Change Your Image
paulp-17-642936
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri (2017)
A gritty, engaging film with some moral intrigue
Humans are creatures that create value. One person may find throwing trash on the ground in a public place intolerable but have little problem treating an employee or co-worker as a means to their own advancement. Another may find fatherhood or motherhood their highest calling investing most of their life energy to the task but give little thought to being cruel to a server at a restaurant or a pet dog. Sometimes our values in one area of our lives seem entirely incongruous with the values we hold in another area and the incongruity can strike others as downright bizarre. This value incongruity is a theme in other writer/director Martin McDonagh's films but is a central focus in Three Billboards.
The movie is about a distraught mother who works to "focus the mind" of what to her is a complacent police chief (played with vigor by Woody Harrelson) who has failed her. Mildred Hayes's (Frances McDormand) daughter has been raped and killed and after a year, no suspects have been arrested. In an act of desperation and anger, she pays to have two questions and a statement posted to three billboards near her home each implicating the Ebbing police department and it's chief of police in particular for inaction and perhaps incompetence. The billboards polarize the town and turn over rocks, as it were, causing all sorts of nefarious and violent things to crawl to the surface. McDonagh deals with themes of abuse, intolerance, bias, authority, revenge, and despair and while these certainly are present throughout the film, I never felt the film was really about these themes. Rather, these form the backdrop for a more dominant theme: the cognitive biases and dissonance we exhibit as humans that give our lives an incongruity about what we value and how we express those values.
Mildred clearly is a mother experiencing despair and tremendous anger about her loss. And rightly so. A victim of an abusive husband who she divorced, Mildred works as a clerk in a trinket store trying to raise two kids on a meager wage. These circumstances certainly would be grounds for bitterness and anger though don't really explain the degree to which Mildred seems to possess them. Then in a single flashback we see Mildred's harshness and anger present in a conversation she has with her son and daughter ostensibly on the day her daughter is killed. "I hope I get raped on the way!" her daughter Angela (Kathryn Newton) screams after Mildred refuses to let her take the only family vehicle forcing her to walk to an undisclosed location. "I hope you get raped on the way too!" Mildred screams back as Angela walks out the door. This is not something we imagine even an angry mother would say on her worst day. She's vindictive, angry, and immature and yet at the same time, tough, determined and passionate. This is a woman we both deeply admire and pity. We want her to win yet we agonize over her loneliness and rage.
(Incidentally, I asked an Irish friend of mine to give me feedback on this review. His comment after on the above paragraph is insightful. He said, "Ireland is full of hard/harsh loving mothers. The mother is also the center of Irish society and we would all believe in the unlimited tenacity of these crazy, ragged characters." This illustrated to me a deeper dichotomy in a character like Mildred than a simple caricature can and should portray and it's a helpful call out. The line between hard and tough or between obsessive and passionate can truly be thin and partly in the eye of the beholder.)
McDonagh then presents a woman who values finding her daughter's killer at any cost. There is a shadow cast over her determination and mental and physical toughness: she thinks very little of being cruel to almost everyone, causing emotional and psychological harm to her son, endangering lives, damaging property, and becoming truly isolated even from those who wish to help and love her all for this single goal. Few have experienced loss of the type Mildred has experienced and while we might imagine the rage we would feel, it's not possible to know it truly. Mildred's dissonance is extreme and perhaps for good reason. But we all possess this type of incongruity. The result is the good that may come from upholding the single value becomes offset by the abuse of all other values.
This is illustrated through the lives of principle characters in the film. Officer Jason Dixon (Sam Rockwell) gives very little thought to physically assaulting a citizen or verbally assaulting people of a different color (or size) in his duty to protect and serve the population of Ebbing. In a state of despair over the loss of a somewhat noble colleague, he says to himself "I know that the best thing, the only thing, to honor that man's memory right now, is to go to work; is to be a good cop. To walk in his shoes and do what he did every day of his life. Help people." He says this just before he walks out of the police department, proceeds across the street to beat up a completely innocent citizen and throw him out of a two-story window in a rage. In the scene that follows, he is shown bragging to other officers of his act as if he believes the act itself was an example of "being a good cop;" of "helping people." He has an extreme form of cognitive dissonance where the singular value of destroying those who he deems unworthy of his colleague's memory comes at the cost of actually protecting and serving those he vowed to protect and serve. The incongruity is at the same time humorous, shocking, and bizarre and we're made to feel it.
McDonagh, though born in England, is a child of blue-collar, Irish parents who left Ireland to look for work and gave birth to Martin shortly after the start of the recent 30-year clash that pitted the Nationalists against the Unionists. While McDonagh himself most likely would not have experienced the conflict in Ireland directly, he no doubt would have felt the effects of The Troubles through his parents and frequent visits to his home country. A dual citizen of Ireland and England, it seems his heart belongs to Ireland. Many of his plays are set in Ireland and it appears he even took an artistic stand related to the effects of the conflict (read more about this in his biography here). I raise this only because I suspect that McDonagh's focus in this movie may partially be influenced (consciously or unconsciously) by hostilities that occurred in his home country during his formative years. The ideas that fuel conflicts like these are supposedly focused on making life better for the people involved but, in the process, tear those same lives apart. The focus on achieving an end regardless of the cost runs the risk of destroying the people who would benefit from the outcome. This is incongruous-as incongruous as the behavior of the principle characters in Three Billboards. (Of course, McDonagh wouldn't have to return to his Irish roots to easily find such incongruity. The country in which he now lives and works exhibit similar pathologies.)
A scene in the movie might lend credence to my suspicions. Mildred returns home one day to find a Catholic priest sitting at her kitchen table talking to her son. The priest tries to tell Mildred that while the town is with her in her desire to find her daughter's killer, they are against her posting the billboards. Mildred's response is indicative of this meta-narrative I'm claiming exists in the movie.
The movie isn't perfect. Some things happen too quickly. Dixon is beyond doubt a cruel and bigoted man. These are not surface qualities but deep-seated, ingrained character flaws. Towards the end of the film he appears to become virtuous in an instant based on a single word from the chief. Granted, Dixon is portrayed as simple but even (especially?) in the simple, character flaws take time to undo and Dixon's transformation doesn't fit the general narrative the film is trying to get us to believe. Typical of modern films, there are no true heroes. But Three Billboards goes further. Ebbing Missouri is depicted as a town full of complacency and inaction. Severe violence happens in the open street at mid-day and no one steps in to help or even seems to care. This is a bit much even for those steeped in cynicism about red states.
Despite these minor flaws, the film is well made. It grinds some axes but not to the point of excess. This is a film that takes no sides and so ends up being a mirror into which we all can look and find ourselves even among the excess (I'm reminded here of Flannery O'Connor's phrase, "To the deaf you shout, and to the almost blind you draw large, startling figures."). It has the texture of Cohen brother's film--particularly No Country for Old Men and while it may not have quite the technical excellence in terms of pacing and direction, it's close enough to warrant the accolades its received.
A couple of people have asked me about the ending. I'm not quite sure what to say. It seems to run tangential to the rest of the film. We seem to be looking at a "Bonnie and Clyde" moment but then Mildred raises an ethical question that casts doubt that this is what we're actually witnessing. Perhaps this is McDonagh's final play at incongruity. Or maybe it's a lot simpler than that. Maybe it's just a sign of hope that things can be better if we just stop, think, and talk. Yes, let's go with that.
6 Dynamic Laws for Success (in Life, Love & Money) (2017)
Fun, light-hearted, caper flick
I ran across this movie looking for something fun to watch on a Friday night and this film was both a delight and a surprise. There isn't much information about the movie so I went in with very little expectations. The quality of the storytelling and the superb acting make this film stand out.
Ulysses T. Lovin (played splendidly by Travis Swartz), a self-described loser, has his evening interrupted by a stranger who promises an incredible opportunity if he can just have some of Lovin's time. Indecisive Lovin leaves the door open a crack both figuratively and literally and the stranger pushes his way into Lovin's home. At the kitchen table, the stranger, Milton Montgomery (Ross Partridge) explains that a 2 million dollar (or is it 2.4 million dollars?) cache of money is hidden somewhere in Lovin's house which he'll split with him if they can look for the treasure together. Lovin heartily agrees, signs a semi-formal contract (handwritten with four simple agreements), and off they go. Except Montgomery's promise isn't exactly on the up and up and Lovin finds himself in the role of sleuth with flirty Lizzy Duffrey (Lisa King Hawkes) and her down-to-earth sister Sue (Sara Lynch) after the same prize.
As it turns out, the money was stolen by a relative of Montgomery's and his partner, the lovely Norma Seville (Jennifer Lafleur). Through Milton's description and flashbacks, we learn that Seville left clues as to where she buried the treasure in a self-help book called "6 Dynamic Laws for Success (in Life, Love & Money)" which was in Milton's possession when he meets Lovin. (While there is no such book in real life, we do learn all 6 laws over the course of the movie and they sound authentically written.) Seville runs into young Nicholas (played spot-on by Bennett Huhn) who, she hopes, will play her younger brother to help her get over state lines undetected. Those events of the past have implications for what Lovin and the sisters encounter in the present day so we're not left guessing in the end how and why things end up the way they do.
Swartz plays Lovin as a lovable, buffoon who stumbles his way through the investigation sometimes hitting on key clues by accident and other times shooting innocent bystanders because he's never handled a gun before. Partridge, Hawkes, and Lynch play their parts with energy and a wink-and-a-smile playfulness bringing the viewer into the game with them. The movie seems like it shouldn't be working--it's too low budget and the actors seem like they're somebody's (very talented) brother or sister-in-law who had too much to drink one evening and were talked into being in a movie. It reminded me of the first time I watched Napoleon Dynamite--I was continually asking myself, "What am I watching?" while loving every minute of it.
The pseudo film noir cinematography and screenplay actually work in this movie (it's shot in black and white) because it doesn't take itself too seriously and doesn't try too hard. It plays to the noir elements in just the right amount at just the right times. Some reviews compare the filmmaking to something you'd see in a Soderberg caper or a Cohen brothers film. Those elements definitely are there (think early Cohen brothers particularly) but make no mistake: Gregory Bayne has a unique style and isn't after mere mimicry. There were enough one-liners and quirky expressions to have me laughing out loud at times but a story that solid enough to keep me engaged throughout.
This is a gem. I hope to see much more by Bayne and each of the principle actors. Together they created something fun, unique, and engaging without a ton of money or big-name actors. This is very rare in todays environment.
Wonder Woman (2017)
Some good sequences but overall formulaic and ultimately sappy
I went into this movie with high expectations anticipating a creative "origins" movie in the class of Ironman and Batman Begins. Instead the movie lacked both the creativity and authenticity of these other films. While there are rather long sequences of supposed meaningful dialogue that attempt to give the film depth, I found them neither inspiring nor believable. Ultimately, the movie ends with a "message" that came across as corny and had me and others who watched it with me rolling our eyes in embarrassment.
The movie did have a couple of great sequences. The depiction of how the Greek pantheon ended up in the state they were in is very well done and was very engaging. And foxhole sequence was the most authentic in the movie and one that should have been the pattern for the entire film. The costumes are excellent as well.
But the movie lacks a grittiness and realism that makes other origin movies so enjoyable. Where it attempts to be gritty, it feels contrived. The world of the early 1900s created in the film feels computer generated and that made it difficult to lose yourself in the narrative (I found myself looking at the clock continually). I never got into "flow" with this film.
Finally, the story is too grandiose. The story should have been about Diana and the complex development of her as a hero. Instead the writers bit off far too much and attempt narratives on six other principle characters, a world war, the Greek pantheon, and an Amazonian society. They end up doing justice to none of them and end up less with a character study as they do a disjointed and shallow video game like experience.
While the movie is fine entertainment for family film night, unfortunately it doesn't have a place in the pantheon of the excellent origin films of recent years. Too bad.
Maverick (1994)
Fun, Engaging Diversion
This is a family favorite that I watched again with my girls. Mel Gibson was at his best during the 90s and is thoroughly enjoyable in this tongue-in-cheek, nothing-is-what-it-seems adventure. Jodie Foster as the pseudo Southern belle and James Garner reprising his TV role complement Gibson perfectly. The movie is presented in three acts. Act 1 sets up Gibson as the playful conman trying to earn just a bit more money to enter the "poker match of the century." Act 2 introduces Garner as Gibson's apparent foil trying both to earn the respect of Mrs. Bransford and, we gather, to keep an eye on Maverick. Act 3 is the poker match where everyone shows their true colors.
Tons of fun and a great diversion. Eight of ten stars for the pure entertainment value.