Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Very good movie which almost lives up to its predecessors
8 July 2003
Despite the views of some critics, I found this movie to be a solid piece of entertainment. Following on the heels of the 1984 sci-fi action classic "The Terminator" and its sequel "Terminator 2: Judgment Day", the plot once again centres around an attempt by machines from the future to eliminate John Connor, the man destined to become the saviour of humankind.

Still afraid for his life, John now lives "off the grid" with no phone or known address to avoid being traced. One can understand his reasons, since a shapeshifting liquid metal cyborg (in the guise of T2's Robert Patrick) tried to kill him when he was still a child. Despite that the foretold nuclear war on August 29, 1997 (see the earlier flicks) failed to materialise, John still suspects all has not been set right. His fears are justified when another cyborg assassin, the T-X who assumes the form of a 5' 11'' blonde female, is sent back to eliminate his unsuspecting lieutenants (initially at least) on the eve of the postponed -- not averted -- nuclear war in the hope of changing the outcome of the future war between humans and sentient machines bent on their destruction. Once again, the resistance sends back another terminator (Arnold Schwarzenegger, who else?) to protect John from the more advanced model. Why not send back a T-1000 or T-X instead? Well, I suppose capturing a liquid man (or woman) alive would be somewhat difficult, so it kinda makes sense.

There are many absentees from the earlier movies, notably Linda Hamilton (John's mother Sarah in T1 and T2), Edward Furlong (John in T2) and not least the writer/director John Cameron. This time, the director is Johnathan Mostow, whose previous credits include Breakdown and U-571. However, I feel the director brought a new feel to the movie and all worked out quite well.

Newcomers Nick Stahl and Claire Danes (who plays Katherine Brewster, one of John's future lieutenants) aquit themselves quite well and have good on-screen chemistry. Kristanna Loken (the supermodel turned actress who plays the T-X) is very convincing and has the same icy look that Robert Patrick had in T2. Arnold is getting a bit old for this type of movie now, but he still has the screen presence needed to liven things up.

The movie is generally more light hearted than its two predecessors, though there is the odd dark scene mixed in. There are plenty of gags, some of which are effective and some which don't quite work. The T-X's abilities are interesting. Without giving too much away, she is somewhat a hybrid of the T-101 and T-1000, a metal endoskelton with advanced weapons surrounding by liquid metal, able to assume the forms of other people and control other machines (which leads to some interesting situations).

T3 is entertaining throughout. Most of the movie is spent with the T-X chasing the heroes (and heroine), kind of similar to T1, but without the prolonged story-driven sections in the middle of T2. There are some very good action sequences, notably a chase seen early on, although I feel they could have made the movie a little longer (perhaps just over two hours) with a more climatic fight between the T-101 and T-X. Despite a good earlier fight scene, she is despatched a little too easily at the end, considering she is supposed to be an anti-terminator terminatrix (according to the T-101 anyway). The fight between the T-101 and T-1000 in the steel mill at the end of T2 was superior, as was the battle between Sarah and the T-101 in the Cyberdyne factory in the original. Also, there are sections where they don't really use the T-X as well as they could have. I think some of the gory sections (which would have made her a more scary character and on a par with Robert Patrick) were cut. For instance, she threatens a cop but we don't actually see him die. There's also a scene where she saws somebody up but we only see the splattering blood.

All in all, an entertaining summer blockbuster (not quite as good as X2 but better than the Matrix Reloaded) and a worthy follow up, though not as groundbreaking as the previous two films.

Eccentric Brit rates it 8/10 (T1 and T2 both 9/10)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flashfire (1994)
3/10
The epitome of a non-thriller
5 May 2003
This movie seemed like it cobbled together the least exciting parts from previous made-for-TV cop movies. The plot is stereotypical, much like everything else: cop's partner gets killed, cop gets involved with the sole witness (naturally a beautiful female prostitute), cop has family problems, cop uncovers corruption within his own police department, etc. etc.

Normally, this kind of plot is often used in b-movies, but usually there is some attempt to inject a certain level of excitement. Here we get a Z-grade DTV flick which simply goes through the motions. Naturally, there is a sex scene between the cop and prostitute, and also some in-family disagreements regarding what he should do with his life. Both of these are included simply to pad out this lethargic non-thriller to a mandoratory running length of 90 minutes. When not boring us with pointless subplots, every cliche in the book is used and the dull screenplay generates the impression the writer penned it all in one evening. Such contrivances include the prostitute going to her best friend's house (she is so obviously a future victim the moment she appears in the film), the bad guy who arranges a meeting with the cop in order to spill the beans on his superiors (evidently another corpse-in-waiting), the cop contacting the person he mosts trusts on the police force once he figures out what's going on (yep, you've guessed it: his buddy is in league with the bad guys). And so on. Believe me, this stuff is even more boring to watch than reading this summary.

There's also an attempt to suggest the femme fatale might be involved in the conspiracy somehow (which would be ridiculous since the bad guys tried to kill her on several occasions). However, the movie isn't smart enough to pull any twists and basically settles for a dull shoot-out between the goodies and baddies, during which a grand total of two shots are fired (truly riveting stuff). Then this pitiful excuse for a thriller abruptly ends.

Eccentric Brit rates it 3/10
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
G.O.D. (2001)
2/10
Poor, implausible, cliche-ridden DTV movie
16 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Sometimes direct-to-video movies are hidden gems, but this is not one of them.

(Mild spoilers follow regarding certain plot details.)

Jalal Merhi plays a cop who then becomes a security guard who then becomes a truck driver who runs a service called Guaranteed on Delivery (G.O.D.). His latest job is to deliver a chest for some mysterious art dealer-types, which turns out to contain a tied-up woman. He helps her out, but from then on you'd be hard pushed to understand any of the motivations of the characters involved. Rather than contact the police, he decides to go through with the delivery. The reason: to earn a grand sum of $500, which will apparently solve all his financial problems. Also, the woman decides is quite happy to go with him and place her life in danger, even though his plan doesn't require the use of her services at all.

One cliche after another follows, such as the fact that the art dealers just happened to be involved with the death of his wife years previously, the kidnapped relative who serves no other purpose in the movie (the bad guys don't even ask for a ransom, or give details of their location, yet the good guys somehow find them), the showdown between two guys with guns who decide to put them down to settle the dispute with their fists, blonde assassin chick in black leather, etc. etc. And there's also a pointless twist at the end which makes no sense.

David Carradine and Oliver Gruner turn up in dull roles, very suited to a dull movie. If you see it in a rental store, and you've seen everything else, take my advice and walk out.

Eccentric Brit rates it 2/10
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed