Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Don't bother
1 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
When you read all about how difficult it is to get a movie made in Hollywood it really makes me wonder how this thing got made.

Even though there are some decent actors (Katee Sackhoff, Keith David) the story is boring and predictable.

The inane "artificial intelligence" scope on the "sentinel's" rifle provides so much exposition the only thing that could make it more ridiculous is if they added a "crawler text" (a la CNN) on the bottom of the screen to explain the already painfully obvious story.

Almost every scene that's not an action scene barely has any dramatic tension and just fill time.

The main character does not change at all during the movie.

The explosions are so gratuitous so as to be ridiculous. If a character had stepped on a cockroach there would have been a mushroom cloud resulting from that simple action! Watching this movie is like looking at a train wreck.

The final scene is such a cliché: The main characters walking off into the sunset with their dog, all smiles and playful.

Please do not waste your time on this movie.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Final Sacrifice (1990 Video)
1/10
So terrible...
5 July 2003
This must be one of the worst movies ever made in recent history. Try to see it on Mystery Science Theatre 3000, otherwise it's just intolerable. The acting is awful, the story so...I can't even find the words. The only redeeming factor is the name of the hero: Zap Rowsdower, which makes me laugh every time I hear it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Day for Night (1973)
10/10
The reality of illusion
30 December 2002
La Nuit américaine (1973) or Day for Night as it's also known, is a classic film about making films. Whereas Fellini's 8 1/2 focuses on the inner creative process of the film director, Day for Night focuses on the practical details of physically making the film. We see the often absurd process Ferrand (the director played by director Francois Truffaut) and crew engage in to create a film.

The director must constantly answer questions about every detail of props, sets, camera, lighting, costumes and at the same time engage in a constant delicate negotiation with the actors. In one scene Ferrand is frustrated as he tries to direct a cat: "Listen, it's very simple. We'll stop and begin shooting again when you find me a cat who knows how to act!" Ferrand tells the actors whatever they need to hear to keep them going. He strokes some egos and treat others as children as he negotiates the turmoil of their personal lives when it affects their performance in the film. The whole process of making the film is a controlled chaos with many details and even the story constantly changing. Towards the end of the making of the film, one of the actors die, making it necessary to do a last-minute re-write. Day for Night is an entertaining film that shows the good, the bad and the ugly of making a film. While the technology and process has changed a bit since this film was made, the core of the story is as relevant today as it was then.
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed