Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
good classic spy thriller
6 July 2003
I haven't read the book, so my views only reflect the impression that this movie gives me, and does not focus on whether it is loyal to the original novel or not.

The film has that air (or arrogance, if you like) of a classy thriller. The music brings out a kind of good old espionage atmosphere , unlike the style of other recent spy movies which focus on gadgets and dazzling the audience with hi-tech. There is still showing off hi-tech in this film, but it doesn't go so far as to degrading the film, because the attention is mainly on telling the story rather than building up to one action showdown after another.

And the story, without having read the book, looks pretty good to me. It's good enough for the film to last two hours without getting the audience bored. The action scenes are good enough, and has a different touch to it, rather than imitating The Matrix like so many other movies have. Anyway, to wrap this comment up, I say if you are a keen thriller fan and haven't seen this film, you should see it, at least once.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
decent crime thriller
26 April 2003
Infernal Affairs is a decent Hong Kong film. I haven't really enjoyed a good hong kong film for sometime (I had found them to be distasteful for a period of time), and this film returned my confidence in Hong Kong films.

The story isn't very original, but nowadays it's very hard to find an original crime drama. The actors gave solid performances, though I wouldn't really say it's their best (I can't really tell, you know, Andy Lau always seems to be the same, and Tony Leung, well, I am just too familiar with this guy). The music is all right, but not very impressive, and the cinematography seems average to me. But it's good entertainment if you've got two hours to spare and are a fan of Hong Kong films (or at least want to see a hong kong film). 8 out of 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My Sassy Girl (2001)
8/10
Such a romantic film
25 April 2003
This Korean film was unbelievablely popular last year in China, but I didn't see it at that time, because I sort of unconsciously have a dislike to something that nearly everybody else is crazy over.

But everybody I knew recommended this film. So I finally decided to see it, this morning, and it won me instantly. I am not a keen fan for romantic comedies, though I do enjoy films like Sleepless in Seattle, You've Got Mail, etc. This film should fall in the same category. The lead roles are brilliant. The girl of the film, you might not like her at start, but as the film goes along she just turns more and more beautiful as you get to know her and her past. The boy, on the other hand, is likeable from the word go (not the handsome type, but quite funny). The comedy is enjoyable and provides some good laughs, but as the film develops into the second hour it just turns so romantic. Of course everybody knows the boy and girl will get together in the end, but the process is really "tormenting". This might not be a great film, but it's truly romantic and great fun to watch. 8 out of 10.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hero (2002)
8/10
A interesting point I would like to state
14 March 2003
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, I AM CHINESE. Note that this is pretty important to what I'm about to say. I hope to comment on this film from a Chinese point of view. ALSO: **WARNING** SOME SPOILERS CONTAINED.

1. I am proud of the cinematography of this film. Usually you won't find a Chinese film as breathtaking as your average Hollywood blockbuster, but Hero is an exception. It is by far the most beautiful martial arts film yet, and when I say this I mean both the kung-fu and the scenery. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon's kung-fu scenes are pretty boring in my eyes. It was a bit of a shame that the best kung-fu scene was put at the beginning, where two great kung-fu "artists" Jet Li and Donnie Yen fight. These two actors really know kung-fu, thus the fighting is the best to watch, although it isn't as visually stunning as some later scenes (like the one when the leaves changes colour).

2. I am aware that some western audiences are still not accustomed to kung-fu scenes that defy gravity and other basic physics lawss. This is a bit culturally related. For example, a lot of Chinese people aren't really interested in The Lord Of the Rings. They don't really believe that there could be magical forces, goblins, elves and etc. On the other hand, we do believe that ancient kung-fu masters could "fly" and so on, and hence we make films like that. Hero is mild in these areas. A lot of kung-fu films nowadays has swordsmen sending out "laser beams" with their hands of swords. It's just to make the fighting look more intense and exciting.

3. The plot of Hero, and the message that it tries to concieve (that the true hero should sacrifice himself for peace, for the country and blah blah blah) is too ancient to really arouse interest in Chinese audiences. This theme has been told too many times before in kung-fu (wuxia) novels, and basically anybody who loves wuxia novels knows it. Therefore Hero received a lot of criticism for its pale storyline. And telling the story three times in a little more than 90 minutes is both rather dumb and unrealistic. There's hardly any depth. And also the dialogues are too poorly written. There are basic mistakes like the emperor saying the chinese word for "peace", which is impossible, because at that time in history there was no such word as the one he used. Things like that really let this film down.

3.5 I am going to expand a bit on the pale storyline. Maybe fellow IMDBers don't agree with me. That's perfectly normal. The difference is still in the culture. Like I said, because nearly every Chinese knows this theme, therefore to tell it in a very simple way would seem (to us Chinese) silly; whereas other audiences who aren't familiar with the background and the theme will find it fascinating. Modern Wuxia that attracts Chinese audiences would seem totally inunderstandable from the average foreign audience's point of view, because you don't know all the background info that the film assumes you do.

4. A bit on the actors. It might be interesting to fellow IMDBers to know that Tony Leung and Maggie Cheung were sort of joked at for their bad Mandarin. It was kind of funny. The way Daoming Chen said his lines were also a bit too theatre like, as if he was performing a play and not a film.

5. By now you'll probably thinking why I am criticizing the film so much. I think that what really affected Hero from being a classic is that it cares too much about looks and forgot to tell a decent story. It's a beautiful film, but nothing more, and that's a shame, because with such a cast and such a director there could have been a lot more. Yet I'm still proud of Hero as a Chinese, because I think we need to make some commercial films like Hero, as the current film industry in China isn't really booming. Anyway, Hero, with all its faults, still won a landslide victory at the Chinese box-office. And that's really important. But if you're interested in some real kung-fu films, I recommend films like New Dragon Gate Inn(made in the 1990s, and one of my favourite wuxia films) and some of Jet Li's earlier series. They are both enjoyable and interesting.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heat (1995)
9/10
Good Cop Movie
9 March 2003
Heat is a good film, and can be considered a great film if we're only talking of cop movies. The idea of seeing Pacino and De Niro together is enough to get me excited and anxious to see this film. I first saw it in 1998 I think, and I must have watched it many times after that. What really lures me is the great plot. It may have its defects and holes, but it really stands out from the average cops 'n' robbers movies which is usually just an excuse for some violence. It pays attention to the life of the characters, their struggles in life, their desires, their ups and downs, and not just the crime they're involved in. This makes Heat stands out. And of course Pacino and De Niro's acting is flawless. The action, on the other hand, is intense enough, and realistic enough for this near-3-hour film. While the opening robbery scene is great, the bank robbery scene can be said as the best ever (or at least one of) action scenes in movie history. It is a must see. All in all, a good film, good enough for me to give it 9.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed