Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Yeah, yeah, I laughed
9 April 2012
This is the third sequel to American Pie (1999). I liked the three previous movies (though each one a little less the the previous one).

I laughed a good deal. It helped that I checked my brain at the entrance of the theater. This is decent entertainment, not high art.

What makes this franchise strong after three sequels is a 1)funny concepts; 2) likable characters (many of the people in the film are like people I associated with in high school and college); 3) good actors; and 4) decent scripts.

Another sequel after this? I think that might be going to the well once too often.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Young Adult (2011)
2/10
What a Waste of a Great Cast
27 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a mess. I don't know where to start.

I can accept a tragically flawed protagonist. However, I can't deal with a protagonist and other important characters behaving in ways that completely lack verisimilitude.

Let's start with the dog-in-the-bag-at-the-hotel-front-desk gag. Mavis, the protagonist, wants to sneak her toy dog into her hotel room so she places the dog in a piece of luggage and places the bag on the front desk as she deals with the front desk clerk. For intended (but failed) comic effect, the dog noticeably fidgets. Why didn't she leave the dog in the car and sneak it into the room after she made the room arrangements? When Mavis is in the small town she grew up in, she visits a local bar and meets a high school classmate, played by Patton Oswalt, who had been the victim of a particularly vicious high school hate crime that partially disabled him. Despite the fact that it is mentioned that the attack garnered national media attention for the small town, Mavis has a hard time remembering him even though both were classmates a mere 20 years ago. Worse, she is clueless to the fact that his locker had been next to hers. While her character is supposed to be self-centered, this is an obliviousness that approaches solipsism and completely lacks the ring of truth.

A stock character, Mavis's wheelchair-bound cousin, is introduced for no other reason than a lame attempt at edgy and cynical humor in which the disabled Oswalt character bemoans the fact that Mavis' cousin is a more likable disabled person. There was a huge set-up but the punch line fizzled. The seams in the script are showing.

It is credible that a self-absorbed and disturbed character would go back to her hometown and attempt to steal her high school boyfriend from his wife, even though the inciting incident is that she found out about the birth of the boyfriend's first child. What lacks plausibility is how the other characters--the former beau, his wife, as well as Mavis' parents who are still in touch with the old boyfriend--respond to Mavis' bizarre behavior. Only in a really odd alternate universe would they passively allow Mavis to inject herself into their lives to the extent that she did. Why did the old boyfriend and his wife tolerate Mavis brazenly imposing herself on them and their family? I suppose the answer is that had they acted in a rational way and politely but assertively taken Mavis aside and told her that her behavior was raising some serious questions, Young Adult would be a 25-minute feature film.

The irrationality of the characters in Young Adult reminds me of another overrated film, The Celebration.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Memory Lane (III) (2012)
9/10
Who Needs Hollywood When You Can Do It Yourself?
17 November 2011
Memory Lane is a no-budget film directed by Shawn Holmes about an intense young man who visits the afterlife in order to avenge his girlfriend's death. I don't want to give anything away so I will just say that it's a solid story.

The possible problem is that there is no budget. However, don't confuse "no-budget film" with "amateurish film" because Memory Lane is highly stylized and has good pacing. Memory Lane shows that Holmes is a highly resourceful filmmaker. This film is the embodiment of Buckminster Fuller's concept of ephemeralization: the science and art of doing more with less. Memory Lane is the result of the DIY ethic at work. I imagine one of the benefits of having a budget of $300 is that the focus was on telling a good story in a cinematic way; the filmmakers succeeded.

Watching the film, I couldn't help but notice the similarity to films by Darren Aronofsky, David Lynch, and David Cronenberg. Memory Lane kicks butt and takes names. I would like to see what his team could do with a little more money.
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Story of GOP Texas-style Crony Capitalism
28 June 2006
This story would be amusing if it weren't true. This is a story of a corrupt Texas mountebank who ruthlessly seized power in the nation's capital. Robert Greenwald--the filmmaker who exposed a political operation disguised as a "fair and balanced" news channel in Outfoxed--takes on one of the most egregious members of Congress in US history, Tom DeLay. The film tears the cover off of the culture of corruption that DeLay created in the US Congress. DeLay has out-Bushed George W. Bush when it comes to crony capitalism. While I knew most of the things the film shows, many people not versed in DC politics will be utterly shocked when they see this film—apparently the alleged liberal media didn't see fit to report much about DeLay's redefinition of the word "sleaze" until his indictment. The only thing bad about the film is that it doesn't have the time to flesh out all the seediness of DeLay's rotten career e.g., his sordid dealings in the Northern Mariana Islands (DeLay took the side of predatory industrialists in this US territory who were running squalid sweatshops and forcing female workers into prostitution and into having abortions when they became pregnant--great from a guy who claims to speak for US Christians). Every American should see this film. Buy the DVD. Go to a screening. Tell your friends about this monumental film and vote out DeLay's spiritual brethren. Pray that DeLay and his cronies (including the ones in the White House) are brought to justice and receive the maximum prison sentences for their crimes against America.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Oh Wow, I get to see other people party
24 April 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Mini-spoilers within.

The Real Cancun is a faux cinema verite look at a dozen college-aged partiers who go to Cancun for spring break. Watching this film leads me to the following conclusions: 1) Partying is fun; 2) Watching other people party is not fun; and 3) Shelling out nine bucks to watch other people party is pathetic. Fortunately, I didn't have to pay to see it because it was an advance screening. The main problem is that if you watched the film to see the party scene in Cancun, you would only get an inkling because the film focused on the goings-on of the dozen subjects-none of whom I found interesting (example: a young woman tells a guy that once she caught her boyfriend with her best friend; he responded that he never experienced anything that intense in his life; if that's true, it's time for him to go out and experience life). Small talk permeates the film. I can hear small talk on the street.

Even for the type of person into the cheesy Girls Gone Wild tapes, this movie is a disappointment. There is a steamy wet t-shirt contest early in the film but that's about it. The subjects start to pair off. A guy and a gal get busy under a blanket in a room with the night vision camera rolling-at breakfast next morning, the guy treats her as if she had SARS-that was cold. One final thought about The Real Cancun: there are a dozen college students and not one of them was smoking weed. What gives there? This is probably the first film that has Snoop Dogg in it in which there is no weed-smoking. This film is to documentaries what Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band is to musicals.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not that bad
22 March 2003
This wasn't a good film but it wasn't bad enough to rank in the bottom 100 either. The plot is weak and the characters aren't particularly interesting. However, there are some decent action and fight scenes. I think a lot of reviewers were way too tough on this film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
City of God (2002)
10/10
An Extraordinary Film
11 February 2003
I saw City of God last night and it easily ranks as one of my top ten films of all time. This film about drug-dealing and gang wars in the slums surrounding Rio de Janeiro is a great example of synergy; everything gelled in this film: the story, plot, characters, acting, cinematography, score, and the overall production values. This film is unpleasant and brutal on the senses at times (it isn't for children) but I give it the highest recommendation to those who can handle it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed