn't it?

Apparently not. The next thing I saw was a dead-serious title card reading "ONE YEAR LATER." From that moment, I knew it was going to be a long couple of hours.

Sure enough, this movie is packed shoulder to shoulder, start to finish with actors who, for whatever reason, aren't acting. You've got Hugh Jackman over here, making wry comments and being oh, so clever. You've got this horrendously unmenacing Dracula and his community theater reject wives (who spend more than fifty percent of their on screen time as computer-generated harpies without nipples). You've got dudes transforming from naked werewolves into humans with pants.

The design Van Helsing's character is not bad, but it's a little too close to Vampire Hunter D. The film has but two saving graces, and those are Frankenstein's Monster and....hmmm. Sorry, the film has only one saving grace. And in this particular case, he failed to completely save the movie, so for all we know, the movie has NO saving graces. So reading this paragraph has just been a waste of your time.

The idea of a story that binds Dracula, Igor, Frankenstein's Monster and werewolves is appealing, to be sure. That's why there have been so many video games made on that premise. But we shouldn't judge movies and games by the same standards, and anyone who does needs to be kicked in the face. If they were trying to make Castlevania into a movie, they should have just called it Castlevania: The Movie.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Air Force One (1997)
4/10
the president is insecure
14 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The plane crashes at the end. And when it does, you'll be confused. You'll wonder, "What's this Playstation game that's suddenly appeared on the screen? Why is an airplane animation, rendered by my little brother with Poser, taking place before my eyes, when I should be seeing the spectacular end of an edgy action film?" It is one of the worst CG effects ever produced by human beings with good intentions.

Harrison Ford plays "the dream president." Well, I don't know about that...he's probably only 49% of the US population's idea of a dream president. And his Vice President Glenn Close will have you in stitches of laughter as she utters stone-faced lines like, "IS THE PRESIDENT SECURE?"

Also, watch for the climactic scene where Harry Ford says, "Get off my plane." Be careful, the line is likely to blow out the speakers on your home theater system, because for some reason, it's louder than every other sound in the movie. When I saw this film in the theater, an elderly woman died when that line was uttered. Apparently the sudden fluctuation of sound waves interfered with her brain impulses and her bodily functions just quit simultaneously.

Gary Oldman is the master of accents. He should be in every movie.

All in all, Air Force One is too patriotic for me. The one-sided depiction of the "bad guys," coupled with punching-yourself-in-the-crotch moments of stupidity (like the part where President Ford cuts the green wire because it isn't red, white or blue) made me squirm with jingoism-induced discomfort. I wish this movie really were the "Die Hard on a plane" everybody makes it out to be. Die Hard on a plane would be awesome. But Die Hard is not a movie about the heroics of the American government.

Look at all the ellipses in the review before mine.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Catwoman (2004)
1/10
makes me wanna kick a cat
3 January 2005
All right, the CG in this movie is as bad as the CG in every movie that stars a comic book character. But when the special effects team finished designing their CG model of Halle Berry Barry Bo-Berrie, they were faced with a dilemma: Should we stick with this movie and get paid? Or should we give the public what it really wants, which is a five-hour computer-generated orgy starring Halle Berry, Sharon Stone and one hundred demonic aliens with phallic tentacles? They chose the former, and the result is this insulting film about cats and the women who want to be them.

Cats have bad breath, but did you know? It's actually bad enough to wake the dead, literally. Also, cats have super strength, and are great at basketball.

In order to make the most educated opinion I could on this movie, I watched it with no sound. Even so, I came away with a perfect grasp of the plot, which reveals that any dialog in the film is purely incidental. Take away the dialog and you're left with action scenes that look like a Playstation game. And no alien porn. It's a lose-lose situation, this movie.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Terminal (2004)
7/10
not what i expected, but then again, what is?
24 December 2004
Spielberg has made so many "oh my god that was so powerful and believable and IMPORTANT" movies, that now he can't make a whimsical bit of fluff without people saying, "Oh my god, that was so unpowerful and inconceivable and TRIVIAL." This movie feels like Catch Me If You Can, and requires a similar amount of suspension of disbelief in order to be enjoyed. Tom Hanks plays a foreign guy who learns to speak English in record time by reading a travel pamphlet. He falls for Catherine Zeta Jones, who is still beautiful as ever, even when playing a stupid, despicable flight attendant.

But watch out for the "evil" airport director! I say airport director, but he should have been referred to throughout the movie as the "final boss," because he seemed more like King Koopa or Sephiroth than a person existing in real life. How do you seriously explain his petty vengeance against Tom Hanks' character? That was the main issue that stuck with me throughout the film. The Evil Airport Director's role as fascist overlord of JFK Airport just didn't jive.

There is also an important plot point near the end that made no sense to me whatsoever. It involves the final trumping of the Evil Overlord via an Indian janitor whose catchphrase, "DO YOU HAVE AN APPOINTMENT?" failed to make the Japanese audience at the theater where I watched Terminal laugh even once. I won't give it away, just watch the movie and then send me an email explaining what the hell happened, because I don't get it.

This is not an important movie. It has no massive revelations or cathartic outpourings of wisdom (although it comes close, in a scene where Evil Final Boss asks Tom Hanks why he wants to enter the US. I half expected Tom to slap himself on the forehead and say, "You're right! Why indeed!" and get on a plane to some country where foreigners DON'T get treated like garbage). But I won't rush to condemn Spielberg for taking a lighthearted prance down Fluffy Fluff Lane for the sake of box office numbers. Spielberg is only human, and he needs his five houses and twelve cars, just like the rest of us.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
cultural identity crisis
20 December 2004
To put things in perspective, first understand that Norika Fujiwara is a huge star in Japan (although the nickname I made up for her, "Fujinori," has yet to catch on). As such, this movie's Japanese title is SPY N. Yeah, N for Norika. N for Ntrigue. N for "No, you shouldn't ever speak English in a movie ever again." Norika's acting isn't exactly prime stuff when she speaks Japanese either, but in this movie she is reduced to a device for almost-nudity and boner jokes.

I vaguely remember some kind of high-flying climactic fight for which the rest of the movie appeared to be one big vehicle. I mean, if you don't count the boner jokes.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ringu (1998)
you don't see the ring. you hear it. dummy.
30 August 2004
This movie proves that people from different cultures are freaked out by different things. When they remade this movie in the US, they made a couple parts more scary (the weird corpses are definitely scarier in the US version...gave me

nightmares, they did. "I saw her face." BLAAAAAAHHHH). But they also took

all the mystery out of Sadako, giving Samara lines like "It never stops" (she's scarier as a mute, you fools!) and for that, I'll never forgive them. In fact, I'll probably burn down their homes while cursing their mothers.

Ringu's requisite "weird little kid" character is much better than the grotesque Aidan in The Ring. That Aidan's eyeballs are trying to escape the confines of his skull in every scene. No thanks, I'd much rather see a film where kids don't behave like adults (much less adults with morbid ocular disorders). So in that respect the original is superior.

Nanako Matsushima is great, and I praise this film for launching her popularity and allowing her to do the cute green tea commercials I've been seeing lately in Tokyo.
15 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Wizard (1989)
i love the power glove. it's my mommie.
18 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Somewhere along the line, someone realized that it's nigh impossible to make a good movie based on a video game. So instead, they made a movie about the entire Nintendo Entertainment System, thereby capturing all the feel-good nostalgia associated with its hundreds of titles, but without crippling handicaps such as an unfeasible plot or Jean-Claude VanDamme as Colonel William F. Guile. Thus was born The Wizard...a shameless consumerist repackaging of The Who's Tommy, adjusted for a new audience and coming at you in full-on buddy film fashion. Fred Savage explodes onto the screen as a curly-haired dork with highly articulate eyebrows. He's caught between his divorced parents in a custody battle over his autistic, obsessive-compulsive, equinophobic, dyslexic, colorblind kid brother Jimmy. Realizing that being in the custody of one or more of his parents will most certainly kill Jimmy (and that Jimmy has the superhuman ability to reach level 3 on Double Dragon), Fred Savage does the right thing and whisks his kid brother off to exploit his virtuosic video game playing ability for cash and prizes worth well over $130. Along the way they meet Haley, who's totally hot if you're 12. Haley misleads Fred and Jimmy on many occasions, notably one scene where renegade truckers steal their entire video game pilgrimage budget and presumably, molest them. Still, they stick to their guns (or should I say, their Nintendo LIGHT GUNS, for use with Duck Hunt), even managing to outsmart the enigmatic Lucas, a rebellious young boy who apparently lives alone in the desert like Mohammed. Only this messiah has a Nintendo POWER GLOVE, buy yours today! Lucas complicates the story, creating a sordid love triangle between himself, Fred Savage and Haley. He taunts Jimmy ruthlessly ("We wouldn't want you to...WHIZ on yourself.") and, despite having devoted his life to Nintendo games and thus presumably having no friends, a crowd of prepubescent disciples follow him at all times. His secret to success is the Nintendo Power Glove, which is, in Lucas's own words, "so bad." But as most of us know, the truth is that the Nintendo Power Glove was "totally gay." It only did what you wanted it to do when you were punching your friend in the face with it to vent your frustration about its lack of response. The protagonists' path is beset by peril on all sides. There are teenage white trash hoodlums who exist solely for the purpose of stealing Jimmy's hat and saying lines like "What is this kid, some sort of cyborg?" There are fat salesmen who talk like Foghorn Leghorn, unable to believe that a scrawny kid is better than they are at Contra. And don't get me started on the creepy bald guy hired by Fred's mom to bring the kids back home, dead or alive. His name is Putnam and repeatedly touches Haley's breasts. Meanwhile, Beau Bridges plays Nintendo like my dad, yanking the controller this way and that. Every time Beau Bridges and Christian Slater run into Putnam, a redneck banjo riff kicks in and the whole movie starts to sound like a Menard's commercial while the adversaries engage in automobile/ gardening tool combat. Saved from certain molestation by a grotesque man-child named Spanky, their adventure climaxes when they play Ninja Gaiden with a scary gravel-voiced MC (who also seems to be a child molester) and nearly get eaten by a fake King Kong at UNIVERSAL STUDIOS THEMEPARK, now open! By the way, Jimmy knows the exact location of the Warp Whistle in Super Mario Bros. 3 prior to the game's release because he reads Nintendo Power Magazine. Jimmy gets the warp whistle and uses it to reach World 4 (yes, "Giant World") and Lucas looks on helplessly as his empire of Power Gloves comes crashing down around him. Spackled with golden dialogue, this movie is a subculture in its own right. But while many people quote Lucas's "it's so bad," or Haley's "he touched my breast," for me it doesn't get any better than when Christian Slater says, "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles."
70 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dreamcatcher (2003)
things i wish i'd never seen
22 June 2004
Well, face it. Deep down, we're all afraid of anally giving birth to aliens. Am I right folks? Mr. Stephen King knows this, and exploits our biggest fear in this horrific toilet-fest. Anyway, if you're not afraid of anally giving birth to aliens now, you will be after you see Dreamcatcher. You will also, invariably, be afraid of Morgan Freeman.

This is like a made-for-TV movie, only they swear. It has the bad acting

characteristic of so many Stephen King adaptations, and then throws on the big budget thrills of CGI aliens and helicopter what-have-you. Watch for a golden scene where Jason Lee acts opposite a computer-generated lamprey. He must

have looked like he was masturbating when they filmed it.

I was working for a market research firm when this movie was being promoted,

and we showed the Dreamcatcher trailer to many people. Nearly all of them

said, "Yeah, I'll go see it in the theater because it has Morgan Freeman."

People, I applaud your taste, but your deception is lamentable.

What the film really needs is a voiceover by Freeman at the end, saying, "I like to think the last thing that went through that alien's head -- other than that bullet -- was to wonder how the HELL he got talked into acting in this smoking-chunk-of- crud movie. Maybe it's because I'm Irish."
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
quick! change the channel! (well said, zangief)
5 April 2004
Please excuse my formatting. The Internet Movie Database's forms code is not very good, and it causes breaks to be randomly inserted into my reviews, for

some reason.

Doomed at birth by its video game-based premise, Street Fighter: The Movie

That Killed Raul Julia never had a chance. First it shot itself in the foot with its casting (this means you, Jean Claude "I'm going to kick Bison's AHHSS" Van

Damme), then it shot itself in the head with its mangled telling of the Street Fighter mythology. What did I expect? They had to figure out a way to make

Guile the main character...I mean, HE'S the American, right?

So in a crusade to glorify Guile's military antics, everybody else gets kicked in the groin, metaphorically speaking. Ryu becomes "Raiyu," and his well-known

romantic involvement with Ken (just ask anybody!) ceases to be. Jimmy/Blanka and Charlie/Nash become one in the same. Balrog becomes Vega, Vega

becomes Bison and Bison becomes Balrog, like some sick game of rock paper

scissors. Sagat becomes an ascot-wearer. Cammy becomes ugly, although, I

admit Kylie Minogue has gotten better with age. E Honda says dippy lines like, "I'm sumo, brotha." Now there's a quotable one.

Some characters have changed sides for no reason. Cammy now fights for

Guile's army! Zangief now fights for the bad guys! It's enough to make your face explode. I hold the filmmakers in great disdain because they obviously paid no attention to the game's actual story elements. Rather, it seems like they got together and said, "HEY! Let's make a Street Fighter movie! You know, that

game. Street Fighter. No, I've never played it. Yeah, I think it's American. Well, yeah, I know about all the characters...I think. Research? No, I don't see any need for that. Anyway, who cares? Kids will watch it. Kids are stupid."

And why on earth did they put Deejay in this movie? It's a known fact that

nobody, in the course of human history, has EVER played as Deejay in the

game Super Street Fighter II Turbo Mega Tunafish Challenge. Deejay is a

maraca-shaking loser.

Thus we are left with only one saving grace: Wing Na Wen as Chun Li. It's not that she was so great. It's just that her character was so unmemorable, I can't think of anything to complain about in regard to her.

The moral of the story is, if you're making adapting a game to a movie, you had better be prepared to go all-out. By that I mean, don't try to fool anyone into thinking you're making a serious film. But filmmakers don't listen to that voice. And that's why, a few years from now, we'll have Pokemon: The Live-Action

Crime Drama, starring Sinbad as Pikachu.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Battle Royale (2000)
a bit ill-condensed
4 April 2004
First I would lay to rest all notions that Battle Royale is any kind of "version" of Series 7: The Contenders. This film is based on a book which was published a year before Series 7 came to be. So there.

Now, what do I think about the movie? Adapting (so directly) any book which

embraces 42 potential protagonists is a herculean task indeed, but truth be told I wish they hadn't tried so hard to cram every last student into the film. The great thing about the book was the pacing. It's quite a long read, so there's ample time to get acquainted with each kid...to feel the tension leading up to his/her demise...and to miss them after they're gone.

The movie, on the other hand, compresses the events of the book down to size

like so many JPEGs. Yeah, we know Mitsuko Souma is a great villain...but we

don't exactly know why. Sure, we know so-and-so killed whats-her-name, but

we don't really care. I miss the concern I once had for the students. I don't want to see them treated like camp counselors in a slasher movie. I want those little anecdotes that made the novel so great (especially the sad end of Mizuho

Inada, who died playing make-believe). Two hours isn't enough time to learn 42 faces...perhaps 20 would have been managable.

Lest I doom this film by comparing it to its superior originator, I respect it for NOT going nuts with violence. Although it has a bad reputation for being horrific, this film actually brought most of the book's violence down a few notches, and I think it's a good thing. I don't need to see a person's head explode to know that war is hell.

The film's casting is basically genius, save for the decision to put Takeshi Kitano in there as the kinder, gentler Sakamochi. I envisioned the Project's "teacher" to look more like Nezu from Akira (yeah, the little ugly guy with the mouth full of pills), but whatever. It was fun to see Takeshi doing Radio Taiso, anyway.

* My favorite scene is Mitsuko vs. Megumi, but even that could have been better.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
what did i expect?
21 March 2004
First of all, I would have been a fool to expect anything more than crap from this movie, but I watched it anyway...because that's what good boyfriends do. But unlike some of the romance comedy tripe I've been exposed to, this one failed at every possible opportunity to redeem itself from total crapdom.

First of all, how am I supposed to believe that Kate Hudson's character is really interested in political journalism AND enviromental issues AND this AND that AND the other stuff she claims to want to write about in the movie? Here's a bright, young journalist who has already made the worst career move in her lifetime by joining the staff of a dippy women's magazine, whose subject matter doesn't interest her in the least. Ooops. THEN, she comes up with this great idea to do research on relationships by doing "all the classic things that girls do wrong." Well, I've never been in a relationship where the woman was even close to being as psycho as Kate Hudson acts throughout the film...but maybe that's because I'm still young. Apparently "all the classic things" includes buying an ugly dog, giving her boyfriend's member a female name (?!) and otherwise being a complete socio- Nazi. Classic, dude. The film culminates in a god-awful karaoke battle (which is actually one of the good parts), but dang, it wouldn't be a date movie if the couple didn't have a fight, go home, get all sad, suddenly decide they love each other and then start making out while some crappy song swells (to make certain that the audience can identify this scene as emotionally important, you see). My friends, this is why divorces happen.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
speed 2: theater crowd control
7 July 2003
I really didn't like the original Speed, so I don't know why I thought the substitution of Jason Patrick for Keanu "Whoa" Reeves would make any difference. But Willem Dafoe is a good bad guy and I respect him for not taking his comicbooky role as LEECH MAN too seriously.

There is a scene where Sandra Bullock and Jason Patrick carry on a painfully extended conversation using only restaurant metaphors. When this scene happens, it's best to put your wallet in your mouth to stop your teeth from grinding, and/or knock yourself unconscious with a brick to stop yourself from strangling total strangers out of frustration and anger.

Watch for the two "islanders" near the end who supply comic one-liners in strained Jarjar Binks accents.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Donnie Darko (2001)
better each time i see it
18 June 2003
The first time I saw Donnie Darko, I was unsure of what I should have "gotten" out of the film. That uncertainty prompted me to watch the movie three more

times, in order to understand it better. In a world where so many movies take the viewer by the hand and coerce them into an uninspired emotional payoff, it was quite refreshing to finish watching Donnie Darko and have no idea

whatsoever about how I should feel.

The story combines so many good elements, you can't help but find something

entertaining about it. There are the simple pleasures of 80s nostalgia, Kevin Smith-ish discussion about the Smurfs, and some really well-delivered comic

moments. Then you have the darker, more thought provoking stuff about time

travel, alternate realities and destiny. I might go so far as to say, this movie has everything.

The film's end is one that reminds me of high school, when my English class

would debate the intended meanings of various symbols in literature. I'm not sure what the writer intended, but Donnie Darko can definitely be interpreted in multiple ways. As a matter of fact, I'm interpreting it in multiple ways at this very moment.

Whoa.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
hey mista miyagi!
9 June 2003
This movie is a guilty pleasure for me, because my brain recognizes how silly it is, but I always come back and watch it again. Any movie, let alone a trilogy, which takes an irritating, unlikeable whiner and makes him the heroic protagonist deserves some respect, at least for overcoming the hurdles associated with making an unlikeable character likeable. See also, Star Wars.

Ralph Macchio explodes onto the screen as Daniel Larusso, the aformentioned whiner. The kid gets into fist fights over boomboxes, steals a guy's girlfriend, hoses the guy down at the school dance, and blames the subsequent problems on his "stupid bike." He is, for lack of a better word, a bonehead. Who WOULDN'T love this crazy all-American teen?

Then Pat Morita steps in to give Daniel some much-needed direction. His attempts to help are greeted with more and more whining. But through months of zen floorwax training, Daniel-san becomes the grandmaster of Miyagido Karate and proves once and for all that violence really IS the answer.

Unfortunately, this is one of those movies that contributes to the general American non-understanding of Asian cultures, with its stereotypically eccentric Mr. Miyagi, but Kreese (the EVIL karate instructor!) is equally eccentric, so I guess I forgive the filmmakers for that.

A word on this movie's soundtrack: Gnarly! During the beach party sequence, we are treated to a rapidfire trio of obscure 80s pop tunes (possibly "fake songs," written especially for the movie, but I'm not sure about that). And during the tournament scene, you'll be dancing like a dork to the motivational hit "You're the Best Around (No One's Ever Gonna Keep You Down)!" or whatever that song's called, I don't know.

FUN FACT: I used to have this movie on VHS. I copied it from my local video store. But the movie is more than two hours long, and I used SP speed to tape it...so right after Kreese says, "sweep the leg," and Daniel's knee is apparently crushed, the tape ends, with Daniel crumpled on the floor in a heap, gasping for life. It's GREAT.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"mika-chan saiko yo!"
5 June 2003
I cannot decide how I feel about this movie. It's basically an orgy of vengeance, with the "eye for an eye" law being enforced over and over again. Toss in the occasional naked breast (for flavor) and don't forget the dark comedy. I disliked the pacing of individual scenes, many of which consist of a few brief spoken lines with 5 seconds of dramatic silence in between. At times I wanted to push fast-forward to get to the next line...only I couldn't because I was in a movie theater.

Most of the movie's earnest attempts to shock the viewer with absurd violence succeed, at least in provoking nervous laughter from the audience. The asymmetry of the plot, however, left me unsure of how I should feel about each character.

The film's musical score is sparse, and when it makes itself heard, its penchant for strident noise is unwelcome. Most of the movie, however, has a mute feeling which contributes to its uncomfortable, edgy atmosphere. At the very least I can say that, regardless of my opinion on this movie, it did make me curious to see the director's other works.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
YOU CANNOT LOOK AWAY
30 May 2003
Possibly the most important Japanese gothic sci-fi tentacle sex horror metamorphosis allegory of our time, Urotsukidouji is poignant love tragedy wrapped in a shroud of horrific telescoping genitals and pink, luminescent semen. This movie is a large part of the reason anime has a negative reputation as porn.

Follow Nagumo as he falls in love, gets killed, comes back to life as a super sex demon and lives happily ever after. His cute, innocent love story with the character Akemi is a grand contrast to his propencity for non-consentual sex with just about everybody he meets. He truly is Everyman. I mean, uh...isn't he?

There is also an incomprehenisble plot about demons and half-humans and the repeated destruction of Osaka, Japan. But you'll have a hard time concentrating on the plot's intricacies, what with all the raping and the killing and the kicking and the hurting.

Part II is also good (maybe better than part I), then the series dissolves into post- apocalyptic gobblediguck. But if you have an insatiable appetite for monster porn, you better watch them all.
40 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fargo (1996)
miscategorized but good
26 May 2003
This movie is often miscategorized in video rental stores as "mystery" or

"suspense." It's really neither, so many people I talk to who didn't like the movie have that attitude because they expected more intrigue and complexity from it. There's not much to this movie, but it's still good.

William H. Macy's character makes the viewer wince again and again at his

poor judgement and its consequences. He's a really lamentable figure, and

probably tied for best character in the film with that of Frances McDormand, who uses sensibility and "Minnesota nice" to bring justice to the guilty.

Of course, the whole Scandinavian accent thing is really overdone in this film, but to good effect. It lends a level of absurdity to every character who uses those mannerisms...a level of absurdity that's present in most real people, even though they try to mask it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Volcano High (2001)
6/10
did not satisfy my lust for...um, satisfaction
24 May 2003
I had high hopes for this movie, since in theory, it's a great premise. And I was fully in martial arts mode when I saw it, so I was ready to be entertained. Unfortunately, I was a bit disappointed in the end, and found myself reaching for my Shaolin Soccer DVD for the 5000th time.

The film delivers some solid visuals, to be sure, but if you don't understand Korean, then you may get tied up in the dialog. There's lots of weird verbage going on. And don't expect the kind of big laughs to be gotten from similar films. I think much of the verbal humor was lost in translation, and what's left is lots of tepid physical humor.

As for the kendo captain being the most beautiful girl in the school, I have to disagree. But her friend, the tomboy kendo girl with the wet hair...she stole my heart, I tell you what.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
babysteps towards greatness
24 May 2003
Better than the first X-Men, but still nothing to make you wet your pants with rapture. I was happy to see the elimination of Toad and Sabretooth, and a slight development of Mystique. The opening scene is rockin, too.

Wolverine is uncharacteristically bloodthirsty in this movie. In the comics he used to just punch through walls and hold his claws to people's necks a lot.

Now he's Mr. Stabby McKillKill! What gives?

Cyclops needs to get headbutted. I used to like Cyclops, but the first X-Men movie made him lose points with me...and now I really can't stand him. He gives bespectacled people everywhere a bad name, what with all his whining and crying and carrying on.

If the TV spots for this movie hadn't flashed Lady Deathstrike's name on the screen, I might not have known who she was. Next time they want to put a hot Asian woman in an X-Men movie, it ought to be Psylocke. She's mind- bendingly knockerific (see also, The Matrix Reloaded and Traffic).

When Wolvie says that Mystique is "good," and Magneto says, "You have no idea," I feel like puking.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Siu lam kung fu zen! (Ho-oh, yeah)
24 May 2003
This movie is super-genius. It's the feel-good story of a kung fu soccer team. I doubt there are many other movies about kung fu soccer teams. It has clever humor, epic visuals and even a sweet love story thrown in. You'll find yourself singing along with Stephen Chow's song, "Siu Lam Kung Fu Zen (Ho-oh Yeah)," even if you don't speak Cantonese. I sure did.

See this movie before Disney screws it all up, like they did with Drunken Master.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
better than i expected, at least
24 May 2003
I went into this movie with a negative attitude, because I didn't like the first Matrix movie. But I have to admit, I liked this one a little more. It had more scenes that prompted my jaw to drop (and my jaw doesn't usually drop unless there's a sandwich in front of it).

The fight scenes were excellent. I was glad to see less gunfighting and more fisticuffs. (What's the use of a gun, if everyone can dodge bullets? That's what really annoyed me about the Matrix.) Guns are dumb.

Monica Bellucci is mind-bendingly knockerific. She should be in every movie.

At the beginning of the movie there is a dorky rave sequence. During that scene, I was thinking, "what movie is this?" It didn't seem to belong. Luckily, however, everyone at the rave is totally hot, so it doesn't matter.

Trinity and Morpheus are still unlikeable in my opinion, and if you go to this movie expecting Keanu Reeves to impress you with his acting, well....then I'm sorry. Furthermore, the script is just about as bad as the first movie's was, loaded with intentionally vague lines like, "They will find you. The answer is out there, and it is looking for you. Follow the white rabbit. Visit the oracle. Eat some ham." So all you have to do is plug your ears when Neo or Morpheus have any lines, and you'll be fine.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Traffic (2000)
10/10
i like it
24 May 2003
This movie has a good balance of importance and entertainment value.

Granted, it's dangerous to put oneself above an issue as weighty as the War on Drugs, as Soderberg has done here, but the result is a pretty believeable telling of the way things are.

Sometimes Forman from That 70s Show gets annoying and you want to smack him. Sometimes Michael Douglas says a stupid line and you want to stomp on his face. But hey! That's the way real life is!

Benicio del Toro is cool as heck, and if you understand Spanish you'll be treated to some bonus one-liners from him that aren't in the subtitles ("Leche en polvo, guey?"). And, if you are like me, you will find Catherine Zeta Jones both dramatically convincing and mind-bendingly knockerific.

Every time I see that car blow up, it makes me sad.

This review is getting out of control. Traffic was a good movie. It should have won the Oscar, instead of Gladiator starring Russell the Crow.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed