Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
I tried to like it...
30 January 2010
After viewing the film, I was truly shocked to see such a high rating on IMDb.

'The Fantastic Mr. Fox' is an adaption of a beloved children's classic, portraying the story of the smooth, slick protagonist Mr. Fox (or 'Foxy') as he attempts one 'last' heist to steal from the dreaded Boggins, Bunce and Bean. That's right, one short, one fat, one lean, or however it goes.

I don't quite know where to start with my criticism.

Well, I'm in my late teens and was never a fan of Roald Dahl, but I like his material well enough, having read a few of his books as a child and seen Matilda and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory over and over again. This film, however, struggles for an audience. Is it aimed at children? Adults? I'm still unsure! Many of the 'jokes' would bore a child, especially as Mr. Fox visits a lawyer for example, or complains about being poor. Also, an audience of (I'm assuming) children is expected to sympathise with a character who steals and kills chickens. I'm all for the food chain, but you practically see Mr. Fox biting down on their necks! Surely that's a bit much? And also, the plot... well, it's kind of boring. I stayed only with the hope of it getting better, but instead I just got more and more annoyed at Mr Fox and his son Ash for making stupid decisions.

The humour, meanwhile, falls flat. I laughed only once or twice, even though I specifically recognised attempts at jokes. I think part of it is that the voice acting is so incredibly flat and monotoned. The voice actors have no sense of comic timing, instead aiming for the subtlety of humour that only works with certain mediums. George Clooney aims to portray Mr. Fox as charming and sleek, but his voice has no character. Meryl Streep shows no emotion, I didn't even realise Bill Murray had a role until the end credits, and Ash, twelve-years old in fox-years, sounds like he's about 30.

I love animation, particularly stop motion, but the visual style actually creeped me out a little bit. Characters are tall, spindly and lacking any warmth of design. They move with very little fluidity and often the animation is jerky and strange. There is also a distinctive 'mixed medium' feel, as 2D components are added in sporadically and unsuccessfully. Characters look straight at the camera and talked; it was very awkward. There was one or two moments when Kylie looked straight at the camera, didn't move and had swirls on his eyeballs. It actually freaked me out.

Fantastic Mr. Fox had so much potential. Lots of people still seem to like it - look at the reviews. Maybe it just wasn't for me.
54 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Avatar (2009)
5/10
Avatar - Through The Magic of Facebook
20 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I believe my review can be summed up with the following Facebook conversation with my dear friend, Hannah.

Me: We saw Avatar 3D this morning. It was... alright. Long. Good special effects but the story was pretty much Pocahontas if John Smith was the main character and it was 150 years in the future.

Hannah: I thought it was long too! And I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought it was only alright. What didn't you like about it? Or what made it not OMG FANTASTIC? :3

Me: It must have been almost 3 hours!! The story was so clichéd, and I didn't like any of the characters. The 3D was really cool, though, and I really want to go and live in that forest.

Hannah: It was, actually. 2hrs, 55mins! Also, we are twins! It was the cliché that got me. Usually, clichés are okay with me, but you could predict things so far ahead. "Dragon thing nobody else can ride? Yeah, he'll do it. Oh look, he's done it." And... now that you mention it, I didn't have any emotional connection to any character. But I admire the complexity of the world... Like, that alone would have taken years to come up with. So many subtleties that nobody would really appreciate, but made it so real... I want a forest like that :D

Me: AHH THAT'S SO LONG for such a story. It was so predictable. As soon as the female Na'vi (can't remember her name) saved him I thought 'They'll end up together'. You see the Colonel guy, you know he's evil. And of course you know Jake's gonna end up picking the natives over the cruel, terrible, heartless humans... Action bores me sometimes - especially that last battle scene, which I thought was so pointless and superfluous - WHY did they fight again? Oh RIGHT, because they HAVE to stand up to the humans SOMEHOW, even if it's suicidal. It was VERY complex. I watched for lots of little details and thought it was really cool. Especially the rendering of the characters and stuff, how they were so detailed.

Hannah: Yes, exactly! Like, you just knew exactly who would be with what, and... I can't of anything that made me go "WOW, TOTALLY DIDN'T SEE THAT COMING :O" Action is usually okay to me, but yeah, I didn't get why they fought and stuff. I mean, they won, but... We didn't see any of the grief of the people, so many things just were left unsaid. Like, did they care about all the deaths? Also, I would have thought the female would be a little more resistant to falling for him, because yanno, she was sworn to someone else... >.< My favourite part was the music... GAH, it was pretty great! *music geek* And the little things about their world...

Me: I don't mind SOME action, but I get bored when action drags out. And drags out. And then just keeps going with nothing progressing... They won - HOW? Somehow! It was so improbable, because if that had *actually* happened they wouldn't have had a hope. Also, the forest probably would have burned down... because there was a hell of a lot of fire around and no one was putting it out... Wait a minute... if there was no oxygen on Pandora, how was fire able to EXIST? PLOT HOLE ALERT! to some degree. Exactly! *nods vigorously* And why did they even let him into their culture? Did they know he was a human? They knew there was something wrong with him yet somehow they were all surprised that he knew they were going to destroy the tree. The music was good, although I don't think I paid too much attention to it unfortunately. Avatar did have a good score.

Hannah: OMG, you are so right about that fire thing!! GAHHHH!! Maybe it was magic fire? But seriously, they couldn't have won... Soldiers aren't THAT dumb, yanno? And then, they all turned on him when they found out he was human, but didn't Eywa love him, so shouldn't they have just trusted them? Their god had given him her blessing, so clearly he wasn't as evil as they made out... I didn't either; the sign of good music is when you don't notice it!

Me: Magic fire in a magic world. Perhaps the atmosphere allowed it to burn somehow. I have no idea. Hell, why did the soldiers wait so long to dump those explosives? They would have won so quickly if they had dropped them instead of waiting til the flying creature people showed up. The whole storyline is just an exercise in convenience. 'Oh, I'll conveniently not question your mysterious past until it's dramatically convenient for plot development'.

How to sum up our feelings? I suppose you could say that we believe that impressive graphics do not justify such a weak, predictable plot and one-dimensional characters. However, go see Avatar to appreciate the imaginative landscape and beautiful cinematography. Especially if you enjoy staring at pretty things for three hours.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Beautiful Adaption - Yes, it is an ADAPTION.
20 November 2009
So, I am an avid fan of the Twilight Saga. I admit it is not high quality. I admit the books are poor quality. Yet, I still love it - I love the characters, the story, the romance.

I waited with ridiculous expectation for New Moon, and my high expectations were mostly rewarded. New Moon is a weak book overall, and I thought the film did an excellent job making it appealing.

The good: - The plot was well interpreted. Reviewers claim the film is 'boring', but I considered it to move along at a ripping, exciting pace. Much of the plot was crammed in, kind of like a checklist - but this did not detract, it enhanced. All the necessary elements were included and polished, and the weaker details were ignored - Overall, the cinematography was impressive and occasionally quite artistic - Special effects, particular the werewolf transformations, were very good - a HUGE improvement from the first movie (which is quite abysmal) - Kristen Stewart's acting had improved dramatically, even if I still dislike her acting style. She portrayed the pain and numbness of Bella's character quite well. - The Italy scene was almost entirely how I pictured it: Sweeping, melodramatic and intense - All additions were impressive: The wolf pack, and Volturi (particularly the gorgeously scary Dakota Fanning) - Stand out actors were Billy Burke, Taylor Lautner, Chaske Spencer and the humans in general, who added some nice comic relief. Oh Anna Kendrick, what beautiful zombie ad-libbing. - The gorgeous Ashley Greene as Alice - The ending make me smile - The soundtrack was beautiful, particularly the use of Anya Marina's Satellite Heart, Bon Iver's Roslyn and Lykke Li's Possibility. Perfection.

The bad: - Kristen Stewart still manages to stutter and blink more than what is normal for a human - Bella's initial escapades in Port Angeles - really? REALLY? - Removal of a few minimal key moments, such as a few lines spoken by Edward in the book which could have been included - Cheesy dialogue - 'you're like your own sun'. Let alone pointing out Lautner's biceps. Don't worry, we noticed them already. - Alice's horrible vision. A nice idea, badly shown.

All the bad points are very nit-picky points, so they can be disregarded if you desire.

If you love the book and the series, you should enjoy the film. Chris Weitz has elevated the Saga to new levels of quality, and is a huge improvement on Hardwicke's initial disasters.

If you haven't read the books - see the film, ignore the critics, and make up your own mind. I think it's worth it. It's not genius, but it's entertaining, devastating, melodramatic and romantic. What's not to love?
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed