Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Beware of the reviews from non-fans and Peacock viewers
18 October 2021
If you are diehard fan, you will enjoy. Avoid the longer reviews. I've seen mention of CGI for Dr. Loomis - wrong. Bad acting - no. The longer reviews are written by those who want to sound ultra-analytical - bad grammar and all. Most of these were, I am sure, Peacock viewers that wouldn't have watched otherwise.

This is an aftermath movie. Keep that in mind. Oh yeah, for those who didn't know, this is part of a trilogy.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Carrie (2013)
8/10
Remake Rather Than Reimaging...But Still GOOD!
20 October 2013
I have been eagerly awaiting this movie since I heard of the casting of Chloe Grace Moretz. I could totally picture her portraying the character in the style and feel created by Sissy Spacek and followed up by Angela Bettis (2002 TV movie). I knew she would be a worthy successor after seeing the film Let Me In. I was, however, skeptical of the casting of Julianne Moore as the religious fanatic mother of Carrie, Margaret White.

After seeing the film twice this weekend, Julianne Moore turned out a creepy performance that should definitely garner her an Academy Award nod. Her portrayal of Margaret White was an emotional witches brew of fanaticism, insanity, and maternal instinct. For me, it was an unexpected treat.

As for Carrie, Chloe Grace Moretz did a fine job. She had big shoes to fill, and her performance does not top that of Sissy Spacek. However, she does hold her own. In all three versions of Carrie, each actress has portrayed Carrie in a different way. Each excelling in making the role their own while maintaining the artistic concept of Carrie herself. Chloe did deliver a chilling performance during the scenes where Carrie is exacting her revenge.

As for the movie itself, I would describe it as a remake of the 1976 film sprinkled with some additional elements from the Stephen King novel. It was very well made, and the modernization is appropriate without being too obvious of the change in times, i.e cell phones, the Internet, etc.

In closing, Carrie is an extremely competent attempt at remaking a classic. As I say with all remakes, you have to go into it with an open mind and not with the mind set of comparing it to the original. If you do that, you will find Carrie is a good movie.
110 out of 186 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scream 4 (2011)
8/10
Let's Keep Screaming!
17 April 2011
Fifteen years ago, I saw the original Scream during its opening weekend. The box office for that opening was relatively low, typically meaning that the film was destined to be less than a success. How could this be? It was the best genre film I had seen in a long time. However, each weekend for several weeks, the box office grew. Word of mouth made the original Scream a box office success.

Attending Scream 4 during its opening weekend, I found a return to the feel of the original. It successfully mixes some witty comedic moments with suspense...and let's not forget gore. It also managed to pull off a pretty good twist ending. It seems that Scream 4 managed to do what many sequels or remakes try to do and fail, and that's bring a fresh twist to the genre. It also managed to reinvent the franchise with its good-natured take on the original and inspiration of the remake trend creating new rules for the sequel.

Box office results for the opening weekend are being deemed as less than impressive. I say to my fellow Scream fans who may not have ventured out to see Scream 4 this past weekend - GO SEE IT. You will not be disappointed. Well, some of you may not...true fans will not.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween II (2009)
4/10
Halloween + Rob Zombie = White Trash Angst
7 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Even though the remake of Halloween had some quirks, ala Rob Zombie, it was still a decent remake. What Rob Zombie added probably hurt the remake more than it helped it. For instance, turning young Michael into a sympathetic character with a bad home life, characters that over use profanity (especially the "F" word), sleazy, low class characters, and way too many minor characters to keep up with. Mix that with some unfortunate casting (Scout Taylor Compton and Malcolm McDowell), and you have a remake that could have been so much more. However, Tyler Mane as the towering, powerful new Michael, and the return of Danielle Harris to the series were both big advantages. As I said a decent remake when you weigh the pluses against the minuses.

I had high hopes for Halloween II. After seeing some of the pre-release photos, I was really excited. However, I can't say that I am that excited after the fact. Rob Zombie's vision of a post-Halloween Laurie Strode is apparently a foul-mouthed, tattooed skank who has dreams of a mother she never met (a desperate attempt to bring back Zombie's wife in a really unnecessary role). As for Dr. Loomis, Zombie found a way to make him even more sleazy than he was in the first film. The only sympathetic characters in the film were actually Danielle Harris and Brad Dourif as the Bracketts, and Zombie even managed to turn them into backwoods hicks. It seems if Zombie wants to focus on the gritty underbelly of everything. What he did with these characters was dehumanize them to the point that you really don't care if Michael mangles them or not...well, you are more or less hoping that he does mangle them to put them (and you as the viewer) out of their misery.

Now, Tyler Mane as Michael was still awesome. There were some really effective moments with him out of the mask or with the partial mask on, and the ending, though not shocking, provided a good conclusion that could take the film series into a fresh direction. Other than that, you have a sequel that just plain falls flat.

In hindsight, which is always 20/20, Rob Zombie probably should have never been considered to remake Halloween. It just was not the right film series for him to put his spin on. He tried to take a film series that was based on such a suburban, everyday landscape and make it gritty and seedy. Now, if this were the Texas Chainsaw Massacre series, I would say gritty is good.

My hopes for Halloween 3-D is that they either get it back on track or send it out with a bang. My only request is no more Rob Zombie. I do not dislike Rob Zombie, but he needs to be separated from the Halloween series permanently.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Friday THE 13TH...Definition of a Decade
10 November 2007
Friday the 13th was the first horror movie I ever saw. I saw it on television I believe in 1982, and I was hooked. Once we purchased a VCR, I rented it probably 15 times until it was priced for sell-thru in 1987. To me this movie and the following sequels are part of the definition of 80's culture. Every 12-18 months, these movies would pop up to the excitement of fans. The original, to me, is a great example of how a simple idea can be turned into a successful movie going experience. Is it a masterpiece...well, no. It is a movie that provides the shocks necessary to elevate it to the classic status it now has. I would love to see Adrienne King and Betsy Palmer turn up in some form or fashion in the remake, if produced, even if it's only as a cameo!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Saw IV (2007)
8/10
Part 4 and STILL GOOD!
10 November 2007
I must admit, I had my doubts about Saw IV. There was little or no marketing on this, and the story was unknown. My initial thoughts were how are they going to continue after the conclusion of Saw III, which seemed to tie everything up. So, my attendance at the movie was based solely on curiosity. I must say WOW...for a third sequel, this movie manages be well made, well acted, stays loyal to the initial mood and story without being repetitive, and still provides twists and shocks that you aren't expecting. Rarely do you find a series like this in which each movie ties into the others so seamlessly and plausibly. This series is not your typical brainless gorefest...it actually gives you something to think about even after you leave the theater. I am actually ready to see how good Saw V is going to be! I will be waiting for it to hit theaters the last weekend in October, 2008!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (2007)
10/10
A New Michael For A New Generation
10 November 2007
I tracked this movie from the time it was announced until it hit the theater. I grew up with the original Halloween (1978) and have been a huge fan. I probably purchased every video and DVD that has been released... currently I own three different DVD editions and the VHS 20th Anniversary Collector's Edition. I was a little nervous when I heard Rob Zombie was directing, mainly because I was not a big fan of House of 1000 Corpses or The Devil's Rejects. However, this movie was awesome. He took the story of Michael Myers and crafted it into a movie that totally takes Michael from being a faceless, indestructible killer to being a human being that life has dealt a raw deal to and the result is what you will see in the movie. Some may argue that it makes Michael less scary to put that human element in the story or to explain why he is the way he is. My opinion is that it makes the story realistic by identifying it with actual occurrences in society today. Everyone has experienced that individual growing up that never fit in or was picked on. That to me is the frightening piece of the story...it relates it to a "this could actually happen" scenario. Warning...do NOT go into this to compare it to the original...go into it with an open mind. One last thing, if you can't spell the title of this movie, then you probably shouldn't be reviewing or criticizing it.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed